Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 1. who knows... 2. not the whole A/C vanishes from your file on the DN's 6th b'day ...already carefully explain this. 3.yes 4.already carefully explain this.
    • if i remember rightly, long ago in one of the first drafts of the old proposed gov't overhauls, there was a listing of recommended 'charges' that inc wrong reg = £20. some PPC's implemented such changes in advance. then later as it looked increasing likely the new code was never going to be implemented after it's 1st review and another set of codes was to be debated they all quietly revert back .......... dx
    • Potentially it may not even get sold on? Just the default left for 6 years then gone? but if it is sold on ill get a letter from the DCA which is the notice of assignment? Sorry what is the different between a default notice and a default cal marker? yes, i may try and work arrangements out with the OCs after the breathing space but I'll see my circumstances then thank you again for all your help and patience, I really appreciate it and apologies If i am too fast or repeating myself.
    • receiving a default NOTICE (forget simple default cal markers) does not mean it will get sold on... OC's very very rarely do court themselves.  if it does you would receive a Notice of Assignment from the debt buyer/DCA.  as for reduced payment if it remains with the OC and they issue a DN, no harm in trying but lets get all your ducks inline first. dx  
    • okay thanks do you know how long it will take for it to get to the DCA or could the OC try and issue a CCJ? even though it's unlikely also for example would the OC agree to a reduction and a small payment over a super lengthy period of time if agreed? Rather than go through chasing apologies again for all the questions, just trying to understand all the possible scenarios.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

RBS Insurance. Claiming back funds debited from me


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6337 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

OK, I moved house back in Feb 2003. Now that Im sorting my finances out it came to my attn that I wasnt recieveing the statements for my RBS card :eek: . I had sent the change of address off to them but until now it had escaped my awareness. Call it what you will, its too late to sort that now.

Anyway, I called RBS and after I sorted out that it was ME calling (the card number had changed :rolleyes: ) they confirmed to me that luckily I had not had any transactions on the card at all in the last 3.5 years since Id moved.

THe did, however, note that there was a monthly debit going out to 'RBS Life' for over £30 a month. I was unaware of taking any additonal policies out so asked them for a contact number. This was provided.

I rang 'RBS Life' and they then confirmed that I had a policy running with themselves. I stated that to my knowledge I had not taken a policy out as I already had life Ins etc already set up - why would I double up on it! I asked for copies of the paperwork with my signature and they said that the policy was taken out over the phone! WHen I asked if they had a recording, they said that they held the tapes as part of the policy documentation/proof. :rolleyes:

Anyway, I recieved a letter yesterday saying that a 'full refund' of £700 (ish) was being credited to my RBS card for the payments taken between Jan 04 and Jan 06. However, there are a couple of things that bother me.

a) I was lead to believe that the policy had been running longer than that by RBS. (I am still awaiting a new statement from RBS - having called them just now, it must have got lost in the post as it was sent a mth ago!) In the mean time they are looking into it for me, to see exactly what went out and when.

b) Its nice that 'RBS Life' have refunded my money 'in full', but what about all the interest that Ive been charged by RBS CC!?!?!?! Why should I be out of pocket!?!?!

Ive asked RBS CC to get me the interest rates and balance from when the Policy started toi be debited from my acct to when it finished. I then need them (and to verify myself using their interest rates) the difference in the two 'final and current to date' balance outstanding figures. THen I need to complain to 'RBS Life' using their complaints procedure about claiming the balance owed to me.

 

My question is (yes there is a point to his thread! :rolleyes: ) is it easier for me to basically get the start balance for 'without policy' and run a statement of interst (as per the bank charges sheet - but with alterd interest rate(s) ) and then to work out THEIR figures (unless I ask for copies of staments for the last XX months - just to make sure that they dont give me duff figures...

 

Any advice???

Barclays :- Settled March 07:o

 

RBS:- Acct Discharged May 07 :o (chase for more and CRA deletion???):confused:

Barclaycard: - CCA recieved 24/1/07. WOW! :o (GITS!!!) :-|

Link to post
Share on other sites

As you hadn't actually used the card for that period of time then surely ALL payments you have made to the card between those dates is the amount you should be claiming ? or have I mis-read it. There should be no need to work anything out as the card has not been used for anything other than the policy.

Pam.

 

If anything I've said helps you then please feel free to tip my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

As you hadn't actually used the card for that period of time then surely ALL payments you have made to the card between those dates is the amount you should be claiming ? or have I mis-read it. There should be no need to work anything out as the card has not been used for anything other than the policy.

 

LOL, if only.

That would be true if there was a ZERO balance to start with ;)

As it is there was a balance oustanding to start with, so I now need to calculate all the interest from JUST the Policy.

 

Its a nightmare.

They told me the Apr was 18.9% :eek: and then the monthly interest rate was 1.456%. I cant work out the APR for the earlier months as I cant calculate the APR from the monthly interest rate. (If you try 1.456% x 12 it doenst equal 18.9% :confused: )

I have in front of me the balances for the months since the policy started. So I have a starting point. But thats about it. Ive asked RBS for a copy of all statements concerned and also for a copy of the calcs AND final figure in the event that the policy paymants had never been taken full stop.

 

I think Im going to have t wait for their figures as its waaaaaaaaaaaay outta my league to calculate these :(

Barclays :- Settled March 07:o

 

RBS:- Acct Discharged May 07 :o (chase for more and CRA deletion???):confused:

Barclaycard: - CCA recieved 24/1/07. WOW! :o (GITS!!!) :-|

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you may be able to use a version of the claims Excel spreadsheet available on this forum. As you have the balances you can load them into it. I'm not really up on the finer details of the spreadsheet but I'm sure someone will come along soon and suggest how it could be used. Good luck.

Pam.

 

If anything I've said helps you then please feel free to tip my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

OK, an update.

Last week I banked two cheques. One for the £700(ish) they owed me in payments taken and another for £240 ish for the interest that I had been charged by RBS for the duration.

 

I worked it out using the std spreadsheets that we all use for the bank charges calcs, then altered the APR where required to reflect the changes in interest rates that I was paying.

 

The reason why I had trouble with the £700 being recieved was that they were trying to crtedit the card that they had taen the funds from. This was then superceded and they were un able to credit the expired card/acct.

 

I feel very happy. It just paid for my 'new' car :):):)

Barclays :- Settled March 07:o

 

RBS:- Acct Discharged May 07 :o (chase for more and CRA deletion???):confused:

Barclaycard: - CCA recieved 24/1/07. WOW! :o (GITS!!!) :-|

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...