Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hmm yes I see your point about proof of postage but nonetheless... "A Notice to Keeper can be served by ordinary post and the Protection of Freedoms Act requires that the Notice, to be valid,  must be delivered either (Where a notice to driver (parking ticket) has been served) Not earlier than 28 days after, nor more than 56 days after, the service of that notice to driver; or (Where no notice to driver has been served (e.g ANPR is used)) Not later than 14 days after the vehicle was parked A notice sent by post is to be presumed, unless the contrary is proved, to have been delivered on the second working day after the day on which it is posted; and for this purpose “working day” means any day other than a Saturday, Sunday or a public holiday in England and Wales." My question there is really what might constitute proof? Since you say the issue of delivery is a common one I suppose that no satisfactory answer has been established or you would probably have told me.
    • I would stand your ground and go for the interest. Even if the interest is not awarded you will get the judgement and the worst that might happen is that you won't get your claim fee.  However, it is almost inevitable that you will get the interest.  It is correct that it is at the discretion of the judge but the discretion is almost always exercised in favour of the claimant in these cases.  I think you should stand your ground and don't give even the slightest penny away Another judgement against them on this issue would be very bad for them and they would be really stupid to risk it but if they did, it would cost them far more than the interest they are trying to save which they will most likely have to pay anyway
    • Yep, true to form, they are happy to just save a couple of quid... They invariably lose in court, so to them, that's a win. 😅
    • Your concern regarding the 14 days delivery is a common one. Not been on the forum that long, but I don't think the following thought has ever been challenged. My view is that they should have proof of when it was posted, not when they "issued", or printed it. Of course, they would never show any proof of postage, unless it went to court. Private parking companies are simply after money, and will just keep sending ever more threatening letters to intimidate you into paying up. It's not been mentioned yet, but DO NOT APPEAL! You could inadvertently give up useful legal protection and they will refuse any appeal, because they're just after the cash...  
    • The sign says "Parking conditions apply 24/7". Mind you, that's after a huge wall of text. The whole thing is massively confusing.  Goodness knows what you're meant to do if you spend only a fiver in Iceland or you stay a few minutes over the hour there.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Provident Late Payments Markers =**WON AT FOS**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3164 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Trying to fight the demoralizing Credit Repair battle.

 

 

I have been registered with Equifax for a good year or more as I think that Experia

n is a complete rip-off at £14.99! Forget snail mail method as I'm trying to be pro-active here.

 

problem is Equifax have never reported any issues with Provident

- not even on my Credit File and was totally unaware that they registered with the CRA's

for reasons I wont go into of how credit was handed out "back in the day".

 

my wife told me about Noddle which use Call Credit and

I therefore signed up to the utter disbelief that Provident have been registering Late Payment markers

for the last 6+ bloody years.

 

I have been a member of Experian way back in the past when it wasnt £14.99 p.m

and Provident never appeared on my credit file way back in the day.

 

 

Now having paid Experian and witnessed Providents Late Payment markers from way back

- I have pretty much had the stuffing kicked out of me.

My last adverse credit account is due to be removed in February 2017. Not too far away.

 

Now I am faced with Provident ruining that by constantly recording late payments

which will show on my credit file for another 6 years!

 

Every other "decent" creditor has either defaulted me or closed and passed my account on,

but not, these.

 

 

Instead, they have crippled me for 12+years instead of the stat 6 for bad credit.

 

Sorry for the long post, but imagine my disgust, anger, disbelief

and futile efforts over the past god knows how many years to put my life back on track,

when this sub-prime lot has ruined my hard work.

 

Therefore, I ask, what do I do,

settle the couple of hundred quid and wait another 6 years

or is there any other course I can take to "repair" this?

 

Thanks in advance, apologies for the semi-rant.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to add, on further analysis,

the late payment markers have been reduced from 6 to 4.

 

 

Apparently, if the late payments had reached 8,

 

 

I would have been defaulted and this would also be getting removed in 2 years,

but no, my willingness to try and pay even a token payment has been used as a weapon against me.

 

Any advice that anyone can provide would be greatly appreciated.

 

 

I have not contacted Provident yet, but that will be my next step. Ho hum!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You've now found out that despite everything said in the media, Provident aren't any different to any other bank, it's all just a case of 'give me the money or else', 'oh, your life will be ruined, not my problem'. And Credit Unions are no different, they just us a different method.

 

 

I fear there is nothing you can do to get the markers removed if they have genuinely been put there. You could try a begging letter, but it will probably get you nowhere. If you can afford to pay them off then do it and be shot of them.

 

 

Is there anything you can claim back, any form of insurance of the ppi type ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You've now found out that despite everything said in the media, Provident aren't any different to any other bank, it's all just a case of 'give me the money or else', 'oh, your life will be ruined, not my problem'. And Credit Unions are no different, they just us a different method.

 

 

I fear there is nothing you can do to get the markers removed if they have genuinely been put there. You could try a begging letter, but it will probably get you nowhere. If you can afford to pay them off then do it and be shot of them.

 

 

Is there anything you can claim back, any form of insurance of the ppi type ?

 

No ppi unfortunately. Shame because out of paying on honest affordable amount, have literally disadvantaged myself.

Link to post
Share on other sites

pleading letter yes

 

 

theres no link between 6,8,D or Whatever markers in the calendar

and a listed default in the summary line.

 

 

have you sent provi an sar?

rarely are their agreements legal

 

 

you could get the debt voided and removed

seen it before

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will give the pleading letter a go first, then SAR, CCA. I'm pretty sure I may have already CCA'd them many moons ago, but will go down that route.

 

As you can imagine, a sore blow after many a battle.

 

Have a Merry Xmas everyone - will need to upload my debt journal one day - should make interesting reading. Past experience though dictates that making every effort to make a token payment can be detrimental. head, brick wall, repeat! :frusty:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Just an update.

 

 

Provident have finally responded to my complaint and refused to pro-actively help in any way even after the offer of full settlement.

- Shame on you Provvi if you read this as I am sure you do.

 

this raises an interesting point on Credit Report referencing.

As I have continued to make a token payment by being honest and not telling the Provvi to do one, I am now being punished.

My Credit File would be in a better state if I had simply ignored paying them

- as they would really have to default it.

Therefore, by being the nice guy I am, Provii have taken me, bent over the sofa! Shame on you.

 

I have contacted the CRA's to raise a dispute.

I am also in the process of sending a final request and also a complaint to FoS.

 

It is UNFAIR and UNACCEPTABLE to me that by making an offer of payment,

I am in a worse state had I just simply ignored them.

I am now going to be penalised for 11+ years on my Credit File. I am totally disgusted.

 

Experian have confirmed that even if I settle the account, it will still stay there for 6 years.

This to me is unthinkable.

I am absolutely raging with Provident.

The money is sitting in my account ready to settle, but I am refusing to be held to bloody ransom.

 

I'm away before I rant even more!

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are in the same class as traffic wardens Scotty, they love the power they have over you.

 

 

Probably fits the bill of what Boris Johnson said about some others "“very badly adjusted in their relations with women”, something he said was a symptom of “their feeling of being a failure and that the world is against them”.

 

 

The world is certainly against them and for good reason.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Conniff, they CRAs in my opinion should "police" the information they receive. They are also a bloody joke. If Provvi want to play hard ball for 300 quid they can shove it where the sun dont shine. Why the bloody hell should I suffer when they have "offset" this "loss" against the tax payer already. It absolutely riles me the way the financial industry operates. They wont win, legislation is against them. They may not reaslise this yet, but they will when all of their dirty laundry is hauled out in front of them in my local court. 👍

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

hey well done

 

 

can you outline the basics of what you sent

so later readers can try too?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...