Written by John Kruse, one of the leading experts on Bailiff Law, this consumer friendly guide is essential reading for anyone who comes into contact with a bailiff.
The book is easy to understand and clearly explains the rights
a bailiff has, and also what they cannot do when collecting debts and repossessing goods etc.
Yesterday I had a "Standard Order for stay for settlement with consent of all the parties" from the court. The Judge has ordered a stay until 8th November to enable the parties to attempt settlement!
I don't understand the terms of this order, perhaps someone could help me here?
It says:
On or before 22 November 2006, one of the following steps must be taken:
either
the claimant must notify the court that the whole of the claim has been settled;
or
the claimant or defendant must write to the court requesting an extension of the stay period, explaining the steps being taken towards settlement and identifying any mediator, expert or other person helping with the process. The letter should confirm the agreement of all the other parties.
or
all the parties must file an allocation questionaire at the court. Where a settlement of some of the isues in dispute has been reached, a list of issues should be attached to the completed questionaire. The list must be agreed with the other parties and must indicate that it has been agreed.
Firstly, if the claim is stayed until 8th November then how come both parties have until 22nd November to file???
OK, so what happens if SCM simply continue to refuse to talk to me, or as seems likely, no agreement on settlement can be reached? There is no option on the stay order for notification of failure to settle at all. The only option in that case appears to be to file an allocation questionaire; why? I've already filed my full claim particulars, I've already filed my schedule of charges and interest, I've already filed an allocation questionaire. I've copied the court in on all my correspondence with SCM that clearly shows that SCM have totally ignored my requests for their offer of settlement.
So why are there further delays culminating in me having to fork out yet another £100 for yet another aq that's only going to say exactly the same things as the first AQ!!??
What do I do now? Can anyone offer some guidance here please?
Ok - mine is for citi is stayed until 17 nov to enable partys to reach a settlement. Now I know citi will come back with the argument that their costs are higher than 12 and they have already offered difference of 25 and 12 - so anything you can put together would be good - I didn't know whether to approach citi or ask the court to lift the stay - butthis is Bristol where a couple of weeks ago at a hearing they put a stay on for 3 months - so the citi approach I suppose os the best.
" The Claimant can supply a copy of this recording ofthe court wishes."
do the temp doc's need a check over ?
Well you have to make any amendments to your particular case and then I would have though it would be prudent ot proof read and spell check what you are sending as mistakes can happen and you need to be happy with what you are sending.
Totally agree, the average newbie could make the basic tweaks to suite his/her case, if this is a Read only template the owner should proof read it to remove any other typo that has crept in
Then the document would be bullet proof.
What of the other questions I raised, like the reference to "test cases attached"
do we attach .. where are they.
I just want to get it right first time really sorry.. panicing again
1/6/06 request charges
16/6/06 received charges
18/6/06 first request for refund
3/7/06 "No" letter from bank
13/7/06 LBA
7/08/06 handed claim to court
10/8/06 court stamped as date of issue
24/8/06 deemed to be served
25/8/06 Sechiari filed acknowledgement of service
6/9/06 defence served
9/9/06 copy of defence and AQ received by me
25/9/06 deadline for AQ submission
25/9/06 call Sechiari confirm safe receipt of my AQ
26/9/06 received copy AQ from Sechiari
29/9/06 letter to SCM to say "you want 1 month to settle, so settle"
18/10/06 after "strained communications"and how !
verbal offer of full settlement with conditions
communications rejecting conditions from me
5/11/06 received letter offering settlement with conditions
7/11/06 sent fax rejecting conditions etc
14/11/06 unconditional settlement in bank and how !
Lloyds TSB Bank Charge Claims Settled Before Court Hearing
6QZ02246
£3,709.00
22/02/2006
6QZ14997
£5,661.81
08/03/2006
6QZ16711
£535.00
14/03/2006
6QZ20434
£3,025.00
29/03/2006
6TF02015
£510.46
30/03/2006
6QZ13940
£2,318.75
03/04/2006
6QZ25163
£1,379.87
19/04/2006
6QZ25892
£4,885.00
03/05/2006
6UB01903
£3,778.00
11/05/2006
6QZ21371
£1,122.50
11/05/2006
6QZ30807
£3,749.62
14/05/2006
6QZ30806
£2,601.83
14/05/2006
6QZ30781
£4,356.34
19/05/2006
6LV21557
£324.34
15/07/2006
6QZ43768
£907.52
08/08/2006
6HG02754
£3,440.48
23/08/2006
6QZ30832
£4,072.99
11/09/2006
6HH01360
£2,524.87
22/09/2006
6QZ36557
£1,916.52
04/10/2006
SA287/06
£671.50
09/10/2006
6QZ35227
£1,639.32
09/10/2006
hope this helps(thanks to Caro)
Freebird
1/6/06 request charges
16/6/06 received charges
18/6/06 first request for refund
3/7/06 "No" letter from bank
13/7/06 LBA
7/08/06 handed claim to court
10/8/06 court stamped as date of issue
24/8/06 deemed to be served
25/8/06 Sechiari filed acknowledgement of service
6/9/06 defence served
9/9/06 copy of defence and AQ received by me
25/9/06 deadline for AQ submission
25/9/06 call Sechiari confirm safe receipt of my AQ
26/9/06 received copy AQ from Sechiari
29/9/06 letter to SCM to say "you want 1 month to settle, so settle"
18/10/06 after "strained communications"and how !
verbal offer of full settlement with conditions
communications rejecting conditions from me
5/11/06 received letter offering settlement with conditions
7/11/06 sent fax rejecting conditions etc
14/11/06 unconditional settlement in bank and how !
Righto, back a bit later than I thought but there we are.... bad weather and poxy idiot bad drivers on the M5!
Bankfodder thinks we should use these stays to gain a bit of one-upmanship over the banks and / or their solicitors.
Have a look at the last post (by BankFodder) on my thread HERE
Let me know if you have any questions and I'll see if I can put a good template letter together.
Pete
Sorry about the delay but bear with me if you can. I was out for much of yesterday and the rest of my time yesterday evening was spent on another pressing matter within CAG. So few hands and so much to do
I'm out for much of today also but I'll do my level best to write a draft letter template later today for those cases stayed for settlement.
Pete
I will not make any deals with you. I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own. Number 6
As regards stays, I just received mine from the local court.
The claim has been stayed till the 16th Nov 06, with the same conditions as put in previous posts, we have until the 30th Nov to put in paperwork to indicate if the matter has been settled.
The part about filling in a aq, does this mean we have to re-submit and pay a second time.
Also I have looked at BF advice, and agree, even though I started to attempt to get them to enter dialogue weeks ago, and nothing, I will be sending out a letter to SCM tommorrow, just got to draft it.
At least we have complied with the courts order to sort it out without it going before the judge, this will look good for our case if they don't.
I have seen somehwhere on a post about asking the courts to award Exemplary Damages for solicitors that breach the civil procedures rules, does anyone know or have any information on this.