Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Sec127 (3) repealed, now gone. S. 127(3)-(5) repealed (6.4.2007) by Consumer Credit Act 2006 (c. 14), ss. {15}, 70, 71(2), {Sch. 4} (with Sch. 3 para. 11); S.I. 2007/123, art. 3(2), Sch. 2
    • We used to recommend that people accept mediation but our advice has changed. The mediation process is unclear. Before you can embark on it you have to agree that you are prepared to enter a compromise – and that means that you agree that you are prepared to give up some of your rights even though you are completely in the right and you are entitled to hundred percent of your money and even though EVRi are simply trying to obstruct you in order to discourage you and also to put others who might want to follow your example off from claiming and even though they have a legitimate basis for reimbursement. Mediation is not transparent. In addition to having to sign up that you are prepared to give up some of your rights, you will also have to agree not to reveal any details of the mediation – including the result of the mediation – so that the whole thing is kept secret. This is not open justice. Mediation has nothing to do with justice. The only way of getting justice is to make sure that this matter goes to trial unless EVRi or the other parcel delivery companies put their hands up and accept the responsibility even if they do it is a gesture of goodwill. Going to trial and winning at trial produces a judgement which we can then add to our small collection to assist other people who are in a similar boat. EVRi had been leading you around by the nose since at least January – and probably last year as well – and their whole purpose is simply to drag it out, to place obstacles in your way, to deter other people, and to make you wish that you'd never started the process and that you are prepared to give up your 300 quid. You shouldn't stand for it. You should take control. EVRi would prefer that you went to mediation and if nothing else that is one excellent reason why you should decline mediation and go to court. If it's good for them it's bad for you. On mediation form, you should sign that you are not prepared to compromise and that you are not prepared to keep the result secret but that you want to share the results with other people in similar circumstances. This means that the mediation won't go ahead. It will take slightly longer and you will have to pay a court fee but you will get that back when you win and you will have much greater satisfaction. Also, once you go the whole process, you will learn even more about bringing a small claim in the County Court so that if this kind of thing happens again you will know what to do and you will go ahead without any hesitation. Finally, if you call EVRi's bluff and refuse mediation and go to trial, there is a chance – maybe not a big chance – but there is a chance that they will agree to pay out your claim before trial simply in order to avoid a judgement. Another judgement against them will simply hurt the position even more and they really don't want this. 300 quid plus your costs is peanuts to them. They don't care about it. They will set it off against tax so the taxpayer will make their contribution. It's all about maintaining their business model of not being liable for anything, and limiting or excluding liability contrary to section 57 and section 72 of the consumer rights act.     And incidentally, there is a myth that if you refuse mediation that somehow it will go against you and the judge will take a dim view and be critical of you. This is precisely a myth. It's not true. It would be highly improper if any judge decided the case against you on anything other than the facts and the law of the case. So don't worry about that. The downside of declining mediation is that your case will take slightly longer. The upside is that if you win you will get all your money and you will have a judgement in your favour which will help others. The chances of you winning in this case are better than 95% and of course you would then receive 100% of your claim plus costs
    • Nice to hear a positive story about a company on this form for a change. Thank you
    • too true HB, but those two I referred for starters - appear to be self admitted - One to excuse other lockdown law breaking, by claiming his estate away from his consistency and London abode was his main home the other if he claims to have 'not told the truth' in his own words via that quote - to have mislead his investors rather than broken lobbying rules   - seem to be slam dunks - pick which was your law breaking - it seems to be both and much more besides in Jenricks case Starmer was director of public prosecutions yet the tories are using seemingly baseless allegations for propaganda and starmer is missing pressing apparent blatant criminality in politics
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Arrows/NCO chasing old Monument Credit Card Debt


almdhussain
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3179 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

I had a Monument Credit Card, which was opened in 2004,

this month i started gettting letters from NCO Europe saying to pay up,

 

i have sent one letter and they have replied with a bit strange wording,

i have listed them below and was wondering if you could help me draft a response

 

the specifics i am looking is for quotes from the law, example under such law and under section and subsection etc., i wonder if you could help., thanks in advance.

 

1) their response

"I can confirm that our letter dated 12th May 2015, confirms that your monument account has now been passed to NCO

to manage the collection of the balance outstanding,

 

This is your notice of assignment,

however, i do acknowledge that you have requested the Deed of Assignment

 

A Deed of Assignment is a document in which a debtor appoints a trustee to take charge of the property to pay debts, partly or wholly.

It allows one party(the assignor) to transfer ownership of something they own, such as a house or endowment policy, to someone else(the assignee).

 

Therefore, it is not applicable to your account and it is not possible to provide."

 

What they say above is it right?, what can i quote in law to make them agree for a deed of assignment.

 

2)"We have not purchased this balance therefore we are unable to provide a Deed of Novation"

 

they have not purchased it????

 

3)"NCO Europe is managing the above account on behalf of Arrow Global.

The account was purchased by Arrow Global from Monument on 22nd December 2014.

As per the original terms and conditions with Monument they reserve the right to pass or sell your account to a third party to manage.

The account was sold to arrow global and they have appointed NCO Europe to manage it on their behalf"

 

they are managing does it not make them a party and under law they have to provide documentation for this,

they say i have to make a CCA request which i do not want to as it will reset the account, can you please advise.

 

Hope to hear from you soon. a image of the letter below

Link to post
Share on other sites

pdf remember please

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

dunno where you are getting some of this munbo jumbo from AH

but it sound very much freeman of the land to me

if it is, dump all that crap now.

 

 

a CCA request DOES NOT, reset your acking of the debt

 

 

you will not get to see the deed

you probably mean the notice of assignment, which is what they have sent you.

 

 

as this is from 2004 they will need the signed CCA

to enforce it.

 

 

I bet you've PENALT charges on the card

and Payment Break Plan [PPI]

so stuff their to reclaim.

 

 

lets see that letter and any others you've been getting please

 

 

is the debt on your CRA file?

what is the defaulted date please?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dx,

 

Right thanks for your input, i have checked my CRA file and it does not showup on my experian report, but my previous report from 2013 shows the entries, the original credit limit was £750 but now they are claiming over £2k, so definetely it is time barred as i have no payments showing up in my previous credit reports.

 

Now how do i go about claiming the ppi and charges, I shall send a CCA request soon and also would like to know how to word it specially asking for proof of last payment on the account.

 

I have signed up with noddle for free credit report and also experian, in both the reports it does not show up any entries for the above.

 

Any help in this matter would be great.

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When did you last pay anything towards this?

Was it more than six years ago? (five in Scotland)

 

The CCA request is in the library (green writing above)

But here it is http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?387435-CCA-Request-Consumer-Credit-Act-1974-**Updated-January-2015**

 

Get 'proof of posting' which is free from the PO counter.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

why send a cca if its statute barred

 

 

ignore then unless a claim arrives

then use sb defence.

 

 

on the old report

what is the defaulted date

 

 

and you'll need to sar monument to get all the statements.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

can we have that letter in pdf please cant read postage stamps

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dx,

 

I will try and upload the letter today/tommorrow hopefully,

 

 

now i have been sifting thru all my old letters and found that i used to have two cards with Natwest, one with Capital one,

can i see the balance is over £5k for all the three, can i follow the same process of doing a SAR for claiming ppi and penalty charges.

 

As to the post by Boo,

i have made a mistake, in 2012 due to various demands by DCA i approached CAB and asked them to help me with my problem,

they have contacted all the DCA's and got me a payment plan,

but i was not in a position to pay them anything as i lost my job

and had financial difficulties and also health problems,

 

 

now will this reset the five year limit?

eventhough i have not contacted them directly,

please advise.

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

so you are in Scotland?

 

 

yes sar monument as already advised

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hehe ofcourse you are re your other thread!!

 

 

even better then

the debt is extinguished not just barred

tough luck arrows!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah bless their cottons........:pound::pound: love to be a fly on the wall when they read that!

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok then so sadly 6yrs sb.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

unapproved the pdf

you've left their ref number on it.

 

 

CCA to arrows

and sar to monument time me thinks

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok Dx, few questions,

 

 

i have taken out this card in 2004,

since 2005 i have been resident in Scotland,

as per rules i normally reside in Scotland not England,

so should the rule of 5 years not apply in my case?

 

Secondly if it is SB'ed (be it 5yrs or 6yrs as i have no recollection of any payment for this period),

why do i need to do a CCA request to Arrows?,

when i am doing SAR to Monument,

can you pls shed some light?.

 

Also i have attached a new modified file, is there a way to delete the old file?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok Dx, few questions,

 

 

i have taken out this card in 2004,

since 2005 i have been resident in Scotland,

as per rules i normally reside in Scotland not England,

so should the rule of 5 years not apply in my case? -

no its where you were resident when you signed the agreement

http://www.govanlc.com/suedinengland.htm

 

Secondly if it is SB'ed (be it 5yrs or 6yrs as i have no recollection of any payment for this period),

why do i need to do a CCA request to Arrows?, because they are the debt owner and are chasing you

when i am doing SAR to Monument,- but they have sold the debt so whatever they send [if they send a copy of the agreement too- there is no legal compulsion to send one in an sar]

 

can you pls shed some light?.

 

Also i have attached a new modified file, is there a way to delete the old file?

 

 

no file attached

 

 

you need the sar to get all the statement

only the OC will have those

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So Dx, what you are saying that i can be tried in Scotland event hough the agreement says it is governed by laws of England,

 

the attachment is edited in the same comment sorry, but i have attached it here?, hope to have your comments on this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So Dx, what you are saying that i can be tried in Scotland event hough the agreement says it is governed by laws of England,

ofcourse you can

 

so technically I could argue that the court does not have jurisdiction as per the agreement?

no, the agreement will mention nowt about that as its not their problem

 

am i right? nope

the attachment is edited in the same comment sorry, but i have attached it here?, hope to have your comments on this.

 

 

you took out an agreement whilst resident in England

 

 

the only real consequence is the statue barring will be 6yrs not 5yrs

 

 

and the debt is never extinguished like in scotland

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry i might sound stupid, as i have a medical condition of getting confused just want to ask you this,

 

Now it is crystal clear about where i can be tried,

 

 

one last question,

The SAR request is for PPI and default charges, and i should be sending it to Arrows and there is no need to do one to Monument?

 

In any case who will i be claiming the money from?

 

 

if there is any PPI & default charges Monument or Arrows?,

 

 

i guess from Arrows?,

 

 

or from the Monument to whom i had paid such sums?

Link to post
Share on other sites

sar's and reclaims always goto the OC [original creditor] as they levied them

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dx,

 

I have taken screen shots of my credit report for Monument and have attached the documents, please have a look, things i have noticed

 

There is no default date on the file, it only shows there is an arrangement to pay, while there is none and no payments have been made i dont know how long, can they do this?, is this right?

 

a bit strange, i have just noticed it., can you please have a look and comment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the ar or ap markers are a killer they never go away.

you need that sar before you go further.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...