Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Irresponsible Lending by Provident ???


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3453 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I need some advice about provident.

 

I discovered a family member with mental health problems, who is under a psychiatrist and on anti psychotic medication has been having loans with this company.

 

Basically he had a few small loans. When a loan came close to being paid off he was given another, with the balance of the previous loan deducted from the cash he was given.

 

Two weeks after he was the victim of an armed robbery, and could not even be interviewed by the police without an appropriate adult being present, Prov gave him a £1000 loan. He asked them for it after he got a letter from them telling him he was eligible for a larger loan.

 

He gets £230 a fortnight and is paying them £70 a fortnight. he cannot afford these payments and is missing payments on his priority bills.

 

You can clearly see he has problems, so can I write to Prov and tell them that their actions in giving this loan were unacceptable, and that it is irresponsible lending on their part? Should he continue to pay this loan? Should I inform his psychiatrist because the worry is affecting him? they are due to call tomorrow for payment and he is stressed and worried sick about what will happen if he does not pay.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does he have a community psychiatric nurse ?

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do not know if he told them. But, it is impossible to sit with him and talk to him and not be aware there is a problem. Even the police saw this when they picked him up, and they classed him as a vulnerable adult. hence, he had to have me present before they could interview him about the attack on him.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi Gia,

 

Self employed agents have a mandate to lend up to a certain amount and, unfortunately, there is not a lot the company can do to stop them issuing so long as the loan is within the agents mandate. The company can do plenty about it AFTER the loan has been issued but this is a bad flaw in the way the agency agreement is worded. I'd be willing to bet that the agent hasn't even made the company aware of the situation!

 

Whilst the normal way to do things would be to get in touch with the HO you'll get a faster resolution talking directly to the branch for reasons I'd rather not explain here. Write to his local office, addressing the letter to the area manager; the complaint will still reach the right people but going through the branch will expediate the process. State that you will take the matter to the FOS should you not receive a satisfactory resolution. From personal experience I think the debt will be written off fairly rapidly after that.

 

Best

 

SP

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well I wrote to his local office told them of his problems and that the agent could not possibly have been unaware of this. I informed them I was reporting the matter to the OFT and the FOS if not resolved to my satisfaction, and that the account is in dispute and no payments will be made. They replied with a slip for him to sign that allows them to address all communication about the account to me; which has been signed and returned.

 

In the meantime a manager visited his home (my letter stated no home visits allowed, but at this point they had not received my letter. Cough.. Cough...) The manager appeared very nervous and said he does not have to pay if he does not want to, but if he wanted to pay something now or in the future they would not refuse. I told him its in dispute, subject to complaint and no payments will ever be made, and showed him the door. He receives the odd arrears letter which gets ignored. However, I am still awaiting a response to the complaint from them, if not received within 8 weeks its off to the authorities above.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I wrote to his local office told them of his problems and that the agent could not possibly have been unaware of this. I informed them I was reporting the matter to the OFT and the FOS if not resolved to my satisfaction, and that the account is in dispute and no payments will be made. They replied with a slip for him to sign that allows them to address all communication about the account to me; which has been signed and returned.

 

In the meantime a manager visited his home (my letter stated no home visits allowed, but at this point they had not received my letter. Cough.. Cough...) The manager appeared very nervous and said he does not have to pay if he does not want to, but if he wanted to pay something now or in the future they would not refuse. I told him its in dispute, subject to complaint and no payments will ever be made, and showed him the door. He receives the odd arrears letter which gets ignored. However, I am still awaiting a response to the complaint from them, if not received within 8 weeks its off to the authorities above.

 

 

Hello Gia,

 

 

I would suggest that you write to this nervous manager and insist that all that he said is put in writing, it has already been seen how provident conveniently forget, lose, and deny conversations and correspondence. (Don't ask Demand).

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gia, just to let you know - the OFT are no longer in existence. You would make your Complaints to - Financial Ombudsman and the Financial Conduct Authority.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Gia,

 

 

I would suggest that you write to this nervous manager and insist that all that he said is put in writing, it has already been seen how provident conveniently forget, lose, and deny conversations and correspondence. (Don't ask Demand).

 

Excellent idea, I will do this today :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gia, just to let you know - the OFT are no longer in existence. You would make your Complaints to - Financial Ombudsman and the Financial Conduct Authority.

 

Yes, I keep forgetting I have the OFT firmly stuck in my mind lol.

Link to post
Share on other sites

he does not have to pay if he does not want to, but if he wanted to pay something now or in the future they would not refuse.

 

Perfect. Just sit on it now, this is a standard last-ditch line that is taught in the training when they're up the proverbial creek without a paddle.

 

SP

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...