Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yep, true to form, they are happy to just save a couple of quid... They invariably lose in court, so to them, that's a win. 😅
    • Your concern regarding the 14 days delivery is a common one. Not been on the forum that long, but I don't think the following thought has ever been challenged. My view is that they should have proof of when it was posted, not when they "issued", or printed it. Of course, they would never show any proof of postage, unless it went to court. Private parking companies are simply after money, and will just keep sending ever more threatening letters to intimidate you into paying up. It's not been mentioned yet, but DO NOT APPEAL! You could inadvertently give up useful legal protection and they will refuse any appeal, because they're just after the cash...  
    • The sign says "Parking conditions apply 24/7". Mind you, that's after a huge wall of text. The whole thing is massively confusing.  Goodness knows what you're meant to do if you spend only a fiver in Iceland or you stay a few minutes over the hour there.
    • Hi and thanks It looks like they ticked all the boxes to me but I'll try and upload the notice. I was wondering if a witness to late delivery might be considered proof - I'm assuming they posted it as normal but Royal Mail stuffed up delivery. If not then they're really saying it just has to be posted within 12 days of the incident, regardless of when it is received. Annoying! edit ok thanks Honeybee here's my 2nd (actually 3rd) attempt at anonymising, copying and uploading the notice! Sorry about the state of it - I sat on it while distracted by my dog 🙃 pcn front.pdf pcn back page.pdf
    • ROFL - dont get upset just because someone (quite a lot of someones) dont want smart meters - well unless you get paid for it .. in which case ...   I assume you haven't been with Octopus long enough to be on one of the very long fixed price tariffs they offered before the prices went bonkers .. and that you dont use your electricity in the evening/lunch time if you think the 'agile type tariffs are good value .. let alone worth installing a smart meter for - high price a good disincentive for an evening cuppa eh? Let alone all your computer/tv etc time in the peak price evening or lunch time. - and boy do those peak prices instantly hammer your bill when those Russian and middle eastern issues kick off.   I would only have considered a smart meter if solar panels had been an option for me - but roof is oriented completely the wrong way. Oh - and My opinion hasn't changed since the smart meter trials 40 years ago, because neither have the issues (well not enough) but I'm happy for you. Be happy for me.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

General Credit File / Statute Barred Advice


mascam
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2544 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hopefully I can get a bit of clarity of where I actually stand.

 

Having racked up a bit of debt in younger years I had little choice but to default.

 

Due to circumstances I simply stopped paying (although I did enter some dialogue for a short time

but the overly aggressive stance of the creditors meant it never progressed)

- this would have been circa 2007/8.

 

Since then I've had a fairly troubled life

- never having any money to pay off the debts and simply ignoring any letters sent.

 

I've not heard from most for 18 months or longer.

 

I'm now in a position where I want and am able to sort my life out,

took the plunge and ordered a credit report from both Noddle and Equifax.

 

Both are showing as clear, with no debts, defaults or CCJ's showing.

The only thing listed is my basic bank account.

 

Am I correct in thinking these debts are statute barred or are they likely to come back and haunt me?

 

Also, what impact are they going to have in the future,

for example will I ever be able to get a mortgage or even a mobile phone on contract?

 

Thank you in advance for any advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if they are not showing on your cedit file they cant harm you.

 

debts are statute barred after 6yrs in E&W

and GONE in 5yrs if you took out the debts whilst resident in Scotland

 

creditors or debt buyers can after 6yrs in E&W can 'ask' for payment

 

you can equally ask them to ... well you know what I mean

 

go enjoy your debt free life

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Thanks for the reply although I am still a little confused by it all.

 

If the debts and CCJ are not showing on my credit file

(have looked at both Noddle and Equifax)

does this mean they have passed the 6 year threshold and are statute barred?

 

I ask as I received a letter yesterday regarding one debt which was notification of a change of name of the company

who currently owns the debt (Aktiv Kapital) and a statement of account.

 

Looking back through the letters I have regarding this

no payment has been made since 2007

so I would assume it is statue barred and I can simply reply in writing stating this?

 

I really don't want to go through all the stress once again as I had hoped to put it all behind and move on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the last payment was 2007, I would suggest it is well and truely Statue Barred. There is a letter in the library you can sent AK.

 

Remember a CCJ never becomes Stat Barred. but if they have not collected on it for over 6 years, they would need permission from the Court to reinstate the CCJ. I have never heard of one being reinstated all the time I have spent on this site.

 

Don't be surprised if a 'phantom' payment appears from whichever company are chasing you.

 

If you need a link to the letter, just shout.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The CCJ is something I have always paid and will do until such a point I might be able to negotiate a settlement payment (assuming I can with a CCJ?).

 

I seem to recall that Horwich (who hold the debt/CCJ) did offer me a reduced payment offer but this was a long time ago

 

All other debts were only taken to defaults - from memory not a single company ever threatened to take any further action than this / send a man round!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope 'horwich' [whomever that is??!!]

 

was the named claimant on the CCJ and not someone this has been passed onto

 

on the SB from

 

pers it's current wisdom not to send the SB letter.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as I know they were named on the CCJ action but I have no record of it.

 

Nothing will be sent unless I have to (court action etc).

 

Again, all of this just shows how murky the world of finance and debt is.

Seems I'll have to go back to keeping my head down and existing on the fringes of society.

 

 

Can't be dealing with playing the game for another goddamn who knows how many years.

 

 

The maddening thing is that if they were less aggressive and actually listened to people they would probably recover more money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you mean Horwich Farrelly , solicitors [of a sort] to Robinson Way [or Lewis or other branch of Hoist Group]? How long you been feeding these creatures?

 

The very same.

According to the court papers I found the CCJ was issued on the 3rd of May, 2008

so been paying them the princely sum of £4 per month since then.

 

 

As the debt was bumped up to £1400 due to 'charges'

I'm still a long way from ever getting near to paying it off.

Reckon there is still best part of £1100 owing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You asked about getting credit again.

 

Various ways of demonstrating a track record include

 

- obtaining a credit repair credit card but ONLY if you have the will / discipline to pay monthly in full , failing which steer well clear

 

- taking out a mobile phone contract but keep an eagle eye on call / data usage

 

- asking your basic bank account provider whether they will up

you to a full current account [but not a fee-charging frills one]

 

If your salary level is sufficient, you would probably qualify for any of the above, as your credit file now seems to be in the clear.

 

Don't go near PDLs or forget your CCJ payments, no matter What, or you'll slide right back to the bottom of the pole

Link to post
Share on other sites

what was the original debt and with whom?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh good

bal all PPI and Penalty charges.

 

have you ever sar'd HFC.

 

reclaiming will prob generate enough to pay it off

 

rare for Horwich Farrelly to be involved

I take you knew nowt about it?

 

served to an old address?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

HF were standard back-up squad for RW.

 

ma Was yours was a case of moving addresses or simple staying put and playing Ostrich syndrome?

 

If any reclaiming to do . . .

 

PPI Complaints

HSBC

Box 5207

CV3 9FB

 

Don't breathe a whiff of full/final to HF at this stage. Wait until your position is at its strongest - i e after saving up or obtained misselling compensation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

To be honest they were probably as above board as they were ever going to be.

 

 

Then again, I didn't know as much about the system as I do now.

 

 

The bump up in costs was mainly due to court fees and a lump sum for 'interest'.

 

 

Although it could well have had PPI included,

I really have no idea.

 

Some of the other debts I had were made up of charges

(I recall a £20 Natwest debt becoming close to £1000 this way).

 

 

Plus there were loans (with HSBC for example)

- even though the original accounts are going to be close to 10 years old,

do they still fall within the time limit for PPI?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No time limit to misselling compensation claims.

 

To try to find what you've paid , make SAR. It's one request per group not per account, so your HSBC one would cover your HFC as well as HSBC account itself. But you should mention this , not just say "all accounts", as records may not have been integrated. You may struggle to get such old information, but it does often turn up if you kick up a fuss .

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will look into sending a SAR. If I can tie in the HFC with HSBC stuff that would good. Probably worth doing the same for Natwest and MBNA (although this one does feel like prodding the hornets nest somewhat).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

How do I find out the best address to send each SAR to? Looking at the Data Protection Register, HSBC have 20 plus addresses. Natwest have 5 or 6. Is there a list of the most common ones anywhere?

Link to post
Share on other sites

each named bank has a named forum here off the main forum tab top left

 

in each of the forums are stickies at the top [red/yellow]

 

details are there

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

A little off topic but I don't want to start a new thread.

 

 

What happened to Horwich Farrelly as a DCA.

 

 

I have a CCJ supposedly with but I can't find out anything about it.

 

 

Have tried Trustonline search which doesn't come back with anything.

 

 

I just want to see what I still owe (if anything) and get it sorted.

 

 

The CCJ is over 10 years old (been paying £4 per month) but I have no idea where that money is going or to who.

Link to post
Share on other sites

post moved to your own existing thread

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...