Patricia Pearl - Small Claims Procedure - A Practical Guide


An excellent guide for the layperson in how to use the County Court - a must if you are intending to start a claim.

£19.99 + £1.50 (P&P)




Last Will and Testament Kit


Make a legally valid will without the fuss and expense of a solicitor - includes a full step-by-step guide.

£9.99 + £1.50 (P&P)

BAILIFFS - The Law and Your Rights

Written by John Kruse, one of the leading experts on Bailiff Law, this consumer friendly guide is essential reading for anyone who comes into contact with a bailiff.

The book is easy to understand and clearly explains the rights a bailiff has, and also what they cannot do when collecting debts and repossessing goods etc.

£13.95 + £2.00 (P&P)


Reclaim the Right Ltd. - reg. 05783665 in the UK

reg. office:
923 Finchley Road
London
NW11 7PE



+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    visagephoto Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    11

    Question OFT ruling, Not for businesses

    Spoke to my (BOSicon) bank manager today regarding the excessive charges being inflicted on my account, he reckons the OFT ruling only applies to consumers and as I'm a sole trader with a business account, the ruling doesn't apply & therefore the charges are perfectly legal.

    Similar Threads:

  2. #2
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    dcefx Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    51

    Default Re: OFT ruling, Not for businesses

    Strictly speaking he's correct

    HOWEVER if they charge consumers at the new low consumer rate but continue to charge business's at the higher rate (for providing the exact same service) they would be showing that the business cost included a significant profit element (around 100%) thus further strengthening your case that the bank is profiteering from your breach.

    t


  3. #3
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    thegoodsamaritan Novitiate thegoodsamaritan's Avatar

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Mar 2006
    I am in
    Your local high-street bank
    Posts
    144

    Default Re: OFT ruling, Not for businesses

    agreed

    (Yes I work for a bank but am here to help! Please be nice to me! )

  4. #4
    Site Team alanfromderby has disabled reputation alanfromderby's Avatar

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Mar 2006
    I am in
    ......need of a holiday!
    Posts
    7,269

    Default Re: OFT ruling, Not for businesses

    If we are talking about unauthrised o/d charges, dd failures etc., then these are still unlawful penalties based on contract law. See the templates for business accounts.

    If they are account operation charges - e.g. cheque processing, overdrafticon fee, etc., then these are charges for a service, and are not unlawful. The bank are entitled to charge for these services, and make a profit - this is exactly the same with personal accounts.

    As a business, you must make a commercial decision which bank offers the best deal for you.

    Alan, Derby, UK.



    PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING
    EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS





    Or you may wish to buy one of these great resources:




    Postage £1.50 - Delivery in the UK only.
    Click on the above link to place your order - payment by Paypal.

    _________________________ _______

    Sorry, but I cannot deal with your case by PM - please ask questions in your own thread. If you do not get a reply within 48 hours send a PM, with a link to the relevant thread, to any Site Team Member.

    DO NOT SEND QUESTIONS ABOUT YOUR CLAIM TO ADMIN, or our WEBMASTER - YOU WILL NOT RECEIVE A REPLY.

    Advice given is purely my opinion, and is not based on any legal training.

  5. #5
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    visagephoto Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    11

    Default Re: OFT ruling, Not for businesses

    Yes these are unauthorised o/d, & failed/bounced d/d & cheque charges, totalling £325.00 accumalated over the past 4-5 weeks.


  6. #6
    Site Team alanfromderby has disabled reputation alanfromderby's Avatar

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Mar 2006
    I am in
    ......need of a holiday!
    Posts
    7,269

    Default Re: OFT ruling, Not for businesses

    They are unlawful charges then, and can be reclaimed.

    Alan, Derby, UK.



    PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING
    EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS





    Or you may wish to buy one of these great resources:




    Postage £1.50 - Delivery in the UK only.
    Click on the above link to place your order - payment by Paypal.

    _________________________ _______

    Sorry, but I cannot deal with your case by PM - please ask questions in your own thread. If you do not get a reply within 48 hours send a PM, with a link to the relevant thread, to any Site Team Member.

    DO NOT SEND QUESTIONS ABOUT YOUR CLAIM TO ADMIN, or our WEBMASTER - YOU WILL NOT RECEIVE A REPLY.

    Advice given is purely my opinion, and is not based on any legal training.

  7. #7
    Gold Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    dave Informative dave Informative dave's Avatar

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    4,013

    Default Re: OFT ruling, Not for businesses

    Most of the case law that supports our view is based on Business to Business.

    If you want the cash back, you'll get it.

    They may well close your account though.

    [COLOR=olive][SIZE=1]If you feel that we have helped you, or you would like to help keep this web site running so that others can continue to get their money back, please click the donate button at the top of the forum.
    Advice & opinions of Dave, The Bank Action Group and The Consumer Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.
    Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

    ------------


    Add me as your friend on FaceBook - I need all the friends I can get

    http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=577405151

    ------------

  8. #8
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    visagephoto Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    11

    Default Re: OFT ruling, Not for businesses

    Since starting this thread I've had a few telephone conversations with several members of the BOSicon Business Banking team, both in Glasgow & Motherwell

    I was initialy offerred a refund of my £100 o/d arangement (but no refund charges) which I refused as (a) they are entitled to charge for this service and (b) I reckoned they would then be entitled to demand my overdaft amount be repaid immediatly.

    I then spoke to an advisor? from the Glasgow office who confirmed that the process of dishonouring cheques D/D etc, is outwith bank staff control, as this process is dealt with automatically by the system. It was at this point advised to cancell all automated transactions (s/o's & d/d's) to prevent further charges to my account, however a few have still been applied and then refunded.

    During a second call to the Glasgow office, an advisor confirmed that processing all cheque, d/d & s/o payment and applying charges is automated, in "fact the only manual intervention is when staff have to access the system to refund charges"

    on my third call I requested a meeting which was refused, I was then offered a refund of half of my charges, which I accepted, however this offer was quickly withdrawn because I wouldn't give up the right to request that the remaining half was also returned (as the conversation was becoming somewhat heated it was ended without agreement)

    My final call was from the Business banking section in Motherwell which was in response to a polite letter I sent in requesting that they consider refunding the full £540 penalty charges. This guy told me he was only prepared to discuss a repayment schedule of my debt, The unfair charges issue only applied to personal not business accounts, and "As far as refunding these charges I'm telling you now, that's just not going to happen".

    As this conversation was also becoming rather heated I proposed that all future correspondence regarding this matter should be conducted in writing, he refused to agree to this and insisted that they (BOS) would only be corresponding by phone, as this speeds up the process. I guess I'll be recording all my calls for a while.


  9. #9
    Classic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Make a contribution
    Movingon Authoritative Movingon Authoritative Movingon Authoritative Movingon Authoritative Movingon Authoritative Movingon Authoritative Movingon Authoritative Movingon Authoritative Movingon Authoritative

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    2,715

    Default Re: OFT ruling, Not for businesses

    What I would do, is IMPOSE the condition on them which you stated, and refuse to discuss it with them over the phone. If they phone you up about it, say that for security reasons you're unwilling to discuss your accounts over the telephone and would they please write to you? CLICK burrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

    Then write the standard template letters to them as per the "Business" templates in the templates libraryicon. Set your own timetable and do not be swayed from it.


  10. #10
    Gold Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    andrew1 Authoritative andrew1 Authoritative andrew1 Authoritative andrew1 Authoritative andrew1 Authoritative andrew1 Authoritative andrew1 Authoritative andrew1 Authoritative andrew1 Authoritative andrew1 Authoritative andrew1 Authoritative andrew1's Avatar

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Mar 2006
    I am in
    The power house of the Cabot Fan Club
    Posts
    5,010

    Default Re: OFT ruling, Not for businesses

    I have a Ltd Company account with Co-op - all £800 charges over 2 yrs being returned. It can be done!

    Thank you BF Dave et al - donationicon en route.!



Browsealoud
Video Tour



Reclaim the Right Ltd. - reg.05783665 in the UK reg. office:- 923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE