Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What you have uploaded is a letter with daft empty threats from third-party paper tigers.  Just ignore it. What we need to see is the original invoice you received last October or November.
    • Thanks for posting the CPR contents. i do wish you hadn't blanked out the dates and times since at times they can be relevant . Can you please repost including times and dates. They say that they sent a copy of  the original  PCN that they sent to the Hirer  along with your hire agreement documents. Did you receive them and if so can you please upload the original PCN without erasing dates and times. If they did include  all the paperwork they said, then that PCN is pretty near compliant except for their error with the discount time. In the Act it isn't actually specified but to offer a discount for 14 days from the OFFENCE is a joke. the offence occurred probably a couple of months prior to you receiving your Notice to Hirer.  Also the words in parentheses n the Act have been missed off. Section 14 [5][c] (c)warn the hirer that if, after the period of 21 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to hirer is given, the amount of unpaid parking charges referred to in the notice to keeper under paragraph 8(2)(f) or 9(2)(f) (as the case may be) has not been paid in full, the creditor will (if any applicable requirements are met) have the right to recover from the hirer so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Though it states "if any applicable ...." as opposed to "if all applicable......" in Section 8 or 9. Maybe the Site could explain what the difference between the two terms mean if there is a difference. Also on your claim form they keeper referring to you as the driver or the keeper.  You are the Hirer and only the Hirer is responsible for the charge EVEN IF THEY WEREN'T THE DRIVER. So they cannot pursue the driver and nowhere in the Hirer section of the Act is the hirer ever named as the keeper so NPC are pursuing the wrong person.  
    • This is simply a scam site.  It's been shown to be a scam in the national press and on national TV. Please fill in the the forum sticky and upload the invoice you've received. In fact what you have is an invoice, not a fine, a private company doesn't have the power to issue fines.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Hard of hearing, problem with bank ** SUCCESSFUL OUTCOME **


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3559 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Fair enough... slightly bizarre though I think that quoting the letter of the law would be considered damaging, but I'll change it. I would have thought that saying what you want would be helpful but I don't know the CPR and so on with this, it's rather different to copyright cases where you definitively state the level of damages you require and explain why.

Edited by schwepppes33
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
  • 1 month later...
Hmmm I made a post but it seems to have vanished. They have changed their letters and paid me money.

 

Oh this is very good news - I will amend your thread title to reflect this is now resolved.

 

:)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

To bump this up... the bank has failed.

 

I'm still hard of hearing. I just had money stolen from my credit card account. On Monday I spent an HOUR in the bank trying to deal with this as I can't use a phone during which time they couldn't even give me the same staff member... three people had to deal with it because it took so long and each time I then had to explain to the next person what the previous person had done.

 

The bank said they would freeze the transaction. They have not. They also said they would write to me, and now I am getting calls from the fraud prevention team. Calls. Despite having told the bank on numerous occasions I can't hear and being told they wouldn't call me but would write.

 

At the end of my tether, so a formal Letter Before Claim is going out now. How does anyone I wonder actually deal with this if they are hard of hearing, the entire fraud thing is telephone only?

Link to post
Share on other sites

To bump this up... the bank has failed.

 

I'm still hard of hearing. I just had money stolen from my credit card account. On Monday I spent an HOUR in the bank trying to deal with this as I can't use a phone during which time they couldn't even give me the same staff member... three people had to deal with it because it took so long and each time I then had to explain to the next person what the previous person had done.

 

The bank said they would freeze the transaction. They have not. They also said they would write to me, and now I am getting calls from the fraud prevention team. Calls. Despite having told the bank on numerous occasions I can't hear and being told they wouldn't call me but would write.

 

At the end of my tether, so a formal Letter Before Claim is going out now. How does anyone I wonder actually deal with this if they are hard of hearing, the entire fraud thing is telephone only?

 

Could you use a textphone / Minicom?

http://www.textrelay.org/index.php

 

Does the bank offer Minicom support?

 

http://www.actiononhearingloss.org.uk/~/media/Files/Factsheets/Equipment/pdf/TextphonesJuly2013.ashx

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

You want me to pay for a telephone line, just so I can use a minicom to communicate with my bank? I have a mobile phone. I have email. I have a postal address. I have instant messaging. They know I'm hard of hearing. How does a minicom help with their automated call system and robot messages? Can it translate them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You want me to pay for a telephone line, just so I can use a minicom to communicate with my bank? I have a mobile phone. I have email. I have a postal address. I have instant messaging. They know I'm hard of hearing. How does a minicom help with their automated call system and robot messages? Can it translate them?

 

All the bank is required to do under disability legislation is make "reasonable adjustments "

 

Text Relay doesn't require you to have a phone line.

http://www.textrelay.org/what_you_need.php shows you can use a PC, over the Internet

 

Would this be a solution that would help with communicating with other utility / service providers too ? As well as the bank?

 

Would it help you help yourself? (Have you spoken to Action on Hearing Loss? Both about the bank but also options to help with communicating with other organisations?.)

The Bank should do their bit to help but you can also help yourself instead of expecting the bank to do "all the running" / "shooting down" contributors without fully considering their contributions.

 

I'd be angry too, if I had a disability and had been treated as you have. The issue becomes if you want to turn that anger into looking for solutions or telling people that you won't consider any solution other than the world revolving around you.

 

Text Relay (including on a PC via the Internet) would help with their IVR systems. : the operator relaying what they hear into text for you types the options and you can choose the relevant one.

 

This wouldn't stop the bank being stupid and calling you, sending letters insisting you call them by phone, or insisting on you speaking to them by phone, but it would then give you a means by which to do so, at no extra cost ......

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the suggestion, I've installed text relay. That's very useful, although as you say, it doesn't help with my utterly incompetent bank who agreed to undertake something in writing, and then broke their own undertaking when I became a victim of crime. That's what I'm proceeding against them for - breach of undertaking :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...