Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi all, I purchased a car in January from Big Motoring World Leeds. At the time of sale I was shown a tab on the salespersons computer marked 'service history' and I was able to take comfort knowing that the car had been serviced on 3 occasions as the date, mileage and company was there on screen. Being a 3 and a bit year old car that, in my mind, constituted full service history 🤷‍♂️ Anyway, collected the car a week later. Once home I settled down to through the book pack etc. Opened the service history booklet and it was completely blank. In addition there were no invoices detailing that any services had been done. I duly contacted BMW and asked them to supply me with proof of service history. They responded saying that on their 'vehicle documentation checklist' I had ticked and then signed to the fact that I had seen the service history and that I was happy with it. I dug out this checklist and what it actually states is 'seen service history online' which I had in the showroom. BMW seem to think that this satisfies their responsibility in providing service history. The reality is that I don't have any proof that the vehicle has ever been serviced! For my own peace of mind I ended up paying for a service that satisfied the manufacturers maintenance schedule to the tune of £330. I even complained to the finance company that the vehicle contravenes the Sale of Goods act 2015 as l, in effect, ot is not as described. Amazingly they weren't interested and instead I just got an email stating that it's not illegal to sell a vehicle without service history and that servicing costs were part and parcel of vehicle ownership. I've since complained to the ombudsman and am awaiting to see if they can help. I have no issue with the car but the treatment and customer service has been the worst I've ever experienced. I don't really know what to do next as I really do feel aggrieved that I've had to pay to service a car that should have already been serviced. Can anyone point me in the right direction please? 🙏
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • Hi again all, below is another email they sent me, I just don't want to get in trouble or things to get worse with this crowd but I am taking your advice here. Anyway advice would be appreciated.   I am contacting you again after having tried to contact you both by email on 03/04/2024 and 10/04/2024, and by telephone on 10/04/2024 and 17/04/2024 to discuss the matter in relation to the regularization of the SOLIDWORKS case against xxx our company.   This is an urgent legal matter. Please contact me at your earliest convenience - +44 2921 920 296.    If we do not recieve a response before 24/04/2024, we will assume that you are not willing to settle this dispute amicably. The case will then be referred back to our client with whom, ultimately, the final decision lies on the enforcement of their intellectual property rights.    Yours sincerel y, Rhys
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Hi all and can someone point me in the right direction.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3699 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi to everyone on the CAG forum.

 

I have been a "lurker" for quite a while and was recently asked for help by a good friend who is totally computer illiterate.

 

She works as a nurse looking after handicapped children and has done so for all her working life.

 

Way back she was persuaded by the NHS to "opt out" of her pension scheme.

 

After 13 years out of the NHS scheme she was warned that her pension had sufferred and advised to opt back in.

 

This she did, but on recently checking her pension forecasts, she finds her pension is a shadow of what it would have been if she had stayed in.

 

Is there any pension advice or anyone who can help on the forum please. If so it would be much appreciated.

 

All the best

 

Ian

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there.

 

Just to check, you're saying that the NHS persuaded your friend to opt out of their own [normally generous] pension scheme?

 

This may not have been good advice and I'm quite surprised that the NHS would say this. Can your friend prove what happened please?

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

My friend started to receive leaflets from a firm called Childs and Co,

who were promoting opting out of the NHS scheme and going into a private pension.

 

I was amazed, when she told me that many members of staff had leaflets put in their wage packets by the payroll dept.

 

She is now devastated that what she thought would be a decent pension is going to be pathetic.

 

Also she should have been upgraded to "mental health nurse status" or sum such on her pension, but only after 10 unbroken years.

 

The opting out negated this option and even after opting back in,

she could not then take advantage of the benefits this enhanced status gave.

I am very upset for her, as she does a sterling job and is real gutted!.

 

Thanks for the quick reply.

 

Ian

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the information. So the problem was created by Childs and Co from what you're saying. Are they still in business?

 

I'll move your thread to the Pensions and Insurance forum, which has seen similar problems in the past.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

My friend started to receive leaflets from a firm called Childs and Co, who were promoting opting out of the NHS scheme and going into a private pension. I was amazed, when she told me that many members of staff had leaflets put in their wage packets by the payroll dept. She is now devastated that what she thought would be a decent pension is going to be pathetic. Also she should have been upgraded to "mental health nurse status" or sum such on her pension, but only after 10 unbroken years. The opting out negated this option and even after opting back in, she could not then take advantage of the benefits this enhanced status gave. I am very upset for her, as she does a sterling job and is real gutted!.

 

Thanks for the quick reply.

 

Ian

 

In addition to contacting the Pension Advisory Service, I think your friend should also contact their HR department about why the NHS allowed a private pension providers leaflet to be issued with wage packets.

 

There is more to this I would think, which needs to be explained. I cannot see any NHS department being involved in providing their staff with information about opting out of the NHS pension scheme and transfering into a private pension. That would not make any sense at all.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks UncleBulgaria, it seemed weird to me as well, but my friend reckons it was in approx 1989.

 

She had been in the NHS scheme since she started in 1984 and the payroll dept started putting info leaflets about private pensions in with their wage slips.

 

I said that this sounded very dodgy, but she assures me that it was happening.

 

I know back around the same time I was advised to contract out of serps and take a private pension, a decision which has and will also cost me dear.

 

Thanks for your help and advice though.

I cannot find Childs and Co, apart from a private bank which is a subsidiary of RBS.

 

However i have been talking to my friend earlier and she thinks she has a big folder of all her old wage slips and pension stuff.

 

So I am going to go on a mission to go through it all and see what we can find.

 

Thanks

 

Ian

Link to post
Share on other sites

I seem to remember the same around about that time.

 

it happened to most people on the superannuation scheme

 

I think there was a wisdom at that time made that they had to 'advertise' alternatives schemes by compulsion.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

nicked from elsewhere:

 

State Earnings Related Pension Scheme.

 

SERPS Opted Out History

 

SERPS: Contracting Out – For Better or Worse?

 

Introduction

SERPS is the state Earnings related Pension Scheme (Now known as the State Second Pension) and is essentially a second pension available on top of the standard basic state pension. SERPS is comprised of National Insurance contributions paid by employers and employees to the Government which in turn pays an enhanced second pension. Since National Insurance contributions increase with earnings, higher earners receive a larger second pension (up To a point).

 

From 1988 onwards it became possible to "contract out" of SERPS – this meant that some of the National Insurance contributions were redirected from the state pension into personal pensions. Where people contracted out of SERPS the Government was no longer responsible for paying the second pension and this responsibility passed to the personal pension provider.

The idea was that the personal pension provider would invest the national Insurance contributions in such a way that the investor would be left with a larger pension at retirement than would have been the case under SERPS. Contracting out was very popular throughout the late 1980’s and early 1990’s.It is estimated that some 7.5 million people have contracted out of SERPS at some point and half of these remain contracted out.

The problem

It is now apparent that millions of people who contracted out in the 1980’s and1990’s are set to be worse off in retirement than they would have been with their second state pension. Put simply, the national insurance contributions invested by personal pension providers have not grown anything like the degree that was anticipated in the 1980’s and 1990’s. Accordingly the pension that people who contracted out will receive will often be significantly less than they would have received under SERPS.

Mis selling

People who have contracted out of SERPS will want to know whether they have any remedy to recoup the losses they may suffer in later life. In order to recover losses a person will need to show that the advice he or she received in relation to contracting out amounted to a "mis-sale". There is evidence that in the 1980’s and early 1990’s financial advisors were recommending almost as a matter of course that people would benefit from contracting out of SERPS. In part this was, no doubt, because the advisors received a commission for each person who agreed to contract out. In addition, however, there was a general perception, encouraged by the Government and media that contracting out was a "good thing". One newspaper even went as far as stating that for many people contracting out could be "the best financial planning decision of their lives". It is perhaps not surprising, therefore, that financial advisors were caught up in the contracting out furore.

Notwithstanding the above, any financial advisor recommending contracting out was obliged to investigate fully whether or not contracting out was appropriate to the individual investor. This means that in each case an advisor should have investigated the investor’s age, sex, employment status, earnings, details of any employer’s pension scheme and attitude to risk. Where this was not done, the investment will have been miss-sold.

 

Compensation Claims

It is estimated that millions of people will lose out as a result of contracting out of SERPS. If the contracting out is as a result of a "mis-sale" then the investor may well be entitled to compensation. Calculating compensation losses is complex where the investor in question has not yet retired. It involves a comparison of the projected return the contracted out contributions will give at retirement with what the second state pension would have given. Even at projected future growth rates of 7% per year (which may be optimistic) many people who have contracted out will suffer significant losses.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...