Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
    • Thanks for opening, it's been another rough year for my family and I've procastinated a little.. Due to the age of my defaults on this and other accounts (circa 2021), I really need to avoid a CCJ as that will be another 6 years of credit issues. Mediation failed as I played the 'not enough info to make a decision' however during the call for some reason they did offer settlement at 80%, I refused. this has been allocated to small claims track, court date is June 3 and I've received their WS. I'm starting on my WS. They do appear to have provided everything required of them (even if docs could be reconstructions). Not really sure what my argument is anymore but I do want to attend court and see this through. Should a judgement be made against me then I will clear the balance within 30 days and have the CCJ removed - this is still possible isn't it? I'm going to be reading up today and tomorrow and hope you can provide me some guidance in the meantime. Wonder what your advice would be given the documents they have provided? I am now in a position to clear the debt either by lump sum or a few large installments - Is this something i should look into at this late stage? Thanks as always in advance
    • I have now received my SAR. It includes a great deal of information! Is there a time limit on how long account information is kept and/or can be provided to debtors? I have received many account statements which were not previously sent to me. I remember that the creditor should provide explanations of any acronyms and abbreviations that maybe used in the documents. Is this still the case? Also what, if any, are the regulations in regard to adding fees to a debt? Can fees be added to a debt after the court has approved a charge on a property. Perhaps due to the numerous owners of the debt, many payments I made were not properly recorded on the account, some were entered over a year after the payment was made! Following the Legal Charge, I paid every month until my payments were refused. I am trying to compute the over payments, but the addition of fees etc. is confusing me. Any comments and/or help would be appreciated.
    • did you submit your directions
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2667 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Aha - I spoke too soon.

 

A firm called Akinika have started calling them.

A quick search reveals its a DCA ( formerly Iqor).

 

I knew this would happen sooner or later

 

 

bearing in mind all payday loan companies got a RD letter stating that any correspondence MUST be in writing only,

and NONE have complied with that,

 

 

how does this stand regarding Akinika?

 

 

Do they have to comply with the original requests too?

 

 

If so, theyve already rang once so should I tell my brother to keep a log of all these calls?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

pass the parcel.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't suppose you know yet but are they acting for the PDL or have they bought it. Either way they should be following any agreements. Until they put it in writing I would just ignore and once they write then tell them. If you get caught on the phone just tell them that you will only discuss it in writing

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you get caught on the phone, id just hang up. Saying " in writing only" will make them know you are there, and they have the right number.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hi all,

well here we are some 18 months later and ARC Europe have sprung up! Theyre chasing the Pounds To Pocket loan.

 

Unfortunately it now turns out that when she took the loans, she gave them the phone number of her husbands employer.

 

For the past week ARC have been phoning that number relentlessly, so much so that her husband has been called into the office and been told to deal with it as they are not happy with the calls.

 

Ive sent them the standard letter saying "in writing only" quoting the relevant legislation etc and its sent Recorded Delivery.

 

At least with a DCA I can string it out with CCA Requests and SARs at a later date

 

. Lets see if I can string it out for 4 years passed a Stat Barred date!

Link to post
Share on other sites

ARC are powerless

Go complain about the relentless calls to a work number

 

FCA and conc rule s apply

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

FCA report ARC

who are ARC's client?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all, another update,

I posted the letter of complaint on 3/10/2016 (recorded delivery) and got a reply on the 4th!!

ARC are denying harassment and say they are perfectly entitled to phone a place of work as she originally supplied the telephone number.

However, they acknowledge the request to cease all calls and from now on will communicate in writing only.

The rest of it is the usual stuff about how the debt must be paid and please send us a big cheque. She can also go to their website and complete a financial statement - thats not happening!

Ok so that ones sorted, I guess the next step is a CCA Request followed at a later date by a SAR.

Im also going to look into the irresponsible lending route. But I dont know how far down the line of credit this actual loan is but Im certainly not going to wake the others up to find that out.

I think the best thing to do now is wait for possible court action and act accordingly.

Thanks all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow, just read through this thread - what a journey!

I wish you much luck with it all.

 

 

I had something similar but on a much smaller scale where my brother took out some payday loans when he turned 18, but panicked when he had to repay them :)

 

 

I had the spare cash so I repaid them and he spent the next three years paying me back.

He learnt his lesson alright!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Well Guys, here we are again.

Now we have a missive from Ladder Loans, they are offering to settle the balance of £1,527,xx for £381.xx.

 

I wonder why its taken them around 2 years to make this offer?

There must be some rocky ground there - just got to find it.

 

So thats two that are trying their luck after all this time.

Maybe the others will follow shortly.

 

I think the best option is to ignore for a couple of months and see if the others get in touch.

Then Ill be able to put them in order and try the irresponsible lending route hopefully to get rid of the ones at the back of the queue.

 

The frontrunners can have the usual CCA Requests followed by SARs

- its odds-on there will be loads of charges with this lot.

Thanks all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...