Safeloans have got a ccj on loan that they refused me even though dispite numerous letters and my bank providing evidence that they never paid into the account theyhave stated the loan should have been paid into. I have now had a letter today fromthem saying that they are going to apply for an attachment of earnings but if Icontact them they can offer a 40% reduction I also never even received anycourt papers before just the judgement papers I have also checked my credit files and the judgement shows. What can I do to stop them getting an attachment of earnings for a loan I did not have they want £445 for a supposed £150 loan.

Have you moved address since the original loan application

No we have lived here for 25 years

Get a set aside asap. Your reason would be you never received any papers to the address.

Safeloans are abusing the legal system. They have got a CCJ on a debt that has never existed and now have the cheek to offer a discount. You must get this set aside, and then get in contact with as many authorites as possible. Make sure you contact watchdog and the national press too.

You can also contact actionfraud.org.uk . Infact, i would recommend that.

As i said, you main focus right now should be to get that CCJ set aside.

I've sent an SOS to an admin so they can give more specific advise relating to the set aside and to where complaints need to be made.

Me thinks this is a prime case for damages under

DURKIN V DSG RETAIL LTD AND HFC BANK LTD

Prime case for damages since theyve broken the law, broken regulation, broken guidance and made a complete mockery of the court system.

If the OP can prove that the CCJ stopped him getting credit relating to a major item, such as a mortgage etc, or even a less major item, the damages could run into the £1000's.

I believe the Durkin judgement stipulated that it was not necessary to prove any quantifiable loss or damages had occurred

The fact the defamation had occurred was enough to satisfy damages

i will need to look up Durkin to confirm though, give me 30 minutes

The case of King v British Linen & Co dealt with the situation where there had been no specific damage. The only loss which the pursuer had occurred sustained was the loss to his credit standing. That was valued by the sheriff at £100 in 1897,

Had there been no finding of specific loss in this case, I would have had no hesitation in finding that an award of damages for the mere injury to credit was appropriate. In modern society credit plays a very big part in the conduct of the daily lives of a significant portion of the population. The financial services industry is constantly advertising loans, credit cards, store cards, mortgages, consolidation accounts etc.

To have one's credit worthiness impugned so that one is at risk of being unable to obtain credit on the grounds that he is not credit worthy is, if anything, a more significant matter for the individual than it would have been at the time of King, over a hundred years ago. Mr Beynon has submitted that a figure of £10,000 would be appropriate. The figure of £100 awarded by the sheriff and left standing by the Inner House in King v British Linen translates, according to the Office of National Statistics Publication "Focus on consumer price indices" 2008, table 5/3, to £9,975 in the year 2008. The figure of £5,500 awarded to an individual in Kpohraror v WoolwichBuilding Society 1996 4All ER 119 was not interfered with by the Court of Appeal in 1996 and, in today's figures, would be worth £8,215.

Thanks guys I am really surprised at the quick replies Ihave had a quick look at DURKIN V DSG RETAIL LTD AND HFC BANK LTD case and will read proper tomorrow as I have to work tonight and will be replying to your help tomorrow I do not want to apply for any credit now but I do want my name cleared just in case I need to in the future. My wife said that the loan was approvedin principle the turned down due to the fact I could not provide wage slips that showed I was earning enough as I was on sick at the time I applied which was Feb 2012 .

Get it set aside, and then DEMAND to know the account sortcode, number and name that the money was deposited in. It's then a simple case of matching up the records.

Renagadeimp I have found the N244 form on the hmctsformfinder web site andwill print and fill out and send off stating I never received the court paperswhen I get back tomorrow.

It will cost you £80.00 though

£80 is better than having a CCJ with no merit or reason though. Plus theres a chance the OP could issue a court claim against the company themselves.

THe main thing is that the CCJ MUST be set aside, as the claimant have already made it clear they will go for enforcement orders, even though the debt doesnt exist.

I agree, and getting Ten grand compensation while turning the knife into SAFE LOANS

MMF, you are next

Give a shout if you need a hand with the N244

Yep. Get the claim, get the judgement, and the second judgement is handed down, go straight for enforcement orders. Pref a winding up order

First step is to download the N244 and complete...... requesting an order that the judgment be set a side and enclose a brief outline evidencing the request.Fee £80 its important to put on the application " Costs in this application"

Just nudge your thread if you need assistance completing the application.

Regards

Andy

Can we have an update on this? Im very interested in how they have managed this.

OP could you post proof that it was declined? Not saying i dont believe you of course, but this could be pivotal in evidence to be supplied in the case

Sorry for no update I have filled in the N244 and I am waiting to get to get paid my salary this week and send off I have had a letter offering an £155 discount on a £445 demand from simpsons legal who I think are really safeloans considering they have the same address and telephone number .I will try to post the documents up at the weekend when I can have the use a scanner.

Doesnt seem to be the case unfortunately... I will say though... They are very close together xd (CR0 & 9) Croydon?!?!?!?!

Also in the long term.... Watch this Space

I THINK IT IS A TWO BIT COMPANY

Unlike using a solicitor to enforce a judgement, we do not charge by the hour and we will collect your CCJ's on a no collection, no commission basis

Not once do they state legal representation by a qualified solicitor

Safe-loans and Simpson legal are out of the same building

Sorry guys just relised that taking a closer look at the docs about the addresses my eyesight is not great and I am at work and not using my glasses.