Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

"Samsung deliberately disabling Windows Update".


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3217 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

When Microsoft MVP Patrick Barker tried to help a user with a computer problem, he stumbled across something curious.

 

Windows Update kept randomly being disabled.

 

Was malware at work, turning off Windows Update to prevent Microsoft patches and security updates from being installed?

 

No, malware wasn't to blame. It was Samsung.

 

Barker discovered that Samsung's SW Update software was downloading and running a file with the unambiguous name of Disable_Windowsupdate.exe.

 

Read More especially the chat with the Samsung Rep at the bottom

 

It is recommended this is reported to Microsoft as malware.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't see the problem. Most likely Windows Update breaks the Samsung drivers. The OEM (=Samsung) can legitimately disable OS features. If somebody wants to be in total control of their PC, they should buy one without OS and/or install a free and open source OS like Linux or BSD.

"Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for Poundland"

Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem is that Samsung user 'won't' get security updates. Unless Samsung are amateurs, they can use another method.

 

It's the same as saying 'I will shut down my anti-virus because I can't play music', that would be stupid.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We don't know exactly. Maybe Samsung users will still be able to update manually or using other methods. I once had an Acer laptop that had its own "Update" button, separate from Windows update.

"Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for Poundland"

Link to post
Share on other sites

It looks like the tool will disable Windows update at reboot. That means one can manually update Windows but not automatically. I don't see the problem.

"Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for Poundland"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Samsung says it will update updater that disabled Windows Update

 

Quite why Samsung ever thought disabling Windows Update was a good idea is a mystery to me

 

Last week, it was discovered that software pre-installed on Samsung computers had the undesirable (but surprisingly deliberate) side effect of disabling Windows Update, Microsoft’s way of automatically keeping your Windows computer secured with the latest patches including security updates.

 

As a consequence, the onus was put on Samsung computer owners to update their devices manually with security updates… and we all know how well that works. :(

 

The technology press found out about Samsung’s crippling of Windows Update, which meant users had to manually download install Microsoft updates, after the issue was uncovered on the Sysnative forum and blogged about by forum staffer Patrick Barker.

 

samsung-600

 

Many observers were quick to comment that it’s much more common for malware to disable Windows Update than pre-installed software by a South Korean PC manufacturer.

 

Now, Samsung says it will issue a fix to its SW Update software, allowing Windows Update to run normally.

 

Samsung, who presumably were on the receiving end of a stern phone call from its business partner Microsoft and concerned that they didn’t want the incident to blow up into Lenovo Superfish-style proportions, announced the turnaround in a statement offered to the press:

 

“Samsung has a commitment to security and we continue to value our partnership with Microsoft. We will be issuing a patch through the Samsung Software Update notification process to revert back to the recommended automatic Windows Update settings within a few days. Samsung remains committed to providing a trustworthy user experience and we encourage customers with product questions or concerns to contact us directly at 1-800-SAMSUNG.”

 

That’s not quite an apology, but at least it sounds as if they have seen the error of their ways and will be resolving the issue real soon now. Quite why they ever thought disabling Windows Update was a good idea is a mystery to me.

 

And what makes it worse is that Samsung clearly did what it did deliberately – this wasn’t the case of a software engineer messing up. The offending software, downloaded by Samsung’s SW Update program, was called Disable_Windowsupdate.exe for goodness sake. And if the poor user attempted to re-enable Windows Update downloads, they would simply be disabled again and again.

 

samsung-wu

 

Source: bsodanalysis.blogspot.com

 

With Samsung’s patch Windows Update’s settings should be reverted to “recommended” and automatic updates for the operating system should start arriving again.

 

There is some irony, of course, that Samsung is pushing out an update to the software updater that broke Windows Update. I bet they’re pleased that no-one else turned off their updater, eh?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also beware Lenovo with the alleged phone home to China unwanted facility.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure I would have used the word 'alleged'. I wouldn't trust China one bit, they are one of a pair of sneaky countries. You can bet your life they are spying just like the Russians are in Kaspersky security and anti-virus.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure I would have used the word 'alleged'. I wouldn't trust China one bit, they are one of a pair of sneaky countries. You can bet your life they are spying just like the Russians are in Kaspersky security and anti-virus.

99.9% of electronic devices are made in China. You might as well shut your router and unplug your PC.

"Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for Poundland"

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...