Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Complaint against JCP adviser - recording the conversation


DarwinUK
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2503 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have had a compliant against the DWP since 2012. Long story. Now my partner is getting ear bashing.

We have placed a complaint against two members of staff for victimisation and disability discrimination under the equality act.

My partner still has to see one of the advisors that the claim is against. The problem is that both advisors sit right next to each other, and they both seem to back each other up and dive in.

My partner recorded the conversation today. It was the only way to prove that our complaint under the equality act is correct. We now have a recorded conversation proving that these two staff dont follow proceedures, are victimising and discrimination against us, specifically my partner.

So can I ask. Because recording the conversation covertly was the only way to get the evidence we needed, can we therefore transcribe to conversation and hand it in as evidence backing up the letters we handed in, and offer the recording on a CD if required. My partner wasnt in a private room, she was shouted at and harrassed out in the main room with other staff and claimants. Our arguement is that if it had been in a private room, and the staff had been informed we were recording, then the staff wouldnt have commited the crime(s), and we wouldnt have been able to prove it.

So we are between a rock and a hard place. Obey the law and get nothing, or break the law and get the proof.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do not believe there should be any legal problem with what you propose to do. It's generally OK to record conversation in this way, although of course you should not do anything daft like post the recording on Youtube. But a transcript submitted as part of a complaint is not being "published" in the normally understood sense of the word.

 

I'll put your post in a new thread where it should hopefully get more responses.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As Antone says, nothing to stop you submitting a written transcript as evidence. It's your right to record either openly or covertly 'for the purposes of gathering information for your own domestic use' - though the DWP would have us believe that we're not allowed to do this (even though they record us!).

 

It's a sad day when we now have to resort to recording the very people who are supposed to be helping us, but they're the ones causing the problem not us. Keep recording ALL meetings.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I met someone who I see at the JCP and INGEUS walking along my road today and as I am incapacitated at the moment asked him in for a coffee and a chat. He told me he went to the JCP earlier to ask for some advice on something and was told "it is not your signing day and you are not allowed to be in the building" He said "I want to pass a note to my adviser can you pass it on to them for me please and sign to say I hand delivered it" He was told they do not do this and they would stop his benefits if he did not leave the building. What a lovely bunch of people who are supposed to be there to HELP PEOPLE not belittle them

Link to post
Share on other sites

I met someone who I see at the JCP and INGEUS walking along my road today and as I am incapacitated at the moment asked him in for a coffee and a chat. He told me he went to the JCP earlier to ask for some advice on something and was told "it is not your signing day and you are not allowed to be in the building" He said "I want to pass a note to my adviser can you pass it on to them for me please and sign to say I hand delivered it" He was told they do not do this and they would stop his benefits if he did not leave the building. What a lovely bunch of people who are supposed to be there to HELP PEOPLE not belittle them

 

Assuming this story isn't garbled in some way (lots of these stories are) then this sort of behaviour from JC staff is not policy - it's grounds for complaint.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I met someone who I see at the JCP and INGEUS walking along my road today and as I am incapacitated at the moment asked him in for a coffee and a chat. He told me he went to the JCP earlier to ask for some advice on something and was told "it is not your signing day and you are not allowed to be in the building" He said "I want to pass a note to my adviser can you pass it on to them for me please and sign to say I hand delivered it" He was told they do not do this and they would stop his benefits if he did not leave the building. What a lovely bunch of people who are supposed to be there to HELP PEOPLE not belittle them

 

Unbelievable, what a lovely bunch of people they are NOT!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Everyone.

 

Ive now listened to the recorded conversation. The only two things the DWP might throw at us is "Data Protection" because of all the other claimants and the staffs own privacy.

Having listened to the recording, the only three clear voices we can hear is my partners, her advisor and the second advisor when she butts in. All the other background noise is garbled and not recognisable as anything specific, and nothing can be heard to anyone elses personal data.

So I believe that as such there is no breach under the data protection act. And Im working on the basis that as public servants who are breaking the law, then the advisors have no right to privacy under the circumstances.

Im getting another letter written and want to word it right as I know they are going to throw the above at me, so I want to nip that in the bud from the start.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They can only complain if you broadcast the recording, ie post it on the internet or play it back to anyone not in your domestic circle.

 

Here's a copy of a Freedom of Information response from the Information Commissioner's Office stating that Section 36 of the Data Protection Act allows for covert recordings for private use;

 

26 September 2012

 

Case Reference Number ENQ0465807

 

Dear Mr xxxx

 

Thank you for your correspondence of 23 September in which you ask if an

individual cannot covertly record conversations when they are solely for

their domestic use.

 

Under the Data Protection Act 1998 (DPA), Section 36, there is an

exemption which states that “personal data are exempt from the Data

Protection Principles and the provisions of Part II (individuals’ rights)

and Part III (notification) of the Act where they are processed by an

individual only for the purposes of that individual’s personal, family or

household affairs (including recreational purposes).”

 

This means that an individual can carry out covert recordings without

being in breach of the DPA as long as the information is for their own

personal and domestic use.

 

I hope this information is helpful. If we can be of any further assistance

please call me, or contact our Helpline on 0303 123 1113, quoting your

case reference number. You will also find useful information on our

website at [1]www.ico.gov.uk.

 

Yours sincerely

 

Michelle Hazlehurst

 

Case Officer - First Contact Group

Information Commissioner's Office, Wycliffe House, Water Lane, Wilmslow,

Cheshire, SK9 5AF

Tel: 0303 123 1113 Fax: 01625 524 510

 

You can throw this into the pot if the DWP get stroppy as the Information Commissioner tells them what to do :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

You can throw this into the pot if the DWP get stroppy as the Information Commissioner tells them what to do :)

 

That is pure magic. Ive added that to my letter. My partner is next in there on Monday, we are going to let them kick off first with their threats, then she is going to hand over our letter.

Im going to be making a donation thursday night as you guys have given me the piece of mind to have a good nights sleep tonight, knowing that IM IN CONTROL of this situation now.

This has been going on since oct 2012, and I can see the light at the end of the tunnel. Ive had 20 months of having to fight them which could have been used more constructively actually looking for more jobs, rather than worrying about what verbal we're going to get at the next meeting. You dont know how helpful you have all been with this as to explain the whole complaint would take more of your server space than you probably have.

So a BIG thank you to you all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In fact Ive just been and donated now. Guess who's one happy chappy with a big grin on his face :-)))))

 

Thank you very much, and I hope this gets sorted out to your satisfaction. As noted, there would only be data protection issues if you "published" the recording by posting it online or the like. If you simply send a transcript to the complaint handling people at the Jobcentre, only they and you will see it.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is pure magic. Ive added that to my letter. My partner is next in there on Monday, we are going to let them kick off first with their threats, then she is going to hand over our letter.

Im going to be making a donation thursday night as you guys have given me the piece of mind to have a good nights sleep tonight, knowing that IM IN CONTROL of this situation now.

This has been going on since oct 2012, and I can see the light at the end of the tunnel. Ive had 20 months of having to fight them which could have been used more constructively actually looking for more jobs, rather than worrying about what verbal we're going to get at the next meeting. You dont know how helpful you have all been with this as to explain the whole complaint would take more of your server space than you probably have.

So a BIG thank you to you all.

 

Keep a regular eye on this website too; https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/body/dwp

 

These are DWP Central Office replies to all sorts of Freedom Of Information requests by people and are very useful when dealing with advisers who don't know the rules. New stuff added daily.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

Hello Guys.

 

Just an update for you all. I will try to keep this short.

 

My partner is now on ESA, and I am the working side. We had the medical which I said I wanted to record, they refused, sanctioned us, had to appeal, tribunal, we won, I had a big bust up with my job centre, told them where to go fly of and quit harassing my partner, got banned and had to go to the nearest town for three months, easy.

Had a interview at my local JCP behind glass, the woman started, I was literary shouting, screaming, swearing, telling her to quit her verbal and get on with it, she was visibly shaking.

Had a letter after 6 months re me having app in my JCP. I wrote back saying I wanted to go to the nearest town office as I didnt like my own JCP, and that they were going to kick off and I would bite and get loud, and that amounts to no help at all.

They called and spoke to my partner saying they couldnt send me to the other office as they didnt have the staff, thankfully she was switched on and replied "The unemployment figures have gone down for our county, so less claimants so should be less work, plus you had the staff when you banned him for 3 months.". Silence....... OK well as everything is OK we will leave it at that, thanks for your time.

 

We haven't heard from them for over two years. Bliss

 

The morale of the story is that you need to search forums like this one, plus the whatdotheyknow (which has given me fantastic ammo), and then be confident enough to go and take no prisoners. You have to be so switched on as they throw stuff at you all the time so quickly. I love it, I always signed on before my partner, so pre warned her of what was going to happen. Ive had them try their bull and Ive thrown it back at them, accused them of lieing in front of other claimants. Hence why they targeted my partner. Shes not stupid, very smart, but not as quick as me, and she would rather take an easy life than kick off.

 

So Im glad for all the help you have all given, been wonderfull.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...