Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thats because this claim has not been allocated as yet hence the above hearing *Case Management " to determine the directions (N157 Notice of allocation) which will follow after this hearing. You are not requested to submit a statement but have all the details with you (claim form defence CPR CCA etc etc)   Andy
    • Our price is the same all day, but varies day to day. Yes there's a risk of high prices but it has never gone above SVR any time since I signed up. Last 30 days average 17.67p/kWh, max 20.67 and lowest was 11.83.  It saved just under £300 during 2023.  
    • It you had E7 in the past but have converted to single rate then the meter will still hold the last recorded Night readings. This introduces scope for error when manually reading. If the meter has only ever been used on single rate then there's only one figure that can be taken. For example ours shows "Rate 1" reading and a "Total import" reading, but they both give the sme figure. If it has ever been on E7 the total will be higher, including the retained night reading.
    • okay, perfect and thank you so much for the help once again. so firstly i am going to initiate the breathing space, during this time it's likely ill receive a default. when i receive the default are you aware of how long it will take for me to know whether the OC have sold it off to DCAs? Once it's with the DCAs i do not need to worry as they cannot issue a CCJ only the OCs can Even if i decide to come an arrangement with the DCAs no point as the default will remain for 6 years paid or not paid I should only consider repayment if the OC still won the debt and then issue a CCJ? Just to confirm the default will not be seen after 6 years? No one can tell I had one then after 6 years ill be all good?
    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Wescot now Cabot & old creation sofa debt from 2006


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3574 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I must admit there are several blogs about Cabot and not many of them are good and put them in the category of parasites.

 

I have two questions,

 

1. Have they ever taken over Creation Finance?

 

2. They claim to have bought the debt (Lie?) but I am still paying the agreed amount to another company

that insist they are the collectors and transactions are still current and recorded.

 

How can I get Cabot off my back!

 

They call twice a day and are sending letters, for which I haven’t replied too.

 

What is the legal terminology to write back to them if I do acknowledge them?

 

And, could this be a ploy to establish contact with me before actually buying the debt or any other debt I have.

 

Thank you, any advice will be most welcome.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and Welcome bit of a blurr,

 

The history of this 'debt' would help people offering any advice.

 

I have moved this thread to the Debt Collectors Forum.

 

Regards,

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

I bought a sofa through Creation Finance probably back in 2006/7.

 

I fell into difficulty when I lost my position within my company (through false allegations), my partner left and the mortgage doubled.

 

I went to see CAB who reduced my debts to my creditors,

this is after I wrote them to say I would go bust in 3 months but, they said I would have to default first!

 

I have kept up the payments via S/O religiously.

 

This past 2 months I have been receiving phone calls from Cabot Financial for whom I just add to the reject list,

 

however on one occasion they said that they have my address from my mobile phone bill,

I still refused to establish that I was the person they were looking for but got a letter.

 

It states they have bought the debt from Creation Finance.

 

I have been in touch with Westcott Finance who still to claim they are acting as collectors and have been since 2008

and that records show that I am up to date with all transactions.

 

Apparently, Cabot are making the claim that they have bought it from Creation but this is not the case.

 

What is the advice,

are they just trying it on?

 

Thanks for any help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

urm. is this debt on your credit file?

 

its typical for lemon debts to get claimed by other fleecers.

 

have you ever sent whom you are paying a CCA request

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dx.

 

This debt is on my credit file and

 

what I am thinking is that they are looking at this and chancing a connection

in order for them to go for the more lucrative debts.

 

This debt stands at around £900 and as said before owned or at least administered by Westcott.

 

I haven't established contact with them yet so have never sent a CCA request,

but what I have done is contacted Creation in the first instance

to establish who is administrating the account which is Westcott, and

they have no knowledge of Cabot.

 

Westcott have sent a request to Creation to establish any contact or instruction with Cabot.

 

thank you for your reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

how much was the org loan?

 

have you the paperwork?

 

a lone from 2006 still being paid ring alarm bells.

 

have EVER been sent at best an annual statement

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If I remember correctly it is late payment. The debt had to be reduced % wise so I wasn't paying to much to one creditor. I have being paying this token contribution since 2009. The original debt was around £1600 by the time I went in to difficulty was around £1000 and its not less than £900 now. I would pay around 30% tom pay it off but that lets the dogs loose to chase me for the other debts. I was told by CAB if I was to pay 20% say off one it should be 20% off all and it is the ALL that is the problem!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...