Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Massive issues from Scottish Power I wonder if someone could advise next steps. Tennant moved out I changed the electric into my name I was out the country at the time so I hadn't been to the flat. During sign up process they tried to hijack my gas supply as well which I made it clear I didn't want duel fuel from them but they still went ahead with it. Phoned them up again. a few days later telling them to make sure they stopped it but they said too late ? had to get my current supplier to cancel it. Paid £50 online to ensure there was money covering standing charges etc eventually got to the flat no power. Phoned Scottish Power 40 minutes to get through they state I have a pay as you go meter and that they had set me up on a credit account so they need to send an engineer out which they will pass my details onto. Phone called from engineer asking questions , found out the float is vacant so not an emergency so I have to speak to Scottish Power again. Spoke with the original person from Scottish Power who admitted a mistake (I had told her it was vacant) and now states that it will take 4 weeks to get an appointment but if I want to raise a complaint they will contact me in 48 hours and it will be looked at quicker. Raised a complaint , complaints emailed me within 24 hours to say it will take 7 days till he speaks with me. All I want is power in the property would I be better switching over to EON who supply the gas surely they could sort it out quicker? One thing is for sure I will never bother with Scottish Power ever again.    
    • Hi. Please don't follow McD's advice to contact Met to appeal. They won't listen and you could end up giving them helpful information. HB
    • The UK-based mining giant Anglo American says it has received a takeover proposal from Australia's BHP.View the full article
    • who gave you the NTH? who was it sent to? thread title updated dx  
    • blimey CAG gave all that FREE help over +6mts and +100 posts and they never even bothered to comeback...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

First Reply From RBS


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6373 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have recently sent my Charges letter and Schedule of charges to the Middlesbrough Branch of the RBS (dated 14th oct).

 

To my suprise I recieved a reply dated the 20th, as follows:

Thank you for your letter of 14th Oct 2006 about charges. I am sorry you were unhappy with the service you recently received, but grateful that you took the time to write and explain why.

I am already looking into your concerns, and can confirm that I have today ordered historic statements in order for us to reconcile the charges quoted in your letter to your acounts. I will contact you again in seven days, either with a full response, or to let you know what progress I have made.

I shall do mt utmost to resolve your complaint quickly and to your complete satisfaction, but so that you are aware of all the options available to you, I have enclosed a leaflet that explains how we handle customer complaints.

Firstly, no Leaflet was included

 

Secondly, the date for the banks reply has passed, as has the 14 days I gave in my first letter.

 

What should my next point of action be??

 

Any help would be gratly appriciated

 

 

Regards

 

 

Chris Catron

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest willowb

So, that was the response to your prelim letter? and the 14 days is up? they are just stalling, pay no attention and send in your LBA. Give them 14 days from the date of posting your LBA and file your claim.

 

Good luck

Wxxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

another 14 days of waiting then!!!!

NatWest - Settled in full 22/05/06

 

RBS- Prelim sent 9/05/06 £1,147

£500 offer 27/05/06, rejected 30/05/06

LBA sent 25/05/06 :razz:

MCOL 15/06/06

Defence received 20/07/06

Settled in full 01/09/06 wahey!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Certainly is Stacey:p

 

Wonder how they'll take that, they said they would write again within 7 days and I'm still waiting for that one.

Request for repayment of charges (14th Oct 2006)

 

Reply Recieved (21st Oct 2006)

Letter Before Action (30th Oct 2006

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

More Stalling I Think:???:

 

Recieved two letters with in two days from RBS:

 

Letter 1 dated 31st Oct

 

Thank you for your Letter dated 30th Oct 2006 regarding repayment of charges and for your patience while I have been investigating your complaint. I am not yet in a position to respond to all your points in full because of a delay receiving copy statements

I am extremely sorry to have to keep you waiting, but rest assured, I will contact you again in due course.

Yours Sincerely

H Byers

Letter 2 dated 2nd Nov

 

RE: Case Reference 3849464

Thank your for your patience while I have been incestigating your complaint about charges made to your account. I am not yet in a position to respond to all your points in full because we have not yet recieved the copy statements but we are chasing this up.

I am extremely sorry to have to keep you waiting, but rest assured, I will contact you again within the next two weeks.

Your Sincerely

A Coote

So I have been sent two very similar letters from two different CSO's and one stating a time frame which is about to pass. Is this yet another delaying tatic?

 

I am also due to make a court application this week as the time scale for that is also due this week.

 

Should I send a letter first reminding them that I'm about to do that and pointing out that their own time scale has again run out?

 

Or should I just proceed straight to the court claim process??

 

Must admit starting to get a little nervous now!!

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...