Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
    • In anticipation of lodging my court claim next Weds 1 May (14 days after advising P2G that was my deadline for them to settle my claim) I have completed my first draft POC as below: Claim Claim number: xxxxx Reference: P2G MAY 2024   Claimant xxxxx   Defendant Parcel2Go 1A Parklands Lostock Bolton BL6 4SD  Particulars of Claim The defendant has failed to arrange for the safe delivery of the claimant's parcel containing a 8 secondhand golf clubs (valued at £265) that was sent to a UK address using their delivery service (P2G Reference xxxxx). The defendant contracted Evri to deliver the parcel (Evri Reference xxxxx) and refuses to reimburse the claimant on the grounds that the claimant did not purchase their secondary insurance contract. The defendant seeks to exclude their liability in breach of section 57 Consumer Rights Act. The secondary insurance contract is in breach of section 72. The claimant seeks reimbursement of £265, plus P2G fees of £9.10, plus postage costs for two first class letters to P2G of £2.70, plus court fees, plus interest. The claimant claims interest under section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year from xxxxx to xxxxxx on £276.80 and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate of £xxxx   Details of claim Amount claimed £276.80 I look forward to your thoughts and comments guys! As ever, many thanks - G59    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Bought a car from a dealer with a few faults....


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3470 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

It's a 2002 Passat estate with nearly 190,000 miles. Yep, worthless in theory. But I paid a couple of grand. And a couple of grand is a couple of grand.

I went to view it, and to be fair it has loads of receipts, it's been cared for, new brakes, 4 new good tyres, new timing belt, recently serviced by previous owner.

Went on a test drive with dealer (well he drove it as he didn't let people test drive) and he said it was spot on. Which is was in all fairness. No nasty bangs or anything.

We even tried the aircon and it seemed cool enough so I drove away happy, I admit.

 

However a couple of days later, I noticed the car didn't reach operating temperature. I was a bit peed off but thought if that's all I have to worry about it wouldn't be too bad. £224 later it was fixed.

I also noticed that in fact the aircon didn't work- now this peed me off quite a bit. It felt ok on the cold day we test drove it but clearly it was just the blower.

 

I've now found out that the window demister doesn't work either, which now is getting annoying. I'm no mechanic and need to pay a mechanic for every fault and by the time I've fixed these issues I would have been better off buying something much nicer.

 

I accept it's a very old car but with having to spend hundreds of pounds to fix it it now feels like a very expensive banger... I just don't really know where to go with this....

Help!?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why didn't it reach operating temp? What was the fault?

 

You said yourself that you agreed the air on worked when you bought it sp thats a non issue there. Even if it was a cold day, you tested it and said it worked.

 

I assume demister for rear window? Have you spoken to seller to rectify?

 

Have you spoken to seller about any of the faults?

 

If you just went ahead and repaired then I would suggest you are out of luck. You should have given the seller an opportunity to put it right.

 

When you say dealer, do you mean dealer or just a seller of one car? Ebay auction seller etc or a car garage?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The thermostat and the coolant sensor was at fault.

 

I never thankfully said the A/C worked. The exact words exchanged was:

 

Me: Does the A/C work?

Dealer: That I'm not sure.

Me: Well I'm not sure, it does feel cold

Dealer: Yes, I think so.

 

But neither of us were sure, that is for sure!

 

Demister is front window- which is not ideal in this wheather...

 

He would never have put this right though, his argument was then that it was an old car- which I agree with but it doesn't mean it should cost me 100s to fix within 3 weeks!

 

I have spoken to him- he just kept telling me everything was fine, not to worry and has since not answered my 3 calls. The seller is someone selling cars from a unit, he does so regularly and I assume in the eyes of the law this makes him a dealer? He is selling 5 cars at this moment in time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

£2k for a 2002 passat with 190000 miles on the clock is way out of the price range, and I am a passat owner and enthusiast, even if it is the 3 litre V6 version with full leather interior.

On your b5.5 there's no heated windscreen, so I guess that the de-mister you are talking about is the vent on the dashboard, correct?

To be honest, the thermostat and the coolant sensor faults are common and can be usually reset with the dedicated software (vag-com), owned by many mechanics.

A 10 minutes job and most do it for £20 max.

As suggested your options are limited because you had the car fixed without consulting the dealer.

I suggest that you look at the dedicated passat forums (uk and usa both excellent, just do an internet search) for advice, especially on water ingress, a silent killer for b5 and b5.5.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No both were at fault with regards to engine temperature. That + labour cost me over £200.

 

The point is it's not about the price. But ok let me explain.

 

If you buy an average passat for £500-£1000 (and I did see a few).

 

Few will have any service history, even fewer will have stacks of receipts showing every regular, on time oil change since new

 

Most will have bald tyres, or mismatched

 

Most will need a cam belt (as most haven't been done for years, or they haven't got a receipt to prove it's been done)

 

Very few would have new brakes all round.

 

Factor all of these to do on a cheap passat and it starts to make more sense, especially for someone without the know how to do it himself.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then if you don't have the know how, why did you not get a qualified person to look over the car? I know 20\20 hindsight and all that but its a lot to spend on what turned out to be a basic Passat in fair condition.

 

As said, temp sensor is an easy fix and should not of cost 200+ unless you went main dealer.

 

Front window as states is just demisted by vent so that's either you are not waiting long enough or vent not blowing.

 

Dealer stated that he wasn't sure the air on worked and you still bought it.

 

All in all, I would say very little/nothing you can do. Chalk it up to experience.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well my reasons remain valid. Factor in all the job and money spent on it recently and it seemed a good deal.

 

Re demister- I waited long enough to know it's simply not working.

 

The car on the advert was described as:

 

If your looking for a nice VW Passat you have found it!

Factory Sat navigation system. Alloys. Air conditioning. Climate control. Heated seats. PAS, Electric windows. Remote locking-2 keys. Maintained regardless of cost. 189,000 miles with full up to date service history- mostly from VW main dealer. Serviced 1000 miles ago. Thick pile of receipts showing recent Timing belt & water pump. New premium tyres(all 4). New brake discs and pads. 12 Months MOT, taxed until November. Fully valeted. Drives like new. This car is in exceptional condition and must not be confused with tatty abused wrecks offered elsewhere, its a real credit to its previous owner.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Frankly, any car with 190000 miles on the clock is destined for the grave in the very near future, regardless of service.

Unless a complete and expensive refurbishment is done.

Considering the age and miles, those faults are very minor.

The front vent could be blocked from the intake if the cabin filter has not been changed for a long time.

To check, just lift the bonnet, remove the cover closest to the windscreen and you'll find another cover on the passenger side held by a long screw.

It's a bit fiddly to remove, but don't force it, just juggle it out gently.

Underneath you'll find the cabin filter.

Remove it and vacuum any debris and leaves out of the air intake.

Replace cabin filter with a new one (around £6-7) and all covers.

Check if vents are working, if not you will need a further investigation.

For the sir con you will need to visit a specialist.

Good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I have been offered £130 by the dealer to fix the issues which clearly isn't good enough. I'm just wanting him to fix said issues- but afraid that if I say I don't want his £130 that he will not offer anything at all. What should I do?

Consumer direct says that he is a professional and will have known that these problems existed when sold so he should fix them.

However, being fair, I do understand the car is old and will have some faults. But not immediately and as costly to fix!

Link to post
Share on other sites

190000 miles car.

Even the Germans can't build something that lasts that long without developing any faults.

On this one unfortunately I have to disagree with other caggers.

The op was ripped off in the first place by paying £2000 for a car that, even in mint conditions, is only worth scrap money on the road.

I explain: If a careless driver reverses into this car's door, the insurance will write the car off and offer a max of £500.

If the turbo goes (and very soon should with that mileage), any decent garage would advise against replacing it because the whole engine has had it's at the end of its life.

Now, to claim that these minor problems are not to be expected is absurd imo

Link to post
Share on other sites

190000 miles car.

Even the Germans can't build something that lasts that long without developing any faults.

On this one unfortunately I have to disagree with other caggers.

The op was ripped off in the first place by paying £2000 for a car that, even in mint conditions, is only worth scrap money on the road.

I explain: If a careless driver reverses into this car's door, the insurance will write the car off and offer a max of £500.

If the turbo goes (and very soon should with that mileage), any decent garage would advise against replacing it because the whole engine has had it's at the end of its life.

Now, to claim that these minor problems are not to be expected is absurd imo

 

Genuine rubbish. Yes, it has high miles. But there are plenty of TDI's of this vintage (VW passats & A4's) with 200k miles+ on eBay at the moment. Most are £1,500+. Why? because the engine itself is good for very very high miles IF taken care of. The turbo, if it does go, can be refurbished for about £300.

I will see, out of interest, how long this car can go ignoring A/C issues and the likes. If the engine itself works for a long while I'll be happy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem is not the engine itself (cilinders and pistons) but everything else attached to it.

To name a few: Intake manifold, exhaust manifold, valves, cambelt, tensioners, water pump, steering system, coolant system, abs module, all the sensors, suspensions, exhaust, cat converter, brake calipers, ecu system, all electrical wiring and sensors, cv joints and boots, rear bearings, water ingress, etc etc.

The pistons will still go up and down and combust fuel, but the car would not be reliable and won't pass an mot making it worthless.

I know there are many passats for sale at crazy prizes, but it's good practice to look for a car with as less miles as possible for the budget, accompanied by prove of maintenance.

I looked for a passat for over a month and didn't even consider any with more than 120k miles.

I eventually found mine £1300 full service all with receipts and cc slips.

The crazy bloke who had it from new never peeled off the plastic from the doors upholstery.

Sorry fella, but I look at passats and a6 every day because they're great, but 190k miles doesn't match the price you paid.

I can see on autotrader now that there are lots of b5.5 with less than 100k miles for max £1500.

After all we're talking about a 12/14 year old car.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How frustrating! I’d typed a long reply and my internet gave up! 
Well to sum up I don’t think it’s necessarily about miles at all. I’d argue my 12 year old 190k could be fresher than a 12 year old 120k car. It’s evidently spent the majority of its life on the motorway, and motorway miles are kind to the clutch, gearbox and other oily bits. In fact if the car is still ‘alive’ at those miles I’d say its very encouraging.

Most people are telling me that the faults I have a very minor and happen to much younger cars. Which to be fair doesn’t help me right now fixing them but is seemingly true.

My car has had a new cam belt, new brakes and tyres all round in the last year. Every record of oil changes since new, on time every time. Which to me made it worth paying the premium. So yes, I took a bit of a gamble. Most 10+ year old cars are. As long as the engine goes for a couple of years or more without any major issue I’ll be happy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...