Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. And, I also continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HMRC harassment


outofsync24
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3371 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My husband was self employed up to 2006 and then changed to a limited company.

 

 

From 2006-09, he was employed by his company (not self employed) which paid his taxes.

 

 

The company then became insolvent. HMRC are saying he owes £10k tax. Any advice?

Link to post
Share on other sites

My husband was self employed up to 2006 and then changed to a limited company. From 2006-09, he was employed by his company (not self employed) which paid his taxes. The company then became insolvent. HMRC are saying he owes £10000 tax. Any advice?

 

Advice : give more detail.

 

What tax year(s) are they claiming this arises from?

Is it all tax owed or tax & penalties?

 

Do you dispute the tax is owed? If not:

 

Does it arise from his employment (did the company underpay his PAYE)?

From his self-employment?

 

I'm not confident anyone can give you reliable advice without more details.

 

Why do you feel it is "harassment" by HMRC?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advice : give more detail.

 

What tax year(s) are they claiming this arises from?

Is it all tax owed or tax & penalties?

 

Do you dispute the tax is owed? If not:

 

Does it arise from his employment (did the company underpay his PAYE)?

From his self-employment?

 

I'm not confident anyone can give you reliable advice without more details.

 

Why do you feel it is "harassment" by HMRC?

 

It's from the tax years 2006 to present. He was employed by his company until 2009, of which, all payments were made and the accounts show this. HMRC are saying he was self employed by his company, he was not. He hasn't been self employed since he started working as a limited company and all the documentation was transferred accordingly. The company was made insolvent in 2009 and every other month, he gets a letter stating he owes the self employed tax and he calls them to dispute it every time he does. They say that they've sorted it out, then a couple of months down the line, he gets another letter saying he owes more. Now they say they're taking him to court even though he's already proved that he's not liable for r it as it's been paid.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's from the tax years 2006 to present. He was employed by his company until 2009, of which, all payments were made and the accounts show this. HMRC are saying he was self employed by his company, he was not. He hasn't been self employed since he started working as a limited company and all the documentation was transferred accordingly. The company was made insolvent in 2009 and every other month, he gets a letter stating he owes the self employed tax and he calls them to dispute it every time he does. They say that they've sorted it out, then a couple of months down the line, he gets another letter saying he owes more. Now they say they're taking him to court even though he's already proved that he's not liable for r it as it's been paid.

 

"It's from the tax years 2006 to present. He was employed by his company until 2009, of which, all payments were made and the accounts show this"

 

You may be out of time for any appeal relating to a 2006 tax year. (When you say 2006 do you mean 2005/6 or 2006/7?)

 

If "all payments were made" is it that HMRC are wrongly claiming he owes for pre 2009, and if so why, if he was on PAYE?

Unless something has gone wrong I can't see how you are saying both that all payments were made and he was on PAYE ..... You may need to detail what tax HMRC claim is owed for which tax year(s) (and penalties / interest)

 

"He hasn't been self employed since he started working as a limited company " ..... Is correct, as you can be self-employed, but not by a limited company.

If it was "his own" limited company then the company may have paid him salary (liable to PAYE if above the income tax threshold) or dividend (which is taxable but still not "self-employment"), even if it is "your own" limited company with all the shares held by you.

Self-employed is literally employed by yourself, not by a limited company (as this isn't "self" as it is a seperate legal entity)

 

If the company was made insolvent in 2009, and you note he has not had self employment between them (when the company was made insolvent) and now - has he been on PAYE?

Again, knowing what figures HMRC are claiming for which years might help disentangle this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's 2006/07 they're claiming. He was PAYE by his own limited company . The HMRC are insisting he was self employed. He has proved that he wasn't. Since 2009 when the company became insolvent, he has been employed by a few companies and never worked for himself and has paid tax (PAYE) which is on his wage slips. They are saying he hasn't put in his self assessment returns, but he didn't need to do this as he was PAYE.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's 2006/07 they're claiming. He was PAYE by his own limited company . The HMRC are insisting he was self employed. He has proved that he wasn't. Since 2009 when the company became insolvent, he has been employed by a few companies and never worked for himself and has paid tax (PAYE) which is on his wage slips. They are saying he hasn't put in his self assessment returns, but he didn't need to do this as he was PAYE.

 

He has to put in self-assesment returns if they ask for them, even if the return shows only that he paid all the tax due by PAYE, and that he had no other income.

Once he has put in a return and it has been accepted it would be for HMRC to show he had other income (eg from looking at bank statements, which they can require.

 

He can't say "I was PAYE only, I'm not putting in a return", he has to say "I was PAYE only, but since you have asked for a return, here is my return where the figures stated relate to PAYE only"

 

Has he been asked to provide a self-assesment return?

If so, for which years, and has he given them the return (and when)?

 

I'm wondering if he has been asked to do so, hasnt done so, and HMRC has made a "determination"?

Has this featured in the correspondence or their statements?

 

Again, if so, and it relates to 2006/7, he may now be out of time to get a 'determination' for 2006/7 overturned, as any determination not appealed can become "fact" even if based on their "guesstimate" - which can happen when returns aren't submitted ......

 

Bizarrely, even once a determination has become fixed, there is still a legal requirement to provide a return. This can lead to the odd situation where a return is provided (very late) but the determination still stands : it is up to HMRC and the appeals timescales for if the determination gets amended.

From memory a determination should be appealed within six months, and may be amended after 6 months but it isn't mandatory, but it would be very unusual to have a determination varied once 6 or 7 years has elapsed from when the return was due.

 

I've posted on this before : http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?403373-DLC-and-HMRC&p=4344824#post4344824

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?439391-HELP!-Tax-bill-from-90-s-when-I-was-unemployed&p=4674730#post4674730

 

so, this isn't an uncommon scenario..... Has your husband had a "determination" made?

Link to post
Share on other sites

When he changed to being employed by his limited company, he was never sent any self assessment forms as they were aware he was PAYE. He has documentation with both his accountant and the insolvency service to prove this. He has had a determination made on 05/04/2008 for £600 and another on the 05/04/2009 for £3000. The rest is all 'charges' and when he phoned yesterday, they still insist he was self employed, even when he's proven that he wasnt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When he changed to being employed by his limited company, he was never sent any self assessment forms as they were aware he was PAYE. He has documentation with both his accountant and the insolvency service to prove this. He has had a determination made on 05/04/2008 for £600 and another on the 05/04/2009 for £3000. The rest is all 'charges' and when he phoned yesterday, they still insist he was self employed, even when he's proven that he wasnt.

 

So, although I couldn't be sure this related to one or more determinations, I wasn't wrong with my suggestion.

 

It would have been helpful if you had provided this info earlier as part of "more details", rather than me having to ask you if it was and you confirming it .... It has felt a bit like "pulling teeth", and I've had to ask for more details 3 times to get the info ....

 

So, as a final contribution (to establish information that may help others take over helping) :

1) did he formally appeal

a) the 2008 determination?

b) the 2009 determination?

c) both??

 

2) by "charges" are they on the HMRC statements as

a) charges

b) penalties, or

c) interest?

A breakdown of the years and composition might help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wasn't at home so didn't have the exact details to hand, I apologise. He appealed over the phone about all contributions where they agreed with him about the details every time except for this time. The breakdown consists of all three items you have listed. I have just noticed 2010 is included also.

The list is 05/04/08 SA Determination, Tax £600, Interest to 20/01/15 £106.31

05/04/08 SA 1st Penalty for Late Return, Tax £100, Interest to 20/01/15 £17.21

05/04/08 SA 2nd Penalty for Late Return, Tax £100, Interest to 20/01/15 £16.06

05/04/09 SA First Payment on account, Tax £300, Interest to 20/01/15 £53.14

05/04/09 SA Second Payment on account, Tax £300, Interest to 20/01/15 £49

05/04/09 SA Determination, Tax £3000, Interest to 20/01/15 £447.28

05/04/09 SA 1st Penalty for Late Return, Tax £100, Interest to 20/01/15 £14.48

05/04/09 SA 2nd Penalty for Late Return, Tax £100, Interest to 20/01/15 £13.10

05/04/09 SA 1st Late Payment Surcharge, Tax £180, Interest to 20/01/15 £22.26

05/04/09 SA 2nd Late Payment Surcharge, Tax £180, Interest to 20/01/15 £22.26

05/04/10 SA First Payment on Account, Tax £1800, Interest to 20/01/15 £268.37

05/04/10 SA Second Payment on Account, Tax £1800, Interest to 20/01/15 £241.59

05/04/10 SA 1st Penalty for Late Return, Tax £100, Interest to 20/01/15 £11.49

05/04/10 SA 2nd Penalty for Late Return, Tax £100, Interest to 20/01/15 £10.11

 

Total unpaid amount £10052.66

 

I'm not sure what other information I can give to you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wasn't at home so didn't have the exact details to hand, I apologise. He appealed over the phone about all contributions where they agreed with him about the details every time except for this time. The breakdown consists of all three items you have listed. I have just noticed 2010 is included also.

The list is 05/04/08 SA Determination, Tax £600, Interest to 20/01/15 £106.31

05/04/08 SA 1st Penalty for Late Return, Tax £100, Interest to 20/01/15 £17.21

05/04/08 SA 2nd Penalty for Late Return, Tax £100, Interest to 20/01/15 £16.06

05/04/09 SA First Payment on account, Tax £300, Interest to 20/01/15 £53.14

05/04/09 SA Second Payment on account, Tax £300, Interest to 20/01/15 £49

05/04/09 SA Determination, Tax £3000, Interest to 20/01/15 £447.28

05/04/09 SA 1st Penalty for Late Return, Tax £100, Interest to 20/01/15 £14.48

05/04/09 SA 2nd Penalty for Late Return, Tax £100, Interest to 20/01/15 £13.10

05/04/09 SA 1st Late Payment Surcharge, Tax £180, Interest to 20/01/15 £22.26

05/04/09 SA 2nd Late Payment Surcharge, Tax £180, Interest to 20/01/15 £22.26

05/04/10 SA First Payment on Account, Tax £1800, Interest to 20/01/15 £268.37

05/04/10 SA Second Payment on Account, Tax £1800, Interest to 20/01/15 £241.59

05/04/10 SA 1st Penalty for Late Return, Tax £100, Interest to 20/01/15 £11.49

05/04/10 SA 2nd Penalty for Late Return, Tax £100, Interest to 20/01/15 £10.11

 

Total unpaid amount £10052.66

 

I'm not sure what other information I can give to you.

 

"Penalty for late return" three times seems fairly conclusive that HMRC are expecting at least 3 returns.

Perhaps this is "new news" to you, ....... But it is clear HMRC believe they've asked for them, and even if you weren't aware before, you are now.

 

Are you saying that in all the previous calls HMRC said "No, it's OK, we aren't asking for a SA return, you are right, you don't have to send them"? Or never mentioned an outstanding return?

 

As for "I'm not sure what other information I can give to you" :

 

Has he been asked to provide a self-assesment return?

If so, for which years, and has he given them the return (and when)?

 

We've established HMRC want returns for at least 3 years.

 

For each of those tax years (3 or more) :

"has he given them the return (and when)?"

 

That information might help you to obtain a reliable answer, if other respondents feel inclined to step in.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He was never asked for a self assessment return, even after every phone call he's made subsequently. Once he'd explained that the relevant documents had been filed to say that he was no longer self employed, they were fine with that. Then he'd receive a new letter, phone again, explain again and be given the excuse that one department doesn't know what the other is doing, but that he was indeed correct in what he was telling them. He was told a couple of phone calls ago that he didn't need to do any returns because they can see by his records that he's been paying PAYE tax. It's just this time they've decided that he was self employed and they've still not asked for a return...

 

Thank you for your advice :)

Edited by outofsync24
spelling errors
Link to post
Share on other sites

He was never asked for a self assessment return, even after every phone call he's made subsequently. Once he'd explained that the relevant documents had been filed to say that he was no longer self employed, they were fine with that. Then he'd receive a new letter, phone again, explain again and be given the excuse that one department doesn't know what the other is doing, outbreaks indeed correct in what he was telling them. It's just this time they've decided that he was self employed and still not asked for a return...

 

Thank you for your advice :)

 

If they've sent "penalty for late return" : it strongly suggests they've asked for one (and even if you didn't know before, you do now).

If you believe they've asked for one you are obliged to provide one : I believe this would be their expectation unless / until you got written confirmation they no longer required one.

 

If you get any returns in (unless they have confirmed in writing they are "not required"), they MIGHT recalculate, and (back of napkin calculation) reduce the total to around £2400 IF they reconsider the 2009 determination and your husband owes no tax for 2007/8 and 2008/9

You could ask if they might reconsider any determinations?

 

I think they are unlikely to reconsider the 2008 determination (as it relates to tax year 2006/7), but again you could ask : I'd be delighted to be wrong.

 

The 3k bill (and its associated interest) are the largest component of the total bill, and (if not already "fixed in place") may become so, so I'd suggest getting that return in quickly if it is still required, then any others where they might re-asses a determination, then (lastly) any where the determination won't be adjusted (as a return may still be required even once the determination is fixed in place)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update to advice, having checked if things have changed since I helped a friend who had similar, where we managed to get determinations re-assessed years after.

 

You may need the help of a specialist tax adviser.

There used to be a principle of "Equitable Liability", but they have replaced this with "Special Relief" as well as making time limits clearer.

 

Time limits : the later of

a) 3 years from filing date of the return OR

b) 1 year from the determination

 

http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/manuals/chmanual/CH56100.htm

 

So, these have passed and the determinations may now be fixed.

 

If they say "determinations fixed, not changing them" then your only hope may become "special Relief", on the basis of the calls where they told you they accepted he had worked PAYE only and didn't mention requiring a return.

 

Special Relief is complex, (and I'm no expert), hence you may need specialist advice

Some relevant pages:

 

http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/manuals/sacmanual/SACM12230.htm

 

http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/manuals/sacmanual/sacm12215.htm

 

http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/manuals/sacmanual/SACM12220.htm

 

You'll note that one of the requirements before HMRC can consider Special Relief is that all the tax affairs MUST be up to date.

So I'd have to advise:

1) Enlist the help of an accountant / advisor who can help you claim Special Relief, but at the same time

2) get ALL returns in, or you'll definitely be dead in the water and bound to pay.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just read through this thread. It's taken a little while to conclude, but yes, seek out an accountant to get you through this. They're dealing with these situations daily and you have kept records which will hasten the solution. I hope this then gets resolved quickly for you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...