Jump to content


PPC Successes (No Questions please)


Recommended Posts

ParkingEYE notice received for car park offering £10 per day parking** WON. PE didn't contest**

 

"Regency Car Park" in Swiss Cottage.*

 

I have successfully appealed against this*parking charge*at POPLA stage.parking eye*didn't even contest the appeal. Thanks everybody for guiding me through the initial stages. I never established a connection between Park-Here, Parking-Here, Regency Car Park, so only referred to them as another agent, and pointed out the confusion in my last appeal point. Everything else is pretty standard.*

 

1. No Keeper Liability

2. Ambiguous, inadequate and non-compliant signage Signage

3. No standing or authority to pursue charges, nor form contracts with drivers!

4. The Charge is not a genuine pre-estimate of loss.

5. Inadequate accuracy of ANPR camera!

6. Existence of two agents, two contradicting contracts, two different tariff rates and two different 'penalties' on one site.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?459128-ParkingEYE-notice-received-for-car-park-offering-%A310-per-day-parking**-WON.-PE-didn-t-contest**

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
The photographs supplied of the signs are not clearly visible*

therefore it is fair to assume that the appellant would not have been able to determine

the terms and conditions at the site.*

 

 

The operator provided a copy of what the signage says,*

but this is not sufficient for me to determine that this is what the signs at the site say.*

 

 

Section 18 of the British Parking Association (BPA) Code of Practice with particular reference to Section 18.3 states

“signs must be conspicuous and legible and written in intelligible language so that they are easy to read and understand”.

 

 

Based on the evidence provided it is not in compliance with the BPA Code of Practice,*

the burden of proof is on the operator to ensure that it gives sufficient, clear and concise evidence*

however, based on the information submitted it is not sufficient to determine.*

 

 

I am not satisfied that the operator has provided sufficient evidence of the signage at the site*

and as such I conclude that the PCN was issued incorrectly.*

Accordingly this appeal should be allowed.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?456710-Park-Direct-UK-left-a-ticket-for-driver-displaying-blue-badge-**-APPEAL-WON-AT-POPLA-**

Link to post
Share on other sites

Parking Eye - Holiday Inn

 

Had a meeting in the hotel and did not realise that it is now a pay car park. I was running a bit late so did not pay a lot of attention to the signs but will be back over the weekend to get the photos.

 

I have contacted the hotel who said that they would look into it as we spent over the minimum spend to get the parking for free however it was the people I met that paid.*

 

Cancelled by the principal.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?460611-Parking-Eye-Holiday-Inn

Link to post
Share on other sites

DecisionSuccessful

Assessor NameSamuel Connop

Assessor summary of operator case

The operator’s case is that the appellant had not paid for his time at the site.

 

Assessor summary of your case

The appellant’s case is that the lighting for the signage was insufficient, the small print is difficult to read, over grown plant obscured the signage, no illumination for the screen and pad and has questioned the landowner authority.

Assessor supporting rational for decision

While the appellant has raised more than one ground for appeal, my report will focus solely on land owner authority, as this supersedes the other aspects of the appeal. “Section 7 of the British Parking Association (BPA) code of practice requires Operators to own the land or to have written authority from the landowner to operate on the land.” As the Operator has failed to provide any sufficient evidence in response to this ground of appeal, it has failed to prove that it has the required authority to operate on the land in question. As such I have no requirements to take into consideration other points made by the appellant.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?457304-Is-it-worth-the-POPLA-appeal-Parking-Eye-2X-PCN-s-**WON-BOTH**

Link to post
Share on other sites

My son sold his car to a friend last April (14) and

 

 

received a couple of*parking eye*letters that he passed on to his friend for an alleged offence that took place in December 14.

 

 

He then wrote to DVLA saying he didn't think they had received the transfer notice.*

This was acknowledged by DVLA but only in February this year.

 

Today (18/3/15) my son received the attached Claim from*parking eye*= £ 175.00.*

 

 

My son's not responded to the letters he's just passed them on,

any advice on how he should proceed would be much appreciated.

 

 

 

 

Finally, it went to court - they didn't turn up, they sent a letter the next day saying we had settled and they were dropping the case - news to me, didn't pay a penny apart from the*contribution*o this site - good job guys, and thanks again..

 

 

 

 

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?443030-Parking-Eye-Claim-Form-Received-help-please!-**-WON-**

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...
  • 8 months later...
  • Haha 1

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Haha 1

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 4 months later...
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...