Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Could you link us to BankFodder's post please? The judge's office means something different to me. HB
    • Hi LFI, With regard to the ANPR cameras in your post #65, while I was on the phone to the Planning Department, they did take a look at Google Streetview and went back to 2012 where they could see the ANPR cameras in place so therefore they would have deemed consent. I had previously read the T&C Planning Regulations and had read the section on deemed consent so I understood the point they made on the phone. It doesn't matter though, that doesn't harm my case any, and I shouldn't really mention this now, (this is what you reminded me of on another thread) but in the past I was a member of a scheme that gave me access to legal advice, I have spoken to a barrister previously through this scheme on another matter and I think I am still a member. I am going to check if I am still a member of the scheme, and if I am I will discuss my case with a barrister or solicitor, whichever the scheme deems appropriate. I will let you know the outcome. I am also going to take Bankfodders advice in the sticky and go to the local court and ask if I can sit in on a case in the Judges office.
    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx Yes sorry. they called it a deed at first in court.  Then Judge said she was happy to have it sealed as something else  exact names of orders in message above.     The disease was tested for when his cardiac testing was done immediately after purchase and part of the now sealed case.   However, results were disclosed incorrectly and I only found out  two days ago.   This disease did not form part of my knowledge during the case as I had been informed of a normal result that was not the case.   it is perfect clarity of a genetic disease where as the previous cardiac issue could be congenital until the pup is genetically tested. 
    • Hi, Halifax recently sold a credit card account of mine to Cabot. I am unemployed and have no assets and was thinking of making token £1 payments for 12-18 months in order to drag things out a bit and reduce the chance of Cabot being able to get the correct CCA documents from Halifax if I requested them in future. However, I saw on the pages on this forum about defending county court claims that one of the standard approaches when defending such claims is to say “I had an account with bank X, but I don’t remember the details and so don’t know if I owe this debt…”. If I made £1 payments to Cabot, would it prevent me from using such a defence in future? OC: Halifax DC: Cabot/Wescot Card account opened: 2016 Defaulted: 2023
    • Paperwork says sealed consent order and composite settlement agreement      YES  ADDISONS DISEASE 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

More Sickness Benefit cuts leaks...


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3213 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

The people have NOT spoken - the biased press and Channel 4 have spoken, allegedly on our behalf.

 

What a warped world you live in. In my case I have worked since I was 17, so 40 years of paying tax and NI contributions, so therefore I am NOT a scrounger or a shirker.

 

Perhaps this thread could be closed as it is getting hijacked by a troll.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 121
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

The question to be asked is why 12 Billion savings have to be made from the Social Security Budget. That is 10% of the whole budget when 70 billion is wasted each year through corporate tax avoidance and evasion? It seems the Nasty party need to get their priorities in order or is this just the usual Tory ideology

Link to post
Share on other sites

well we will all know whats what come the 8th, i know in the paper to day he is talking about lowering the cap to 23K for london and 20K for the rest of UK, and it looks like there will be big cuts to TAX/C, but like i said none of us know for sure what will be cut, so lets wait and see, it may turn out its not as bad as we was all thinking

 

 

There is one way they could make a lot of money, and that is fine the french for each migrant that comes over in the back of a truck, they would soon stop them on there side then.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would say to you that if you can come up with a way to stop tax avoidance, then it is your duty to say so, no I thought not.

 

Do you have to be an expert to hold an opinion? Thought not...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am wondering if some of the intended change to esa support group is the insistence of treatment for the illness/condition. No doubt all will be revealed on wednesday.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Totally agreeing with you Nystagmite. I have had 12 months one to one treatment whilst i waited for my tribunal hearing ...there is no more or new treatment i can have. Thinking of the already ridiculous waiting lists and state of the nhs its hardly much good idea wise anyhow. And who would decide what the best treatment is. Just my thoughts with the comment about change to support group. Guess we will see on wednesday.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suspect the changes to the support group won't be fully explained until the Autumn statement, but we've had leaks for some time now that they intend to means test it, and make it much, much harder to get into that group.

 

Huh, as if it was easy now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would say to you that if you can come up with a way to stop tax avoidance, then it is your duty to say so, no I thought not.

 

Close the loopholes, overhaul the way we tax in this country.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am wondering if some of the intended change to esa support group is the insistence of treatment for the illness/condition. No doubt all will be revealed on wednesday.

 

That's a bit of a problem, insisting on treatment. It's ok for things like talking therapies or cbt for depression/anxiety or attending a weight loss group or for obesity related disability, maybe physio for some conditions, but insisting on medications or surgery is a no go because the government would find themselves open to litigation for adverse effects. Also it would be a human rights violation. Plus, can you imagine the fallout from the first death during surgery or as a rare side effect of a drug?

 

Also I suspect the whole 'insisting on treatment' thing is code for 'we have a company in the wings ready to provide mandatory courses for everyone with a certain diagnosis' (depression, anxiety, obesity would be my guess). The NHS doesn't have the capacity to treat all those on the waiting list for proper treatment so any mandatory insistence will probably be for a pseudo treatment course that has no value apart from to try to force people off of benefit due to fear of the courses.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

The government should be sorting out low pay and high rents, that's where all the problems started, around 10 to 15 years ago my rent was around a quarter of my take home pay now rent is around half the take home pay of someone on minimum wage and people are having to claim tax credits to top the wages up.

 

A decent living wage would be the incentive to work instead of letting employers pay peanuts while letting the tax payers foot the bill as employers profits soar.

To be able to have affordable housing /rent and a decent rate of pay they would have to stop the flow of illegal immigrants coming into this country as well as proper control on the amount of economic migrants from the EU , as the increased demand on housing is forcing rents and house prices up, and putting extra strain on our infrastructure , health services, schools and transport,(roads) but we know that government will not do this as it suits them that there is so much cheap labour incoming that what the tory capitalists want, it's a form a slavery IMO

 

Until the working population decreases (cheap imported labour) rates of pay will not increase, stop WTC would mean some would loose their low paid jobs and would reveal the true unemployment figures

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why has this forum been infected with Kippers??

 

This is the third time That term "Immigrants" has been used in a despicable negative way today

What next "Muslim bashing?"

 

This topic is state benefits, not Europe or immigrants/Migrants

 

This forum is helping people, no matter what their status, not demonising them

Link to post
Share on other sites

My son is currently in the support group and has been for the past 18 months. I am not sure what treatment they could mandate him to have that could possibly help. He is autistic and as far as I am aware there is no cure or medication fix. Maybe they will try brain surgery, you know straighten out the neurological developmental issues. Wonder if they will do this in the main area of the JC, surely brain surgery will afford him a private room.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My son is currently in the support group and has been for the past 18 months. I am not sure what treatment they could mandate him to have that could possibly help. He is autistic and as far as I am aware there is no cure or medication fix. Maybe they will try brain surgery, you know straighten out the neurological developmental issues. Wonder if they will do this in the main area of the JC, surely brain surgery will afford him a private room.

 

Like your son, I have Autism. I also have severe OCD because of this. I also have some other complex medical issues. I have been told more than once there's no cure or indeed treatment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why has this forum been infected with Kippers??

 

This is the third time That term "Immigrants" has been used in a despicable negative way today

What next "Muslim bashing?"

 

This topic is state benefits, not Europe or immigrants/Migrants

 

This forum is helping people, no matter what their status, not demonising them

 

Whilst I dislike UKIP to the core, People who Support UKIP are entitled to their opinions. And not everybody that has immigration concerns is a KIPPER

 

Please remember that people are entitled to their opinions and so long as they do not break the site rules should be continued to be allowed to.

 

Although your comment regarding the original topic of conversation is noted. Perhaps we should stick to the topic on sickness benefit cuts here.

 

Rest assured any post advocating illegal activities esp muslim bashing, or immigrant bashing or anything illegal shall be dealt with.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

To be able to have affordable housing /rent and a decent rate of pay they would have to stop the flow of illegal immigrants coming into this country as well as proper control on the amount of economic migrants from the EU , as the increased demand on housing is forcing rents and house prices up, and putting extra strain on our infrastructure , health services, schools and transport,(roads) but we know that government will not do this as it suits them that there is so much cheap labour incoming that what the tory capitalists want, it's a form a slavery IMO

 

Until the working population decreases (cheap imported labour) rates of pay will not increase, stop WTC would mean some would loose their low paid jobs and would reveal the true unemployment figures

 

No, the fact that housebuilding isn't keeping up with demand is what is putting increased pressure on rental prices plus the difficulties for the last few years of getting a mortgage causing more people to need to rent than buy, plus less availability of social housing.

 

And there isn't a decent rate of pay because government is subsidising employers with tax credits and housing benefit meaning employers don't need to pay a living wage. Pro business lobbys ensure that the government don't put up minimum wage to ensure that wages don't eat too much into profits.

 

Lack of sufficient funding is putting pressure on public services.

 

The UKIP model of 'all immigrants are to blame for everything', is a clever propaganda filled policy which hooks people who are looking for an easy answer to what is a far more difficult situation than UKIP suggest.

 

It is also an an excellent cover for the fact that UKIP are a right wing uber capitalist pro business, pro wealth party - even more so than the Tories.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why has this forum been infected with Kippers??

 

This is the third time That term "Immigrants" has been used in a despicable negative way today

What next "Muslim bashing?"

 

This topic is state benefits, not Europe or immigrants/Migrants

 

This forum is helping people, no matter what their status, not demonising them

I wasn't bashing anyone, just telling how things are, infact it's because of benefits and free health care that the uk is their choosen target, and most are not genuine asylum seekers, Government would sooner pay them benefits than it's own people, that is what has been happening, and I'm not a kipper they IMO are no better than what we have in power now
Link to post
Share on other sites

No, the fact that housebuilding isn't keeping up with demand is what is putting increased pressure on rental prices plus the difficulties for the last few years of getting a mortgage causing more people to need to rent than buy, plus less availability of social housing.

 

And there isn't a decent rate of pay because government is subsidising employers with tax credits and housing benefit meaning employers don't need to pay a living wage. Pro business lobbys ensure that the government don't put up minimum wage to ensure that wages don't eat too much into profits.

 

Lack of sufficient funding is putting pressure on public services.

 

The UKIP model of 'all immigrants are to blame for everything', is a clever propaganda filled policy which hooks people who are looking for an easy answer to what is a far more difficult situation than UKIP suggest.

 

It is also an an excellent cover for the fact that UKIP are a right wing uber capitalist pro business, pro wealth party - even more so than the Tories.

Yes thatchers government with the right to buy council housing stock, and councils not being forced to replace housing stock , but the influx of people from the EU and those from outside it who are here but not officially, working as slaves illegally they all need somewhere to live, this whilst not being solely responsible has never the less played a part in it, we are one of the most densely populated countries in the EU , it's not building more houses and more vehicles on our roads what we need, it's a lower population ,

 

On the rates of pay i'm aware of some companies who started employing eastern Europeans, who they paid less than what they paid British workers, as a result they lowered their rates to everyone, the government have encouraged this , and as said if they stopped WTC and HB for min wage jobs, most employers would lay off some staff, because by paying such poor wages they have been able to afford 2 people for the price of one basically, boom time for them should be over

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wasn't bashing anyone, just telling how things are,

 

No, just how YOU see things.

 

The UKIP model of 'all immigrants are to blame for everything', is a clever propaganda filled policy which hooks people who are looking for an easy answer to what is a far more difficult situation than UKIP suggest.

 

It is also an an excellent cover for the fact that UKIP are a right wing uber capitalist pro business, pro wealth party - even more so than the Tories.

 

Exactly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...