Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I hope Lord Frost is OK. Islamists and the woke Left are uniting to topple the West ARCHIVE.PH archived 18 Apr 2024 19:12:37 UTC  
    • Ok you are in the clear. The PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 for two reasons. The first is that in Section 9 [2][e]  says the PCN must "state that the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver and invite the keeper— (i)to pay the unpaid parking charges ". It does not say that even though it continues correctly with blurb about the driver. The other fault is that there is no parking period mentioned. Their ANPR cameras do show your arrival and departure times but as that at the very least includes driving from the entrance to the parking space then later leaving the parking space and driving to the exit. It also doesn't allow for finding a parking spot: manoeuvering into it avoiding parking on the lines: possibly having to stop to allow pedestrians/other cars to pass in front of you; returning the trolley after finishing shopping; loading children disabled people in and out of the car, etc etc.  All of that could easily add five, ten or even 15 minutes to your time which the ANPR cameras cannot take into account. So even if it was only two hours free time you could  still have been within the  time since there is a MINIMUM of 15 minutes Grace period when you leave the car park. However as they cannot even manage to get their PCN to comply with the Act you as keeper cannot be pursued. Only the driver is now liable and they do not know who was driving as you have not appealed and perhaps unwittingly given away who was driving. So you do not owe them a penny. No need to appeal. Let them waste their money pursuing you . 
    • If Labour are elected I hope they go after everyone who made huge amounts of money out of this, by loading the company with debt. The sad thing is that some pension schemes, including the universities one, USS, will lose money along with customers.
    • What's the reason for not wanting a smart meter? Personally I'm saving a pile on a tariff only available with one. Today electricity is 17.17p/kWh. If the meter is truly past its certification date the supplier is obliged to replace it. If you refuse to allow this then eventually they'll get warrant and do so by force. Certified life varies between models and generations, some only 10 or 15 years, some older types as long as 40 years or maybe even more. Your meter should have its certified start date marked somewhere so if you doubt the supplier you can look up the certified life and cross check.
    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Is it legal to send a DN just for cancelling a DD (all payments completed)


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2743 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I've come to the end of my year's car insurance, I've moved elsewhere and cancelled the direct debit.

 

Swinton have served me with a default notice.

 

I'm just wondering what everyone's views were as to the legalities of such a move - afterall, I'm not in breach of any payments.

 

Weird.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cant default you if youre fully paid up. Could it simply be an automated letter?

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

but did you inform Swinton you were moving insurers , as far I I remember they automatically renew unless you contact them

 

Sure did. I've read enough horror stories.

 

I also saved over £500(!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

This should not be a default notice re CCA, as that would be wrong.

 

What Swintons do, which I think is very questionable is to collect the first months premium before renewal, as a deposit for the next years Insurance. This is assuming that you are renewing the policy, even though you may not want to. So cancelling the DD is preventing them from collecing this deposit.

 

I am surprised that the FCA have not stopped them doing this. I can't believe that it would be legally compliant to do this.

 

You need to make a formal complaint to Swinton head office and make sure they have not notified your credit records.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah it's CCA as per s87(1). They had a pretty harsh call at 9 when they opened.

 

I'm not reinstating the d/d as they've had all of their payments. As far as I'm concerned I have performed the full obligations under the contract.

 

If they touch my credit file they'll be making a very serious error.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah it's CCA as per s87(1). They had a pretty harsh call at 9 when they opened.

 

I'm not reinstating the d/d as they've had all of their payments. As far as I'm concerned I have performed the full obligations under the contract.

 

If they touch my credit file they'll be making a very serious error.

 

In my opinion this process that Swinton have in place cannot be compliant with ICOBS or Consumer Credit law.

 

As you say, your only obligation is to pay the premium for the year. Swinton cannot commit you to renewing the policy, by taking a deposit premium. They cannot issue a default notice for not wanting to pay this deposit, as you are not in default.

 

Because of the silly complaints regime with the FCA not taking complaints directly, I suspect most people don't bother going down the FOS route. Therefore Swinton just carry on doing this and I suspect that they retain customers who did not really want to stay with them.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

On a related note, I was told by my motor insurers that all companies automatically renew policies every year because it is the law that you must have insurance. They were going to take the full year's payment using the card information they were given the year before.

Are they telling the truth that all motor insurers have a legal duty to renew automatically unless they receive a written instruction in advance?

I am perverse enough to change policy when I feel I am being bullied, so I switched company, but I would be interested to know the law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They offer automatic renewal, as that is seen as a good thing. It stops people being uninsured, because they forgot to renew. But it is not a legal requirement to accept automatic renewal. Insurers will kick up a fuss and say they can't take off the auto renewal function. It is up to you as the registered keeper of a vehicle to make sure you have Insurance. You don't have to supply your new Insurance details, before the previous company will cancel their policy.

 

As far as I know the new laws are all about the registered keeper of a vehicle maintaining Insurance. I don't think there is anything saying that Insurance companies are legally required to automatically renew Insurance policies. If an Insurance companies tells you this, ask for specific law that applies not just 'continuous Insurance Enforcement'.

  • Confused 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Because of the silly complaints regime with the FCA not taking complaints directly, I suspect most people don't bother going down the FOS route. Therefore Swinton just carry on doing this and I suspect that they retain customers who did not really want to stay with them.

 

It's not the FCA's job to deal with complaints - hence the reason why the cannot be complained to. I know some people say well it's possible to still inform them, it's kinda true - though they just pass info elsewhere. The firm I work for is involved in a couple of projects with the FCA at the mo, so far they seem more on the ball than the OFT :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sequenci

Silly question I know but how much are they asking for?

I suppose the insurance was taken out under a credit policy i.e split payments .

 

You know of course what I would do, formal complaint then off to the FOS. I agree with you about the FCA although I do often just copy them in or send a quick email saying company X (or MMF) are sh1te and should have their licence removed because .....

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sequenci

Silly question I know but how much are they asking for?

I suppose the insurance was taken out under a credit policy i.e split payments .

 

You know of course what I would do, formal complaint then off to the FOS. I agree with you about the FCA although I do often just copy them in or send a quick email saying company X (or MMF) are sh1te and should have their licence removed because .....

 

 

This happened to me a few years back with AA insurance, renewal quote was too high so insured elsewhere, so cancelled DD and received a DN for 1 missed payment on the rollover con.

 

 

Made a big fuss wrote to the CEO got a compo payment.

 

 

BTW from what I a seeing here and elsewhere the FCA is acknowledging individual complaints, and in one case has acted almost immediately, this may become public at a later date I think.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sequenci

Silly question I know but how much are they asking for?

I suppose the insurance was taken out under a credit policy i.e split payments .

 

You know of course what I would do, formal complaint then off to the FOS. I agree with you about the FCA although I do often just copy them in or send a quick email saying company X (or MMF) are sh1te and should have their licence removed because .....

 

They're not asking for anything other than the reinstatement of the d/d. I'm not going to do it as I don't owe them any money(!)

 

By the way, I'm not sure if you're still around the West Midlands - but we're recruiting again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

BTW from what I a seeing here and elsewhere the FCA is acknowledging individual complaints, and in one case has acted almost immediately, this may become public at a later date I think.

 

They do act on the info given by passing it recording the info they get + passing it over (where relevant) to organisations more suited to dealing with the issue at hand.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They're not asking for anything other than the reinstatement of the d/d. I'm not going to do it as I don't owe them any money(!)

 

By the way, I'm not sure if you're still around the West Midlands - but we're recruiting again.

 

 

Thanks for the info but I start at Uni at the end of sept.

I really am not sure how a DN can be issued for that. Surely that is an abue of process. Complain complain complain but you know im a stroppy B

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the info but I start at Uni at the end of sept.

I really am not sure how a DN can be issued for that. Surely that is an abue of process. Complain complain complain but you know im a stroppy B

 

 

 

 

Looking through records here and elsewhere this is very common indeed particularly with insurance on credit and "subscription" accounts for collectables and magazines.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

It does seem strange. I'll certainly complain if they actually place the default on my file. I'll, of course, keep you all posted.

 

Fletch: Good luck with uni, what are you studying? Which uni are you off to?

Link to post
Share on other sites

We had the issue where we were paying instalments and then paid off the balance in one payment so nothing owing. Cancelled the DD and next moment got threatening letters that insurance will be cancelled! Took several phone calls to resolve. Outcome was that we went elsewhere and saved about £50.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

AT LAST!! This is the thread I've been searching for...

 

Relating to the legality of issuing default notices for cancelled DDs in relation to auto renewal of insurance...(It's the AA... surprose, surprise).

 

They have actually raided my bank account via my debit card and left me without the means to pay for essentials... I'm on a very low income... 6k a year. I can't afford to lose £70.

 

I believe the contract is for one year and that they should at least obtain a signature before they renew insurance for a further period of time... otherwise, they are saying they have an open ended contract... there is no such thing.:-x

 

OK... so it seems I should contact the CEO... I'll give it a go. & maybe fill in a form to the FCA as I know they are currently looking into this abuse of process...

 

Thanks! TB

Link to post
Share on other sites

Get a chargeback via your debit card as it was an unauthorised transaction. Don't let your bank say no

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

They can refund immediately then investigate. The creditor will always say the transaction is legit

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

did you inform the AA you were moving elsewhere

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

did you inform the AA you were moving elsewhere

 

Hi… yes, I did tell them I was looking for a cheaper quote, but I can't afford to pay twice… they have taken the money up front for the whole year but cancelled my policy… so I've paid but am no longer insured.TB

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...