Last month we gave sky notice to cancel our subscription of several years and a few days ago it became limited to the free to air channels as expected.
Early last year a sky plus box was installed at a cost £200, which if my memory is correct was to buy the box and have it installed. Since going to the free to air channels we've discovered that the sky plus features no longer work. Trying to use any of them brings up a "Please phone 0870.... to upgrade your subscription" message.
Now I realise that sky charge £10 a month extra for use of this, unless you subscribe to enough premium channels in which case it is free. My understanding of the £10 charge was that since you can skip adverts in recorded programs sky could potentially lose advertising revenue. But since we own the box, no longer recieve their channels and the features in question don't require sky to provide any sort of additional service can they have any possible justification for requiring money for it? This seems somewhat unfair.
I've been trying to think of an analogy with some other service and finally came up with mobile phonesimlocks. If you buy a phone or recieve one as part of a contract (at it's conclusion) the network are required on request to provide you with unlocking information, so you can use it elsewhere. Now surely freeview could be seen as an alternative service provider to sky, so shouldn't the box be 'unlocked'?
If there's nothing I can do I'll just sell the system 2nd hand and replace it with something else but if anyone has any advice on what can be done I'd rather take it up with sky.
Similar Threads:



Reply With Quote
