Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The Notice to Hirer does not comply with the protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule  4 . This is before I ask if Europarks have sent you a copy of the PCN they sent to Arval along with a copy of the hire agreement et. if they haven't done that either you are totally in the clear and have nothing to worry about and nothing to pay. The PCN they have sent you is supposed to be paid by you according to the Act within 21 days. The chucklebuts have stated 28 days which is the time that motorists have to pay. Such a basic and simple thing . The Act came out in 2012 and still they cannot get it right which is very good news for you. Sadly there is no point in telling them- they won't accept it because they lose their chance to make any money out of you. they are hoping that by writing to you demanding money plus sending in their  unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors that you might be so frightened as to pay them money so that you can sleep at night. Don't be surprised if some of their letters are done in coloured crayons-that's the sort of  level of people you will be dealing with. Makes great bedding for the rabbits though. Euro tend not to be that litigious but while you can safely ignore the debt collectors just keep an eye out for a possible Letter of Claim. They are pretty rare but musn't be ignored. Let us know so that you can send a suitably snotty letter to them showing that you are not afraid of them and are happy to go to Court as you like winning.  
    • They did reply to my defence stating it would fail and enclosed copies of NOA, DN Term letter and account statements. All copies of T&C's that could be reconstructions and the IP address on there resolves to the town where MBNA offices are, not my location
    • Here are 7 of our top tips to help you connect with young people who have left school or otherwise disengaged.View the full article
    • My defence was standard no paperwork:   1.The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 2. Paragraph 1 is noted. The Defendant has had a contractual relationship with MBNA Limited in the past. The Defendant does not recognise the reference number provided by the claimant within its particulars and has sought verification from the claimant who is yet to comply with requests for further information. 3. Paragraph 2 is denied. The Defendant maintains that a default notice was never received. The Claimant is put to strict proof to that a default notice was issued by MBNA Limited and received by the Defendant. 4. Paragraph 3 is denied. The Defendant is unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly served from either the Claimant or MBNA Limited. 5. On the 02/01/2023 the Defendant requested information pertaining to this claim by way of a CCA 1974 Section 78 request. The claimant is yet to respond to this request. On the 19/05/2023 a CPR 31.14 request was sent to Kearns who is yet to respond. To date, 02/06/2023, no documentation has been received. The claimant remains in default of my section 78 request. 6. It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of proof of assignment being sent/ agreement/ balance/ breach or termination requested by CPR 31.14, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to: (a) show how the Defendant entered into an agreement; and (b) show and evidence the nature of breach and service of a default notice pursuant to Section 87(1) CCA1974 (c) show how the claimant has reached the amount claimed for; and (d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim; 7. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed. 8. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer credit Act 1974. 9. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.
    • Monika the first four pages of the Private parking section have at least 12 of our members who have also been caught out on this scam site. That's around one quarter of all our current complaints. Usually we might expect two current complaints for the same park within 4 pages.  So you are in good company and have done well in appealing to McDonalds in an effort to resolve the matter without having  paid such a bunch of rogues. Most people blindly pay up. Met . Starbucks and McDonalds  are well aware of the situation and seem unwilling to make it easier for motorists to avoid getting caught. For instance, instead of photographing you, if they were honest and wanted you  to continue using their services again, they would have said "Excuse me but if you are going to go to Mc donalds from here, it will cost you £100." But no they kett quiet and are now pursuing you for probably a lot more than £100 now. They also know thst  they cannot charge anything over the amount stated on the car park signs. Their claims for £160 or £170 are unlawful yet so many pay that to avoid going to Court. When the truth is that Met are unlikely to take them to Court since they know they will lose. The PCNs are issued on airport land which is covered by Byelaws so only the driver can be pursued, not the keeper. But they keep writing to you as they do not know who was driving unless you gave it away when you appealed. Even if they know you were driving they should still lose in Court for several reasons. The reason we ask you to fill out our questionnaire is to help you if MET do decide to take you to Court in the end. Each member who visited the park may well have different experiences while there which can help when filling out a Witness statement [we will help you with that if it comes to it.] if you have thrown away the original PCN  and other paperwork you obviously haven't got a jerbil or a guinea pig as their paper makes great litter boxes for them.🙂 You can send an SAR to them to get all the information Met have on you to date. Though if you have been to several sites already, you may have done that by now. In the meantime, you will be being bombarded by illiterate debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors all threatening you with ever increasing amounts as well as being hung drawn and quartered. Their letters can all be safely ignored. On the odd chance that you may get a Letter of Claim from them just come back to us and we will get you to send a snotty letter back to them so that they know you are not happy, don't care a fig for their threats and will see them off in Court if they finally have the guts to carry on. If you do have the original PCN could you please post it up, carefully removing your name. address and car registration number but including dates and times. If not just click on the SAR to take you to the form to send to Met.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Selling a car on finance


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4397 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I wounder if anyone could give me some legal advice on selling a car with outstanding finance.

 

A friend of mine obtained a car on finance @ about 44%apr. he now wants to get rid of the car and has been told by somebody that if he gets a signed declaration from the buyer that he(the buyer) will continue to pay the finance i.e assume respinsibility for all outstanding monies on the car, then my friend would be covered against the finance company. Therefore the finance company would not be able to take County Court proceeding or even record a default on my friends credit profile.

 

Is there anybody on here who is familiar with the legalities on this subject.

 

Please help

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

To the best of my knowledge selling goods which are the subject of a finance agreement (i.e. hire purchase) is against the law. Basically it's not the "hirer's" property to sell until all payments (including any "option to purchase fee") have been paid and written confirmation is received from the finance company that this has been done.

 

A "declaration" such as you suggest isn't, I think, worth the paper it's written on. If the "purchaser" defaults it's the original hirer the finance company will be chasing. I doubt any finance company would consent to the "transfer of lability" to an unknown (to them) third party. I would suspect that a contingency such as this will be covered in the agreement's "small print" too.

 

 

Jimbo44

Jimbo 44 - always happy to help, but always willing to learn from being corrected too!!! Whilst any advice given may be based upon personal experience, please always be sure you seek guidance from a professional in the particular field.

 

Never be afraid to try something new. Remember that a lone amateur built the Ark, but a large group of professionals built the Titanic.

 

A 'click' on the scales is always appreciated if I have helped. Many Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

agree with the above - but you can usually sell it to someone if they pay the finance company what you agree for it - say there is 4K owing and car is worth 2K you can ask the finance co if you can sell it so long as funds go to them - you advertise it for 2K and sell it getting the buyer to pay the finance co directly and then you owe the reminder for soemthing you no longer have...i know of freinds who have done this but to me its worse to be paying for it and not having it!

People who haven't made mistakes, haven't made anything!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Selling a vehicle on which HP is still owed is against the law. The way an HP agreement works is that the car dealer invoices the finance company for the car. The finance company then pays the dealer for the car and the customer hires the car from the finance company until the very end of the agreement. At this point the customer pays the finance company an 'option to purchase fee' which actually transfers ownership to the customer. It would be exactly the same as selling a rented t.v., house etc. i.e. it's not yours to sell in the first place. You wouldn't dream of selling a dvd you rented from blockbuster so why would you do it with an item worth 500 times as much. In my job I use experian car data checks every day and this can tell you whether a finance company has an interest in any car. There has however been a tendency in recent years for finance companies to sell personal loans rather than HP. In this case most of the rights given to the customer under the CCA 1974 are taken away - chiefly the right to voluntarily terminate the agreement upon paying half the total payable. Many people who have taken these loans have no idea they have a loan instead of HP as the forms they sign look very similar. If you have one of these loans you do have a right to sell the car and the finance company has no right to register an interest on experian/HPI. Many of them do register an interest but if they have you can have it removed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to Hijack but I'd be interested on how to get them to remove it as Black Horse have done this to me and they wont reply to my letters asking them to remove it from teh HP register - any help would be great!

People who haven't made mistakes, haven't made anything!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Likewise - any information would be great!

 

Sorry to Hijack but I'd be interested on how to get them to remove it as Black Horse have done this to me and they wont reply to my letters asking them to remove it from teh HP register - any help would be great!
Link to post
Share on other sites

I will take it that the agreement has now been paid off and you are wanting them to remove it so you can sell the car on. If they won't remove it i beleive the best way to do is contact the people that run the HP register requesting them to remove it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats the point - its not a secured loan, nor a HP agreement, so they shouldnt be able register their interest in it!

 

 

Depends what type of laon it is as far as i am aware. If it is a secured car loan them i am sure they would be within there rights to add their interest.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Have done so - and this is their reply:

I have spoken to one of our finance team and they have confirmed that Black Horse will not remove the financial interest against the vehicle, even if it is a personal loan. All we can recommend is that you get a letter from Black Horse confirming that the personal loan will not cause a problem with the sale of the vehicle.

I dont think this is an acceptable reponse and have replied reaffirming the fact that what they are doing is a misuse of the register - watch this space!

 

Then i agree they can't add interest and as such i would speak to HPI to have it removed
Link to post
Share on other sites

The reply to the reply to the above email was as follows:

 

Dear Mr Hosgood

 

We are unable to comment further in reference to your email, we can only advise you contact the finance company as previously mentioned in the email.

 

Regards

Barbara

 

So a letter has been sent to Black Horse, it will be interesting to see the reponse!

 

Richard

 

I would agree with you if it is a personal loan then they have no right to register any interest in the car as they don't have it. I would recommend writing to Blackhorse requesting them to remove it
Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course, if you really want to get the finance company to scratch their corporate head you could ask them under which statute they they alledge they have the authority to register the car!

 

I have a kind of hunch the answer, (if they give a direct one), could be interesting.

Jimbo 44 - always happy to help, but always willing to learn from being corrected too!!! Whilst any advice given may be based upon personal experience, please always be sure you seek guidance from a professional in the particular field.

 

Never be afraid to try something new. Remember that a lone amateur built the Ark, but a large group of professionals built the Titanic.

 

A 'click' on the scales is always appreciated if I have helped. Many Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course, if you really want to get the finance company to scratch their corporate head you could ask them under which statute they they alledge they have the authority to register the car!

 

I have a kind of hunch the answer, (if they give a direct one), could be interesting.

 

and what would your hunch be lol.

 

 

this is exactly the question i will be asking when i post them my next letter this weekend!

People who haven't made mistakes, haven't made anything!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

and what would your hunch be lol.

 

 

this is exactly the question i will be asking when i post them my next letter this weekend!

 

My 'hunch'? I don't know of any legislation giving anyone the right to register their interest in unsecured goods. Secured goods, (as in subject to a Hire Purchase Agreement, Secured Loan, Mortgage etc.), maybe, but not unsecured (as in financed by a Personal Loan such as those used for car purchase).

 

I could well be wrong though!!! Anyone know for sure????

 

If you do ask the question though, I would love to see the answer, please.

Jimbo 44 - always happy to help, but always willing to learn from being corrected too!!! Whilst any advice given may be based upon personal experience, please always be sure you seek guidance from a professional in the particular field.

 

Never be afraid to try something new. Remember that a lone amateur built the Ark, but a large group of professionals built the Titanic.

 

A 'click' on the scales is always appreciated if I have helped. Many Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a copy of the letter which has been sent by me and received by Black Horse (recorded delivery)

 

To Sir or Madam:

 

Agreement number – XXXXXXXXX

Vehicle Registration – XXXXXXX

After recently obtaining a HPI check for the above vehicle (copy attached) I am concerned as to why there is an outstanding finance file shown against it.

 

I brought this vehicle with a Black Horse personal loan agreement, which is confirmed at the top of the signed agreement (copy attached).

 

As this is not a Hire Purchase Agreement, I respectfully request that you remove the file held against it on the HPI register and provide me with an explanation in writing as to why a file was placed as such.

I have been advised that unless the finance agreement is Hire Purchase, or a "secured agreement", no file should be placed on the HPI register and to do so is a serious misuse of it.

The signed agreement cannot be both a Personal Loan Agreement and a Hire Purchase Agreement – please confirm in writing which you deem the contract to be. If you deem the contract to be a Hire Purchase Agreement, then I request documentation detailing it as such.

Unless I receive a satisfactory response from Black Horse Ltd, replying to my above requests and giving written confirmation of the removal of, or the intention to remove, the file on the HPI register, I will report the misuse to the Finance and Leasing Association and proceed to take further legal action.

I would request that this letter is replied to within the next 14 days.

 

So we'll await the reply!

Richard

Link to post
Share on other sites

thats almost what i wrote first second and third (the third threatened legal action if they didnt reply!!)

 

their responce (in writing) was it IS a PERSONAL LOAN and that they are not removing thier interest unless i pay in full or the agreements ends in 3 years as planned....

 

i have no responded yet as unsure on wording!

People who haven't made mistakes, haven't made anything!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yeah we arent disputing its a personnal loan, but that doesnt give them the right to register an interest in the item that was bought with it on the HPI register - to do that they need a HP agreement or a secured loan, which this isnt.

 

Its no different than going to the bank to borrow £3000 and spending it on double glazing for example - the loan isnt secured on the windows so they cant take them away nor can they register an interest in it so they get all the money back if you move house, so why do the same for a car?

 

BTW - Ive PM'ed you seeing as we are in the same boat I thought we may be able to assist each other on this bumpy road along which we tread - lol! :D

 

Richard

 

thats almost what i wrote first second and third (the third threatened legal action if they didnt reply!!)

 

their responce (in writing) was it IS a PERSONAL LOAN and that they are not removing thier interest unless i pay in full or the agreements ends in 3 years as planned....

 

i have no responded yet as unsure on wording!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Blackhorse are being total ar#es and ignoring every letter that Ive sent, and I know they have been delivered as I have proof of delivery - I am going to complain to the FSA and see what they say about it.

 

As for selling the car..................;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

hi guys just picked this thread up on google i know its quite an old topiic but i am in exactly the same possition with my car bought on finance (not hp) and i wondered how it all panned out did they take it of the hpi register or not (my guess is not they always seem to get round things like that).

 

any reply would be most grateful

 

regards Steve

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Black Horse Finance have caused me nothing but headaches.

 

I purchased a new vehicle with a previous girlfriend from a Kia showroom. After agreeing a price we arranged finance (Personal Loan) through our joint bank (Barclays) for the £22,000 it would be costing us.

 

As we arrived at the showroom to collect the vehicle the salesman who we had been dealing with suggested we took their finance as the rate was cheaper than what we were paying at Barclays. Before agreeing my partner and I asked for assurance that the loan would indeed be a PERSONAL LOAN. Meaning, that when it came to selling the car we would not have any problems selling it. I had personally been the victim of buying a car which had finance remaining on it back during the late 1980's, so I was aware of the potential issues involved in these matters.

 

After signing the finance agreement, which clearly stated PERSONAL LOAN at the top of the form we drove the vehicle away.

 

Two years later and my girlfriend and I went our separate ways, so we agreed that we would sell the car. This is where the grief began! After placing an advertisement a buyer viewed the vehicle and we arranged for him to collect it the following Friday. He would be paying by bank transfer and I assured him that there was no finance remaining on the vehicle.

 

However, on the morning when I was expecting the money to arrive into my bank account I received a call from the buyer stating that the HPi check he has initiated stated that there was finance remaining on the vehicle!

 

I immediately contacted the finance company who informed me that I would have to clear the remaining finance (approximately £7,000, which I did NOT have) before the car was legally owned by the new owner (who would not of course pay me until I had done this!)

 

Again, when I took out the loan I was assured that it was indeed a personal loan, meaning that the money could have been used for a holiday, new breasts, or indeed ANYTHING.

 

Had I ignored the Kia Salesman the matter would have been addressed by now. I would simply be paying off the outstanding amount each month without any problems.

 

The matter has now gone on for 10 MONTHS and the vehicle has depreciated further (meaning, the longer the matter goes on, the more money I lose)

 

I urge ANYONE considering taking a 'personal loan' through Kia/Black Horse Finance to THINK before doing so. It may be more expensive dealing with your personal bankers, but should you be considering selling the vehicle before the conclusion of the agreement and you do not have any spare cash, you will be SCREWED, and stuck with a vehicle you no longer need.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

hello ppl

well here goes i privatly bought a car on the "hpi" with black horse so before i completed the sale i called them give the details as i got from hpi .

 

 

 

they told me everything i asked the mans name address dob amount per month an that the car was on "personal loan" but do not worrie they would remove the intrest in car.

 

 

so needless to say i bought the car

 

 

1 year on i have been in car crash (man in 4x4 run into me)

 

 

settled with my insurance sitting by letterbox for my 9000 kite (slang for cheque but i would have been better flying one)

 

 

no cheque but letter saying they had transfered the money to bh all i had to do as settle the further 3650

 

i called black h why do they have intrest they had reapplied it to hpi after i bought the car

 

so needless to say i am 9000 out of bed an no car for someone elses personal loan

 

if you ever see black horse stay well away they are not to be trusted with your details either but thanks to them i have the man who has benifited details

 

i will be colecting my money from him once his new loan comes through but not everyone is this lucky

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...