Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • They have defended the claim by saying that the job was of unsatisfactory standard and they had to call another carpenter to remedy. My husband has text messages about them losing the keys a second time and also an email. What do they hope to achieve??? Most importantly,  as far as I have seen online, now I need to wait for paperwork from the court, correct?
    • The Notice to Hirer does not comply with the protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule  4 . This is before I ask if Europarks have sent you a copy of the PCN they sent to Arval along with a copy of the hire agreement et. if they haven't done that either you are totally in the clear and have nothing to worry about and nothing to pay. The PCN they have sent you is supposed to be paid by you according to the Act within 21 days. The chucklebuts have stated 28 days which is the time that motorists have to pay. Such a basic and simple thing . The Act came out in 2012 and still they cannot get it right which is very good news for you. Sadly there is no point in telling them- they won't accept it because they lose their chance to make any money out of you. they are hoping that by writing to you demanding money plus sending in their  unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors that you might be so frightened as to pay them money so that you can sleep at night. Don't be surprised if some of their letters are done in coloured crayons-that's the sort of  level of people you will be dealing with. Makes great bedding for the rabbits though. Euro tend not to be that litigious but while you can safely ignore the debt collectors just keep an eye out for a possible Letter of Claim. They are pretty rare but musn't be ignored. Let us know so that you can send a suitably snotty letter to them showing that you are not afraid of them and are happy to go to Court as you like winning.  
    • They did reply to my defence stating it would fail and enclosed copies of NOA, DN Term letter and account statements. All copies of T&C's that could be reconstructions and the IP address on there resolves to the town where MBNA offices are, not my location
    • Here are 7 of our top tips to help you connect with young people who have left school or otherwise disengaged.View the full article
    • My defence was standard no paperwork:   1.The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 2. Paragraph 1 is noted. The Defendant has had a contractual relationship with MBNA Limited in the past. The Defendant does not recognise the reference number provided by the claimant within its particulars and has sought verification from the claimant who is yet to comply with requests for further information. 3. Paragraph 2 is denied. The Defendant maintains that a default notice was never received. The Claimant is put to strict proof to that a default notice was issued by MBNA Limited and received by the Defendant. 4. Paragraph 3 is denied. The Defendant is unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly served from either the Claimant or MBNA Limited. 5. On the 02/01/2023 the Defendant requested information pertaining to this claim by way of a CCA 1974 Section 78 request. The claimant is yet to respond to this request. On the 19/05/2023 a CPR 31.14 request was sent to Kearns who is yet to respond. To date, 02/06/2023, no documentation has been received. The claimant remains in default of my section 78 request. 6. It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of proof of assignment being sent/ agreement/ balance/ breach or termination requested by CPR 31.14, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to: (a) show how the Defendant entered into an agreement; and (b) show and evidence the nature of breach and service of a default notice pursuant to Section 87(1) CCA1974 (c) show how the claimant has reached the amount claimed for; and (d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim; 7. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed. 8. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer credit Act 1974. 9. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2539 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Further to my post on facial recognition and shoplifting databases, a little 'Googling' indicates that the technology exists for the type of supermarket CCTV system that detects and alerts to the presence of known shoplifters. For example the following extract from: http://www.clearview-communications.com/cctv/facial-recognition-video-analytics

 

"Facial Recognition - Biometric facial recognition systems compare images of individuals from incoming CCTV video against specific databases and send alerts when a positive match occurs.

 

The key steps in facial recognition are:

 

Face detection

Recording detected faces

Match recorded faces with those stored in a database

Automatic process to find the closest match

 

Applications include:

 

VIP lists – make staff aware of important individuals (VIPs) and respond in an appropriate manner

Black lists – identify known offenders or to register suspects to aid public safety

Banking transactions – verification of the persons attempting a financial transaction

Access Control verification – confirming identity visually, manually or automatically

Mustering – keep a tally of who is in and who is out"

 

A relatively reputable CCTV supplier (Avigilon - who supply the large city CCTV systems) states: http://avigilon.com/products/video-analytics/

 

"With a high degree of accuracy and the industry's lowest false alarm rates, within seconds of a suspect triggering user defined analytics rules, instant notifications can be sent directly to your security personnel - delivering instantly actionable information when it matters most, helping to minimize the impact on your organization."

 

*Sigh*

 

The technology undoubtedly exists.

That wasn't your (paranoid?) point on your previous thread:

You claimed that there was a "Super-database" shared by ALL the major supermarkets that meant you were identified and followed every time you went into any of the large chains, anywhere in the country.

 

The technical feasibility of such doesn't mean

a) that it does exist,

b) that if it existed someone wouldn't report its existence to the ICO or the press.

 

I thought you had accepted that on your previous thread.

Why open a new one?. Do you have shares in Alcan?

 

Edited to add : site team appear to have merged the threads, thanks .

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought you had accepted that on your previous thread.

Why open a new one?. Do you have shares in Alcan?

 

Ha ha. Ultimately…..I'm trying to convince myself that it's not true. I'm still paranoid about the whole thing because I got myself into such a state about it and can't let it go. And I'm recalling incidents where it seemed so clear that I was being watched and followed and wondering how I could possibly have created the situation through my own paranoid actions as opposed to being on a shoplifting database. Which one is more likely?

 

I'm self aware enough to know it could possibly all be in my head and I'm almost in a state of mild psychosis……however…..well?…..I don't know. I need some hard facts or someone in authority to tell me it's really not true. A Police Office maybe? I'm almost like a bloody child or something.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I Used to work in retail management for one of the big 3

 

First sign ALL staff were taught to look out for was someone walking in and looking like they are working out where all the staff were.

I used to catch many shop lifters that way.

 

Other times we would be by the door as a deterrent.

 

If you are going into a store and appear to be sizing up where the staff and security are, your painting a target on yourself.

 

The company I worked for BANNED photos of suspected shoplifters. Reason. They got sued. They had a wall of mugshots and a candidate came in for interview and spotted their mother who was not best pleased.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I Used to work in retail management for one of the big 3

 

First sign ALL staff were taught to look out for was someone walking in and looking like they are working out where all the staff were.

I used to catch many shop lifters that way.

 

Other times we would be by the door as a deterrent.

 

If you are going into a store and appear to be sizing up where the staff and security are, your painting a target on yourself.

 

The company I worked for BANNED photos of suspected shoplifters. Reason. They got sued. They had a wall of mugshots and a candidate came in for interview and spotted their mother who was not best pleased.

Exaclty.

 

The OP is acting paranoid and looking around at shop staff and security thereby making them look suspicious.

 

It's catch 22.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Funnily enough, call me paranoid as well, but I have had similar experiences.

 

 

My daughter and I were overtly treated like shoplifters in London, so much so, it was one of the reasons we moved to Hove.

 

 

It was such a relief not to feel like we were under suspicion.

 

 

Unfortunately, it started again.

 

 

We were blatantly followed and glared at by the security, and staff pretending to tidy shelves etc.

During this time I started work at a very large supermarket.

 

 

On my first day I walked through the main entrance in my staff uniform and was told to go to the security guard who was to issue me with photo id.

That was embarrassing for the security guard and me as who was on every single giant tv monitor in the room ? Me!

Photo's were taken as soon as I passed through the security barriers.

It has been wearing and demoralising.

 

 

We moved to south Wales, where it felt much more relaxed at first, but the peace only lasted a few months at most unfortunately.

 

 

The problems started in a large supermarket, but soon permeated the whole of the city centre and beyond.

The local crime prevention programme has obviously passed our details to all the businesses in the area.

We don't imagine these things, we aren't looking out for problems.

Staff aren't at all discreet and are indeed extremely rude.

 

 

The worst thing is , we are both scrupulously honest.

No one has actually approached us to allow us to clear our names.

 

 

Any insights would be deeply appreciated.

I had an incident of scattiness in the late 1990s, when I was in Woolworths busily trying to figure out

what screws to buy in their messy display. and accidentally walked out of the shop with some picture hooks,

I can explain in detail if needed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

until you make a formal complaint to the ceos office of the supermarkets concerned then you will never get to the bottom of it.

 

I suspect it is down to unconcious body language making you appear suspicious

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that you believe that it is just you but the reality is that this is the level of intrusion into the lives of everyone when they step out into the street.

However, I can assure you that any incident in Woolies in the 1990's will not attract any attention now, Woolies didnt have recording monitoring back then and they dont exist now so there is no possibility that they have passed on any details about you or anyone else.

If a database existed it would have names and addresses but as you have moved several times since there would be no method of updating that database so it owuld be worthless and dangerous for anyone using it. Facial recognition software cannot see images of a person smiling and yawning as the same facea nd the number of measurements used to characterise someones features is so vague you will get a false positive about once every 20 people. OK if you are watching for a single known shoplifter in a village but rubbish in a supermarket where hundreds of customers a day would be falsely identified.

Even the software doing passport check only look at the stored data on the central computer with the picture on the passport, not the person standing in front of the immigration officer.

I always got stopped coming into the country because I looked like a terrorist/drug smuggler/Lord Lucan. If only they knew the truth, my real purpose was to act as the decoy for cheese smugglers (yes, cheese made with unpasteurised milk is contraband).

Link to post
Share on other sites

garibaldi, I assume you weren't charged by the shop or details taken, so I would think the shop would be treading on dangerous grounds, if they send your picture round other shops, claiming you were shop lifting

 

 

As for being followed round the shop, I get this my self, its all down to my face and appearance, not wanting to catch someone eye for one thing, and the funny thing is because I work in retail I can spot these guys a mile of, and to show you how stupid they are

 

 

July 2011, went away on holiday for 3 weeks, holiday abroad in Italy, so when I returned from holiday, a little bit exhausted walked in to my work place, only to be followed round by the NEW SECURITY GUARD, who thought I was up to no good, and wanted to remove me from the shop

 

 

I made my way to the security room to speak to my manager, before I could knock on the door, he grabbed me....a big mistake on his part, he lost his job

 

 

so from the security manager; I just have one of these faces, and it looks like I have done something so draw the attention of security

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

Hi you are exactly right, I am treated the same way in all big stores.

 

Get a CRB search done, it will show all your unspent conviction. Disclosure Scotland

 

Keep it in your wallet and a cope or two in your back pocket

 

Even genuine shoplifters should not be treated this way.

 

Lets face it 90% of goods go missing before it gets on the shelf.

Where would security be if nothing went missing?

 

For someone to shoplift in a supermarket have to have IDIOT burned in his forehead.

And the guys that say you are paranoid probably have.

 

Best wishes Ken

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Hello Everyone.

 

I was recently accused of shoplifting in Sainsbury's, by an off-duty employee, who just happened to be shopping in the store, incorrectly claimed she saw me trying to steal some items and she reported me to the store security.

 

The security guard (accompanied by several 'burly' male members of staff) asked me to leave and escorted me off the premises, I attempted to remonstrate with them but they weren't interested and feeling completely surprised and intimidated I left

 

As someone who works in retail, and has to deal with possible shoplifters, who go at lengths to not pay for things. Sometimes it isnt clear cut if a customer is up to no good, now I dont know what your intentions were, so lets look at what, why this off-duty employee claimed you were trying to steal.

 

So I take it you went round the shop with either a basket or trolley.

 

Did you place all the items into the basket or trolley

 

Did you at anytime decide you didnt want that item, and place it someplace else in the shop, possibly high value item

 

If you havnt done anything wrong, in my eyes you have been acused by an employee, who possibly has got it wrong, and if this was my self being accused, I would be writting to the store manager, or even the regional manager, telling them you have been accused of trying to steal something from one of there stores. Ask them to clarify and check there cctv, and at any time does the person being accused act out of the ordinary way. Now have you tried to go back to this store, and what was there reaction, and if they repeat there claim, I would think that would be slander, and open to be challenged

 

From that day on, I always get followed by security in almost all major shopping chains up and down the country from London to Aberdeen. It's very easy to spot and I'm certainly not being paranoid.

 

I wouldnt say your being parnoid, even my self I pick up on this when I go to other shops, I get followed alot, and even now I find it funny. Now I even asked my security manager, on why this was happening, and he gave me an honest repsonse, he said I have a shifty looking face, and I always keep my eye slooking down, rarely do I make eye contact

 

And this is where I find it funny: Was away on holiday for 2 weeks came back to work, and there a new secuirty guard on the door, he thinks Im up to no good and follows me round the store, and have to tell another colleague,

want to tell him, I work here

 

 

Am I an some sort of UK National Shoplifting Database?

 

Does the database have a name and someone I could contact?

 

Can I get removed from it?

 

The shops local to me have a database, but is only used to identify shoplifters, who have been caught, and is used more as a warning system, and once on it we dont remove you

Link to post
Share on other sites

thread is +3yrs old

 

 

now closed

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2539 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...