Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Query about MMF and Statute Barred


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3556 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All

 

My brother received a letter from MMF a few weeks ago about a debt with Pounds Till Payday. The original amount was taken out in November 2008. It was scheduled for a doorstep visit, etc.

 

Having spoken to them and verified his identity, they discovered that his date of birth on file was incorrect. They explained what the debt was, etc. and he asked for more information to be sent out. The account was put on hold. They had an email address for him that he hasn't used in years and is, AFAIK, defunct.

 

Don't get me wrong, my brother has had debts and he's paid them off. Anyway, we checked his credit report and it had no record of MMF on it at all. No searches, no associate searches, etc. Nothing. No defaults.

 

He explained this to MMF and asked why he hadn't received the information he'd requested, etc. They said they would email it to him. The next day, a default was registered on his credit report with MMF for the amount in question, etc.

 

He has received the information he requested and there are some issues. There is no date of birth on the credit agreement but it does have his name and NI number. The loan was paid into a NatWest account but he hasn't had a NatWest account since he was 8 years old and was collecting the piggy banks.

 

The address on the credit agreement is one that he had moved out of 3 months earlier. He was living in England at the time. More significantly, he moved to Scotland in June 2009. AIUI, the debt (if it is his) should be statute barred as it's now past 5 years. Indeed, under Scots law it no longer exists. However, the credit agreement specifically states that it is governed by English law.

 

So, I throw this over to all of you for some advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1st thing to do? Stay off the phone. MMF are the lowest of the low and will cross the line from general threats into the murky tactics. We've had plenty of cases of them doing it.

 

From now on, demand everything in writing. If they call, simply hang up and log the attempted call. Also, if MMF are registering defaults, you need to sit down and check the credit files carefully. They cannot add a default of their own or if there was one originally, they cannot change the original date ( although they have been known to try).

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

They do seem to have bought a lot of pounds to payday accounts recently. They are getting into some trouble for using email as a direct means of communcation. As far as I know, if the your brother lived in England at the time the debt would not be SB however you seem to be suggesting that this is a fraudulent application. They will try to tell you that it is your responsibility to prove t is fraud although actually it is theirs to prove it is not.

 

By the way , if MMF have bought the debt they can register the default but you would have a claim against them if they placed the default date as now when it should have been registered between 3 and 6 months after payments stopped. Hope that makes sense If they follow the rules then the default will be gone within a year anyway

Edited by fletch70

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

@renegadeimp Thanks for your reply. For the record, there have been no threats. My brother has used a speakerphone and I've listened to each call. They've been handled in much the same way as any other call centre. Re. the default, we've checked his credit report and the date of default is 28/11/2008 which is when the pay day loan should have been repaid. Technically, I cannot see that they have done anything wrong (as yet...!)

 

@fletch70 - As above, thanks for the reply. I'm not really sure if it is a fraudulent application. It's been six years and my brother cannot remember if he took out a pay day loan then or not. The reason we're skeptical about this is a) the erroneous date of birth on file and b) the Natwest account. What is most annoying is the absence of any search for him on the credit agencies. In all of the time since this pay day loan was taken out there hasn't been one search in relation to any of this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

To be honest , so long as you don't ignore any letters before action you can probably blag this until the end of November.. I would send them the prove it letter stating that you did not have a Natwest bank account at the time (unless he did) . My payday loan with PTP has never been defaulted and there are no searches . They have provided a copy of the agreement but no bank details .

So I would send a combined prove it, no telephone calls , in writing only. They are so inefficient they are bound to cock it up so you can then complain

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...