Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

12 week rule - Agency worker


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3901 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Trying to keep this brief and have read a bit on it but still not sure.

 

I started work at the local council as an agency worker beginning of July - the council requested Level 3 (agency pays £8 an hour for this) and as the work wasn't too high level thought it okayish - not great but a job - no one else did this role and it was to help out for 12 weeks.

 

After 3 weeks I was offered a kind of promotion being in charge of Admin for the department and a chance that this will last more than 12 weeks - it's still Level 3 no hassles with that. What I am concerned about is that from my reading on the council jobsite is that Level 3 wages are 15875 up to I think 18500 - as my £8 an hour rate works out less than that, could I potentially ask for in 6 weeks the same rate from my agency that the council would pay a directly employed worker?

 

The agency did witter on a bit that I would get the same holiday rights after 12 weeks but no mention was made of comparable pay. I'm lucky my boss at the council is quite cool - I mentioned something about this to her this week and she said she would show me what the agency were charging me out for and I know she wants me to stay - so maybe I can put something together that I would be better on their books than on the agencies cost wise for the length of the contract.:oops:

 

If this doesn't happen - would just like to know if anyone knows where I stand after 12 weeks re what my wages should be.

 

Thanks in advance:roll:

 

Clare

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Clare,

 

the important point, of course, is that you work for the agency, not the Council. If you have been given higher graded work now, perhaps you should now be pressing you agency for a higher rate of pay, rather than in six weeks time. There are no guarantees that the work will be extended.

 

You could compare your agency rate of pay to what you think the Council rate of pay is for that role - it doesn't mean your agency will pay you that.

 

You might be surprised at the hourly rate you are being charged out at by the agency, and the hourly rate you are being paid; you may have some wriggle room to negotiate a higher hourly rate without the agency increasing their charges to the Council (and therefore you become more expensive to keep on). At £8ph you will already be on the full-time equivalent salary of £14,976 - not that far off the bottom end of the salary scale you mentioned.

 

Salary scales usually don't show the other salary oncosts that the Council have to bear - National Insurance and pension contributions - which work out at a approx. a third of salary paid out (10% NI, 20% Pension Cont.).

 

So where do you stand in all of this? I shall assume the agency charges you out at £15ph (I have no idea of course). I shall use rounded full year costs.

 

Clare..................£15,000 per annum

Agency Oncost.....£13,000 per annum

Cost to Council.....£28,000 per annum

 

Council Employee.....£15,900 per annum to..£18,500 per annum

Employer Oncost........£5,300 per annum to...£6,200 per annum

Cost to Council.........£21,200 per annum to..£24,700 per annum

 

If you can find out the agency's charge out rate this will make things clearer for you. In the first intance you will know how much the agency itself is earning per hour on top of your wage and therefore how much they could afford to pay you more. An extra £1 ph = approx an extra £1,900 a year to you (36 hrs x 52 weeks).

 

It might be cheaper for the Council to employ you directly on a short-term (rolling 13 week?) contract. You probably wouldn't be joining the pension scheme on that basis, so employer oncosts would be reduced to approx. 10% NI contributions. (Congratulations, as an employee, you have just become more attractive).

However the Council may have to pay the agency a 'finders fee' to take you off the agency's books (your Council boss would have to find out about that).

 

Get the agency fee rate, key all the other figures into a spreadsheet as well, have a play with the figures and you perhaps can begin to see how much more you could negotiate off the agency. I would be inclined to quote the equivalent hourly cost to the Council of employing a council employee to do that role (i.e. £11ph [21,200] to £13ph [24,700]) when negotiating with the agency - see what you can get.

 

I don't think it would be a good idea to tell the agency that you know the rate they are charging you out and see how close you can get to £11ph-£13ph.

 

Again, if the Council take you on remember you have some leeway to negotiate a figure towards the higher end of the pay scale as the Authority won't be incurring pension contributions.

 

It might also be worth insuring that if you do take a short term contract with the Council that they don't put you into the Council's pension scheme as a matter of course - as they will then deduct pension contributions from your (hard-won?) salary which will be of next to no use to you in later life.

 

All the best

Edited by SweetLorraine
Link to post
Share on other sites

You might find this article helpful: -

 

From October 1, those in agency work who complete just 12 weeks in a temporary assignment will be entitled to the same pay and benefits as permanent staff.

 

This is good news for temps, because, you could be entitled to more pay, annual leave and other benefits – so it’s worth making sure you know whether you are covered by the new rules and what you should get.

 

You will be covered by the new Agency Workers Directive if:

you are a temp hired through a recruitment agency to work for an employer

you are paid through the PAYE system

you work under the direct supervision of the company you temp for

Some 1.4m agency workers will be covered by the new rules – if that includes you, here’s a summary of what you can expect to get:

What’s changing from day one of my assignment?

From 1 October and from the first day of any job you are placed in through an agency, the company must provide you with the same access to company facilities and amenities as if you were a permanent member of staff. You will now be entitled to go to the o-site gym, crèche or canteen, for example, and should get access to information about any job vacancies going at the company.

Agency work: What happens after 12 weeks?

After you have worked for the company for 12 weeks in the same role, you will become eligible for some of the same rights as if you had been directly employed by the company. These include:

Pay

Overtime

The same pattern of working hours/ shifts

Rest breaks

Annual leave

Performance-related bonuses

What’s not included?

Other benefits, including pensions and access to health insurance are not included in the extra benefits temps will be entitled to.

What if my temping assignments are generally shorter than 12 weeks?

You will only be eligible for the new agency worker benefits once you have worked for the same company in the same role for 12 weeks.

If you take a break from your job, which is more than one week and less than seven weeks, then the count of qualifying weeks will pause, resuming once you go back to work.

If the break is due to sick leave or jury service, then the break should be less than 28 weeks.

If you are taking maternity, paternity or adoption leave, you will qualify for the new agency worker rights regardless of these breaks.

If you temp at different employers for assignments lasting 11 weeks or less, you will not be eligible for the new benefits.

Prepare yourself for what’s changing

Link to post
Share on other sites

you are a temp hired through a recruitment agency to work for an employer

you are paid through the PAYE system

you work under the direct supervision of the company you temp for

 

Hi goodatreserch, that's good to know for the future. Do agency workers have to meet all three elements of the criteria? If so, if the agency pays the temp - not the company, these benefits may not apply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It doesnt matter if its the agency paying the temp or the company. The new rules apply. The exception is if your classed as self employed i.e.you arrange payment of tax/NI yourself and are therefore not paiud through PAYE. However note, alot of agencys will try to confuse you and not apply the rules. You really need to be on the ball and demand compliance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Thanks for all your advice and especially the calculations you did Sweet Lorraine and that article goodatresearch - I now know what I'm been charged out at and I do know the finders fee rate.

 

Not done the calculations in full yet but I can see that compliance with the 12 week rule is going to be my best option at the moment for the length of the current contract - like I say my boss at the council is cool, I think she realises will be a bit of a false economy to get shut after 12 weeks and then train someone else up. I am PAYE so the self employed stuff doesn't apply - not bothered about pension stuff just want goes into my bank account to be a fair wage for the job I do so hopefully these new rules will help.

Edited by aliceinw
typos
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...