Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Paragraph 18 – you are still talking about Boston stolen items. About time this was fixed??? Paragraph 19  In any event, the claimant's PS5 gaming device was correctly declared and correctly valued. The defendant accepted it for carriage and was even prepared to earn extra money by selling sell insurance in case of its loss or damage. New paragraph 20 – this the defendant routinely sells insurance in respect of "no compensation" items (a secondary contract contrary to section 72 CRA 2015) new paragraph above paragraph 20 – the defendant purports to limit its liability in respect of lost or damaged items. This is contrary to section 57 of the consumer rights act 2015. The defendant offers to extend their liability if their customer purchases an insurance cover for an extra sum of money. This insurance is a secondary contract calculated to exclude or limit their liability for the defendants contractual breaches and is contrary to section 72 of the consumer rights act 2015. New paragraph below paragraph 42 – the defendant merely relies on "standard industry practice" You haven't pointed to the place in your bundle of the Telegraph newspaper extract. You have to jiggle the paragraphs around. Even though I have suggested new paragraph numbers, the order I have suggested is on your existing version 5. You will have to work it out for your next version. Good luck!   Let's see version 6 Separately, would you be kind enough to send me an unredacted to me at our admin email address.
    • UK travellers have been turned away at airports because their passports are not valid for EU travel.View the full article
    • i think theres been MORE than amble evidence of that and am astonished that criminal proceedings haven't begun.
    • Yep, those 'requirements' not met to shareholders satisfaction seem to me to be: 1. Not being allowed to increase customer bills by 40% (of which well over 50% of the new total would NOT be investment) 2. 1 plus regulators not agreeing to letting them do 'things in their own time (ie carry on regardless)
    • As already mentioned freely available "credit scores" are fairly useless. All lenders have their own "credit scoring" system, that for obvious reasons they don't divulge. And they're "scored" differently to the freely available ones. As soon as they could, we've always encouraged our two children to use credit cards responsibly... Pay off in full, etc, to generate good history. It's paid off. At quite young ages, they have both obtained loans for cars, mortgage and their credit card limits are through the roof. Personally, I have shifted debt around a lot on credit cards (even financed a house purchase once at 0% 😉) and I've only ever been refused a credit card once, sorry twice by the same company, over many years. They must have something very different in their lending criteria. You're a tight one, Mr Branson.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Payday Express Problem


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3313 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I sent out a complaint letter to Payday Express Limited on the 30/10/2014.

 

 

The letter about

them unfairly adding on interest and charges.

Them failing to provide me with the proper statutory pre-contractual information before I entered into the loan

– including a clear explanation of the consequences of missing a payment, default and rollover charge.

 

The company not complying with the relevant consumer credit laws and so on. It was a letter a payday loan help guide told me to send to my payday lenders.

 

I will upload a copy of my letter in this post.

 

Now they sent me a letter on the 07/11/2014 saying we are sorry you have had to contact us.

We will ensure your complaint is fully investigated.

And then it asked to provide full details of your concerns by the 14/11/2014

or we'll assume we have all the information for the complaint.

 

Have I given all i needed for the complaint?

also any advice on how to proceed from here will be much obliged.

Edited by Ftgab19

We live in a world where seeing is not believing, where only a few know what really happened.

NatWest Problem *****Refunded*****

Link to post
Share on other sites

pers details and numbers on attachments

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think they are being deliberately obtuse.. they have more than sufficient information within your first letter to enable them to understand what the problem is ! IMHO, they are trying to extend the time frame they have to investigate your complaint.

 

You do not need to respond to their letter - give them 8 weeks from the date they received yours which (in the absence of a signed receipt if you sent by tracked method) would be 2 days after you posted if by first class and 4 days after if you posted by 2nd class mail.

 

Please do keep us informed of the progress of this complaint :)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi citizanB thank you for your reply,

 

That's what I thought, I made sure I got my point across in my first letter to avoid the unnecessary back-and-forth ow well.

 

I sent the letter 1st class recorded delivery, but when I check the status it still says "We have your item" I sent the letter on the 30/10/2014 so if my math is correct they need to respond by 27/12/2014.

 

I will keep you updated on there correspondence.

 

Many Thanks

Andrew

We live in a world where seeing is not believing, where only a few know what really happened.

NatWest Problem *****Refunded*****

Link to post
Share on other sites

hI dx100uk,

 

I've updated the attachments, what steps do you think I should take from this response?

 

Many Thanks

Andrew

 

 

2nd attachment still has ref number

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You will probably need to give them a couple of extra days because of the Bank Holiday - however, I would expect them to invest in some due diligence and respond Before the BH rather than leave it until the new year !

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are right, I didn't factor that into my math. What should the cut-off date be then? and what steps should I take If they send the letter late or not at all.

 

Also I sent the same type of letter to my other payday loan Quick Quid on the same date, but I've not had anything back yet. Should I just wait for a reply?

 

Many Thanks

Andrew

 

You will probably need to give them a couple of extra days because of the Bank Holiday - however, I would expect them to invest in some due diligence and respond Before the BH rather than leave it until the new year !
Edited by Ftgab19

We live in a world where seeing is not believing, where only a few know what really happened.

NatWest Problem *****Refunded*****

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are right, I didn't factor that into my math. What should the cut-off date be then? and what steps should I take If they send the letter late or not at all.

 

Also I sent the same type of letter to my other payday loan Quick Quid on the same date, but I've not had anything back yet. Should I just wait for a reply?

 

Many Thanks

Andrew

 

 

IMHO, they should be addressing this swiftly and not sticking to "Industry Standard" time to reply. However, if you have not received a satisfactory response by say the 1st week of 2015, then I would be escalating my complaint to the Ombudsman.

 

As for QQ - did you send that via Tracked mail as well ? If so, then add two days on to the date of your letter, then count 8 weeks forward from then. Same as above.. if you haven't received a response by at the latest the 1st week of the New year, then escalate.

 

It is good if they provide you with a deadlock letter/or one that doesn't satisfy your requirements.. but it isn't necessary - lack of response after 8 weeks and you can go to the Ombudsman.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for clearing the dates up for me citizenB,

 

I'll keep this post updated with there response, if they don't I'll probably be asking for help with the Ombudsman ha,

 

Once again thank you for your help, you've been very helpful.

 

Andrew

 

IMHO, they should be addressing this swiftly and not sticking to "Industry Standard" time to reply. However, if you have not received a satisfactory response by say the 1st week of 2015, then I would be escalating my complaint to the Ombudsman.

 

As for QQ - did you send that via Tracked mail as well ? If so, then add two days on to the date of your letter, then count 8 weeks forward from then. Same as above.. if you haven't received a response by at the latest the 1st week of the New year, then escalate.

 

It is good if they provide you with a deadlock letter/or one that doesn't satisfy your requirements.. but it isn't necessary - lack of response after 8 weeks and you can go to the Ombudsman.

We live in a world where seeing is not believing, where only a few know what really happened.

NatWest Problem *****Refunded*****

Link to post
Share on other sites

:thumb:

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi citizenb,

 

Just something i want to run by you, I've just been looking at my credit report and when looking at what payday express have put. I've found they've put a few arrangement to pay and a lot of late payments.

 

Now the arrangement to pay are on March, April and May.

 

June, 2 late payments

July, 2 late payments

August, 2 late payments

September, 2 late payments

October, 2 late payments

 

Now i joined a DMC mid May and ended it in Nov, so I'm wondering can I get theses removed. Because they are wrong on the basis that my DMC was paying token payments, well they said they was anyway.

 

I've already sent my DMC a SAR to see how they've been handling my other creditors.

 

Any advice on how to proceed would be much obliged.

 

Thanks

Andrew

We live in a world where seeing is not believing, where only a few know what really happened.

NatWest Problem *****Refunded*****

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry for jumping into your thread but this relates also to Express Finance. I checked my noodle credit file today (having requested a number of months to have my new address linked to it which they have now done). It appears that I had taken a PDL out from them in Dec 2011 for £400 (this is also relected on my bank statement). I did recieive an email to confirm transfer but this was a few days after my request and I had been accepted by this point by another lender. The monies were transfered with advice that £500 would be due on my next payday. I appear to have totally overlooked this loan but am very surprised I have done so. The details of the default are strange stating £470 each month. This would suggest I had paid something toward the debt but I cant find it on my statement. Is it possible they have asked for another company name to be paid (a subsidery)? Also I have had dealings with DCAs in the past but cant find 'westbridge' when looking at my statements. Do they use any others? Obviously I want to clean up my credit file pronto and have not taken any PDL out for 3 months and plan to close all outstanding debt in next 6 months. I want to contact them for clarity but am unsure what to say. Im worried that I have paid them as I cant see I would have overlooked this amount of money and its strange that I have not recieved any letters or followup emails from them since the confirmation of transfer email. Any help would be appriciated. Thanks (in advance).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry for jumping into your thread but this relates also to Express Finance. I checked my noodle credit file today (having requested a number of months to have my new address linked to it which they have now done). It appears that I had taken a PDL out from them in Dec 2011 for £400 (this is also relected on my bank statement). I did recieive an email to confirm transfer but this was a few days after my request and I had been accepted by this point by another lender. The monies were transfered with advice that £500 would be due on my next payday. I appear to have totally overlooked this loan but am very surprised I have done so. The details of the default are strange stating £470 each month. This would suggest I had paid something toward the debt but I cant find it on my statement. Is it possible they have asked for another company name to be paid (a subsidery)? Also I have had dealings with DCAs in the past but cant find 'westbridge' when looking at my statements. Do they use any others? Obviously I want to clean up my credit file pronto and have not taken any PDL out for 3 months and plan to close all outstanding debt in next 6 months. I want to contact them for clarity but am unsure what to say. Im worried that I have paid them as I cant see I would have overlooked this amount of money and its strange that I have not recieved any letters or followup emails from them since the confirmation of transfer email. Any help would be appriciated. Thanks (in advance).

 

 

its best to start a new thread

 

 

of your own

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi all again,

 

Got a letter on the 03/12/2014 from Payday Express saying,

 

In our previous letter we promised to keep you updated on the progress of our investigation. We are writing to advise you that we need more time to complete our investigation. It goes on a bit, I'll upload a copy but it also says we will contact by the 29/12/2014

 

My question is can they do this or are they just messing about?

 

I sent my letter of complaint on the 30/10/2014 and said in the letter to "write-off the interest and charges you have applied to my loan. If you are not prepared to do so please explain why, within the statutory 8-week period, so I can take my complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service."

 

They replied to that letter on the 07/11/2014 saying we are sorry you had to contact us blar blar blar and that we are looking into the issues you have raised and will updated you on the 01/12/2014 witch they did in the above letter asking for more time.

 

What should I do?

 

Thanks

Andrew

 

We live in a world where seeing is not believing, where only a few know what really happened.

NatWest Problem *****Refunded*****

Link to post
Share on other sites

Most lenders will send a generic holding letter after 4 weeks so don't be concerned about receiving this.

However, your right to approach the Financial Ombudsman starts 8 weeks after complaining and this will be unaffected by any alternate dates that they might suggest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andybars, thanks for your reply,

 

 

I will wait until the 8 weeks are up then. I sent my complaint on the 30/10/2014 so they have until the 30/12/2014.

 

 

I'm guessing I'll need to inform them that I will be going to the Financial Ombudsman before doing so?

 

 

Thanks

Andrew

 

 

Most lenders will send a generic holding letter after 4 weeks so don't be concerned about receiving this.

However, your right to approach the Financial Ombudsman starts 8 weeks after complaining and this will be unaffected by any alternate dates that they might suggest.

We live in a world where seeing is not believing, where only a few know what really happened.

NatWest Problem *****Refunded*****

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi all again,

 

I had a letter from Payday Express today, dated 17/12/2014, god they have some great post on there end don't they.

 

 

It was titled "Final Response" I will upload the letter for everyone to read because it's 4 pages long. But it's says you electronically signed your loan agreement where you accepted the terms and conditions and consented to our privacy policy. Now from my memory of it, the loan was done over a website and they also said a lot on the phone. I can't remember signing anything.

 

 

The letter goes on to say that you also provided monthly income and expenditure information. I do not remember doing this and the information they say I provided couldn't be more wrong. It says I had a net pay of £1,800.00 at the time of taking out the loan, this is not true because I was only on about £200 a week cash in hand at the time.

 

 

They also say they did an external credit check, I can't see that they did, because my credit file was really bad at the time with loads of miss-payments for Littlewoods.

 

In the last page there is a gesture of goodwill, they say "with no admission of liability Payday Express is willing to waive any charges and interest applied in full final settlement of your complaint. This would reduce your outstanding balance from £659.16 to £496.00. To accept this offer please contact us within 14 days so that we can update your account.

 

They also sent me:

 

Credit Agreement regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974

Terms and Conditions of the agreement

Pre-contract credit information

 

I can't remember them sending any of this when taking out the loan, what should I do from here? because I believe a lot of what they have said it bulls**t.

 

Any advice on how to proceed from here will be much obliged.

 

Thanks

Andrew

We live in a world where seeing is not believing, where only a few know what really happened.

NatWest Problem *****Refunded*****

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry you were missed. After reading, I can see both sides of the coin perse.

Dont tell payday express you are going to the ombudsman.

 

Just contact them with the final response. Number is on FOS website.

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok thanks,

 

I contacted them early today, they said they will be sending out a complaint form and letters so I can sent my paperwork back.

 

Will keep this post updated with any news.

 

Andrew

We live in a world where seeing is not believing, where only a few know what really happened.

NatWest Problem *****Refunded*****

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi all again,

 

Got a letter of the FOS today about my case. They have managed to side with payday express and said I need to pay what payday express offered me in there last letter. Which was £496.00.

 

Now I'm on benefits, so how would I sent up a repayment plan?

 

 

Thanks

Andrew

We live in a world where seeing is not believing, where only a few know what really happened.

NatWest Problem *****Refunded*****

Link to post
Share on other sites

I also got a email from Payday Express at 9:30pm.

 

Email:

We are writing to inform you that Express Finance (Bromley) Ltd. (trading as "Payday Express") has transferred all of its business to another company within our group, Instant Cash Loans Limited, with effect from 28th February 2015. Instant Cash Loans Limited is a company registered in England with Registration Number 02685515; with its registered office is at 6 Bevis Marks, London EC3A 7BA and it is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.

 

As part of this business transfer, your Loan has also been transferred with effect from that date. The transfer of your loan is known in legal terms as an assignment. The terms of your Loan have not changed and, for the avoidance of doubt, you will not be charged any fee as a result of this transfer.

 

For further information, please feel free to contact us by telephone on 0800652466 or email us at [email protected]

 

Many thanks for using Payday Express

 

Yours sincerely,

 

Not sure what to make of this.

 

Andrew

We live in a world where seeing is not believing, where only a few know what really happened.

NatWest Problem *****Refunded*****

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...