Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • ps i doubt the PCN says macdonalds?? MET dont operate a reverse trespass car park for mc'd's parkers going to starbucks...(occupants left vehicle claim) they only do that for the starbucks part  i bet you parked in the starbuck side and walked to MCd's? dx    
    • it is NOT A FINE.....this is an extremely important point to understand no-one bar a magistrate in a magistrates criminal court can ever fine anyone for anything. Private Parking Tickets (speculative invoices) are NOT a criminal matter, merely a speculative contractual Civil matter hence they can only try a speculative monetary claim via the civil county court system (which is no more a legal powers matter than what any member of Joe Public can do). Until/unless they do raise a county court claim a CCJ and win, there are not ANY enforcement powers they can undertake other than using a DCA, whom are legally powerless and are not BAILIFFS. Penalty Charge Notices issued by local authorities etc were decriminalised years ago - meaning they no longer can progress a claim to the magistrates court to enforce, but go directly to legal enforcement via a real BAILIFF themselves. 10'000 of people waste £m's paying private parking companies because they think they are FINES...and the media do not help either. the more people read the above the less income this shark industry get. where your post said fine it now says charge .............. please fill out the Q&A ASAP. dx  
    • Well done on reading the other threads. If ECP haven't got the guts to do court then there is no reason to pay them. From other threads there is a 35-minute free stay after which you need to pay, with the signs hidden where no-one will read them.  Which probably explains why ECP threaten this & threaten that, but in the end daren't do court. As for your employer - well you can out yourself as the driver to ECP so the hamster bedding will arrive at yours.  Get your employer to do that using the e-mail address under Appeals and Transfer Of Liability.  
    • good you are getting there. Lloyds/TSb...i certainly would not be risking possible off-setting going on if a choice were there, but in all honestly thats obv too late now..., however..you might not never be in that situation so dont worry too much. regardless to being defaulted or not, if any debt that is not paid/used in 6yrs it becomes statute barred. you need to understand a couple of things like 'default' and 'default notice' a default is simply a recorded D in the calendar section/history of a debt, it does not really mean anything. might slightly hit your rating. the important thing here is a default notice , these are issued by the original creditor (OC) under the consumer credit act, it gives you 14 days to settle whatever they are asking, if you don't then they have the option to register a defaulted date on your credit file. that can make getting other credit more difficult. and hits your rating. once that happens, not matter what you do after that, paying it or not or not paid off or not, the whole account vanishes from your credit file on the DN's 6th b'day. though that might not necessarily mean the debt is not still owed - thats down to the SB date above. an OC very rarely does court and only the OWNER of a debt can instigate any court action (Attempted a CCJ) DCA's debt collection agencies - DCA's are NOT BAILIFFS they have ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter what it's TYPE. an OC make pass a debt to a dca as their client to try and spoof people into paying through legal ignorance of the above statement. an OC may SELL on an old debt to a DCA/debt buyer (approx 10p=£1) and then claim their losses through tax write off and their business insurance, wiping their hands of the debt. the DCA then becomes the debt OWNER. since the late 70's dca's pull all kinds of 'stunts' through threat-o-grams to spoof a debtor into paying them the full value of the debt, when they bought if for a discounted sum (typically 10p=£1). you never pay a dca a penny! if read carefully, NONE of their letters nor those of any other 'trading names' they spoof themselves under making it seem it's going up some kind of legitimate legal 'chain' say WILL anything....just carefully worded letters with all kinds of threats of what could/might/poss happen with other such words as instruct forward pass... well my dog does not sit when instructed too...so... DCA's SOMETIMES will issue a court claim, but in all honesty its simply a speculative claim hoping mugs wet themselves and cough up...oh im going to court... BIG DEAL DCA - show me the enforceable paperwork signed by me...9/10 they dont have it and if your defence is conducted properly, most run away from you . however before they do all that they now have to send a letter of claim, cause the courts got fed up with them issuing +750'000PA speculative claims and jamming up the legal system. so bottom line is two conclusions.... if you cant pay a debt, get a DN issued ASAP (stop paying it!) make sure it gets registered on your file then it stops hurting your file/future credit in 6yrs regardless to what happens (bar of course a later DCA CCJ - fat chance mind!)  once you've a registered DN , then look into restarting payments if the debt is still owed by the OC, if SOLD to a DCA, don't pay - see if they issue a letter of claim (then comeback here!).        
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2666 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Make sure to keep detailed logs. FCA wont act on single cases, but as youve seen, they take all complaints when they investigate a PDL. Now if everyone started reporting them, the PDL's would soon sit up and take notice.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi Fletch,

havent logged the calls.

Inventive signed for the original letter (which included a "communicate in writing only" request) on the 8th of July.

And no, she doesnt answer any of the calls, I told her to ignore them

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Fletch,

havent logged the calls.

Inventive signed for the original letter (which included a "communicate in writing only" request) on the 8th of July.

And no, she doesnt answer any of the calls, I told her to ignore them

Link to post
Share on other sites

If theyre still harassing you, report them and log every single attempt they make at contacting you. Don't put it off. report them asap. We've seen first hand that the FCA are coming down hard on rogue offenders. And also remember that you wont be the only person they are doing this to.

 

Ok renegadeimp, calls logged from today.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If theyre still harassing you, report them and log every single attempt they make at contacting you. Don't put it off. report them asap. We've seen first hand that the FCA are coming down hard on rogue offenders. And also remember that you wont be the only person they are doing this to.

 

Ok renegadeimp, calls logged from today.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If she has the self control not to get into an argument ( I know it takes me all my time to keep cool) it may be worth answering once and while refusing security just to tell them that they have a letter stating in writing only. If possible record that call but hopefully it should help.

 

I am aware that some firms tend to read the first few lines of a letter, particularly templates from websites and ignore the rest of the letter. I know this from experience

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quick question guys,

Weve still had no reply from Wonga, Inventive or Pounds to Pocket. They all recieved, and signed for the letters on or around the 8th of July.

Ive got all the signatures from the Royal Mail site and the RD receipts.

So should I follow these up with another letter and if so, would it be a simple reminder letter or is their now another step? Or have we done "our bit" and continue to sit back and wait?

I ask because these are not the kind of people to trust and I wouldnt like to think that whilst we are sat here waiting, they may be plotting some devious move that I could have countered?

Thanks all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally I would wait for them to contact you, if they start chasing you just a quick one liner of dear sr, I refer you to my letter of xxxxxx, received by yourselves on xxxxxx, enclosed is a copy of the POD

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Update again.

After over a month, the second one has come in. Pounds to Pocket have agreed to my terms but only for six months. On the same day they sent a DN by email. Must be something in that to trip them up with. Time to read up again!

Link to post
Share on other sites

P2p are just qq in disguise. After 6 months just tell them your circumstances remain unchanged.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Most companies only set arrangements for 6 months or a year, just a pain in the backside when you renew it.

 

Was the DN an actual proper DN as set out in the CCA or a notice of intention to file a default. I know this is a moot point but I am yet to be convinced that email is an appropriate system for sending DN's. How can they tell when it was received? I know a DJ has suggested that in his opinion a DN is served on the day it is produced but I can not see that standing up to scrutiny

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
Update again.

After over a month, the second one has come in. Pounds to Pocket have agreed to my terms but only for six months. On the same day they sent a DN by email. Must be something in that to trip them up with. Time to read up again!

 

I know you may not be in a position to do this otherwise you wouldn't be on this thread but

 

 

I have been in same situation and still am to a degree but

 

 

p2p will accept significant reduction if you send them email stating you can offer xxx amount.

 

 

They come back at first and say no but they accepted in the end a much lower amount.

 

 

Keep on at them.

 

 

I was offered a 6 month plan initially but 4 months in I tried to settle with a much lower full and final settlement

which with the help of a family member I sorted.

 

 

I still got few more to clear but keep chipping away.

 

 

Good luck with everything.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another update guys,

 

after initially receiving a letter from Pounds to Pocket agreeing to the repayment plan (for six months)

we now receive a letter from them marked "Final Notice - Impending Account Sale")

and demanding three payments of £280.xx over the next three months.

 

It also states that her account will be sold on the 7th September

but the first payment they have demanded is not until the 15th September.

Whos fooling who here?

 

Then theres the usual threat of doorstep collectors and court action that may be used by the new owners of the debt

( they havent said who this will be yet).

 

So, bearing in mind that she already has an affordable arrangement in place for the next six months (in writing)

can I possibly use this latest letter against them in the foreseeable future?

 

And who has a name like Pete Ng (Final Resolution Team Manager)?

 

Thanks guys.

Link to post
Share on other sites

H Merlin

Ng is a common Chinese surname and I have seen it pop up on several letters posted on the forum. Even if it is not his real name , so long as it can be traced back to an individual it is perfectly legit.

 

Ok , so if they do sell the debt , which the T&C's will say they can do, you have an arrangement in place and the new owners can not alter that . If the new owners try to get out of t , you will have a legitimate complaint.

 

I hope , for your peace of mind they do not sell it to the buffoons who are MMF (although another complaint against them would be fantastic)

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply Fletch, whats the story with MMF?

I see all the advantages of the debt being sold on ( none-forwarding of critical paperwork etc) and yes, it can be a pain dealing with DCAs but as long as everything is in writing I can build a wall for her against them.

Whatever happens, I will keep any repayments at an affordable level - this is generally a lot easier to do when a debt is sold on. You just have to be as awkward and as obstructive as the DCA - but keep it all on paper!:wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

MMF (motormilefinance) seem to take little or no notice of their own policies and procedures let alone the FCA rules. They routinely do not answer letters or avoid answering the relevant parts .

It is a shame but the only way I ever seem to get a real response is to escalate the matter to the CSA (their trade body) and/or the Fos .

In one recent exchange I showed them letters and read receipts sent on 27th May yet they still continued to insist the first letter they had was the follow up one on the 2nd June

 

I have records and copies and then copies of those copies. My emails are IMAP and my letters are in a file as well as scanned on my PC and backed up into google Drive ( Overkill or what)

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok. see what you mean Fletch.

Im a stickler for Recorded Delivery, everything I ever send is by RD.

This one might be fun then. I have four folders, one for each debt. Records, letters etc are meticulously kept. Bring on MMF!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok. see what you mean Fletch.

Im a stickler for Recorded Delivery, everything I ever send is by RD.

This one might be fun then. I have four folders, one for each debt. Records, letters etc are meticulously kept. Bring on MMF!

 

Just checking how you going on. Also to let you know that the quick quid one I am still paying off on 6 month arrangement they have emailed without me asking and extended again so don't worry when the 6 month is up they will probably make contact doing the same so long as you stick to the arranged payments. Hope all goes well

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi all just an update -

 

Inventive are still ringing two or three times a day even after all this time.

It would seem that they are not going to comply with the original letter I sent which included the request

that all future correspondence should be in writing.

 

 

However, they received that instruction by Recorded Delivery and I have a copy of the letter and the receipt from the Post Office

and a copy of their receiving signature so we are not too worried about that one.

 

The good news is that yesterday (11/10/2014) she received an email from Wonga saying that her debt is one of the many

they have been forced to wipe so she now owes them nothing:-)

 

That email has been printed out and put in her "Wonga" file as it wouldnt surprise me if, in a year or two,

someone makes a quick buck by selling these cancelled debts on to a DCA,

and that DCA then tries to chance its arm with the usual threats to ex-customers in the hope

that by then most people will have deleted these emails and have no physical record of their cancellations.

It wont be happening here!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all just an update -

 

Inventive are still ringing two or three times a day even after all this time.

It would seem that they are not going to comply with the original letter I sent which included the request

that all future correspondence should be in writing.

 

 

However, they received that instruction by Recorded Delivery and I have a copy of the letter and the receipt from the Post Office

and a copy of their receiving signature so we are not too worried about that one.

 

The good news is that yesterday (11/10/2014) she received an email from Wonga saying that her debt is one of the many

they have been forced to wipe so she now owes them nothing:-)

 

That email has been printed out and put in her "Wonga" file as it wouldnt surprise me if, in a year or two,

someone makes a quick buck by selling these cancelled debts on to a DCA,

and that DCA then tries to chance its arm with the usual threats to ex-customers in the hope

that by then most people will have deleted these emails and have no physical record of their cancellations.

It wont be happening here!

Great news about the wonga. I settled with them only few weeks ago wish I had held out now. Anyway good luck with the rest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all, another update -

 

having got an email from Wonga dated 10/10/2014 cancelling her debt to them,

she has now received another email dated 14/10/2014 headed

"Notice of our Intention to Register a Default".

 

 

They are now demanding the full amount and threatening to register a default 120 days after the original loan repayment date.

 

Now this could simply be one department not knowing what the other department is doing

as the "cancelled debt" letter came from "[email protected],

whereas this latest demand came from [email protected].

 

before I send the collections team a copy of the first letter, a quick question.

 

 

Are they entitled to change their mind regarding wiping the debt?

 

 

Just want to be fore-armed before we go head to head.

Thanks all

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes they can I suppose

 

 

however, just scan it

attach it to an email

 

 

an send it to collections.

 

 

chew on this mate

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Hi all.

thought I would drop by with an update.

 

Ive recently found out that my brother had a change of heart shortly after setting up payment plans with the payday loan firms

and decided not to pay any of them.

This, as you will recall.all started last June 2014.

 

The state of play 8 months on is this,

 

Pounds To Pocket - not one letter or phonecall from them.

Sunny - same as above.

Very Loans - as above again.

Inventive - still ringing on the same number although this is now down to 3 or 4 calls a week.

 

 

This, to me, is a good sign. It tells me they are being cagey.

 

If you recall, they were all sent Recorded Delivery letters (all signed for) stating that any further communication MUST be in writing.

None of them have complied - not one written communication from any one of them.

 

So what would happen should any one of them decide on court action?

Would the letters still stand after all this time?

Or could a judge take a view that some responsibility lies with us and that we should have taken further steps to address these debts?

 

Im expecting DCAs to get on the case some time in the not too distant future.

How do these letters stand regarding them?

 

I appreciate your input guys and gals and thanks all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...