Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi and thanks It looks like they ticked all the boxes to me but I'll try and upload the notice. I was wondering if a witness to late delivery might be considered proof - I'm assuming they posted it as normal but Royal Mail stuffed up delivery. If not then they're really saying it just has to be posted within 12 days of the incident, regardless of when it is received. Annoying! edit ok thanks Honeybee here's my 2nd (actually 3rd) attempt at anonymising, copying and uploading the notice! Sorry about the state of it - I sat on it while distracted by my dog 🙃 pcn front.pdf pcn back page.pdf
    • ROFL - dont get upset just because someone (quite a lot of someones) dont want smart meters - well unless you get paid for it .. in which case ...   I assume you haven't been with Octopus long enough to be on one of the very long fixed price tariffs they offered before the prices went bonkers .. and that you dont use your electricity in the evening/lunch time if you think the 'agile type tariffs are good value .. let alone worth installing a smart meter for - high price a good disincentive for an evening cuppa eh? Let alone all your computer/tv etc time in the peak price evening or lunch time. - and boy do those peak prices instantly hammer your bill when those Russian and middle eastern issues kick off.   I would only have considered a smart meter if solar panels had been an option for me - but roof is oriented completely the wrong way. Oh - and My opinion hasn't changed since the smart meter trials 40 years ago, because neither have the issues (well not enough) but I'm happy for you. Be happy for me.
    • Hi. I'm afraid I've had to hide your post with the pdf files to keep this anonymous for you. You've left the PCN reference number and your car reg showing. Could you edit that and repost please? HB    
    • Well naturally if you want to maintain your outrage, and retain something to bitch about, then arguing about the level of your fixed monthly DD is the way to go. You are of course perfectly free to ignore the easy solution.
    • His financial situation isn’t great, and the landlord has made lots of things up. The things he’s put isn’t true at all. My friend did tell the full truth with incoming and outgoing, I helped him fill in his form and he checked bills etc. to make sure it was right. His wage is ok, but not as good as the landlord thinks it is,  and he doesn’t have anything spare. How much are they likely to take from him? Should he send any reply?  the letter just says to take the court letter with him. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Incorrect insurance sold by IFA


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3596 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

Back in 2006 we took out an interest only mortgage and were sold an insurance policy to run along side it, should anything happen to myself or my partner. The mortgage and insurance were sold to us by an Independent Financial Advisor.

 

A few months ago, we found out that the we had been sold a mortgage decreasing policy instead of a level term policy. After speaking to Legal and General, they confirmed that the decreasing policy was no good for our mortgage, we should have been sold the Level Term Policy. They also stated to put a complaint it, but they could not deal with it because it was not them who sold it.

 

We wrote to the IFA stating we were not happy about being sold the incorrect policy and wanted to know WHY we were sold it and what they were going to do to correct this mistake. A week or so later we received a letter from Legal and General saying they were dealing with the complaint and would be in contact soon. I rang L&G to see why they were dealing with it when I was told they could not deal with it, and was told it had been passed to them and if the IFA contacted us, we were not to speak to them incase they tried to get us to drop the complaint.

 

Around 4 weeks later, we received a letter from L&G saying they admit we were mis sold the policy and to correct this mistake, they could arrange to change the policy to the correct one for almost £20 a month more each month, but they would not get us to pay the shortfall which occurred over the last 8 years!!

 

Gobsmacked is not the word!!! No explanation as to why this happened, no proper apology for this mistake, no apology for the distress and upset we have had for the past few months!!

 

We told L&G we did not accept this and we have now sent this to the Financial Ombudsmen to look into.

 

Have today received a call from the FOS stating they are awaiting further information from L&G and they are not there to punish the company but the possible solution to this would be to swap to the correct policy, at more money each month......... I commented that I didn't feel this was fair as we have been paying a policy for 8 years which is not worth the paper it is written on and basically they said "well if you're only doing this complaint for the money, I wouldn't hold your breath"

 

Its not just the money.... its the principle, the upset, the stress, the thought of paying out dead money for the past 8 years.....

 

Any advise would be appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

But normally in this situation, you would get the benefit of the policy you asked for at the time of buying it and not the wrong one. The FOS would have made sure that you did not lose from the mistake made by the insurers agent. So in theory you have had 8 years of paying a cheaper premium and going forward will have to pay the relevant premium for the correct policy.

 

Depending on the type of product, you could simply arrange the insurance elsewhere.

 

The FOS don't always award compensation in this type of situation. They will simply accept that the Insurers had put right their error. You can continue with the complaint, but I am not sure whether it will get you anywhere, unless you got the media involved. Sometimes a bit of adverse media coverage can loosen the purse strings of an Insurers.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand what you are saying, but hypothetically, if something had happened to myself or my partner, there would not have been enough to cover the mortgage as they sold us a decreasing policy and should have sold us a level term policy.

 

I also feel an apology wouldn't go amiss for the upset and distress this has caused and they betrayal we feel after trusting the IFA!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand what you are saying, but hypothetically, if something had happened to myself or my partner, there would not have been enough to cover the mortgage as they sold us a decreasing policy and should have sold us a level term policy.

 

I also feel an apology wouldn't go amiss for the upset and distress this has caused and they betrayal we feel after trusting the IFA!

 

They would have dealt with any claim, as if you had been given the correct level term policy. Of course you are not going to believe this, but it is my experience of dealing with hundreds if not thousands of complaints for Insurers. Mistakes are made and in this situation, the Insurers have lost out on 8 years of receiving the correct premium, when they were at risk for more than the decreasing policy you were given.

 

They should apologise and offer a token of compensation, plus the correct policy. Then hopefully you will be happier. It is not in the interest of L&G to allow you to continue to feel unhappy, as no doubt you will go tell dozens of people of your experience and they will tell other people, therefore L&G lose out on potential business.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

They should apologise and offer a token of compensation, plus the correct policy. Then hopefully you will be happier. It is not in the interest of L&G to allow you to continue to feel unhappy, as no doubt you will go tell dozens of people of your experience and they will tell other people, therefore L&G lose out on potential business.

 

I understand people make mistakes and i accept that. From what the FOS said they wont offer any compensation.... However i feel something should be offered as a gesture of good will.... But im not holdingy breath

Link to post
Share on other sites

Generally FOS 'token compensation' will be around £50-100 (if they award any - beyond that you essentially need to have suffered financial detriment) - I also understand what you are saying but essentially, you've had 8 years of cover at a much reduced price, so their error has benefited you.

 

As unclebulgaria says, it's difficult because you haven't had to claim so the instinct is to think they wouldn't have been paid out, but they would have treated it exactly the same as they have now, and would have had to deal with the claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would suggest that the insurance company should give you the cover at the price it would have been when you took it out (the price increases with age). There is no way LTA is £20 higher than DTA. I would also check the new policy still covers you for terminal illness and any waiver of premium.

 

As in regards to compensation it is hard for FOS to decide what is fair, somethings upset people in different ways. Your main complaint is the advice you were given not the actual product. It may be worthwhile writing to the IFA's network (who do their compliance) to raise a concern.

 

Cheers

 

Colin

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...