Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • They did reply to my defence stating it would fail and enclosed copies of NOA, DN Term letter and account statements. All copies of T&C's that could be reconstructions and the IP address on there resolves to the town where MBNA offices are, not my location
    • Here are 7 of our top tips to help you connect with young people who have left school or otherwise disengaged.View the full article
    • My defence was standard no paperwork:   1.The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 2. Paragraph 1 is noted. The Defendant has had a contractual relationship with MBNA Limited in the past. The Defendant does not recognise the reference number provided by the claimant within its particulars and has sought verification from the claimant who is yet to comply with requests for further information. 3. Paragraph 2 is denied. The Defendant maintains that a default notice was never received. The Claimant is put to strict proof to that a default notice was issued by MBNA Limited and received by the Defendant. 4. Paragraph 3 is denied. The Defendant is unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly served from either the Claimant or MBNA Limited. 5. On the 02/01/2023 the Defendant requested information pertaining to this claim by way of a CCA 1974 Section 78 request. The claimant is yet to respond to this request. On the 19/05/2023 a CPR 31.14 request was sent to Kearns who is yet to respond. To date, 02/06/2023, no documentation has been received. The claimant remains in default of my section 78 request. 6. It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of proof of assignment being sent/ agreement/ balance/ breach or termination requested by CPR 31.14, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to: (a) show how the Defendant entered into an agreement; and (b) show and evidence the nature of breach and service of a default notice pursuant to Section 87(1) CCA1974 (c) show how the claimant has reached the amount claimed for; and (d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim; 7. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed. 8. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer credit Act 1974. 9. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.
    • Monika the first four pages of the Private parking section have at least 12 of our members who have also been caught out on this scam site. That's around one quarter of all our current complaints. Usually we might expect two current complaints for the same park within 4 pages.  So you are in good company and have done well in appealing to McDonalds in an effort to resolve the matter without having  paid such a bunch of rogues. Most people blindly pay up. Met . Starbucks and McDonalds  are well aware of the situation and seem unwilling to make it easier for motorists to avoid getting caught. For instance, instead of photographing you, if they were honest and wanted you  to continue using their services again, they would have said "Excuse me but if you are going to go to Mc donalds from here, it will cost you £100." But no they kett quiet and are now pursuing you for probably a lot more than £100 now. They also know thst  they cannot charge anything over the amount stated on the car park signs. Their claims for £160 or £170 are unlawful yet so many pay that to avoid going to Court. When the truth is that Met are unlikely to take them to Court since they know they will lose. The PCNs are issued on airport land which is covered by Byelaws so only the driver can be pursued, not the keeper. But they keep writing to you as they do not know who was driving unless you gave it away when you appealed. Even if they know you were driving they should still lose in Court for several reasons. The reason we ask you to fill out our questionnaire is to help you if MET do decide to take you to Court in the end. Each member who visited the park may well have different experiences while there which can help when filling out a Witness statement [we will help you with that if it comes to it.] if you have thrown away the original PCN  and other paperwork you obviously haven't got a jerbil or a guinea pig as their paper makes great litter boxes for them.🙂 You can send an SAR to them to get all the information Met have on you to date. Though if you have been to several sites already, you may have done that by now. In the meantime, you will be being bombarded by illiterate debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors all threatening you with ever increasing amounts as well as being hung drawn and quartered. Their letters can all be safely ignored. On the odd chance that you may get a Letter of Claim from them just come back to us and we will get you to send a snotty letter back to them so that they know you are not happy, don't care a fig for their threats and will see them off in Court if they finally have the guts to carry on. If you do have the original PCN could you please post it up, carefully removing your name. address and car registration number but including dates and times. If not just click on the SAR to take you to the form to send to Met.
    • In order for us to help you we require the following information:- [if there are more than one defendant listed - tell us] 1 defendant   Which Court have you received the claim from ? County Court Business Centre, Northampton   Name of the Claimant ? LC Asset 2 S.A R.L   Date of issue – . 28/04/23   Particulars of Claim   What is the claim for –    (1) The Claimant ('C') claims the whole of the outstanding balance due and payable under an agreement referenced xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and opened effective from xx/xx/2017. The agreement is regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974 ('CCA'), was signed by the Defendant ('D') and from which credit was extended to D.   (2) D failed to comply with a Default Notice served pursuant to s87 (1) CCA and by xx/xx/2022 a default was recorded.   (3) As at xx/xx/2022 the Defendant owed MBNA LTD the sum of 12,xxx.xx. By an agreement in writing the benefit of the debt has been legally assigned to C effective xx/xx/2022 and made regular upon C serving a Notice of Assignment upon D shortly thereafter.   (4) And C claims- 1. 12,xxx.xx 2. Interest pursuant to Section 69 County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from xx/01/2023 to xx/04/2023 of 2xx.xx and thereafter at a daily rate of 2.52 to date of judgement or sooner payment. Date xx/xx/2023   What is the total value of the claim? 12k   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? Yes   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? N/A Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Credit Card   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After   Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Online   Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes, but amount differs slightly   Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. DP issued claim   Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Not that I recall...   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Not that I recall...   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? Yes   Why did you cease payments? Loss of employment main cause   What was the date of your last payment? Early 2021   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No   -----------------------------------
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot/reston claim form - Old Halifax Overdraft


masjntt
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2576 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

Im new to the site and am looking for some advice so apologies if this is posted in the wrong section.

 

A few years ago I had a unsecured loan and overdraft from Halifax. I became ill and unable to work, did not have insurance and was unable to pay the outstanding money.

 

Stupidly at the time I ignored the letters of demand and eventually they stopped. I obtained my credit file from experian about 15 months later and noticed that two defaults had been registered against me for each debt { the date of defaults was Aug 2002}.

 

As far as I am aware this should remain on my credit file for six years from the date that the default notices were issued, can somebody just confirm that for me please?

 

Also will it automatically be removed from my file or do I have to make an application to have it removed??

 

My main problem seems to be that since the deault was issued in 2002 that I have had no correspondence from Halifax at all, in fact I was not notified of the actual default notice, had the threatening letters which I ignored but never a letter to say they had gone ahead and filed one.

 

The debt now appears to have been sold onto debt collection agencies, since 2002 I ve had various companies write and threaten home visits, bailiffs court action etc if I dont repay the debt, normally I write back 3 or 4 times explaining my position, inability to pay and request that they cancel the debt, I never normally hear back from them after about my 4th letter then normally 9 or 10 months down the line a different collection agency contacts me about the same debt and the cycle starts all over again.

 

The latest debt collection company wrote to me this week and I have replied to them explaining the above, just out of couriosity I obtained a copy of my credit file and it shows the debt still listed as to the Halifax, same default date but says that is settled with a part payment, now I havent made ANY repayments so I presume this part payment is the payment received once my debt was sold on??

 

I can handle the debt agencies but my query is this, once the six years is up although the Halifax arent the ones chasing me will these debt agencies continue to keep passing my debt around?? None of these agencies are listed ANYWHERE on my credit file / report?

 

Hope this all makes sense, thanks to anyone who can help me

Thanks Jem x

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 205
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Thanks babybear39, are you saying that perhaps I shouldnt have replied to the recent letter from the DCA??

 

I never actually posted it didnt have time and was going to send it recorded del tomorrow??

 

Thanks x

Link to post
Share on other sites

On the face of it, this looks like a statute-barred debt. However, you say that when DCAs have contacted you since 2002 you have written to them 3 or 4 times. Depending upon what you said in your letters, this could be seen as acknowledgement of the debt - and so the statute-barring clock will have restarted each time you did it.

 

You could send the latest DCA the statute-barred letter available from the templates section, and see what they come up with.

 

On the other hand, if as it seems you have acknowledged the debt then the next course of action is to get the DCA to prove that the debt is legally enforceable. This can be achieved by asking for a copy of the original executed agreement, again using a template letter.

 

Which DCA is it? Some specialise in buying debt that is either already statute-barred or about to become statute-barred - so the name will tell us a lot and help us to help you deal with them.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that scarlet pimpernel

 

Since 2002 I have been contacted by about 4 or 5 different DCA's ,

each time I have written explaining that my circumstances chave changed due to sickness

and that I cannot make any repayments nor token payments and have asked them to write off my debt in view of my circumstances,

 

 

they always ignore what I say and just continue sending the threatening letters and

I ve normally always responded to each one re explaining the above and saying I cant pay,

cant afford to declare myself bankrupt,

either write my debt off or start bankruptcy proceedings against me.

 

 

Normally I end up explaining all of this in writting 3 or 4 times to each DCA then suddenly I dont hear back from them,

then many months later a new DCA gets in touch and whole process is repeated!

 

The current DCA is a company based in Glasgow called Scotscall, Im in Birmingham and have never heard of them,

if you know of them or have any advice as to which would be the best way forward for me then pls let me know.

 

Will look into the statute barred letter and other option now

 

Thanks x

Link to post
Share on other sites

In addition to the above post claims entered by creditors stay on your file for 72 months (6 years), to have this removed you usually do have to pay a fee (around £30 I believe) to have this 'struck off' your record.

 

Other wise it will stay there, it won't affect your rating after the 72 months, just be viewable to potential lenders etc.

 

As Scarlet Pimpernel says if you could tell us a bit more info about your letters etc, this way it's easier to tell what approach they are taking

 

Hope this helps

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that Chris - who do I contact to have the debt "struck off" the creditor or credit ref agency??

 

Babybear39 - there are two debts, one for £800.22 and the other for just over £6k both payable to Halifax originally. I havent contacetd any charirities as Id prefer not to go down the bankruptcy route, I dont own property or have assets etc so if they really want to pursue me then id prefer them to commence proceedings but ideally id like to try and sit it out until the debt is old enough to be legally removed from my credit file.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I deal with commercial litigation, and I am aware of differences, but I'm sure the overall basics would be the same.

 

First point of call would be to ring your credit reference agency, as for some info on the defaults entered on your file (dates, claim/ref numbers, etc)

 

Then give your local county court a call and see if they can help you out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will do thank you both x

 

 

On the face of it, this looks like a statute-barred debt. However, you say that when DCAs have contacted you since 2002 you have written to them 3 or 4 times. Depending upon what you said in your letters, this could be seen as acknowledgement of the debt - and so the statute-barring clock will have restarted each time you did it.

 

You could send the latest DCA the statute-barred letter available from the templates section, and see what they come up with.

 

On the other hand, if as it seems you have acknowledged the debt then the next course of action is to get the DCA to prove that the debt is legally enforceable. This can be achieved by asking for a copy of the original executed agreement, again using a template letter.

 

Which DCA is it? Some specialise in buying debt that is either already statute-barred or about to become statute-barred - so the name will tell us a lot and help us to help you deal with them.

 

 

Just need some help now deciding which course of action to take first as per scarlet pimpernels post above?? Send a statute barred letter and see what happens or try to get the DCA to prove that the debt is legally forceable, any suggestions guys???

 

Cheers x

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

*** UPDATED NEED SOME MORE ADVICE PLS**

 

Hiya - I sent off a statute barred letter to the DCA Scotscall at the end of March regarding this debt to see what if anything they came back with.{please read earlier threads}

 

The letter was signed for by them but I never received a reply. I have today recieved letters from a different DCA (Rockwell) chasing the same two Halifax debts.

 

In my inital post I mentioned that over the years I had contacted some DCAs about the debt basically explaining my inability to repay - Im fairly sure Rockwell were one of the DCAs that I wrote to and Im wondering that as Scotscall wouldnt have had any previous correspondence if they sent my file back to Rockwell perhaps knowing they may have copies of my old letters??

 

Im just wondering whether to send another statute barred letter anyway and see what happens or go straight to a CCA request?

 

Any advice greatly appreciated, Thanks x

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi

 

 

Further to my last post {31st May} I sent a statute barred letter to the current DCA Rockwell

and also mentioned that I had sent the same letter to the previous DCA Scotscall who had not responded.

 

 

As I had said previously I am 99.9% certain I have contacted this current DCA about this debt in writing during the last six years

so the idea was to send the statute barred letter and see what they came up with.

 

I have received a letter from them today very brief - saying they had received my letter and have referred back to their client

to see what info if any they have and will be in touch in due course ......

.... just wondering if this is a good sign or not?? Or should I start preparing for a CCA request??

 

Sorry to waffle on

Thanks x

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

** UPDATE NOT GOOD NEWS**

Hi I received a letter from Rockwell this morning confirming that they have written acknowledgement from myself dating back to just Jan 2006 {as said prev was certain I had}.

They have sent me a copy of the letter which I sent at the time to a solicitors who were at that time pursuing me for the debt.

 

I guess as the statute barred idea is now out the window is my next step a CCA request? Im not to up on this, there are two debts with one DCA do I sent two payments or one?

 

I could soooooo kick myself but at the time didnt realise my rights and was advised by Nat Debt helpline to explain my financial inability to repay Arrgg roll on Feb 2012!

 

Thanks x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes.

 

The Sar will hopefully show lots of charges to reclaim or maybe even clear the account :)

 

The CCA will establish rockwell's legal right to collect :p

 

Don't be too hard on yourself, we all made mistakes before finding this site.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Aww cheers

 

One last thing for the halifax do I S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) head office as the branch i opened it is has long gone and i think the overdraft was agreed via telephone banking ?

 

All it states on my credit file is "Halifax" no address ?

 

 

You should send it to the address of their registered office (which is legally the address for the service of documents).

 

[later] I can't find an address for Halifax but they are a part of the Bank of Scotland whose registered office is -

 

BANK OF SCOTLAND PLC

THE MOUND

EDINBURGH

EH1 1YZ

 

 

hth

I really do appreciate all those 'thank you' emails - I'm glad I've been able to help. Apologies if I haven't acknowledged all of them.

You can also ding my gong if you prefer. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...