Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
    • The streaming giant also said it added 9.3 million subscribers in the first three months of the year.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Motor Trader Issues on vehicle functions. Small Court Claim now issued ** Full Refund Given **


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3178 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

Sorry about the title first of all as did not know how to categorise the issue.

 

I bought a vehicle yesterday (18.10.2014) from a dealer / trader around 135miles away from myself, the vehicle is bought for the better half (the wife) and was located on ebay at a fixed price / classified ad.

 

I called the dealer / trader up around a week before and was advised the vehicle is all fine and no issues with it with a full service history and MOT records. I wanted the vehicle for the wife as it was top spec and an upgrade

 

I was advised I need to leave a holding deposit on the vehicle which would be refunded on seeing the vehicle and it is not as described.

 

I left a debit card deposit over the telephone and went yesterday to collect the vehicle, I was met by the trader and I went round the vehicle. I was advised at this point the vehicle hunts slightly when driving but found the AIR MASS METER unplugged.

 

Paperwork suggested this had been changed and once plugged back in the vehicle ran fine and no hunting.

 

The vehicle is fitted with a Sat Nav system which I have no operational skills of but the wife has one the same in her previous vehicle, I was advised by the dealer / trader the disks are missing for the system but it all works and disks can be purchased on ebay.

 

So the vehicle was bought, taxed using the wifes insurance that she had prearranged and I drove the 135ish miles back home without any problems.

 

The wife looked at the car and was happy untill she tried the button for the sat nav to open it as her old disks would work, upon attempting to open the system (pressing button) the screens gets stuck and switches off making a sound through the speakers.

 

 

After some internet research we believe the unit has packed up and as someone has tried to force it closed at some point.

 

I have contacted the dealer / trader regarding this but their response was "We don't try the functions on the car, the main thing is the unit is present". I have advised the dealer / trader that I would have expected them to test the functions especially when someone is parting with £5,500 for a vehicle.

 

The sat nav unit to buy second hand is around £450 - £500 and repairs are unheard of at the time being.

 

I was wondering if anybody would be able to help with where I stand with the above?

 

Many thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 89
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi poor-boy

 

If he said the 'disks are missing for the system but it all works (to make that statement, they must of checked it) and disks can be purchased on ebay', well clearly that isn't the case.

 

Then to state the following ' We don't try the functions on the car, the main thing is the unit is present', clearly one statement contradicts the other.

 

What does the Ebay listing state regarding the SatNav?

If it does mention it, take a 'screenshot'.

 

Here is the guide for second hand dealers, please read it, it covers misleading statements inorder to sell a car:-

 

http://www.norfolk.gov.uk/view/NCC094699

Link to post
Share on other sites

rebel11

 

I thank you for the reply, the advert states "Sat Nav" and I have the screen shots of the advert.

 

I was advised the system all works and the only fault stated at the dealers address was the hunting when the revs are between 1400 and 2000, the hunting was rectified by plugging the Air Mass back in.

 

Thanks for the link also and will have a read through it.

Edited by poor-boy
More info
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just copied the text and will work on how to make the advert bigger.

 

** SPORT MODEL WITH MONSTER SPEC!! **, FULL COMPREHENSIVE SERVICE HISTORY WITH SEVERAL STAMPS IN THE RECORD BOOK - MEANING IT HAS BEEN MENTAINED TO ITS VERY BEST! + A GENUINE WELL LOOKED AFTERED EXAMPLE + ULTRA RARE FANTASTIC SPEC, WITH £1000'S SPENT ON EXTRAS WHEN PURCHASED NEW + FULL LEATHER SPORTS INTERIOR FINISHED IN BLACK + FACTORY SATNAV SYSTEM + REAR PARKING SENSORS + HEATED SEATS PERFECT FOR WINTER + MULTIFUNCTIONAL STEERING WHEEL WITH CRUISE CONTROL FUNCTION + AIR CONDITIONING DIGITAL DUAL CLIMATE CONTROL ALONG WITH HEATED SEATS + REMOTE CENTRAL LOCKING + FULL ELECTRICS PACK INC ELECTRIC WINDOWS + CD PLAYER + THIS CAR DRIVES FAULTLESSLY, LOOKS AMAZING AND NOTHING THAT DETRACTS THE OVERALL EXCELLENT CONDITION OF THIS VEHICLE + A VERY SMOOTH TIGHT DRIVE PROVIDING AMAZING MPG! + LOOKS STUNNING,Name of company removed- TRADING FOR 25+ YEARS - QUALITY USED CAR CENTRE - DELIVERY/FINANCE ALSO AVAILABLE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks rebel11, I am currently reading the link you have posted (many thanks for that).

 

I will be sending them an email regarding the matter and also a copy of the email by recorded letter.

 

I will update this thread as I go along and would it be better to contact the Trading Standards in the area of purchase or leave it for the time being?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi poor-boy

 

http://www.which.co.uk/consumer-rights/problem/the-second-hand--car-i-bought-has-a-problem-what-are-my-rights

 

 

Thanks rebel11, I am currently reading the link you have posted (many thanks for that).

 

I will be sending them an email regarding the matter and also a copy of the email by recorded letter.

 

I will update this thread as I go along and would it be better to contact the Trading Standards in the area of purchase or leave it for the time being?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Below is a letter I have written to the company, is it any good and does it make any sense?

 

I purchased a vehicle from your selves on 18th October 2014, the vehicle was stated as fit for purpose and all functions listed in the classified advert on eBay (item number: XXXXXXXXX) including Factory Sat Nav.

 

The functions listed in the advert would have been tested by you to satisfy the sales of goods act 1979 being a motor trader.

 

I am informing yourselves the Factory Sat Navigation system is faulty and does not work as it should and no mention of this in the advert, after a telephone call to your selves it was stated by you (Ali) that you do not test the functions of the vehicle but merely just sell them.

 

The Sale of Goods Act 1979 makes it an implied term of the contract that goods be as described, of satisfactory quality and fit for purpose. As you are in breach of contract I am entitled to have the Sat Nav System repaired or replaced and I would request that you confirm that you will do this within the next seven days.

I also require you to confirm whether you will arrange for the Sat Nav system to be collected (will require removal from the vehicle) or will reimburse me for the cost of returning it.

I look forward to receiving your satisfactory proposals for settlement of my claim within seven days of the date of this letter.

 

I look forward to receiving your satisfactory proposals for settlement of my claim within seven days of the date of this letter.

 

Yours faithfully

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi poor_boy

 

The XXXXXXXXX = name of dealership.

The OOOOOOOO = car model.

 

On 18th October 2014 I purchased OOOOOOOO, the vehicle was stated as fit for purpose and all items listed in the classified Ebay ad (item number: XXXXXXXXX) were deemed to be fully functional, including the 'Factory Sat Nav'.

 

As a dealer the items listed in the Ebay ad would have been tested by XXXXXXXXX to satisfy the Sales of Goods Act 1979.

 

I am informing XXXXXXXX that the Factory Sat Navigation system is faulty and does not work and this in not stated in the ad. After a telephone calllink3.gif to XXXXXXX it was stated by you (Ali) that you do not test individual items in the vehicle, but merely sell them on.

 

The Sale of Goods Act 1979 makes it an implied term of the contract that goods be 'as described, of satisfactory quality and fit for purpose'. As you are in breach of contract I am entitled to have the Sat Nav System repaired or replaced and I would request that you confirm that you will do this within the next seven days.

 

I also require you to confirm whether you will arrange for the Sat Nav system to be collected (will require removal from the vehicle) or will reimburse me for the cost of returning it.

 

I look forward to receiving your satisfactory proposals for settlement of my claim within seven days of the date of this letter.

 

 

Yours sincerely

Link to post
Share on other sites

Below is the reply from the trader, the reply is incorrect.

 

I like to start of by telling you that you were given the opportunity to fully inspect the vehicle and test drive at your pleasure.you were aware that the sat nav was not functional as it was apparent at the time of purchace.it showed on the system that the sat nav medium was not available therefore it would not work and also the screen tilt position was jamming too.upon your observations and comments you proceeded with the purchace.we cannot stress the importance of such items intensity as they were sold as seen and not tested and you were made aware of this.furthermore the vehicle was of satisfactory roadworthy quality as it had just undergone a 12 months mot by an independependent garage.in the circumstances we are not able to facilitate your claim .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Contact you card provider, explain what's happened, send them the following amended template. Send the trader's response's, a copy of the ad etc. Send it Recorded Delivery. The ad makes no mention of the Sat Nav not working.

 

'MEANING IT HAS BEEN MENTAINED TO ITS VERY BEST! '

 

The card provider will contact the dealer for their side.

 

http://www.which.co.uk/consumer-rights/action/letter-to-make-a-chargeback-claim-

 

http://www.which.co.uk/consumer-rights/problem/how-do-i-use-chargeback

 

Visa Debit Card
Link to post
Share on other sites

I just called my bank for the address to write a letter to the correct department.

 

They just tried to fob me off after I explained my reason to them, I have then spoken to a supervisor whom also tried to fob me off but I read my rights to him and he then provided a reference number.

 

Do I let the trader / dealer know what is going to happen next or leave it to the bank?

 

Keep you posted..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Leave it to the bank, but follow up with the amended template with the evidence, i.e. the responses from the trader, the ad etc. Put the reference number the bank gave you on the amended template. Send it Recorded Delivery.

 

I just called my bank for the address to write a letter to the correct department.

 

They just tried to fob me off after I explained my reason to them, I have then spoken to a supervisor whom also tried to fob me off but I read my rights to him and he then provided a reference number.

 

Do I let the trader / dealer know what is going to happen next or leave it to the bank?

 

Keep you posted..

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have read the document sent by rebel11 regarding SoGA and what an interesting read.

 

I have filed the complaint with my bank after a right nightmare supervisor in the contact centre trying to fob me off.

 

Just waiting for the statement now off the person whom attended with me and also a price to replace the unit from Audi. the bank have asked for them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right gents and ladies, A little update -

 

I have today spoken to the better half (Wife) and we are going to reject the car, the reasons for this are -

 

*The vehicle was advertised with no faults listed.

*The vehicle was advertised as a 170BHP but is only a 103KW (140BHP).

*The Sat Nav system is broken and the seller stated it only required disks.

*The clutch bite point is at its maximum and after research it would require replacing including dual mass flywheel.

*Advertised as 132,000 miles, invoiced at 135,000 miles but the milometer read 135,317 miles

*The vehicle jerks very badly in 1st, 2nd and 3rd gear causing whiplash effects to driver and passengers.

*The tandem pump (vacuum / fuel pump) is dumping diesel into the engine oil (not major amounts, just leaking but have been advised this will knacker the turbo)

 

Just to replace the sat nav, clutch inc flywheel and tandem pump is going to cost just over £4,000 supplied only, now we know from previous correspondence with the trader / dealer they will refuse to accept this.

 

 

Whom should I contact next or still leave it with the bank as they are dealing with it currently?

 

We are not in a position to purchase another vehicle for the wife at the moment.

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...