Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Your concern regarding the 14 days delivery is a common one. Not been on the forum that long, but I don't think the following thought has ever been challenged. My view is that they should have proof of when it was posted, not when they "issued", or printed it. Of course, they would never show any proof of postage, unless it went to court. Private parking companies are simply after money, and will just keep sending ever more threatening letters to intimidate you into paying up. It's not been mentioned yet, but DO NOT APPEAL! You could inadvertently give up useful legal protection and they will refuse any appeal, because they're just after the cash...  
    • The sign says "Parking conditions apply 24/7". Mind you, that's after a huge wall of text. The whole thing is massively confusing.  Goodness knows what you're meant to do if you spend only a fiver in Iceland or you stay a few minutes over the hour there.
    • Hi and thanks It looks like they ticked all the boxes to me but I'll try and upload the notice. I was wondering if a witness to late delivery might be considered proof - I'm assuming they posted it as normal but Royal Mail stuffed up delivery. If not then they're really saying it just has to be posted within 12 days of the incident, regardless of when it is received. Annoying! edit ok thanks Honeybee here's my 2nd (actually 3rd) attempt at anonymising, copying and uploading the notice! Sorry about the state of it - I sat on it while distracted by my dog 🙃 pcn front.pdf pcn back page.pdf
    • ROFL - dont get upset just because someone (quite a lot of someones) dont want smart meters - well unless you get paid for it .. in which case ...   I assume you haven't been with Octopus long enough to be on one of the very long fixed price tariffs they offered before the prices went bonkers .. and that you dont use your electricity in the evening/lunch time if you think the 'agile type tariffs are good value .. let alone worth installing a smart meter for - high price a good disincentive for an evening cuppa eh? Let alone all your computer/tv etc time in the peak price evening or lunch time. - and boy do those peak prices instantly hammer your bill when those Russian and middle eastern issues kick off.   I would only have considered a smart meter if solar panels had been an option for me - but roof is oriented completely the wrong way. Oh - and My opinion hasn't changed since the smart meter trials 40 years ago, because neither have the issues (well not enough) but I'm happy for you. Be happy for me.
    • Hi. I'm afraid I've had to hide your post with the pdf files to keep this anonymous for you. You've left the PCN reference number and your car reg showing. Could you edit that and repost please? HB    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

about to send 2nd letter to BOS


mclaren
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6573 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have been charged on charges, ie im within the OD limit, then they take a charge and take me out of the limit, then they charge me cos of that and then they take the money and charge me for goin further out of the limit cos they took the charge out.

 

Seems a little amount £292 + 2 pending charges + intrest compared to some of the cases but still....

 

I handed the bank manager the 1st letter by hand as i requested that he refund, he refused. He also disputed the legality of the charges ( tho he was the only one )

 

1st letter was handed in 28/03/06 - 2 days after i received a letter stating that he handed it to the customer care team. 2nd letter i will hand in to him will be 12/04/06. I will give then a further 14 days grace period, then do i start with legal action?

 

I am scared incase i lose but its worth the risk to take, after all, it is my money.

 

btw - halifax should be in this group aswell as halifax and bank of scotland are one company HBOS ;)

 

With syaing i received a letter from the bank manager, i still have not received anything from the actual bank re the letter. is this usual?

Link to post
Share on other sites

i got a phonecall from BOS this afternoon. Friendly person said they are willing to give me a maximum of £127 from the £292 (at the time of 1st claim £264) - i said it was a nice offer but i am not going to accept it. I knew that i could have taken the bakn to court and got all the money back. She then went on to talk about the legality of the fees - and she said that they were legal, i claim they are not. I went on to say that i would not accept £127 because it was such a low sum compared to what i could get at court. She then went on to say she would be willing to give me the maximum of £200. On this i said £220 and reverse the other charge, she said she could not go that far. I could tell things were starting to go cold on her half, as if she was about to call defeat and stop communication and allow it to go to court. I then said i would accept £210 plus the pending charge to be reversed. She agreed. So thanks to this site and the advice i was given, i didnt have to go to court and i was given back a fair part of my money.

 

I know i should have went all the way but i was nervous incase they said no in court.

 

I can say, if it happens again, i will NOT hessitate in taking the bank to court over the ILLEGAL bank charges.

 

So out of the £292 i got back £210 and also one charge pending reversed and also a company that is owe me money due to a fee will pay me £58 so overall, i am only out of pocket about £20 so i am not going to moan.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Did you have any written confirmation of what they had agreed to refund? If not, then send the Letter Before Action letter (personally in this instance I would give them 7 days) and take no nonsense from them.

 

You've given them enough time and opportunity. Hit em where it hurts.

Yes, i got written conformation on the 12th of April 2006.

 

I will go to the bank tomorow, and if it is not in, then i will take your advice and say i want all 100% of the money and i will send the 2nd letter, and i will not take no for an answer :)

 

I think the bank has a cheek saying they will give me most of the money back but do not put it in straight away.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well went in today and the money was in, the whole £238. Unfortunatly the pending charge was still on the system. I called up today, and spoke to a man, and gave all the details, and he was nice as anything, UNTILL i mentioned the words "out of court settlement" and he started to change. I told him i was not happy and even although i have signed a statment to say i will not take the bank to court over this matter, that because they have broken the terms of that agreement, i have the right to do so.

 

He then said "unfortunatly" and i said, "what, system down?" and he said "yes, im afraid so"

 

He told me to call back tomorow on 08457 20 30 40 at 7AM and the system should be back up.

 

If they do not reverse this charge, what can i do next? should i send a letter to them saying that i am pursuing in court? what will happen with the letter i signed?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 12 years later...

This topic was closed on 03/08/19.

If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support there.

If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened.

- Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6573 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...