Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

How can I obtain my account details for a 20+ year old loan/PPI claim?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3374 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My brother has suggested that I may have a PPI claim from the 1990's

even though the bank already refunded the premium,

on the grounds that I was refused a claim on it.

 

 

When I tried to claim I was told I wasn't covered due to NOT being in full time permanent employment when I took out the policy.

 

 

I was in fact in full time employment but the underwriters misconstrued my letter of appointment.

 

 

There was a paragraph which read

"after a trial period of 6 months your wage will increase to xxx".

 

 

I always maintained that only the pay level was subject to the trial period and not the employment itself, but they refused to pay me.

 

 

I was redundant for a period of 13 months and could not pay the loan.

 

 

The bank obtained a CCJ and I was instructed to pay £15 per month.

 

 

Eventually I actually paid it off at a rate of £200 a month as I wanted it gone.

The bank refunded the PPI premium directly to the debt.

 

i have never considered I could make a PPI claim because they repaid the premium

but my brother says it was their fault I suffered hardship because I thought I was covered due to the bank accepting me for the insurance.

 

 

I still remember the snotty woman on the phone refusing my claim (think it was London & Edinburgh insurance co)

and when I said I would take them to court if they didn't pay she simply said "I'll look forward to it"!

 

Any advice as to how I could possibly find out the details of my account after all this time would be welcome

and if at all I have any chance to claim anything back?

Thank you.

Redletter

 

 

'I believe the struggle for financial freedom is unfair - I believe the only ones who disagree are millionaires!'

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh and would the moderators please put this in the PPI forum/correct place? Apologies I haven't been on here for a while and I'm just getting to grips with navigation once again.

Redletter

 

 

'I believe the struggle for financial freedom is unfair - I believe the only ones who disagree are millionaires!'

Link to post
Share on other sites

you could try sending the original creditors an SAr to get all the details.

 

 

from that you might be able to determine what might ne owed you.

 

 

theres no time limit on PPI reclaiming.

 

 

however, if the PPI premiums were repaid/removed

then unless they failed to pay your the interest the PPI had caused

there might not be much to get back?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the reply. Is it not the case (as I was led to believe through hearsay) that they only have to provide/keep records of the last 6 years?

If not then yes I did wonder about the SAR. Thank you.

Redletter

 

 

'I believe the struggle for financial freedom is unfair - I believe the only ones who disagree are millionaires!'

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the reply. Is it not the case (as I was led to believe through hearsay) that they only have to provide/keep records of the last 6 years?

If not then yes I did wonder about the SAR. Thank you.

 

Yes, they can hide behind this. But it may be the best £10 you ever spend.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
My RBS SAR produced information as far back as 1998. Good luck.

 

Thank you. I have been busy so have only just been able to review this.

Redletter

 

 

'I believe the struggle for financial freedom is unfair - I believe the only ones who disagree are millionaires!'

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...