Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. Could you post up what they've sent please so we can see what the charge is? Cover up your name and address and their reference number. HB
    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

House Insurance : Burgled - Insurance company offering half the cost


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3792 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

A close friend of mine has recently been burgled.

 

Though distraught and stressful, the stolen items were minimal in comparison to what could have been taken.

 

The assessor came round a few days after the event, took some details etc and said that the electrical claim will be passed to the 3rd Party Company.

 

Part of the claim, there were 2 electrical items which were gifted to my friend, for which the full price has been offer (by way of vouchers). There are no receipts for these items.

 

The 3rd item a camera, my friend has a receipt for £140. It is barely 15 months old. They have offered less than half the cost, £66 in vouchers or a different model and spec camera which is rubbish (we know as I have the cheaper spec camera). My friend purchased this model of camera after much deliberation, and as the policy is 'new for old' thinks that the camera should be replaced with a model with the same spec or at minimum vouchers to the cost he paid.

 

This camera is now discontinued, and the new specification for the camera is £165 so obviously the insurance do not wish to replace the camera.

 

The assessor viewed the receipt when he came round and said there shouldn't be a problem with replacing the camera.

 

Can anyone advise if my friend can complain about this offer. He has stated he isn't happy but the 3rd party company are not budging.

 

Also he has an old phone, unable to locate the box at the moment, which was used as a spare. It is still worth around £50. The 3rd party will not accept this as part of the claim as he doesn't have the IME numbers etc. The silly sod kept those details on the laptop which also got stolen! With no back up. So no IME number = no claim. The assessor again said there would be no problem with this item on his visit!

 

They are also refusing to replace the laptop until he agrees with all of the offers made on the other items.

Being without a laptop is proving an issue and wants this all sorted as quickly as possible.

 

Is there anyone out there who knows his rights on having part of the claim completed whilst trying to 'sort out' the rest of the claim?

 

 

We have read up on vouchers being offered instead of cash, on the FOS website. So we know they can offer vouchers, all very well, but they are only offering PCWorld/Currys/Argos - all the places you don't buy electrical's from!

Luckily they have said they will replace the laptop, he just needs one asap.

 

Thanks Me_too

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your friend should send a written complaint to their Insurers claims department about the items that they are not happy about. The Insurers have to offer a like for like replacement under a new for old policy, so if their 3rd party replacement company is not doing this, then the complaint needs to be made to the Insurers.

 

I am sure that the Insurers will try to resolve the problems with the parts of the claim your friend is not happy about. There is no reason for delaying the claim for parts of the claim they are happy with.

 

The reason for the IME on the phone is I expect to do with so many phones being stolen or just gifted because someone else has upgraded. If you friend registered the phone, they may be able to obtain the IME from Orange/Vodafone etc, as I am sure that you provide this when registering.

 

Most Insurers have deals with Currys/Argos re vouchers, as they have outlets around the whole of the UK. For items that are easily replaced, it just makes it easier for most policyholders, without the Insurers having the admin costs of dealing with many thousands of highsteet and online retailers.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi unclebB,

Thank you for your great advice, friend spoke with 'electricals' and offers all sorted.

Also spoke with Orange and attained IMEI number.

 

Still an issue with blocking the phone, I have posted a new thread regarding that issue, in mobile section.

Still have problems in the blocked phone now holding up insurance claim, but considering the weather problems can understand why unable to get through to insurance company. Electricals refusing to release all other items until IMEI blocked.

Can't get in touch with insurance company to ask for procedures in these circumstances.

Can't get phone blocked as out of contract.....going round in many circles!

 

Thanks for your advice, it is much appreciated.

Me_too

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...