Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
    • The streaming giant also said it added 9.3 million subscribers in the first three months of the year.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Ind Claimform - old HSBC Credit Card Debt - got judgement after only 17 days...


exasperated
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3384 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello

I was working away for two weeks,

when i returned there was a claim by IND for HSBC for a credit card debt which had no valid CCA.

The from they sent me was a application form and the various letters advised on here were sent to them and other DCA on numerous occasions.

The letter from Northampton asking me for my response was delivered and replied to within 1 day of the 14 day timeline,

I informed them I would be sending my defence within the 28 DAYS of the issue.

I have received the Judgement this morning what should be my next course of action?

Thank you

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 184
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi

Ive learned from the site I need to forward a form N244 to set aside, my options are to contact IND and ask for their approval or to just send direct to the court.

I would imagine IND wont agree so it looks like the sewcond option is theior anyone whom can help me with my defence??

Please

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

So if my maths is right you should have had your Acknowledgement of Service at the Court by Monday 1st September.

 

You posted it on Sunday 31st August so it would have arrived a day late on 2nd September.

 

Does that sound right?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats correct and the judgement is dated the 5th, i thought it was the acknowledgement that I intended to send in my defence within the 28 days after receiving advice from on here. Instead it was the judgement with no acknowledgement being received as yet

Link to post
Share on other sites

I could have emailed it however it stated on the form that the acknowledgement period of 14 days also included was 5 days from the date of the form taking me to the 18th. I miscalculated and missed it by 24 hours.

I have printed N244 but what is the wording I should use to from my defence do we have a guide on here...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have access to an email, but I misclaculated the 5 extra days onto the original date. I thought I had another 24 hours.

Do you have a example of a defence for an invalid CCA? I appreciate their will be some on here if I search but Im not that computer literate and I have difficulty looking on the site

Link to post
Share on other sites

My defence will be based on my numerous requests for a valid Consumer credit agreement that has not been supplied

by the original creditor or any of the numerous DCA whom bought the account subsequently.

 

 

Obviously there are many ways of terming what this actually means to the court

but refering to an excerpt from the original case (rankin) would this be okay:

 

The court shall not make an enforcement order under section 65(1) if section 61(1) (a)(signing of agreements) was not complied with unless a document (whether or not in the prescribed form and complying with regulations under section 60(1)) itself containing all the prescribed terms of the agreement was signed by the debtor or hirer (whether or not in the prescribed manner.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello

I missed the deadline to return my acknowledgement by a day, in a 17 day period the claimant IND made a claim and received a judgement.I will now have to send an N244 to have the judgement set aside along with a defence. Some history of the case..

original crdit card debt with HBOS which had an invalid CCA. Asked them and other DCAs for a CCA on numerous occasions and was sent an application form.

Ind purchased the debt recently and whilst working away they submitted a form to Northampton county court to which I replied informing them of my intention to send in my defence within 28 days. Whilst waiting for acknowledgement a judgement came through. On reflection I miscalculated the days and missed it by 24 hours.

Could anyone help with my defence as numbered below I leave to work away again on Thursday.

1) Can you email a N244 request to the court

2) Is their a template for a defence applicable to the above

3) Can I ask someone to represent me and if so anyone any suggestions on whom

Id appreciate any help

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should stick to one thread

I'm sure a Mod will merge shortly.

 

You cannot email your application as you need to also pay a £155.00 Court fee. You also cannot have someone attend without you there unless you hire a solicitor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Threads merged ...please do not start threads on the same claim.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

NAME OF CLAIMANT:

IND LTD

DATE OF ISSUE;

13/08/2014

PARTICULARS OF CLAIM:

THE CLAIMANT IS AN ASSIGNEE OF A DEBT IN REALATION TO A/VARIOUS CREDIT AGREEMENT BY THE CONSUMER CREDIT ACT 1974 ENTERED BETWEEN BANK OF SCOTLAND AND THE DEFENDANT. NOTICE OF ASSISNMENT WAS PROVIDED TO THE DEFENDANT BY THE CLAIMANT IN WRITING. DESPITE DEMAND FOR PAYMENT THE DEBT REMAINS DUE. THE CLAIMANT COMPLIED WITH SECTION 11 AND IV AND ANNEX B OF THE PD PRE-ACTION CONDUCT. AND THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS CREDIT CARD ACCOUNT NUMER XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX BALANCE OF £XXXX as of 12/03/2009 interewst under s69 of the county court act 1984 at the rate of 8% per year from 12/03/2009nto13/08/2014 of £x and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgement or earlier apyment at a daily rate of 1.05 and costs.

VALUE: £4xxx

COURT FEE: £185

TOTAL CLAIM £5xxx

 

CLAIM FOR CREDIT CARD FROM BEFORE 2007 WITH NO ENFORCEABLE CCA

 

ORIGINAL DEBT BY BANK OF SCOTLAND PURCHASED BY SEVERAL dca BUT LASTLY ind

 

no notice of default sums

 

I DID RECEIVE A NOTICE OF ASSIGMENT (LETTER FORWARDED TO IND LETTER AT BOTTOM OF POST).

 

DISPUTE WITH ORIGINAL CREDITOR WAS NO CCA WAS FORTHCOMING.

 

 

Mr xxxx

 

30th JAN 2014

 

I refer to your letter dated JAN 2014. Ref: xxxxxx

 

BOS ACCOUNT

 

We have on file several requests tothe Original Creditor for a compliant CCA and in response the Bank of Scotland sent a mere application form. Over a substantial period BOS were repeatedly contacted to resolve the situation which theychose to ignore. Therefore this letter is a formal request pursuant to s.77/78of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. I require you (IND) to provide me with a truecopy of the credit agreement relating to the above account, together with anyother documentation the Act requires you to provide.

 

I expect you to comply fully and properly with this request, not forward anapplication form which does not fulfil my request and you are reminded thatshould you fail to comply with my request; the provisions of s.77 will apply.

 

If it is your view that you are not the creditor, s.175 of the CCA 1974 appliesin the case of a simple assignment, and places a duty upon you to pass thisrequest to the creditor. In the case of an absolute assignment, you are acreditor as defined by s.189. If you contend that you purchased the rights butnot the duties of any agreement, you are reminded that s.189 of the Act isclear that an assignment is of both rights and duties.

 

Your attention is drawn to ss.5 (2), 3(b), 6 and 7 of the Consumer Protection From Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 (CPUTR).

 

We also believe this matter to be statute barred and request proof of anypayment made to this account within the last six years stating clearly when andhow this payment was made .

 

If you are unable to comply fully and properly with this request, you shouldconfirm this in writing at the earliest opportunity, and certainly within thestatutory time limit for compliance.

We look forward to hearing from you.

 

Yours faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...