Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Costacleethorpes vs RBS


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6369 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Helllo everyone,

 

Have been following things for months now and am at the stage where I am issuing claims against HSBC & RBS for refund of bank charges(both about £600). Due to all the info on these groups this has gone entirely to plan and I am reasonably confident of success.

 

So, firstly, a big thank you to everyone who posts here.

 

I do have another, rather more complicated issue: RBS managed to take a spectacular 98 days to get my statements to me (I was away for a month so couldn't push them as much as I would have liked). By their own admission this was their third attempt the other two were sent but never arrived

 

A similar thing happened a couple of years ago when the first two deliveries of six months statements went missing, the third arrived. I recovered one sent from an old address of mine even thought they had my correct address at the time.

 

I need to know do I have grounds for claiming compensation for their breaches even though the statements have arrived? From my point of view someone somewhere could have six-years worth of my bank statements. Let alone their exceeding the time limit and the exact same occurence two years ago.

 

I have searched the forums and cannot find anything that matches up. Would be extemely grateful of any advice.

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

 

the delay in sending them is certainly a breach of the data protection act, as for the sending to the wrong address that has got to be a breach, but i'm not an expert. Hopefully some1 here can give you more details advice or tell you where to get it.

 

Good luck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Although they have not complied with their obligations under DPA, proving negligence here would be too awkward. Even if it was proved, how can you quantify a level of compensation for something which may have no effect? Sorry to be the bearer of bad news here, but I think you would be onto a loser with a compen claim.

 

That said, security is an issue, so ask them to change your account details and report back to you as to how this happened (a written report would be useful should you ever have identity theft issues (it could also pin the blame and liability to the bank).

 

 

I would also report the details of your complaints to the information commissioner as a matter of principle.

 

J

1/9/06 RBS claim #1

8/11/06 - claim settled

17/11 claim #2 started - incl creditcard

30/11 - CC statements received

31/11 - Prelims issued - RBS paying up, only M/C to go)

 

If any of my advice/ info has been helpful, please click the scales:D

 

Please also remember that any advice is given from my own experience and in good faith as a lay person. If in doubt, please contact a qualified professional:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

me too! I know how to stop a banker drowning.......take your foot off his head!

 

The only (non-monetary) compen you will get is the information commisioner sticking his boot up your bank's arris.

 

worth it for that alone:-)

 

j

1/9/06 RBS claim #1

8/11/06 - claim settled

17/11 claim #2 started - incl creditcard

30/11 - CC statements received

31/11 - Prelims issued - RBS paying up, only M/C to go)

 

If any of my advice/ info has been helpful, please click the scales:D

 

Please also remember that any advice is given from my own experience and in good faith as a lay person. If in doubt, please contact a qualified professional:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for this.

 

A bit frustrating, I think I might include in my claim in terms of I want a formal ruling the bank breeched the Data Protection Act - I can then send that the Info Commissioner's way.

 

I do have some proof they sent it to the wrong address - I managed to recover one batch of statements from a past address, with the wrong address on the envelope.

 

In terms of the time period they must have to face some penalty for exceeding it, otherwise there is no point in having it? Oh well will have a punt and let you know how it goes.

 

Thanks once again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Just an update for anyone who may find themselves in a similar situation.

 

I sent RBS a letter stating I would apply for a judgement acknowledging their breaches of the DPA - which I could then send to the Information Commissioner - as well as my charges.

 

The effect was impressive they have offered to settle my claim for charges in full and I haven't even issued a Claim Form yet. Bit disappointing as I was looking forward to the 8% interest! Also stated my complaints regarding DPA had been referred to someone else.

 

I have written back saying I will not formally accept their offer on charges until I hear back regarding DPA but assume I have no choice. As ever any advice appreciated but I would rather go to court on the DPA issues to prove a point then be fobbed off, as they will no doubt attempt to do; RBS have been consistently rubbish and even if I lose at least I've had a go.

 

Anyone out there have any experience of this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...