Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I hope Lord Frost is OK. Islamists and the woke Left are uniting to topple the West ARCHIVE.PH archived 18 Apr 2024 19:12:37 UTC  
    • Ok you are in the clear. The PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 for two reasons. The first is that in Section 9 [2][e]  says the PCN must "state that the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver and invite the keeper— (i)to pay the unpaid parking charges ". It does not say that even though it continues correctly with blurb about the driver. The other fault is that there is no parking period mentioned. Their ANPR cameras do show your arrival and departure times but as that at the very least includes driving from the entrance to the parking space then later leaving the parking space and driving to the exit. It also doesn't allow for finding a parking spot: manoeuvering into it avoiding parking on the lines: possibly having to stop to allow pedestrians/other cars to pass in front of you; returning the trolley after finishing shopping; loading children disabled people in and out of the car, etc etc.  All of that could easily add five, ten or even 15 minutes to your time which the ANPR cameras cannot take into account. So even if it was only two hours free time you could  still have been within the  time since there is a MINIMUM of 15 minutes Grace period when you leave the car park. However as they cannot even manage to get their PCN to comply with the Act you as keeper cannot be pursued. Only the driver is now liable and they do not know who was driving as you have not appealed and perhaps unwittingly given away who was driving. So you do not owe them a penny. No need to appeal. Let them waste their money pursuing you . 
    • If Labour are elected I hope they go after everyone who made huge amounts of money out of this, by loading the company with debt. The sad thing is that some pension schemes, including the universities one, USS, will lose money along with customers.
    • What's the reason for not wanting a smart meter? Personally I'm saving a pile on a tariff only available with one. Today electricity is 17.17p/kWh. If the meter is truly past its certification date the supplier is obliged to replace it. If you refuse to allow this then eventually they'll get warrant and do so by force. Certified life varies between models and generations, some only 10 or 15 years, some older types as long as 40 years or maybe even more. Your meter should have its certified start date marked somewhere so if you doubt the supplier you can look up the certified life and cross check.
    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Claiming charges from Britannia Building Society


gerson
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3648 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

I have had a response to my SAR request from BBS and I am looking to reclaim various fees. Looking through what I have is dificult (copies of microfiche files, two mortgages, 1 savings account, various correspondance, etc.)

 

Mortgage was taken out in 1986 and re-paid in 2005

 

From looking around in the forums I gather that the following can be reclaimed:

 

Late payment fees

Returned DD/CHQ fees

Deeds dispatch fees

Penalty interest

 

Is there anything else that can be reclaimed, e.g. cost incurred for passing mortgage to solicitors prior to taking action, etc.

 

Also I re-paid the morgage early by re-mortgaging with another supplier, are early redemption fees exempt?

 

Thanks for all and any response

 

G

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Update,

 

Still waiting for confirmation from BBS as to what the various codes mean.

 

In the meantime I have put everything that looks like a 'charge' into the spreadsheet - makes a very pretty number indeed (wifes face light up like a Christmas tree:smile:).

 

Also included 'sols/litigation' costs into the spreadsheet.

 

I have sent a letter today giving 7 days to respond requesting full breakdown of all/any 'sols/litigation' fees and again requesting a glossary of codes.

 

Also noticed that no information was given regarding some endowment policies that we had - so requested that as well

 

G

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent - look forward to the update :)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Havinastella,

 

We were in arrears at various times during the term of the mortgage but BBS never instigated any court action, only ever threatened and we always managed to 'find' the money to pay what was due or at least a good portion.

 

G

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi All,

 

Update time

 

Not much - BBS have responded to my request with the following------ a) cannot supply as your current address does not match that on record and b) you did not sign the request letter and c) DPA etc.......

 

OK - they have already supplied the SAR (incomplete) so why the BS now

 

Anyways I will form a reply on the basis of 'You have already supplied some SAR to this current address' and this time sign it

 

See how quick they reply with the confirmation of the codes and the other info requested.

 

G

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, point out that the time to query your address and no signature would have been before sending out some of the data !!

 

Once you get the rest, make a complaint to the Information Commissioner.. Ask .. is it usuall to send out half the data, and then question whether they have sent it to the right person before sending out the rest !!

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

Hi All,

 

Update - BBS have still not supplied the information requested

 

So today I have sent them a 'formal complaint' and a request for refund of all 'items' that I consider to be penalty charges

 

They have 14 days to respond or it is off to the FOS

 

I have asked for all solicitors fees to be repaid and the indemnity insurance as well

 

Will keep you updated

 

G

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Hi All - Update time,

 

BBS have refused my Claim in full

 

1. Mortgage indemnity fee is not reclaimable...

2. Litigation/Solicitors fees - rejected but have not provided any evidence/invoices to prove the costs just simply stated 'These are the costs applied on us for the services'

3. Fees (returned chq, failed DD, referal to arrears dept, etc.) are denied, - FOS have deemed that the arrears fees charged have been deemed fair and reasonable

4. Additionally they Quote reference to correspondance in 2003 where we supposedly queried fees and as such this issue is now 'time barred'. The only correspondance in 2003, which is in the SAR data and also re-copied in the recent reply, related to 'enquiry in respect to the Balance outstanding' at the time we were looking at re-mortgaging - the reply being 'The amount due would be the interest charged plus the insurance charged plus any fees charged making a total of xxxx'

 

To me Point 4 does not equate to me asking for a breakdown of fees but simply a Balance of account

 

Also in the recent correspondance is a spreadsheet of the breakdown of how they came to the xxxx number. This spreadsheet is not contained within the SAR data but does have a column for the 'Fees charged' over the years Prior to 2003, but is only totals and not a confirmation of each and every fee charged

 

Should I now take this to the FOS or give BBS one last Chance?

 

Thanks

 

G

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Decided to give BBS one last chance and sent them a letter pointing out my dispute

 

1. No company should require the consumer to indemnify them for a commercial loss

2. Provide invoices for the work carried out or refund in full - No caourt action was ever taken by BBS only a few letters from the 'arrears department'

3. Fees - unless they can provide a full breakdown of the reasonableness (i.e. this is a true cost) then refund in full

4. Correspondence in 2003 was in relation to balance of account and nothing else therefore not time barred

 

Have given them 14 days to respond or it off to the FOS/FCA we glo

 

G

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Update,

 

 

BBS have basically said 'go away - FOS have agreed our charges are correct already'

 

 

So I now Need to give this to FOS/FCA for consideration

 

 

How do I pass this to the FOS/FCA from outside the UK?

 

 

G

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Britannia Building Society have refused to budge on my claim for various charges, fees, etc.

 

Am now in the process of sending all information to the FOS

 

Is this still the was to go or should I be looking at court (claim would be in excess of 30k)

 

G

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Gerson

 

I preferred to take my mortgage company to court (3 times) and each time they paid back the unlawful charges, just before the court hearing.

 

However, going down the FOS route is fine too - if you're not successful with the FOS you can then still take the court route!!

 

:-) BAE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Update:

 

BBS have informed the FOS that they are under the impression that my complaint is 'time barred' and should not be investigated.

 

The final response from BBS was in Oct and complaint laid in February (so not time barred that way).

 

Will have to wait for the FOS to provide more details

 

G

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update:

 

No suprise - FOS have accepted the comment from BBS that I requested a detailed breakdown of fees in 2003

 

There is absolutely no evidence of this is the SAR pack, the only evidence I can find is a response in relation to a 'balance of account' enquiry which says 'balance including insurance, fees, etc'.

 

When I raised the complaint with BBS they responded along the same line and suddenly included a spreadsheet which showed an annual summary of account - but not since inception - which only gave totals and included a collumn for fees - in no way did this provide a breakdown of the fees only a 'yearly total'

 

I will now need to go back through all my paperwork and the SAR coms log to verify that we never requested at any time a full breakdown of fees

 

The FOS obviously do not look at the data supplied and simply followed the BBS 'script'

 

Once I verify that no breakdown of fees was ever requested or supplied then I will reject the FOS decision and request a further review

 

I will post up my redacted response to FOS in due course

 

G

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...