Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The NTK is pretty good at complying with the Act  as is the Notice to Driver so no help there. I seem to remember OPS getting hammered by a Judge [in brighton I think] so they seem to have tightened po their act since. The organ grinder is the MA and the monkey is OPS.
    • @jk2054 and @BankFodder - Your feedbacks in posts #199 and #202 have been incorporated into the attached WS. As usual, amends are in blue in this draft. Based on other WS drafts I've seen where the issues in dispute are part of the WS, I built my first draft WS in the same format and hadn't seen it to be an issue before. You will notice that the 'witness statement' has been replaced with 'Claimant's Statement' so that issues in dispute does not need to be on a separate page before the WS. This is especially given the work that has gone in to reduce the size of the WS to 8 pages. Also thanks for the suggestions re: confidentiality - I agree with your views and will stand firm on this if a condition of confidentiality is brought up. I have not been approached by Evri on this forum or by email. I haven't yet had success in paying the hearing fee. I am calling the court as often as I can (during work breaks/lunch etc.) and have sent 2 emails to the court requesting a call back. If i don't have any success by the end of this week, I'll send another email chasing for a call back. @BankFodder - Also attached is an invoice from Packlink which shows that I was charged by Packlink for these services: "drop-off at EVRi - Next day delivery" and "Proof of Delivery". It also has the payer's address and there are "Origin" and "Destination" fields which have the postcode of the sender and the recipient (I have redacted personal details in the attached invoice).  I am already including this in my evidence bundle (without the redaction) but wanted to share this redacted version so that other people can consider this as example in their bundle of Packlink and Evri's contract being instigated by the sender of the parcel who has paid for the service, and further shows that there is information in the invoice to identify that a third party beneficiary (sender / recipient) is present in the contract between Packlink and Evri. If this invoice is no good, then please let me know / delete it from this post. Draft - Witness Statement and Court Bundle redacted.pdf Packlink invoice - REDACTED.pdf
    • It can be frustrating when clients fail to pay for services or products rendered, ignore payment reminders, or claim an inability to pay. How quick do you pass to a Debt Collection Agency like www.corporatedebtrecovery.co.uk 
    • The Court s pretty informal. The Judge [who you call "Judge" rather than Sir or madam] will not be wearing a wig and gown just a suit and it is advisable that you do the same and a tie. Other than that the Judge will do most of the talking .If they haven't received a WS from the scrotes either the case will probably be thrown out straight away. Usually the Judge will ask their lawyer a number of questions then ask for your take on things and then the case will be decided.  UKPC 0 Mystic Bertie 5. Then ask for your expenses time off work [if not being paid by your company while in Court, travelling and parking costs and occasionally they will allow something like 5 hours research at I think £8 per hour. Later celebrate and post us the result and how much fun it was. You will wonder  why you worried about it so much. Next time will be much easier.🙂
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot Wanting CCJ over Cap1 Debt - NO CCA returned


Barney1966
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2889 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi first post here and would really appreciate some help/guidance

 

Description of the issue

Received a letter from Cabot (DCA) on 10/07/2015 threatening legal action, CCJ, relating to a Capital One Credit Card.

Letter was dated 04/07/2015 giving me 7 days to respond.

Amount being claimed is 4100

 

Last contact i had regarding this was in 2009 when i disputed the amount as i think it included loads of charges

which i knew nothing about, but never heard anything back so assumed they had written it off.

 

I've since moved house but

until 10/07/2015 have not received any correspondence from DCA for this debt in the 6 years i've lived at my address

so i assume they are trying it on as any debt would be or about to be Statute barred.

 

Quite concerned about the CCJ threat though as the letter was quite strongly worded.

 

 

After reading some of the debt forums I've sent a "prove it" letter this morning by recorded delivery

but from what i've read about this DCA and their solicitor Restons im inclined to think this will antagonize them and they will go ahead and try for a CCJ anyway.

 

I have a CCA request prepared to go tomorrow but could use some advice.

Am i doing the right thing?

And if they go for a CCJ how do i defend it?

 

Appreciate any advice i can get.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Wait for their response to the 'prove it letter' first.

 

And there is no need to waste good money or RD postage, you can simply obtain ''proof of postage'' which is free from the PO counter.

 

When exactly in 09 did you last have contact/pay towards this?

 

You're reading way too much into their puerile threat letters, they are simply designed to intimidate and exploit your lack of knowledge surrounding debt collection, nothing more, what they want is to force you to contact them.

 

When was this agreement first taken out?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Thanks for the reply.

 

As far as i can remember i think any payments would have been about Aug/Sept 2009 - when i was disputing the charges. The card was taken out in 2001/2002 i think certainly no later than 2004 anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

bet it doesn't say will anywhere.

 

shame you sent any kind of reply

that's the idea of these letters

they cleverly word them to get a response

 

please scan the letter up

following the upload

 

pers I'd go check you credit file and see if this debt shows

and the poss ring cap1 and ask when the last payment/ use was

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well as it was pre 07 they will need the original agreement in court to enforce.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Normally i wouldnt have - Had problems with DCA's before during a bit of a "difficult period" so am a little bit familiar with the types of letter they can send. Managed to settle with previous DCAs though. This one was much stronger than ive seen before. Will post up later today when i get home .

Link to post
Share on other sites

settled with a dca...*cough*..hope you'd cca'd them first!

 

so by you post unless you are in Scotland

its not SB'd

 

sar always goes to the OC [Cap1]

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

DCA's are NOT BAILIFFS

they have no such legal powers

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have stated in writing that they "WILL" take action within seven days. That needs to be treated as a letter before action

 

You need to send a CCA request like tomorrow as they cannot enforce or litigate while in default of such a request

 

You need to be asking for a full statement of account as well

 

What does your credit file say as to when the last payment was made

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's their new format letter read it carefully

Doesn't say they will do court in 7 days

 

 

it says the above course of action....

which is they intend to instruct a solicitor to issue court proceedings..

that does not mean the sols will follow that instruction nor recommend its the right action.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

CCA them. They wont have the original agreement. They very rarely ever do. Especially on a debt that old, and chock full of charges.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally I would send them a cca request headed "I do not acknowledge any debt to yourselves or to anyone you claim to represent "

 

You seem to be only one to two months from SB

 

 

 

Send the SAR a sap to confirm the facts

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the responses. really are appreciated. CCA will go tomorrow morning to be on the safe side and will sort out the SAR as well. Only problem with that is that i have no idea what the CAP1 account number is anymore. Does that matter or can they do this all on the addresses?

 

CCA has a request for Statement as well as Original agreement.

 

Ok checked Credit report. Everything looks fine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sar goes to cap1

have you moved since you took it out?

if so read the whole sar

you don't need the account number

 

 

as for the CCA request to cabot

quote their ref number

use a BLANK £1PO don't sign anything

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks ill sort out the SAR today - Re the CCA: Why a blank PO? wont they just send it back as not correctly filled in?

 

Need a bit of help with CCA - Which section should i be quoting? All three sectuons 77/78/79? or just s78? - Bit confused!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats great - Thanks

 

This is what is set to go to them today!

 

Template removed

 

(please do not post copy of templates to the thread...they are for members only)

Edited by Andyorch
Section 78 removed
Link to post
Share on other sites

They have stated in writing that they "WILL" take action within seven days. That needs to be treated as a letter before action

 

You need to send a CCA request like tomorrow as they cannot enforce or litigate while in default of such a request

 

You need to be asking for a full statement of account as well

 

What does your credit file say as to when the last payment was made

 

They can start litigation ( in order to avoid the SB problem ) but certainly cannot obtain judgment while the CCA request is outstanding.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...