Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi welcome to the Forum.  If a PCN is sent out late ie after the 12th day of the alleged offence, the charge cannot then be transferred from the driver to the keeper.T he PCN is deemed to have arrived two days after dispatch so in your case, unless you can prove that Nexus sent the PCN several days after they claim you have very little chance of winning that argument. All is not lost since the majority of PCNs sent out are very poorly worded so that yet again the keeper is not liable to pay the charge, only the driver is now liable. If you post up the PCN, front and back we will be able to confirm whether it is compliant or not. Even if it is ok, there are lots of other reasons why it is not necessary to pay those rogues. 
    • Hi 1 Date of the infringement  arr 28/03/24 21:00, dep 29/03/24 01.27 2 Date on the NTK  08/04/2024 (Date of Issue) 3 Date received Monday 15/04/24 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012?  Yes 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No  7 Who is the parking company? GroupNexus 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Petrol Station Roadchef Tibshelf South DE55 5T 'operating in accordance with the BPA's Code of Practice' I received a Parking Charge letter to keeper on Monday 15/04/24, the 17th day after the alleged incident. My understanding is that this is outside the window for notifying. The issue date was 08/04/2024 which should have been in good time for it to have arrived within the notice period but in fact it actually arrived at lunchtime on the 15th. Do I have to prove when it arrived  (and if so how can I do that?) or is the onus on them to prove it was delivered in time? All I can find is that delivery is assumed to be on the second working day after issue which would have been Weds 10//04/24 but it was actually delivered 5 days later than that (thank you Royal Mail!). My husband was present when it arrived - is a family member witness considered sufficient proof?
    • lookinforinfo - many thanks for your reply. It would be very interesting to get the letter of discontinuance. The court receptionist said that the county court was in Gloucester 'today' so that makes me think that some days it is in Gloucester and some days its in Cheltenham, it was maybe changed by the courts and i was never informed, who knows if DCBL were or not. My costs were a gallon of petrol and £3.40 for parking. I certainly don't want to end up in court again that's for sure but never say never lol. Its utterly disgusting the way these crooks can legally treat motorists but that's the uk for you. I'm originally from Scotland so it's good that they are not enforceable there but they certainly still try to get money out of you. I have to admit i have lost count of the pcn's i have received in the last 2 yr and 4 months since coming to England for work, most of them stop bothering you on their own eventually, it was just this one that they took it all the way. Like i mentioned in my WS the the likes of Aldi and other companies can get them cancelled but Mcdonalds refused to help me despite me being a very good customer.   brassednecked - many thanks   honeybee - many thanks   nicky boy - many thanks    
    • Huh? This is nothing about paying just for what I use - I currently prefer the averaged monthly payment - else i wouldn't be in credit month after month - which I am comfortable with - else I wold simply request a part refund - which I  would have done if they hadn't reduced my monthly dd after the complaint I raised (handled slowly and rather badly) highlighted the errors in their systems (one of which they do seem to have fixed) Are you not aware DD is always potentially variable? ah well, look it up - but my deal is a supposed to average the payments over a year, and i dont expect them to change payments (up or down) without my informed agreement ESPECIALLY when I'm in credit over winter.   You are happy with your smart meter - jolly for you I dont want one, dont have to have one  - so wont   I have a box that tells me my electricity usage - was free donkeys years ago and shows me everything I need to know just like a smart meter but doesnt need a smart meter,  and i can manually set my charges - so as a side effect - would show me if the charges from the supplier were mismatched. Doesn't tell me if the meters actually calibrated correctly - but neither does your smart meter. That all relies on a label and the competence of the testers - and the competence of any remote fiddling with the settings. You seem happy with that - thats fine. I'm not.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Arrow Global/Shoosmith summary cause summons - Old Santander Credit Card dEbt - Edinburgh **Absolvitor with expenses**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3220 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I've just received a summary cause summons from Arrow for the sum of £4324.32 for a credit card debt I owe.

 

This debt is not SB and won't be for a while. The summons is legit and I have to answer it.

 

My question is this:

If I took PPI out with the credit card, can I make a counterclaim,

stating that the amount the pursuer is claiming is incorrect because of owed PPI and interest?

If I did, any opinions/advice on how this might go?

 

Or should I just bite the bullet and make an application for a pay over time?

 

Thanks for any advice about this. I'm considering going for a midnight swim in the Atlantic.

Link to post
Share on other sites

certainly in E&W you cant use the PPI no

so prob not so in Scotland either

 

 

tell us about the debt please

 

 

were you resident in Scotland when you took this out?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks dx.

 

Debt is from a Santander credit card I took out in 2008.

 

Payments were on time and up to date until I separated from my wife.

 

With my income halved, and other debts, I could not afford the minimum payment.

 

I wrote to Santander and explained asking for help, but they weren't interested.

 

I defaulted 20/08/11 and only recently (a few months ago) started getting letters from Arrow telling me to pay them the debt or else.

 

Well, or else is now upon me :( Court return date for my reply is Nov 14th.

 

I can follow the procedure on the guidance notes in the summons, but I'm scared what will happen to me.

 

I am just barely keeping my head above water just now and working all the hours I can.

 

I'm not looking for sympathy, it's my own damned fault.

 

there it is.

 

It's not Y&K on this one, it's Shoosmiths LLP from Saltire Court in Edinburgh that are acting for Arrow.

 

oh also, I'm pretty sure that a large chunk of the £4323 is charges for defaulting etc

Link to post
Share on other sites

if arrows have issued the claim

 

 

the satans bank must have sold it on

 

 

yes PPI/PENALTY charge swill be the reason for that I'm sure

but those I believe are of no use toward the claim.

 

 

can you check you credit file please

I bet arrows are shown as the owner

 

 

did you get notice of assignment from them recently?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

checked credit file with noddle yesterday - Arrow Global Ltd are the owners. I did get a letter of assignment from them a while back, but to be honest, I just ignored it.

 

I hate this idea that people can buy a debt for 1/10th it's value and pursue the full amount. Why didn't Santander offer ME the loan for a settlement of 1/10th? i would have begged, borrowed or stolen to get £432 to pay it off.

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re: You have received a Claim - **ISSUED IN SCOTLAND** - What you need to do.

 

 

What is the claim for – 

 

1. The parties are designed in this instance. The named defender resides at (address redacted). The defender has been so resident for more than 3 months immediately preceding the raising of this action. The defender is domiciled there. This court accordingly has jurisdiction. There are no proceedings pending before any other Court involving the present cause of action and between the parties hereto. No agreement exists prorogating jurisdiction to another Court.

 

2. The pursuers are a finance company which inter alia operates the business of debt purchasing. By virtue of a debt purchase agreement between the pursuers and Santander UK plc dated May 2013, the pursuer acquired the right to payment in respect of all debts and other monetary claims of any nature due or owing by the defenders to Santander UK plc which were in existence as at the date the said Agreement was entered into in relation to the contract hereinafter condescended upon. The said assignation was intimated to the defender by way of a written notice on or around the date of assignation.

 

3. The said contract between Santander UK plc and the defender is a regulated credit agreement in terms of Section 189 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. It is dated 4 February 2008, and relates to a credit card agreement with account number (number redacted). The said account is in default and the sum due thereunder is due and payable now. As the date hereof, the sum due in terms of the said agreement amounts to £4,324.32 conform to copy statement of account which will be produced in any defended process to follow hereon. In terms of the debt purchase agreement hereinbefore condescended upon, the right to receive payment of the sum in terms of the said statement of account.

 

4. The defender has been called upon to make payment of the sums sued for. They refuse or at least delay in doing so. This action is accordingly necessary.

 

What type of action? (Small/Summary/Ordinary)

It is a summary cause summons

 

Is the claim for a current or credit/loan account or mobile phone account?

It is for a credit card (not loan)

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007?

Feb 2008

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim.

account has been assigned to Arrow Global Ltd and it is Shoosmiths lawyers on behalf of arrow who have issued the claim.

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment?

Yes. I received one, and then approx 5 months later I received another one saying that the date of assignment the first informed me of was incorrect and gave me a new date of assignment.

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor?

Yes

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ?

No

 

Why did you cease payments:-

personal circumstances changed (divorce, job redeployment to a lower paid job, fuel cost increased) and made it impossible to meet the minimum payments.

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved?

no

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan?

I wrote to the original creditor explaining my situation and asking for help. I received no reply.

 

 

 

If you have not already done so – send a CCA1974 request (section 77/78/79 request) to the claimant (unless its anoverdraft/Mobile/Telephone debt)

I sent this off last week recorded delivery.

 

What's my next step? Should I fill in the court form and say I'm defending, or should I co for a continuance? Or should I wait 12+2 days to see if Arrow return the documents I have asked for?

 

What if they don't send me the documents? Does that mean I can go to court and ask for the case to be dismissed?

 

Thanks for any guidance on this. I'm trying to get things done as quick as I can but I work 60-80 hours a week and finding time is difficult.

Edited by sgianthebard
clarity
Link to post
Share on other sites

defend all - I brlieve

 

 

there are other threads in this forum

 

 

check there.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Depends on whether I receive the documents I have asked for.

 

 

If they don't send me the documents,

 

 

I believe my defence will be that they have not provided me with the documentation I requested.

 

 

This may not be a defence at all.

 

 

That's why I'm here - I'm asking for advice on whether this should be defended and if so, what could my defence be.

 

 

I'm not as clued up as most on this site.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have read as many threads on here regarding this subject as I can find, but most of them stop before the conclusion of the cases so I don't know if any were successful or not.

 

I'm also wondering how successful I would be in asking the court to write this debt off due to my financial circumstances being so bad that the likelihood of me paying this debt off in less than 100 years is slim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would think no docs would be a killer for them.

 

ida knows more

 

let me just go have a browse

I'm sure theres a threads or too here

or in the financial legal issues

about Scottish claims.

 

the issue here ofcourse might be its a post apr 2007 sign up

so a recon might suffice them.

 

not sure.

 

this one seems ok though no resolution

 

it shows the process

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?212609-Summary-cause-Summons-Scotland.-MBNA

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep dx, that's the one that looked most interesting to me. I read it thru the other day and was disappointed to see no resolution.

 

However, this great forum is full of great info and tactics and I'll commit myself to digging thru it all (the search function is extremely handy!)

to try to make myself a defence that will work. I'll certainly keep posting my progress as I go along this road.

 

I was just thinking this morning as I left home for work,

that there is another house in my street (that's the third in 2 weeks)

that are adding extensions or making improvements to their buildings.

 

 

This must surely be a sign that things are getting better financially for people.

...and isn't it now a coincidence that the banks/DCAs are now starting to crawl out from under their rocks to demand payments from people.

 

 

Funny how they were very quiet during the years that they were found out as being unscrupulous, unlawful arrogant Alan B'stards.

 

Aw well, back to life as usual I suppose. We normal people will continue to survive while the bankers light cigars with tenners.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok so when you did you take the card out?

 

was it online or in a bank?

 

or through the post?

 

is this the only debt you have?

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

took the card out in 2007 (Feb)

 

It was online

 

I also have a secured loan that was with Picture Finance Ltd>Picture>Target>IDMS (and possibly another company in between...can't remember now)

 

 

I'm in massive arrears on this one and even though I've been paying for 10 years this December,

I still owe as much as I took out. And I've paid over £70,000 back on it :(

 

Apart form that, no other debt, just usual bills.

Link to post
Share on other sites

that need investigating

start a thread in the secured loans forum sometime

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Today I'm sending a CCA to Shoomiths (the lawyer representing Arrow Global) just in case it should have been thenm I sent it to in the first place.

 

Can anyone let me know when I should sent in an IA to the court? I don't expect Arrow or Shoosmiths to return the documents requested in the CCA, so I guess I'll need more time.

 

I'm sending a CCA to Shoosmiths (lawyers representing Arrow Global) today just in case it should have been sent there in the first place.

 

When should I take an IA to the court? I don't think Arrow or Shoosmiths will supply me with the documentation requested in the CCA, so I'll need more time to prepare my defence.

 

Ahh..sorry for double post. I didn't think the first one had gone thru.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In my opinion a post 2007 online agreement they will get no problems and putting all your hopes on them not having this will crash. - never seen one not produced

 

however:

 

when is the return day ?

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

No documents have arrived from either Arrow or their lawyers.

 

However, I did receive a letter from Debt Managers (services) LTD of Rotherham,

stating that they are no longer dealing with this account and telling me to contact Arrow directly

(I already did this, sending a CCA to their PO box - I am assuming this is a reply from the recipient of that CCA request).

 

I am submitting the court papers in 30 mins time,

saying that I intend to defend

but have not yet received documents requested,

which I rely on for my defence.

 

I have also typed up a letter asking for the case to be postponed and temporarily sisted,

and that the court orders ARROW to comply with my request of the cca.

(template letter from this site).

 

II will ask the clerk if I should wait to the hearing date to submit this letter

or if I should submit it along with the papers of my intention to defend today.

 

I'll keep updating on the situation.

 

papers returned.

The clerk was not particularly helpful.

He asked if I intended to turn up in person on the hearing date.

I said yes but when I tried to explain that I had not yet received requested docs which I was relying on for my defence, he just said that I had noted that on my papers and I should just turn up on the hearing date.

 

With that, he walked away...

Link to post
Share on other sites

You would need to request these via an Incidental application

 

INCIDENTAL APPLICATION

 

Sheriff Court:

 

Summary Cause Summons Number:

 

Date of Next Hearing:

 

(Their name) Pursuer against (your name) Defender

(address) (address)

 

The defender requests the court to postpone the hearing fixed for xxxx 2009 and that the case is temporarily sisted.

 

The defender also seeks an order for the recovery of documents from the pursuer in relation to the claim made against the defender.

These documents are vital to the defender in order to compile a full defence.

The documents requested to be recovered are listed below:

 

1. A true copy of the executed credit agreement and any terms and conditions that applied to the account

at the time of default and at the time the account was opened.

 

2. All records the pursuers hold on the defender relevant to this case, including but not limited to:

 

a. Transcriptions of all telephone conversations recorded and any notes made in relation to telephone conversations by the pursuers, or by any previous creditor

b. Where there has been any event in the defenders account history over this period which has required manual intervention by any person, the defender requires disclosure of any indication or notes which have either caused or resulted in that manual intervention, or other evidence of that manual intervention in relation to my account formerly held with ORIGINAL CREDITOR.

c. True copies of any notice of assignment and/or default notice or enforcement notice that the pursuersor the original creditor sent the defender, with a copy of any proof of postage that the pursuers hold.

d.Documents relating to any payment protection insurance added to the account, including the insurance contract and terms and conditions, date it was added and deleted (if applicable).

e. Details of any collection charge added to the account; specifically, the date it was levied, the amount of the charge, a detailed financial breakdown of how the charge was calculated, and what the charge covers.

f. Specific details of the fees/charges levied by any other agency in respect of this account and a detailed breakdown of said fees/charges and what each charge relates to and on what date said fees/charges were levied.

g. A genuine copy of any notice of fair use of the defenders data as required by the Data Protection Act 1998

h. A list of third party agencies to whom the pursuers have disclosed the defenders personal datalink3.gif and a summary of the nature of the information the pursuers have disclosed.

i. Copies of statements for the entire duration of the credit agreement.

 

3. Any other documents the pursuers seek to rely on in court.

 

 

Signed:

Defender:

Dated:

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Ida,

 

 

I already have that letter written.

 

 

I took it with me and considered submitting it at the time I handed in the return papers.

 

 

But my intention is to appear at the hearing date and if the pursuer does turn up,

 

 

I will present the letter of IA then.

 

Unless you think this is wrong?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I received a letter from Shoosmith's today. Here is the content:

 

Dear Sir

 

Arrow Global Management Limited -v- Sgianthebard

Client Agreement Number ************

Court: Kilmarnock Sheriff court

Court ref ******

Return date: 14 November 2014

Calling Date:28 November 2014

 

We refer to the above matter and to your letter dated 26th October 2014

 

we confirm that copies of the original agreement along with statements in relation to the above account have been ordered.

 

 

Once we are in receipt of the said documentation we shall forward theses (sic) on to you.

Please note that documentation may take up to 6 weeks to obtain.

 

We note in your letter you state that a payment of £1.00, however we confirm there was no payment included with your letter.

 

Should you wish to discuss the matter further, please do not hesitate to get n touch.

If you contact us we will need to confirm certain personal details for data protection purposes.

If it is not convenient for you to telephone during the office hours shown above,

please leave a message on the above number to confirm the most appropriate time of day and the relevant telephone number for us to call you.

 

If you need to seek advice then you should do so as a matter of urgency.

You may wish to contact a Solicitor or one of the organisations listed below who are able to provide independent advice, taking this letter with you.

 

yours faithfully,

 

SHOOSMITHS LLP

 

 

 

What's my next move please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 weeks!!! they have 12+2 working days if you sent the CCA request from here

 

 

typical reston speculative claim mind.

hoping the defendant doesn't contest it

and they get a default decree.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...