Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you all   JK, I agree; if they were to accept my full claim today, then the interest would be around 8-9 pounds. If I were them, I would have offered to pay the interest and said no to the 12 pounds for the letters. These have not been mentioned, which is my mistake.   As you pointed out, if the judge were to award at 4% and I did not get the letters, I would get less.   Bank, thank you. I do hear what you are saying. If I am to continue with this, then I will need to pay an additional trial fee of £59. If I win everything, then great, but if I win less the claim and court fee, then I lose out. I am not sure what the judge will think about the interest. I think we have to remember that I won the item and, therefore, did not pay a penny for it. Yes, I have had to purchase an additional one, but maybe the judge will hold this against me. I am content that this is a win. I have not signed any non-disclosure clauses, and they do not ask for this either in their offer. 
    • Are you saying that both businesses were closed? Yet you stayed there for over two hours. . If both were closed than to charge £100 is a penalty since Horizon had no legitimate interest in keeping spaces clear for the company. sake as there were no customers..
    • Well you would think that would be the case. Sadly i doubt there is one honest broker within the BPA or IPC and most of their members. they are there to take as much money as they can from motorists regardless of PoFA.   Take the Consideration  period for example. This is a minimum of 5 minutes to allow motorists to find a parking space, read the T&Cs giving them enough time to leave the car park without having to pay if they decide not stay. Simple. Well it would be simple if it were any other company than BPA [or IPC who have now fallen into line with BPA's "reasoning"].  You see if you decide to stay then despite the fact that during the Consideration period when you still weren't classed as parking , once you accept the terms [with all the underhand little tricks designed to trip you up] that five minutes is now included in your parking time. [No not the parking period because the poor dears who ANPR cameras are apparently unable to work out what the exact parking period is since their ever so infallible cameras [yeah right] are incapable of tracking cars once they are in a car park]. After 12 years they still haven't worked out a way of doing it. Some of them fudge and the majority [with a wink fro their ATA [Accredited Trade Association though it should be Discredited Trade Association] just ignore the parking period all together. This is what BPA claim is the Consideration period Entrance grace period: This is for when motorists enter a car park, read the signs and/or attempt to make payment then leave. In these instances, motorists must be offered a reasonable amount of time before an operator takes enforcement action, but we do not define this time, due to the variance in size and layout of car parks. An entrance grace period for a small, permit-only car park could be below 5 minutes, whereas for a large multi-story this could be 15. But  heaven forbid that anyone should leave 6 or 7 minutes after entering  their member's car parks. . They are dutybound to receive a PCN. This is regardless of how busy the car park would be [Christmas eve for example ] .Our minimum is their maximum. Moving on to Grace periods. Again BPA gobble degook. Exit grace period: This must be a minimum of 10 minutes and this is when a motorist intends to stay – for example, if you paid for an hour but spent a total of 1 hour 10 minutes on-site, you will not receive a PCN. It is important to note that the grace period is not a free period of parking however and should not be advertised as such. If that ten minutes in not free parking what is it. their members all think they can send out PCNs for anything after 1 minute after the exact time never mind ten minutes. Our snotty letters have stood the test of time. Do not try to reinvent the wheel -especially with DCBL . They don't even know what a non compliant PCN is for goodness sake! You already know more about PoFA then they do. However if you include that they will find a way to disabuse the Judge of your logic and the law. So don't give them the chance.  I am sure you have the Parking Prankster going on about the rogues misusing the rules on planning permission by lying and stating that they had "retrospective permission". There is no such thing in English law yet Judges were swallowing it until one Judge pulled up Parking Eye about one of their Witness Statements alluding to "rp" by claiming it was "tantamount to perjury".  It wasn't tantamount,it was plain and simple perjury. Parking Prankster: The great private car park planning approval scam PARKING-PRANKSTER.BLOGSPOT.COM Guest blog from shuteyepark, from the Consumer Action group forums In December 2013 my daughter received a Parking Charge Notice (PCN) fro... Hope it wasn't too long winded Nicky Boy.🙂
    • and more immediate issues WT* is the UK doing. Ukraine needs these funds and weapons NOW Lets sincerely hope this isnt another Tory VIPal skimming issue.   MoD accused of ‘go-slow’ with half of £900m Ukraine fund unused | Defence policy | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Delays mean just £404m of the money donated by nine countries has been committed or spent  
    • If everyone who wanted or needed a permit could get one easily how would PCM make any money?    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Disciplinary - Any law I can refer to ?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3306 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I've worked at my current role for 2 and half years. For 2 yrs I had two managers, neither of which ever raised any problem with my work.

 

 

The company I work for are very small and we don't have any appraisal or any HR process

- so my feedback had always come via 1to1 meetings with my managers.

 

Over my 2 yrs I had also been given praise from some of our clients over work delivered.

 

Six months ago I got a new manager.

At our 3rd meeting she told me she had concerns over my work,

suggesting I wasn't fulfilling the job as she'd see fit and had told the company directors I was thinking of leaving.

 

 

This stemmed from a private conversation I had had in an earlier session which I joked about leaving

- unfortunately this was taken literally and passed on to the company director as fact - something I wasn't very pleased about.

 

At the same (3rd) meeting I was told that I'd need to improve or it "wouldn't end well". Understandable this shook me up.

After that meeting relations didn't improve.

 

 

For the past couple of months I continued to do my job as I had before,

and a couple of times since I have been told I need to do things to match her way of doing things

- nothing has ever been written down - it's all verbal.

 

I've also been given new processes and systems to work on, but no training has been given

other than the offer of sitting with my manager when she's available to be shown.

I have done this, but

 

 

lately I am asked for forward work to her for approval, or for her to update rather than me spending time on it. I am made to feel like a spare part.

 

I have understandably become a lot less confident in my role as I feel I am not supported.

This in turn has made me more withdrawn with my colleagues.

 

 

Recently I've been told that directors have been discussing me (openly) suggesting if my quieter mood doesn't improve there would be consequences.

 

I did try and meet with my director to discuss, but he didn't follow up on my requests and frankly gave me the impression he wasn't keen to meet.

 

We have no written disciplinary process other than a sketchy paragraph in my contract about "not fulfilling my role".

I am keen to know legally if I do have an employment law I can refer to ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The law - specifically the Employment Rights Act 1996 - gives you the right not to be unfairly dismissed. That is the legislation, and the framework around which the employer must meet certain conditions in order for any dismissal to be ruled 'fair'.

 

OK - you are not yet at the point where you have been dismissed, but from your post, and from the outline that you have given it sounds that your 'capability' do perform your role is being brought into question. Capability IS a potentially fair reason for dismissal, but in order for the employer to have a defence to a possible Employment Tribunal claim for Unfair Dismissal, they should take clear steps to demonstrate that their decision to dismiss was made reasonably and that you were treated 'fairly'.

 

This (along with matters of 'conduct' - another potentially fair reason for dismissal) should involve a properly recorded warning system, escalating to a point where dismissal may be considered. You will probably be aware already of a system of 'verbal' warnings, 'written' warnings and 'final written' warnings, and that should apply in your case. Your contract or company handbook should contain a disciplinary policy which sets out what procedures should be used. In the absence of any specific code of practice internally, the ACAS Disciplinary Code should be used. An employee would normally (depending on the nature and severity of the offence, or failure to perform) expect to receive at least one formal warning in order to allow for improvement in a given timescale before dismissal would be considered. In many cases there would be a warning, either written or verbal, a final warning and then if still not satisfactory, dismissal may result. At each stage the employee should be informed in writing of the allegation, invited to a meeting and given the option of having a trade union official or colleague present as a witness. After the meeting the employee should be informed of the outcome and what is required to prevent the matter escalating to the next stage.

 

So, although not 'law' in itself, an employer seeking to dismiss an employee fairly, should allow clearly documented steps prior to dismissal or would find it very difficult to justify the decision were the employee to take the case to a Tribunal - as the Judge would be looking at whether the disciplinary policy or ACAS code was followed and if the case went in your favour any award could be increased if this were not the case. Applying this to your case, the employer's concerns over your performance may or may not be genuine, but if your future is being considered, then you should be entitled to formal meetings, with a witness and clear direction on what you need to do to get back on track.

 

In terms of what you should do, I personally would avoid direct confrontation. I would probably be looking over my shoulder and looking at opportunities elsewhere, because if they are losing faith in you - justifiably or not - it is often difficult to come back from that. In the meantime I would still be looking to deal with it head on and persist with a meeting - at whatever level of management - to get an honest appraisal of what more you need to do to be considered a valuable employee. Tell them that you are keen to impress, and ask for some clear steps on how you can achieve this. If loyalty is in question, take the opportunity to dispel their doubt. If it comes to a fight, then you will be in a better position to demonstrate that you took all reasonable steps to resolve the problem and can then consider what more you can do by way of grievances about your treatment or failures to follow procedure.

 

Good luck - these situations are never easy, but can often be resolved before they get nasty - hopefully you will get through this OK

  • Confused 1

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No problem - feel free to come back and give us an update or ask for further advice if you need it

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a meeting with my manager today and was told that they want to give me a warning over an incident when I'd called someone in our team a prick. I was told it was aggressive behaviour and the warning was bullying.

 

No formal warning process is in place at my company and when I mentioned this I was told that I would be sent a process.

 

My manager then told me I should take the weekend to consider my position. I was told that the company has changed a lot in the time I've been here (2 yrs 6 mths) and I hadn't evolved with them. I didn't seem to want to fit in or work with people and my attitude was not right.

I was told the company were now more tech focused and I needed to learn to understand it more.

 

I was told that I had 2 options.

 

1 - I "Decide" that the company isn't right for me any longer and if I want to remain

 

2 - I remain in the role and take a warning for my behaviour the previous week.

 

I am at a bit of a loss, I have told them I want to remain and want to be trained. Even if I don't (longterm) manage to fit in it will at least buy me some time.

 

I feel I am being forced out by a manager who doesn't want me. Legally I am not sure how this can happen either.

 

Any further advice ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as the warning you will have to take it, you can't use that type of language and get away with it 99.9% of the time.

 

If you cannot fulfil the job they need you to do you can be taken down a capability route and dismissed.

 

those are the facts here

 

You have these options

 

1. leave

2. take a warning then leave

3. Carry on as you are and be dismissed

4. Improve, engage brain before mouth and don't say anything, if i had a pound for every time the grey matter has muttered a plethora of disparaging and downright insulting thoughts about my workmates i'd be typing on my gold plated keyboard right now ;)

 

As long as they follow a set out and fair process the above are your options in my view.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply.

 

In regards to No 4 - I've asked for training to be given (as other members of my team have had this) but it's not been offered to me. The whole incident seems extremely harsh to say that is bullying as the word was said to a colleague about this person, not to this persons face and it's a one time thing that has happened in my 2 and 6 mths at the company.

In the past months I have complained about another manager and the way he spoke to me, he actually sellotaped my laptop to my desk - as far as I am aware he wasn't given a warning, so I feel I am being treated unfairly to further the aim of getting me to leave.

 

I have decided to leave the place and I am being interviewed, but I am just not going to be treated unfairly here. The company have sent me their disciplinary policy and no verbal warning is given, it's direct into a written warning - which seems at odds with the company advice ACAS give for a first time offence.

 

What do you think ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think while you continue to put forward the view that you ar eblameless/ it's no big deal, you'll get nowhere. You seriously need training in how not to be offensive?Try and find an employer with collegues you respect. Time to move on.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was told the company were now more tech focused and I needed to learn to understand it more - Training in this area, I don't need training to be offensive.

But you are right, I do need to move on

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...