Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Just out of curiosity aesmith - are you a lawyer?
    • I spoke to a pro-bono entity this afternoon.  They advise I must initiate a claim in the court v the receiver if I want to then file an application for an order for sale.  I must have a claim/ proceedings to be able to force a sale. The judge in the current proceedings  has told me that I cannot force the lender to sell and the lender cannot interfere either.   If the receiver isn't acting correctly and isn't selling - this means I must make a claim against the receiver I could initiate a claim. Or much quicker  - the other entity - with a charge already - could use that to make an application for an order for sale.
    • Thanks Dave It's not too far away, about 8 or 9 miles, so I will probably venture over on my bike if I can't think of a good reason to drive there again! I'll have a chat with Mrs GB_Joe tomorrow and see which shops they visited, I know M&S was on the list (had to try on multiple sets of trousers!) and they are actually in that bit of retail park. The uniform shop is across the way in the Meridian Centre, so probably not helpful to get them involved.
    • As they have failed to deliver their original PCN you will need to send them an SAR where they should provide that PCN. It should show the address they used . If it is not your current one that would explain the non delivery. If it was correct then perhaps the Post office messed up. A more cynical view would be that UKPC didn't send it so that you couldn't claim the reduction. It appears that UKPC have been there for some time  but I have been unable to find any pictures of their Notices.The leisure park itself is pretty big so while some parts maybe give 5 hours free parking other parts may have restrictions like permits. I haven't been there for years -I went  to Nandos and the bowling centre . I am surprised that they are now infested with UKPC as the place is plenty big enough not to require their dubious services. If you live not to far away it would help if you could get some legible pictures of their signs. Be carful to park in an area that doesn't require a permit and take photos of the entrance signs, the five hour sign and the permit only sign as well as any other signs that are different from the previous signs. Also if their is a payment machine could you please photograph that.
    • This other entity doesn't know what's going on.  To be clear I had huge equity.  No-one would ever expect a lender to erode all my equity.  The question is - if anyone knows the legal answer - on the basis they have a charging order - could they make an application for an order for sale?  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Confused by DWP Capital Rules


RustyWheels
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3303 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All. I live in Wales and have been in a wheelchair for the past 6 years.

I receive DLA (higher rates),

ESA (support group), and

housing benefit.

 

 

I recently received a letter from the DWP demanding a refund for 'overpaid' ESA even though my cirumstances haven't changed

and my only income is from my benefits.

 

 

I have been trying to save somethig each month, and my combined ISA and current account have gone over the £6000 capital limit imposed by the DWP.

 

 

I was under the impression that benefits received, particularly DLA, did not count as income for this purpose.

 

 

Can anyone say where I went wrong?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any income is only disregarded for the period it is paid for. I.e. DLA paid four weekly, anything not spent after four weeks is capital, same for ESA paid fortnightly, not spent within that period, becomes capital.

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Any income is only disregarded for the period it is paid for. I.e. DLA paid four weekly, anything not spent after four weeks is capital, same for ESA paid fortnightly, not spent within that period, becomes capital.

 

Thanks for the quick reply. So, rather than saving up for a £5000 power heelchair, I have to spend it quickly (on stuff I may not need) to avoid going over the capital limit? That's just insane.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if your capital has gone over £6k - you could buy the £5k wheelchair - which will bring your capital down below the threshold again

  • Confused 1

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

True enough, provided I don't wish to buy food,

pay my utility bills, fuel my car or continue paying off the finance on it!

 

 

I'll join the waiting list for an NHS wheelchair

 

 

- I was going to save them money by buying my own,

 

 

so this rather pointless policy seems a bit of a false economy in my case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:RustyWheels:

 

Generally, benefits do count as income. Some benefits (including disability living and some lump sum arrears of benefits) are disregarded as income for calculating entitlement to income related benefits. But income other than earnings, which benefits are, becomes capital at the end of the time period it's paid for. Not a problem for most people cos usually claimants are waiting for the benefit to pay for care, or the leccie bill!

 

Unfortunately I can't see any way out of repaying this unintentional overpayment. Anyone else who can, please shout.

 

Take care if you decide to go on a spending spree. A few bathroom/kitchen aids to make you more independent, or a subscription to a leisure activity, or a holiday which makes you feel better should be acceptable. A designer wardrobe or giving money to family/friends may be seen as deprivation of income in order to claim extra benefit.

 

Best wishes, Margaret. :panda:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks.

 

 

So my DLA is disregarded unless I try to save it.

 

 

I'm not planning on having a spree, just saving up for a powered wheelchair (which is rather the point of DLA)

 

 

instead of joining an 18-month waiting list and making the NHS pay for one.

 

 

Still, coming up with false economies like that keeps some civil servants in their jobs,

 

 

I suppose. I'm feeling a little bitter about this, as you may be able to tell.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If there is a welfare benefits advisor locally (try CAB, your local council) I would get advice before giving up on this. Whilst technically you may have gone over the capital limit, there may be some way around it if you can show that it was saved for such a disability specifc purpose. If you can't find anyone locally, other sources of advice might be a help group or charity specifically related to your condition or disability in general.

 

If you get DLA, could you not get a wheelchair through Motability? Unless of course you're already using your allowance to pay for a car.

  • Haha 1

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Margaret,

 

Getting around in a manual wheelchair is a miserable experience. Things I didn't even notice when not disabled become massive issues. Getting over the slightest bump takes a surprisingly big effort and kerbs are impossible. Even carpets try to push you off track due to their 'grain'. And as for going out to the shops, well, apart from the obvious ease-of-mobility issues, I'm using both hands to move the chair. What do I use to pick items off the shelves? And how do I open 'pull' doors? A powered wheelchair would give me one free hand back. These things aren't obvious until you come across them yourself.

 

R.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think getting some advice is excellent, er, advice. I am getting the motability component of DLA, but I bought a (vastly overpriced) car that's been adapted with a power ramp (lifts once I'm inside) and motorbike-style tiller controls (so I can drive from my wheelchair). I have to top up the paymets. A car is essential in the wilder parts of Wales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

£6000 and over 'in the bank' affects income related benefits (ESA I assume you are on income related) so it will be the amount over the £6000 thats causing the issue.

 

If brought under the £6000 threshold then there is no issue and any overpayment if its only just over the threshold should be pretty small.

 

When on income related benefits, anything over £6000 worth of savings has to be declared to the DWP.

Link to post
Share on other sites

DMG,

 

This is what triggered the demand. They count each £250 over £6000 as providing £1 per week income (what planet are they on?), and have asked for a repayment for a two-year period where I've had approx £7k capital - a bill for over £400 I wasn't expecting. And to stop them charging me even more in the future, I have to spend enough to drop down to £6k totalled over my savings and current accounts. This ridiculous rule actively discourages financial prudence such as saving - that's what I'm confused about.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I fully understand, the problem is its a blanket rule and covers everyone doesn't it and has been this way for a very long time.

 

There isn't anything you can do at all, apart from keep it under the £6000 otherwise they will keep charging so to speak.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only note of caution I can add RE: Spending Spree.

 

Expenditure will need to be justified to the DWP to combat the accusation of Disposing Capital to qualify for benefits. A CAB adviser should be able to hep with that.

Morally, i agree, saving for an aid that helps you due to illness/disability should not impact.

Wonder if there is a way to pay monthly on the equipments?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's the conclusion I've come to as well. Just put up with their ludicrous effective interest rate (since when did £250 earn anyone £1 per week?) and try to keep below £6000 capital. This is really Orwellian.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Monthly payments would be a good suggestion to avoid saving up a large amount.

 

But my problem is not really in paying for a wheelchair, it's the unexpected demand for repayment of benefits to which I genuinely believed I was entitled. They don't exactly make it clear on their forms that the capital cut-off is £6000. I do remember a question asking if I had £16k savings (in which case the application would be refused), but not £6k. I've only been able to save up that amount using my perfectly legal benefit income, and now they want it back. I should have spent it on more expensive stuff rather than furnishing my flat with cheap second-hand items from ebay!

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's the conclusion I've come to as well. Just put up with their ludicrous effective interest rate (since when did £250 earn anyone £1 per week?) and try to keep below £6000 capital. This is really Orwellian.

 

£1 per week is not the expected weekly rate of earning on £250. It is the rate at which you are expected to deplete your capital in order to meet your basic living needs - if your capital exceeds £6000, of course.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

£1 per week is not the expected weekly rate of earning on £250. It is the rate at which you are expected to deplete your capital in order to meet your basic living needs - if your capital exceeds £6000, of course.

 

Thanks for clearing up that bit of confusion. It seems to me that they are going to take it from you regardles of whether or not you spend it on living needs. Telling them you have >£6k will get you a refund demand; not telling them will get a refund demand and possibly a fine and/or fees on top of that. This seems to be a capricious way of capping the savings of people who are trying to be prudent with their income. I accept that it is intended to filter out new benefit applications by people who already have substantial savings, but it has the collateral effect of penalising people who are trying to be financially prudent with their entitlements. The argument seems to be "if you have £6k you're not entitled to anything more". This logic says that I should go to Waitrose rather than Lidl so I won't have anything to save at the end of the month. It simply doesn't make sense to me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

means tested benefits are intended to provide assistance to those with insufficient income and capital to support themselves

 

capital below £6,000 does not affect benefit entitlement (£10k for pensioners)

 

however if a person has capital above this level, the benefit scheme deems them as being able to use some of their capital to support themselves, e.g. a working age person with capital of £7,000 is deemed to be able to afford to use £4 pw towards their living costs

 

if a person has capital in excess of £16,000, they are deemed not to require any assistance as they have sufficient capital to support themselves (this limit does not apply to guarantee credit)

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

True enough, provided I don't wish to buy food, pay my utility bills, fuel my car or continue paying off the finance on it! I'll join the waiting list for an NHS wheelchair - I was going to save them money by buying my own, so this rather pointless policy seems a bit of a false economy in my case.

 

 

If you are on the DLA high rate for mobility you do not need to finance your own car you can get one from Motability all you pay is the fuel, they take xx-xx from your DLA mobility part to pay for the car. Which would be BRAND NEW every three years....

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are on the DLA high rate for mobility you do not need to finance your own car you can get one from Motability all you pay is the fuel, they take xx-xx from your DLA mobility part to pay for the car. Which would be BRAND NEW every three years....

 

it depends upon the car you want/need - for some vehicles, you have to pay a premium on top of your DLAm

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the info.

 

I bought the car whilst still in hospital (after 11 months!) and didn't know / couldn't find out about much of the available help since I was flat on my back and staring at the ceiling. I am spending my mobility DLA component plus a bit extra on the car at the moment. I'll look into any premium I might be entitled to, but I'm already able to save a little each month, so probably won't apply for it.

 

I'm just amazed that there are restrictions on what I can spend my money on. Is there a list of what spending is acceptable to the government? And what legislation enforces this? I was under the impression that (for DLA at least) there are no restrictions on spending, despite the 'care' and 'mobility' monickers. I guess this is why they've specifically demanded a rebate on my ESA even though it all goes into the same bank account. There is very poor communication between the ESA and DLA people - I informed the DLA guys of a change of address and got a stroppy letter from the ESA people complaining that I hadn't informend them of a change in circumstances, which is what prompted all of this in the first place. Their website simply states I had to inform rhe DWP, which I had done - it's not my fault the two offices don't communicate!

Link to post
Share on other sites

With absolute apologies, I'm somewhat baffled. The OP has, frugally, saved up and inadvertently taken themselves over the £6k limit. They have been presented with a bill for £400 which, whilst unexpected, can be paid. They want an electric wheelchair which costs £5k. They can afford this having saved up. The purchase of which would take them well under the £6k limit and, now they understand it is there, they can keep within it. What have I missed?

Link to post
Share on other sites

With absolute apologies, I'm somewhat baffled. The OP has, frugally, saved up and inadvertently taken themselves over the £6k limit. They have been presented with a bill for £400 which, whilst unexpected, can be paid. They want an electric wheelchair which costs £5k. They can afford this having saved up. The purchase of which would take them well under the £6k limit and, now they understand it is there, they can keep within it. What have I missed?

 

You have missed nothing

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...