Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Sec127 (3) repealed, now gone. S. 127(3)-(5) repealed (6.4.2007) by Consumer Credit Act 2006 (c. 14), ss. {15}, 70, 71(2), {Sch. 4} (with Sch. 3 para. 11); S.I. 2007/123, art. 3(2), Sch. 2
    • We used to recommend that people accept mediation but our advice has changed. The mediation process is unclear. Before you can embark on it you have to agree that you are prepared to enter a compromise – and that means that you agree that you are prepared to give up some of your rights even though you are completely in the right and you are entitled to hundred percent of your money and even though EVRi are simply trying to obstruct you in order to discourage you and also to put others who might want to follow your example off from claiming and even though they have a legitimate basis for reimbursement. Mediation is not transparent. In addition to having to sign up that you are prepared to give up some of your rights, you will also have to agree not to reveal any details of the mediation – including the result of the mediation – so that the whole thing is kept secret. This is not open justice. Mediation has nothing to do with justice. The only way of getting justice is to make sure that this matter goes to trial unless EVRi or the other parcel delivery companies put their hands up and accept the responsibility even if they do it is a gesture of goodwill. Going to trial and winning at trial produces a judgement which we can then add to our small collection to assist other people who are in a similar boat. EVRi had been leading you around by the nose since at least January – and probably last year as well – and their whole purpose is simply to drag it out, to place obstacles in your way, to deter other people, and to make you wish that you'd never started the process and that you are prepared to give up your 300 quid. You shouldn't stand for it. You should take control. EVRi would prefer that you went to mediation and if nothing else that is one excellent reason why you should decline mediation and go to court. If it's good for them it's bad for you. On mediation form, you should sign that you are not prepared to compromise and that you are not prepared to keep the result secret but that you want to share the results with other people in similar circumstances. This means that the mediation won't go ahead. It will take slightly longer and you will have to pay a court fee but you will get that back when you win and you will have much greater satisfaction. Also, once you go the whole process, you will learn even more about bringing a small claim in the County Court so that if this kind of thing happens again you will know what to do and you will go ahead without any hesitation. Finally, if you call EVRi's bluff and refuse mediation and go to trial, there is a chance – maybe not a big chance – but there is a chance that they will agree to pay out your claim before trial simply in order to avoid a judgement. Another judgement against them will simply hurt the position even more and they really don't want this. 300 quid plus your costs is peanuts to them. They don't care about it. They will set it off against tax so the taxpayer will make their contribution. It's all about maintaining their business model of not being liable for anything, and limiting or excluding liability contrary to section 57 and section 72 of the consumer rights act.     And incidentally, there is a myth that if you refuse mediation that somehow it will go against you and the judge will take a dim view and be critical of you. This is precisely a myth. It's not true. It would be highly improper if any judge decided the case against you on anything other than the facts and the law of the case. So don't worry about that. The downside of declining mediation is that your case will take slightly longer. The upside is that if you win you will get all your money and you will have a judgement in your favour which will help others. The chances of you winning in this case are better than 95% and of course you would then receive 100% of your claim plus costs
    • Nice to hear a positive story about a company on this form for a change. Thank you
    • too true HB, but those two I referred for starters - appear to be self admitted - One to excuse other lockdown law breaking, by claiming his estate away from his consistency and London abode was his main home the other if he claims to have 'not told the truth' in his own words via that quote - to have mislead his investors rather than broken lobbying rules   - seem to be slam dunks - pick which was your law breaking - it seems to be both and much more besides in Jenricks case Starmer was director of public prosecutions yet the tories are using seemingly baseless allegations for propaganda and starmer is missing pressing apparent blatant criminality in politics
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Esa tribunal in jan 2014


downmum
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3725 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

im trying to get some advice re esa tribunal for a friend who is in pieces at the short hearing date - only had 15 days to prepare.

 

A big pack has arrived which contains all the paperwork from both atos and him and well its a minefiled.

 

I cant understand some of the paperwork as their is a lot of legal jargon.

 

Problem he faces - everyone including dr and hospital consultants are away over xmas and new year so he is unable to get any supporting documents in time.

 

2 questions really.......

 

1. Can we request a later hearing date

 

2. If the hearign still goes ahead how should we approach it.

 

Any help will be greatly appreciated.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

just to add there is a medical report from 2010 - carried out independantly by his work place - which outlined in detail his health condition. Is it a good idea to use this as I believe it is still valid to his current medical conditions. admittedly it does not mention much about the care needs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's a link to the forum stikky about tribunals.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?251737-Appealing-or-going-to-a-Tribunal-Some-useful-information%281-Viewing%29-nbsp

 

One of the things you can do is to go through the Atos report and find any errors, contributions and omissions in it. That's where I started when I had my tribunal. That information should help you start to add to the template in the stikky and start the submission document. You need to mug up on the DWP's descriptors [link in the stikky] and figure out which apply to your friend and how many points they should have scored.

 

I'm sure the forum guys will have other suggestions about medical information, tribunals and so on.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

:downmum:

 

Suspect the preparation for this tribunal's been put off until the last minute? :-) And now it's panic stations. Not an unusual scenario with the end of funding for help with first tier tribunals. Your friend can apply in writing for a postponement, but it's unlikely to be granted unless there's a genuine last minute bereavement or domestic emergency, or he's only received the 'bundle' from Jobcentreplus within the last few days. And he shouldn't assume a postponement without written confirmation.

 

With the bank holidays your friend's already out of time for a submission of written evidence via the Tribunals Support Centre, but if he gets something prepared it can be sent directly to the venue or three copies taken on the day. The tribunal will hear the case as scheduled unless there isn't time for them to read a 'book'. Even at this late stage it's worth preparing a written submission of evidence cos it clarifies thinking and helps the appellant to answer the questions from the tribunal panel.

 

The booklet at the sixth link of :honeybee13:'s guide has the exceptional/special circumstances for an award of employment n support on pages 10 - 12 and the descriptors for activities that are relevant to the workplace on pages 18 - 28.

 

One way to approach a written submission of evidence is to identify the descriptors you and your friend believe he meets, then write each one at the top of a separate sheet of A4 or word doc. For each descriptor quote what Atos have said, then write a paragraph to explain where Atos got it wrong. Followed by several paragraphs about how it really is for your friend. Along the lines of; cos of X, can't do Y. Refer to the medical evidence you've got and illustrate what you're saying with examples from day to day life. For example; cos the nearest bus stop is n metres away, my friend has to leave work early to take me to the doctor/hospital/collect medication from the pharmacy.

 

Slot the paragraphs into the template. Then, if applicable, add a paragraph about why being found fit for work/work related activity would constitute a substantial risk to the health of your friend or someone else.

 

The 2010 medical report can be used so long as it's relevant to your friend's ability, or inability, to perform the specified descriptors at the time of the Atos assessment. (Cos articular cartilage doesn't regenerate, I once had a tribunal influenced by a ten years old scan which showed missing cartilage.) And I've also put statements from carers to good use. Doesn't have to be an officially registered carer, so long as s/he can put together a few paragraphs about the care they give the appellant cos of the descriptors the appellant can't do. And even better if the carer's prepared to be a witness.

 

Sincerely, Margaret. :panda:

Edited by **Margaret**
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Quick question

 

is each area scored out of 15 points as i have now gone through them all and have got a total fo 120 points my friend should have been given. From the threshold of 15 points to 120 sounds a lot to me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quick question

 

is each area scored out of 15 points as i have now gone through them all and have got a total fo 120 points my friend should have been given. From the threshold of 15 points to 120 sounds a lot to me.

 

If you have looked at each criteria separately and scored them accurately, then yes, you total the score. I only managed 93! Does your friend meet any of the support group criteria?

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:downmum:

 

It's important to understand that eligibility for employment n support with the support component doesn't depend on points or a score. Some of the 15 point descriptors are also descriptors for the support component, but not all of them.

 

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/esa214-a-guide-to-employment-and-support-allowance-the-work-capability-assessment

 

Exceptional circumstances for being found to have limited capability for work related activity (support group) on pages 11 - 12.

 

Descriptors of limited capability for work related activity (support group) on pages 26 - 28. Only one needs to be satisfied.

 

Margaret.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Margaret.

 

My friend won his appeal & he has been put in a support group!

 

I'm over the moon for him :)

 

Just now need to understand what happens now. I'm presuming they will back date any payments owed to him.

 

How does the support group work? Is anyone on here that might know & shed some light?

 

Once again a massive thank you all for the support & advice as it shows even at the last stage of prep everything helps no matter how small. I couldn't have done it without ur guidance on the site :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

All payments should be backdated to when the money was originally reduced to the appeal rate or, if it is a new claim, to week 14.

 

Support group means that he doesn't have to do anything - no work focussed interviews or anything. If the tribunal recommended a period before he should be reassessed then DWP should but may not adhere to it.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Congratulations! It may take a few weeks for back pay to be sorted. However long it takes, no money will be lost and your friend will get all the money owed to him.

 

With support group, you don't have to do anything. You can contact an adviser at the JCP if you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done. As said, it can take several weeks for back payments to be made. Actually, it can take several weeks before the DWP are made aware of the Tribunal result.

Once it's been finalised, your friend should receive a letter confirming everything. What it won't do, is say how long he / she is in the Support Group for. As this can vary widely, I'd suggest a phone call to their BDC to confirm length,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks both.

 

For now we're just happy tribunal went in our favour.

 

Having read the decision myself it also states on the letter "tribunal recommends xxxxx should not be reassessed for a period of 2 years". I'm presuming this is the length of time my friend will be in support group!

Link to post
Share on other sites

But the recent review did suggest that DWP should start adhering to tribunal recommendations and should anyway have a minimum of 6 months between a tribunal and reassessment so any suggestion of an earlier assessment should be challenged I think.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:Reassessment Following a Tribunal:

 

Has been a thorny issue since 2012, when tribunal panels started to qualify their decisions with very brief reasons for a decision added to decision notices. And one line reasons, from a drop down menu, of why the panel disagreed with Jobcentreplus. At the same time tribunal panels began to recommend an interval before further reassessment but usually it was far from clear as to when the recommendation ran from; date of the Jobcentreplus decision or date of the tribunal decision. Following some freedom of info responses;

 

Unless there's a statement to the contrary, the default recommendation is the original recommendation from the date of the Atos assessment and Jobcentreplus decision.

 

Some judges are now giving recommendations of an interval (n months or years) from 'today's date' or the date of an upheld appeal.

 

Neither of the above are binding on Jobcentreplus who frequently ignore tribunal recommendations.

 

Doctor Paul Litchfield who conducted the fourth independent review of the decidedly flawed work capability assessment has made further suggestions concerning the intervals between appeal and reassessment.

 

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/work-capability-assessment-independent-review-year-4

(Pages 42 - 43 and 47.)

For claimants who find themselves with another ESA50 within months (or sometimes days) of an upheld tribunal, it's worth attaching a copy of the tribunal decision notice (and the statement of reasons if it was applied for) to the new ESA50.

Margaret.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanku all for the info :)

 

We will make a call to them to find out exactly the length of time for support group. I'm hoping they adhere to the tribunal recommendation but as u all said it's not binding but fingers crossed!

 

As for another esa50 I think if that happens then we will definitely attach the tribunal recommendation and question it if it happens straightaway.

 

I must admit it's all so complicated but thanks for making me understand it & be able to follow it.

 

Margaret - i will look at the link (thanks) when I can absorb the info properly. It looks interesting!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Indeed, downmum. Keep all the information you have as it will form the basis of the next ESA50 - even if that's a couple of years away. I keep an updated file at home of all my medical correspondence and just add to it as additional evidence comes my way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...