Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
    • In anticipation of lodging my court claim next Weds 1 May (14 days after advising P2G that was my deadline for them to settle my claim) I have completed my first draft POC as below: Claim Claim number: xxxxx Reference: P2G MAY 2024   Claimant xxxxx   Defendant Parcel2Go 1A Parklands Lostock Bolton BL6 4SD  Particulars of Claim The defendant has failed to arrange for the safe delivery of the claimant's parcel containing a 8 secondhand golf clubs (valued at £265) that was sent to a UK address using their delivery service (P2G Reference xxxxx). The defendant contracted Evri to deliver the parcel (Evri Reference xxxxx) and refuses to reimburse the claimant on the grounds that the claimant did not purchase their secondary insurance contract. The defendant seeks to exclude their liability in breach of section 57 Consumer Rights Act. The secondary insurance contract is in breach of section 72. The claimant seeks reimbursement of £265, plus P2G fees of £9.10, plus postage costs for two first class letters to P2G of £2.70, plus court fees, plus interest. The claimant claims interest under section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year from xxxxx to xxxxxx on £276.80 and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate of £xxxx   Details of claim Amount claimed £276.80 I look forward to your thoughts and comments guys! As ever, many thanks - G59    
    • Hmm, that's strange how they got my email then.  I assume the below is ok to send to DCBL, Nicky?  Hello, I am writing regarding our ongoing dispute and the upcoming court claim reference xxxxxxxx. To ensure fairness and transparency in our communications leading up to the court hearing, I request that you use postal mail exclusively for all further correspondence related to this claim. Please refrain from sending any communication or documents via email. Thank you for your understanding and cooperation. If you have any questions or need clarification, please feel free to contact me via postal mail at the address provided above. Yours sincerely, xxxx
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

carter claim form Old Capital One debt ***Claim Discontinued***


nigrob
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3561 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi ,

 

I have received a MCOL from Brian Carter about an old Capital One debt that I believe is statute barred.

 

I acknowledged service of the MCOL with I intend to defend the whole claim box ticked.

 

I then CCA'd Brian Carter to ensure that I received a response from the 28 day limit.

 

Today Brian Carter solicitor has written back saying they cannot supply me with this information

and I need to contact Lowell Group , Leeds instead.

 

This may then take me outside the time limit for the defence to be submitted if I wait for the information to come back.

 

Shall I just submit the statute barred defence or wait until nearer the deadline ?

 

Can anyone write a defence for statute barred for me to put onto the court defence.

 

Has anyone else had this problem with these company's ?

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is the prefered Statute Barred Defence nicurro:-

 

1 The Claimant's claim was issued on (date).

 

2 The Claimant contends that the Claimant's claim so issued is a claim in contract and is statute barred pursuant to the provisions of section 5 of the limitation act 1980. If, which is denied, the claimant contends that the Defendant is in breach of the alleged contract, in excess of 6 years have elapsed since the date on which any cause of action for breach accrued for the benefit of the Claimant.

 

3 The Claimant's claim to be entitled to payment of £x or any other sum, or relief of any kind is denied.

 

PS for the record everyone that becomes a target of these companies have the same problems.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi ,

 

I submitted the defence as the above post ,

 

today I received a letter from BC solicitors saying

 

" attached is a letter saying that the claimant wishes to proceed with the claim at this time .

The claimant agrees to mediation in principle.

We would be grateful to hear from you in relation to without prejudice negotiations."

It then gives me a contact number to call.

 

Attached was also a letter which says the same and that they are looking forward to hearing from the court with directions.

 

I have heard nothing from the court since they acknowledged my defence nor have I received any response from the CCA request I sent.

The statutory time limit has passed for the CCA .

 

Do I now follow the CCA request with another letter or request ?

 

Has anyone else has this response from BC solicitors ?

 

Are BC just trying to get me to agree a repayment plan with no intention of continuing court action ?

 

Can anyone advise please.

 

Thanks

 

Nic

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep that's about it

 

they'll run away soon I bet.

 

well they've already started.

 

...have you looked at your credit file to see if this confirms SB status ?

 

noddle is good for payment dates/

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi , there is no record of this on my credit file , today I received another letter saying the same thing as previous letter , also there was another letter made out which looked like it has come from the court but needed me to complete the empty spaces with a payment schedule and to sign it .

 

it also says that if a repayment agreement can be reached or would prevent any further costs being added onto the total.

 

nic.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep more begging before we have to run away as we know its not collectable.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi , can someone tell me what happens after I submit my defence please. I have had the letters above from BC but heard nothing from the court.

The MCOL is still at the stage of defence submitted.

Should I send the account in dispute letter to BC or is there another letter to send to stop them trying to get me to agree to a repayment plan.

 

Are there any time scales from when I submit my defence ?

 

Cheers

 

Nic

Link to post
Share on other sites

28 days to respond to your defence and if not the claim is stayed.If they do the claim is then allocated to your local county court.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi again , after filing the defence and sending an account in dispute letter I have now received from the Northampton court for proposed allocation to the small claims.

It says that the claim is defended and I need to complete the Small Claims questionnaire and return it by 09 the April.

There is also a form about the Small Claims mediation service which says they will try to sort it out before it goes to court to avoid fees.

I have still received no response from Lowell / BC from my CCA request .

 

Any advice on what to do now please.

 

Cheers

 

Nic

Link to post
Share on other sites

You submit the N180 by the date stated...agree to mediation..the rest is self explanatory.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can raise whatever you wish at mediation...remember though its not a mini trial...mediation is an attempt to narrow the differences and try to settle to avoid further court action.

As for your second point its depends how mediation goes otherwise its going to court.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again , just filling in the N180 ,

Question 1 : Do you agree that small claims track is appropriate track for this case ?

 

Do I answer yes even though the debt is statute barred ?

 

Then if I answer no it asks which track should it be a located ?

 

I just don't want to agree to it going to small claims if it can be avoided.

 

Also are there any other letters to send to BC / Lowell to try to get them to drop it altogether ?

 

Any help appreciated .

 

Nic

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again , just filling in the N180 ,

Question 1 : Do you agree that small claims track is appropriate track for this case ? Yes should the claimant wish to continue considering their claim is Statute Barred

 

Do I answer yes even though the debt is statute barred ? Yes and quote the above

 

Then if I answer no it asks which track should it be a located ? well you have answered yes so not applicable

 

I just don't want to agree to it going to small claims if it can be avoided.It must be placed to a track and if less than 10K small claims is the correct track

 

Also are there any other letters to send to BC / Lowell to try to get them to drop it altogether ? Afraid not if only ....then we wouldn't need courts

 

Any help appreciated .

 

Nic

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

It would appear that the claimant has rejected mediation....see how the court reacts to this.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi again , the case has now been allocated to fast track at my local court , I have received a letter saying that I need to send to the court and BC copies of what I will be relying on in court. Can you advise me of what I need to send and any other advice on going to court.

I received no response from BC from the requests I sent them for proof of the debt , they did send me a letter asking me to contact them which I thought was from the court at first as it was about mediation , I never contacted them.

 

Cheers

 

Nicurro

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again , the case has now been allocated to fast track at my local court , I have received a letter saying that I need to send to the court and BC copies of what I will be relying on in court. Can you advise me of what I need to send and any other advice on going to court.

 

This is called standard disclosure...see the legal library N265..complete with anything you wish to rely on or have referred to within your defence/witness statement...once finished serve on the claimant by the date stated within your Notice of Allocation.

 

I received no response from BC from the requests I sent them for proof of the debt , they did send me a letter asking me to contact them which I thought was from the court at first as it was about mediation , I never contacted them.

 

If you agreed to mediation within your DQ N181 then thats why they wrote to you.....they will inform the court that you disregarded their approach

 

Cheers

 

Nicurro

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi , sorry my mistake , the case is allocated to the small claims track , the letter says that witness statements need to be served to the court and the claimant 14 days before the hearing , the hearing is 6th August 2014.

I have heard nothing from BC / Lowell since the letter from court.

I have no witnesses for a statement .

The claim is for around £500 but I defended with the Statute Barred , my requests for proof from BC / Lowell have not been answered.

 

Please advise on the way forward.

 

Nic

Link to post
Share on other sites

I must admit I was surprised when you referred to Fast Track.......you are the witness to the claim ...you prepare a WS and submit by the date stated likewise disclosure as above.

 

Just follow the time line stated within the Notice of Allocation.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The witness evidence referred to is your own witness statement.

 

Hi , forgive me if I sound stupid but what do I need to put in the statement ?

Is there a correct way to write the statement ?

 

I need to try to get this done today if possible.

 

Nic

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi , forgive me if I sound stupid but what do I need to put in the statement ?

Is there a correct way to write the statement ?

 

I need to try to get this done today if possible.

 

Nic

 

Shouldn't your Witness Statement have been submitted today (ie 14 days before the hearing date), if you haven't done it you need to search the threads and produce a WS which mirrors the defence you've already submitted, the take it and hand deliver it to the Court

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...