Patricia Pearl - Small Claims Procedure - A Practical Guide


An excellent guide for the layperson in how to use the County Court - a must if you are intending to start a claim.

£19.99 + £1.50 (P&P)




Last Will and Testament Kit


Make a legally valid will without the fuss and expense of a solicitor - includes a full step-by-step guide.

£9.99 + £1.50 (P&P)

BAILIFFS - The Law and Your Rights

Written by John Kruse, one of the leading experts on Bailiff Law, this consumer friendly guide is essential reading for anyone who comes into contact with a bailiff.

The book is easy to understand and clearly explains the rights a bailiff has, and also what they cannot do when collecting debts and repossessing goods etc.

£13.95 + £2.00 (P&P)


Reclaim the Right Ltd. - reg. 05783665 in the UK

reg. office:
923 Finchley Road
London
NW11 7PE



+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2
1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 25
  1. #1
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    kirsty22 Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    31

    Question kirsty v woolwich

    This isnt my first time on here, but the start of a thread.
    Sent my first request letter,from the template library to woolwich on the 4th september, Barclaysicon replied on 18th October with a letter basically saying they disagree my view and that they are unwilling to refund the charges, and if i am disatisfied to refer to the financial ombudsmen. No partial refund or anything mentioned.
    I need help now as i am not quite sure what step to do now, shall i send a letter before actionicon letter or start a claim against them.
    Am also claiming against Halifaxicon who have offered partial refund as final offer am sending my moneyclaim form off tonight.
    Please Help!!!

    Similar Threads:
    Sent Data Protection Act to halifax, NatWest and woolwich on 07/08/06
    received Data Protection Act frm halifax 29/08/06 charged. Sent request letter to halifax 30/08/2006
    recieved gesture of £84 claiming £340 on 28/09/06
    sent letter before action on 29/09/06
    sent moneyclaim form , issued on 27/10/06
    **WON RECIEVED SETTLEMENT LETTER 15/11/06
    recieved Data Protection Act from Woolwich 31/08/2006, no charge sent request letter to woolwich 04/09/2006sent LBA on 26/10/06 have till 10/11/06 moneyclaim filed 16/11/06
    NatWest 40 days is 18/09/06 . Sent request letter 31/10. Sent LBA letter 15/11/06 till 29/11
    **WON RECEIVED FULL SETTLEMENT***

  2. #2
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    frankthecabbie Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    75

    Default Re: kirsty v woolwich

    The advice i was givern at the same stage as you was just stick to the timetable . I think that if it goes to court you have to have givern them every chance to settle


  3. #3
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    kirsty22 Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    31

    Default Re: kirsty v woolwich

    what did you do send a letter before actionicon. how is your claim going, what stage r u at?

    Sent Data Protection Act to halifax, NatWest and woolwich on 07/08/06
    received Data Protection Act frm halifax 29/08/06 charged. Sent request letter to halifax 30/08/2006
    recieved gesture of £84 claiming £340 on 28/09/06
    sent letter before action on 29/09/06
    sent moneyclaim form , issued on 27/10/06
    **WON RECIEVED SETTLEMENT LETTER 15/11/06
    recieved Data Protection Act from Woolwich 31/08/2006, no charge sent request letter to woolwich 04/09/2006sent LBA on 26/10/06 have till 10/11/06 moneyclaim filed 16/11/06
    NatWest 40 days is 18/09/06 . Sent request letter 31/10. Sent LBA letter 15/11/06 till 29/11
    **WON RECEIVED FULL SETTLEMENT***

  4. #4
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    frankthecabbie Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    75

    Default Re: kirsty v woolwich

    I waited until the time limit was up from the prelim letter and then sent the letter before actionicon .I then waited until that time limit was up .Today I put in the N1 form at court .


  5. #5
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    kirsty22 Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    31

    Default Re: kirsty v woolwich

    ok will do that, thanks for your time and help

    Sent Data Protection Act to halifax, NatWest and woolwich on 07/08/06
    received Data Protection Act frm halifax 29/08/06 charged. Sent request letter to halifax 30/08/2006
    recieved gesture of £84 claiming £340 on 28/09/06
    sent letter before action on 29/09/06
    sent moneyclaim form , issued on 27/10/06
    **WON RECIEVED SETTLEMENT LETTER 15/11/06
    recieved Data Protection Act from Woolwich 31/08/2006, no charge sent request letter to woolwich 04/09/2006sent LBA on 26/10/06 have till 10/11/06 moneyclaim filed 16/11/06
    NatWest 40 days is 18/09/06 . Sent request letter 31/10. Sent LBA letter 15/11/06 till 29/11
    **WON RECEIVED FULL SETTLEMENT***

  6. #6
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    frankthecabbie Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    75

    Default Re: kirsty v woolwich

    If you need help just ask .Its a huge learning curve and a bit scary . If I can help I will , If I don't know I will say so


  7. #7
    Classic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Make a contribution
    closey Informative closey Informative closey's Avatar

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Mar 2006
    I am in
    Brighton
    Posts
    1,386

    Default Re: kirsty v woolwich

    Also read back through the FAQ's. Everything you need to know is there. Ensure that you stick to the tried and tested method.

    Lloyds TSB - £972
    S.A.R, prelim and LBA sent
    Claim acknowledged
    Defence received
    AQ 20/06/06
    ***FULL SETTLEMENT RECEIVED 20/07/06***

    Woolwich - £2288
    S.A.R, prelim and LBA sent.
    Offered half
    Moneyclaim filed online 02/08/06
    Judgement filed online 23/08/06
    WARRANT FILED ONLINE 30/08/06
    MONEY RECEIVED BY BALIFF 04/10/06
    ***FULL SETTLEMENT RECEIVED 09/10/06***

    Smile - £175
    Pelim 23/06/06
    ***FULL SETTLEMENT RECEIVED 07/07/06***

    My Ex vs Woolwich - £715
    S.A.R sent 30/08/06
    Pelim 06/10/06
    LBA 20/10/06

    Advice & opinions provided are personal, and not endorsed by CAG or BAG, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

  8. #8
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    kirsty22 Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    31

    Default Re: kirsty v woolwich

    The 14 days is up now since I sent the lbaicon letter so have just filed my moneyclaim form against them for £1061. Lets wait and see what happens. Just won my case against Halifaxicon for £318 so stick at it everyone.

    Sent Data Protection Act to halifax, NatWest and woolwich on 07/08/06
    received Data Protection Act frm halifax 29/08/06 charged. Sent request letter to halifax 30/08/2006
    recieved gesture of £84 claiming £340 on 28/09/06
    sent letter before action on 29/09/06
    sent moneyclaim form , issued on 27/10/06
    **WON RECIEVED SETTLEMENT LETTER 15/11/06
    recieved Data Protection Act from Woolwich 31/08/2006, no charge sent request letter to woolwich 04/09/2006sent LBA on 26/10/06 have till 10/11/06 moneyclaim filed 16/11/06
    NatWest 40 days is 18/09/06 . Sent request letter 31/10. Sent LBA letter 15/11/06 till 29/11
    **WON RECEIVED FULL SETTLEMENT***

  9. #9
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    paddym Informative paddym Informative

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    755

    Default Re: kirsty v woolwich

    good luck Kirsty !


  10. #10
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    kirsty22 Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    31

    Default Re: kirsty v woolwich "HELP NOW GOING TO COURT"

    So far i have 2 other claims that have been settled in full, this one however is for my partner on a closed account, and i have not come this far before, so a bit stuck. Have done all the template letters my moneyclaim particulars stated.
    1. The Claimant has an account xxxxxx with the Defendant, opened prior 2000
    2.Since 14/08/00 the Defendant debited charges and interesticon in respect of purported breaches of contract. 3.Defendant is aware of all details as a list of charges has already been supplied. Another copy will be sent. 4.Claimant contends:
    a)The charges exceed the Defendant's losses caused by the breaches; (b)Term permitting the Defendant to levyicon such charges is unenforceable under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999, Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 and at Common Law.
    5.Claimant claims: a) return of the amounts debited of £717.00; (b) Interest per S.69
    County Courts Act 1984 of 8% - of £264.35 continuing at the same rate of 8% up to the judgment date or earlier payment at a daily rate of £0.15p; 6. Alternatively, if the
    charges are a fee for a service, then they must be reasonable under S.15 of the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982. 7.Costs allowed by the Court.
    The first part of their defence states
    1. The particulars of claim do not provide details or particulars of teh precise charges alleged to have been unlawful, or the date thereof. To the extent it is alleged that the claimant incurred bank charges on his account for unauthorised borrowings (whether unpaid fees for returned cheques, paid referral fees or any such other fees, the defendent puts the claimant to strict proof of each charge and the date thereof.

    This sounds to me like they want proof of each charge i am claiming ie schedule of charges which im pretty sure i sent. If i did forget though should i write a letter to woolwich and attach another schedule of charges. Is there a template letter? i have an allocation questionaire to fill out(n149) and send to local court and i will include a schedule of charges with this.
    Im not sure what to write in the other information box, information i consider that will help the judge to manage or clarify the claim, including information that should be supplied by the other party. Shall i put in here that i require a Breakdownicon of what it costs the bank for unpaid direct debits etc

    The other parts of defence were basic, they can charge me for unauthorised borrowing blah blah blah

    Any help will be very gratefully recieved thanks

    Sent Data Protection Act to halifax, NatWest and woolwich on 07/08/06
    received Data Protection Act frm halifax 29/08/06 charged. Sent request letter to halifax 30/08/2006
    recieved gesture of £84 claiming £340 on 28/09/06
    sent letter before action on 29/09/06
    sent moneyclaim form , issued on 27/10/06
    **WON RECIEVED SETTLEMENT LETTER 15/11/06
    recieved Data Protection Act from Woolwich 31/08/2006, no charge sent request letter to woolwich 04/09/2006sent LBA on 26/10/06 have till 10/11/06 moneyclaim filed 16/11/06
    NatWest 40 days is 18/09/06 . Sent request letter 31/10. Sent LBA letter 15/11/06 till 29/11
    **WON RECEIVED FULL SETTLEMENT***

  11. #11
    Royalties Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    Michael Browne Highly authoritative Michael Browne Highly authoritative Michael Browne Highly authoritative Michael Browne Highly authoritative Michael Browne Highly authoritative Michael Browne Highly authoritative Michael Browne Highly authoritative Michael Browne Highly authoritative Michael Browne Highly authoritative Michael Browne Highly authoritative Michael Browne Highly authoritative

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    13,005

    Default Re: kirsty v woolwich

    In Section G: (Read and amend to suit)

    1.You can request Standard Disclosure

    I am respectfully requesting that my claim be allocated to the small claims track. This issue is not a complicated one; it is an issue of fact and not of law. The issue is only whether the money levied by the Defendant in respect of its customer’s contractual breaches exceed their actual costs incurred. I am happy to pay their actual costs and I am surprised the Defendant did not counterclaim for these, because I would have paid them without argument.

    However, the continuing problem is, (in common with the 100s of other cases currently being brought by other bank customers), that the banks refuse to reveal the details of their penalty-charging regime. As the banks have a fiduciary duty towards their customers, they have a duty to deal straightforwardly and in utmost good faith.

    Accordingly, I would respectfully ask that the court in this case, not withstanding allocation to the small claims track, order standard disclosure. I understand that it is in the courts discretion to do so. This would bring a rapid end, not only to this litigation, but would also likely bring an end to much of the litigation in progress against other high-street banks.
    2 Refute their contention that POCicon's are lacking
    The defendant in its defence contends that this claim is not suitably particularised and the statement of claim is “embarrassing” and shows no reasonable grounds for the claim to be brought. The Claimant disagrees with this contention entirely. The claims particulars clearly state the statutory and common law provisions on which this claim relies, and the claimant will of course elaborate upon the claim particulars at such time as is required upon the direction of the court. Further, contrary to the contention of the defendant, the relevant numbers of the account in question were clearly identified in the claimant’s particulars of claim, and a full schedule of the charges which form the sum claimed from the defendant was sent to Northampton bulk court on the day of issue for inclusion alongside the claims particulars. Additionally, the defendant was served with this information on two occasions previously within a 28 day period allowed by the claimant to attempt to resolve the issue prior to the commencement of this litigation. For the sake of expediency, I have attached another copy of the schedule to this allocation questionnaireicon.
    3. Requset a Directions Order.See here

    http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk...tionaires.html


  12. #12
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    kirsty22 Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    31

    Default Re: kirsty v woolwich

    Im not sure which way is best. If i go for the new strategy way the template letter Draft order for directions do i put this in the other information box or do i attach this letter to the form and then what do i put in the box?? sorry really confused.

    Sent Data Protection Act to halifax, NatWest and woolwich on 07/08/06
    received Data Protection Act frm halifax 29/08/06 charged. Sent request letter to halifax 30/08/2006
    recieved gesture of £84 claiming £340 on 28/09/06
    sent letter before action on 29/09/06
    sent moneyclaim form , issued on 27/10/06
    **WON RECIEVED SETTLEMENT LETTER 15/11/06
    recieved Data Protection Act from Woolwich 31/08/2006, no charge sent request letter to woolwich 04/09/2006sent LBA on 26/10/06 have till 10/11/06 moneyclaim filed 16/11/06
    NatWest 40 days is 18/09/06 . Sent request letter 31/10. Sent LBA letter 15/11/06 till 29/11
    **WON RECEIVED FULL SETTLEMENT***

  13. #13
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    kirsty22 Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    31

    Default Re: kirsty v woolwich

    Just read it through again can i put all three points in the other information box. Obviously on continued paper as the box is quite small.

    Sent Data Protection Act to halifax, NatWest and woolwich on 07/08/06
    received Data Protection Act frm halifax 29/08/06 charged. Sent request letter to halifax 30/08/2006
    recieved gesture of £84 claiming £340 on 28/09/06
    sent letter before action on 29/09/06
    sent moneyclaim form , issued on 27/10/06
    **WON RECIEVED SETTLEMENT LETTER 15/11/06
    recieved Data Protection Act from Woolwich 31/08/2006, no charge sent request letter to woolwich 04/09/2006sent LBA on 26/10/06 have till 10/11/06 moneyclaim filed 16/11/06
    NatWest 40 days is 18/09/06 . Sent request letter 31/10. Sent LBA letter 15/11/06 till 29/11
    **WON RECEIVED FULL SETTLEMENT***

  14. #14
    Royalties Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    Michael Browne Highly authoritative Michael Browne Highly authoritative Michael Browne Highly authoritative Michael Browne Highly authoritative Michael Browne Highly authoritative Michael Browne Highly authoritative Michael Browne Highly authoritative Michael Browne Highly authoritative Michael Browne Highly authoritative Michael Browne Highly authoritative Michael Browne Highly authoritative

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    13,005

    Default Re: kirsty v woolwich

    Just read it through again can i put all three points in the other information box. Obviously on continued paper as the box is quite small.
    Yes.


  15. #15
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    kirsty22 Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    31

    Exclamation Re: kirsty v woolwich SERIOUS HELP PLEASE LETTER FROM JUDGE

    Please i need some serious help with this one, for some reason it has not gone the way of my other claims and i fear it will be struck out if i dont get this section right. Received letter from my court this is what it says.

    Before District Judge xxx sitting at xxx county courticon xxxxx.

    IT IS ORDERED THAT

    1. The claim be stayed as it makes no serious attempt to comply with CPR 16.4(1) by setting out a concise statement of the facts. (Stylised particulars do not constitute compliance).

    The claimant must amend or subsititute its particulars of claim setting out the Claimants case in plain english by 26th January 2007 and in default, the claim be stuck out without further notice.

    If the obove order is complied with the Defendent has permission to file and serve an amended defence in accordance with CPR 16.5 setting out its case in plain English.

    2. This order was made without a hearing. Any party affected by it may apply within 7 days of service for it to be set aside, varied or stayed.


    I understand i have got to write the particulars of claim again but what do i need to put in. The template of particulars is obviously no good at this stage.
    Thanks everyone

    Sent Data Protection Act to halifax, NatWest and woolwich on 07/08/06
    received Data Protection Act frm halifax 29/08/06 charged. Sent request letter to halifax 30/08/2006
    recieved gesture of £84 claiming £340 on 28/09/06
    sent letter before action on 29/09/06
    sent moneyclaim form , issued on 27/10/06
    **WON RECIEVED SETTLEMENT LETTER 15/11/06
    recieved Data Protection Act from Woolwich 31/08/2006, no charge sent request letter to woolwich 04/09/2006sent LBA on 26/10/06 have till 10/11/06 moneyclaim filed 16/11/06
    NatWest 40 days is 18/09/06 . Sent request letter 31/10. Sent LBA letter 15/11/06 till 29/11
    **WON RECEIVED FULL SETTLEMENT***

  16. #16
    Platinum Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Make a donation
    Karnevil

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Apr 2006
    I am in
    UK
    Posts
    9,718

    Default Re: kirsty v woolwich

    hii kirsty - you okay - I have just come acros this post...hope you found some help on another thread. PM me if you're stuck.


  17. #17
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    kirsty22 Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    31

    Exclamation HELP Court date for end of March

    Please someone i really need some help and advice with this letter i recieved from my local court, it says


    The judge has considered the statements of case and allocation questionaires submitted in this claim and has decided that a hearing is necessary before a final decision about allocation is made.

    The judge orders you to attend at 1000 on the 21st of march.

    The reason for the hearing is as follows

    The issues raised cause this claim to be unsuitable for small claims track. The court anticipate allocating to fast track.

    The hearing will be a telephone hearing. The parties must follow the Practice Direction to CRP23 at paragraph 6. If parties cannot agree as to who is responsible under the Practice Direction for making arrangements with BT(or other supplier) arrangements mus be made by the claimant. The applicant of claimant must file no later than 4.00pm on the last working day before the hearing a case summary not exceeding 500 words and draft directions agreed if possible, together with copies of any documents necessary for the hearing not already on court file.


    A few questions, why fast claim track?
    what is Practice direction etc
    Im not sure what i have to send to them or put in case summary or draft directions.
    I cant afford to pay out any more court costs

    HELP PLEASE

    Sent Data Protection Act to halifax, NatWest and woolwich on 07/08/06
    received Data Protection Act frm halifax 29/08/06 charged. Sent request letter to halifax 30/08/2006
    recieved gesture of £84 claiming £340 on 28/09/06
    sent letter before action on 29/09/06
    sent moneyclaim form , issued on 27/10/06
    **WON RECIEVED SETTLEMENT LETTER 15/11/06
    recieved Data Protection Act from Woolwich 31/08/2006, no charge sent request letter to woolwich 04/09/2006sent LBA on 26/10/06 have till 10/11/06 moneyclaim filed 16/11/06
    NatWest 40 days is 18/09/06 . Sent request letter 31/10. Sent LBA letter 15/11/06 till 29/11
    **WON RECEIVED FULL SETTLEMENT***

  18. #18
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    kirsty22 Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    31

    Default Court Date Help Please

    Still need some information anyone please.

    Sent Data Protection Act to halifax, NatWest and woolwich on 07/08/06
    received Data Protection Act frm halifax 29/08/06 charged. Sent request letter to halifax 30/08/2006
    recieved gesture of £84 claiming £340 on 28/09/06
    sent letter before action on 29/09/06
    sent moneyclaim form , issued on 27/10/06
    **WON RECIEVED SETTLEMENT LETTER 15/11/06
    recieved Data Protection Act from Woolwich 31/08/2006, no charge sent request letter to woolwich 04/09/2006sent LBA on 26/10/06 have till 10/11/06 moneyclaim filed 16/11/06
    NatWest 40 days is 18/09/06 . Sent request letter 31/10. Sent LBA letter 15/11/06 till 29/11
    **WON RECEIVED FULL SETTLEMENT***

  19. #19
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    sparklydayz Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    48

    Default Re: kirsty v woolwich

    I suggest you pm one of the moderators about this. Don`t worry, it may be just so the Woolwich are forced into a disclosure or pay up situation.


  20. #20
    Platinum Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Make a donation
    GaryH Authoritative GaryH Authoritative GaryH Authoritative GaryH Authoritative GaryH Authoritative GaryH Authoritative GaryH Authoritative GaryH Authoritative GaryH Authoritative GaryH Authoritative GaryH Authoritative GaryH's Avatar

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    May 2006
    Posts
    6,516

    Default Re: kirsty v woolwich

    Ok, what did you do about amending your POCicon in the end?

    And what did you put in section G of the aqicon?

    How much is the claim for?

    Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!


    Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.


Browsealoud
Video Tour



Reclaim the Right Ltd. - reg.05783665 in the UK reg. office:- 923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE