Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

UK Student Loan Debt being chased by CCI Legal in NZ


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3438 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I hope this is the correct place for this post.

 

I have a UK student loan that I originally started paying back in the UK.

 

We then moved to NZ and as I wasn't working the loan was deferred for the first 12 months.

 

We moved house again (still in NZ) and

 

I wrote and advised the SLC of our new address a couple of times and even had the mail forwarded from our old address.

I never heard from them.

 

I've now received a letter from CCI Legal in NZ chasing the debt.

 

 

My question is this:

are they chasing the repayments on behalf of SLC or have they purchased the debt?

 

Has anyone got any suggestions for dealing with them?

 

Any advise greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Probably chasing repayments, how much us it currently for?

Funny thing is, I doubt they will beable to enforce it over there as its a UK Debt.

When was the loan given to you? Pre 1998 or after 1998?

Is it one of those "Mortgage Style" Loans

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would suspect like 100'000's of others

your debt has been sold to eruido [Arrows DCA]

 

 

pers where you are

I'd be ignoring them.

 

 

I take it CCI legal is some kind of OZ DCA.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

CCI are UK DCA's who say they can go and collect anywhere in the world. Or at least send threatograms.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope this is the correct place for this post. I have a UK student loan that I originally started paying back in the UK. We then moved to NZ and as I wasn't working the loan was deferred for the first 12 months. We moved house again (still in NZ) and I wrote and advised the SLC of our new address a couple of times and even had the mail forwarded from our old address. I never heard from them.

 

I've now received a letter from CCI Legal in NZ chasing the debt. My question is this: are they chasing the repayments on behalf of SLC or have they purchased the debt? Has anyone got any suggestions for dealing with them? Any advise greatly appreciated.

 

Just chasing. But you need to contact SLC to advise them of your position, completing any income/expenses info they required. You may just be able to defer payment for the time being if you cannot make repayments. But atleast you are in contact with them and will know what the score is.

 

If you don't do this, then it is possible for UK debts to be enforced in NZ. They won't just forget about it and write it off, unless the loans were taken out before 1998.

 

Under NZ law the courts there won't consider a foreign debt unless there has been a judgement in a court where the debt was incurred. I believe it is possible to obtain a UK court judgement in your asbsence and then they would transfer it to the high court in Auckland. If you are staying in NZ and not paying the loan back, you would have to think how likely it would be that they would get a UK court judgement and to then transfer to NZ. I am not sure that I have read of such cases happening.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

If erudio own it, then why contact SLC? If SLC own it, then sure, contact them. But if Erudio do, i'd be tempted to just ignore, as they will try and make you sign a deferment which is considerably changed to have an advantage to them.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they gain a UK judgement, theyd have to prove that the OPwas living in the UK, otherwise they could get a set aside.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

we need to know if this is pre or post 1997

 

 

and who CCI states are their client

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they gain a UK judgement, theyd have to prove that the OPwas living in the UK, otherwise they could get a set aside.

 

I believe it is possible to bring a UK court claim against a non resident if the debt was incurred in the UK, even if the claimant knows the debtor is abroad. There are CPR's covering the service of the court claim papers to a foreign address. The claimant would have to make the case that they could only use a UK court to make the claim, as it is not possible to go directly to a court in NZ where the debtor is resident. Presumably there would be more process involved, with the defendant given more time, with the ability to defend by video conference to the court if necessary.

 

But just because it is possible, does not mean it is likely. Would they go to all this hassle ? I doubt it. But it is important to keep creditors aware of your foreign address, so they can't use this against you or try to get a sneeky default CCJ using a last known UK address.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Doesnt SCC state that the defendant must be resident in england or wales in order for the claim to be served? If thats the case, then if the claimant knows the defendant does not reside in those countries, theyre out of luck.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Doesnt SCC state that the defendant must be resident in england or wales in order for the claim to be served? If thats the case, then if the claimant knows the defendant does not reside in those countries, theyre out of luck.

 

If this is the case, then UK residents could move to NZ and never have to pay their debts, as NZ won't deal with foreign debts, unless there is already a judgement in the country where they incurred the debt.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the responses so far. This is an Income Contingent Student Loan taken out in 1998.

 

The letter I received was from a NZ Debt Recovery company (Receivables Management) and they state "We act for CCI Legal Services Ltd on behalf of their client Student Loans Company and have been instructed to collect the above account". The title is Collection Action Commenced.

 

None of their references relate to my Student Loan reference. Is it best to write to them asking them to send copies of the account for the debt owed?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the responses so far. This is an Income Contingent Student Loan taken out in 1998.

 

The letter I received was from a NZ Debt Recovery company (Receivables Management) and they state "We act for CCI Legal Services Ltd on behalf of their client Student Loans Company and have been instructed to collect the above account". The title is Collection Action Commenced.

 

None of their references relate to my Student Loan reference. Is it best to write to them asking them to send copies of the account for the debt owed?

 

If you are not intending to go back to the UK to live, you could ignore. Once you enter into communications, these debt companies will believe they have a chance of gaining payment from you, which they will earn a commission from. I am guessing that they want you to start paying a NZ debt company and they will seek to get you to sign an agreement with them which if you break, they could then use NZ courts.

 

At the moment they are a bit stuck. If they cannot use a NZ court without a UK court judgement and they cannot get a UK judgement in your absence, then they have no current way of enforcing the debt. Hence why I think they could try to fool you into making some agreement with a NZ debt company.

 

I suspect that if you ignore, after a few more letters and phone calls, they will give up. If you get any phone calls asking you to confirm your identity it will probably be them, so never give out personal information to anyone cold calling you.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...