Patricia Pearl - Small Claims Procedure - A Practical Guide


An excellent guide for the layperson in how to use the County Court - a must if you are intending to start a claim.

£19.99 + £1.50 (P&P)




Last Will and Testament Kit


Make a legally valid will without the fuss and expense of a solicitor - includes a full step-by-step guide.

£9.99 + £1.50 (P&P)

BAILIFFS - The Law and Your Rights

Written by John Kruse, one of the leading experts on Bailiff Law, this consumer friendly guide is essential reading for anyone who comes into contact with a bailiff.

The book is easy to understand and clearly explains the rights a bailiff has, and also what they cannot do when collecting debts and repossessing goods etc.

£13.95 + £2.00 (P&P)


Reclaim the Right Ltd. - reg. 05783665 in the UK

reg. office:
923 Finchley Road
London
NW11 7PE



+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2
1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 30
  1. #1
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    magic_paul Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    20

    Default magic_paul vs Natwest **WON**

    Hi guys,

    After successfully requesting a list of charges from Natwesticon over the last 5 years, I've worked out they've taken £2,444 (I was quite shocked at this figure!).

    I am sending my request for repayment today via Special Delivery and will keep you posted of my progress.

    Paul

    Similar Threads:

  2. #2
    Platinum Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Make a donation
    livelylad Authoritative livelylad Authoritative livelylad Authoritative livelylad Authoritative livelylad Authoritative livelylad Authoritative livelylad Authoritative livelylad Authoritative livelylad Authoritative livelylad's Avatar

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jun 2006
    I am in
    Devon
    Posts
    9,526

    Default Re: magic_paul vs Natwest

    Quote Originally Posted by magic_paul
    Hi guys,

    After successfully requesting a list of charges from Natwesticon over the last 5 years, I've worked out they've taken £2,444 (I was quite shocked at this figure!).

    I am sending my request for repayment today via Special Delivery and will keep you posted of my progress.

    Paul
    good luck






    I am not a legal expert my advice is given without prejudice and is purely my opinion only. If you are in doubt please seek professional advice.

  3. #3
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    magic_paul Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    20

    Default Re: magic_paul vs Natwest

    The other day I received what looks like a standard response, telling me they weren't prepared to pay or discuss their charges with anyone. I am now going to send out the letter before actionicon.


  4. #4
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    magic_paul Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    20

    Default Re: magic_paul vs Natwest

    Recieved a response to my lbaicon yesterday saying sorry I wasn't happy, and thanks for letting them know of my intended course of action. The 14 days are up today, so I'm going to log onto moneyclaim today and work my way through that.


  5. #5
    Classic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Make a contribution
    Deller Authoritative Deller Authoritative Deller Authoritative Deller Authoritative Deller Authoritative Deller Authoritative Deller Authoritative Deller Authoritative Deller Authoritative Deller Authoritative Deller Authoritative Deller's Avatar

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Aug 2006
    I am in
    Somewhere!!!
    Posts
    2,355

    Default Re: magic_paul vs Natwest

    Make sure you use the correct Particulars of Claim, something I didn't do.


    1. The Claimant has an account xxxxxxxx with the Defendant, opened xxxx. 2. Since xx/xx/xx the Defendant debited charges and interesticon in respect of purported breaches of contract. 3. Defendant is aware of all details as a list of charges has already been supplied. Another copy is attached. 4. Claimant contends: (a) The charges exceed the Defendant's losses caused by the breaches; (b) The Term permitting the Defendant to levyicon such charges is unenforceable under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999, Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 and at Common Law. 5. Claimant claims: (a) return of the amounts debited of £xxxx; (b) Interest per S.69 County Courts Act 1984 of 8% - £xxxx continuing at 8% until judgment or settlement at a daily rate of £0.xx; 6. Alternatively, if the charges are a fee for a service, then they must be reasonable under S.15 of the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982. 7. Costs allowed by the Court.


    IF MY COMMENTS HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES


    Don't be like the banks - give a little back


    NAT WEST - WON - £4282.36


  6. #6
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    magic_paul Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    20

    Default Re: magic_paul vs Natwest

    Moneyclaim request filed 15/11/06 - thanks deller, I did change the details to match my own.


  7. #7
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    magic_paul Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    20

    Default Re: magic_paul vs Natwest

    Quick question. In the moneyclaim details it states:

    3. Defendant is aware of all details as a list of charges has already been supplied. Another copy will be sent.

    Does this mean I should send another copy of my list of charges, with interesticon, to the bank?


  8. #8
    Classic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Make a contribution
    Deller Authoritative Deller Authoritative Deller Authoritative Deller Authoritative Deller Authoritative Deller Authoritative Deller Authoritative Deller Authoritative Deller Authoritative Deller Authoritative Deller Authoritative Deller's Avatar

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Aug 2006
    I am in
    Somewhere!!!
    Posts
    2,355

    Default Re: magic_paul vs Natwest

    No problem paul, I wouldn't like to see anyone making the same mistake as me.

    IF MY COMMENTS HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES


    Don't be like the banks - give a little back


    NAT WEST - WON - £4282.36


  9. #9
    Classic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Make a contribution
    Deller Authoritative Deller Authoritative Deller Authoritative Deller Authoritative Deller Authoritative Deller Authoritative Deller Authoritative Deller Authoritative Deller Authoritative Deller Authoritative Deller Authoritative Deller's Avatar

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Aug 2006
    I am in
    Somewhere!!!
    Posts
    2,355

    Default Re: magic_paul vs Natwest

    Quote Originally Posted by magic_paul View Post
    Quick question. In the moneyclaim details it states:

    3. Defendant is aware of all details as a list of charges has already been supplied. Another copy will be sent.

    Does this mean I should send another copy of my list of charges, with interesticon, to the bank?

    I did, that way the bank are then aware that you have filed a claim against them and that you are now also claiming the 8% interest!

    IF MY COMMENTS HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES


    Don't be like the banks - give a little back


    NAT WEST - WON - £4282.36


  10. #10
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    magic_paul Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    20

    Default Re: magic_paul vs Natwest

    Cool, I'll pop a copy in the post today for them.


  11. #11
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    magic_paul Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    20

    Default Re: magic_paul vs Natwest

    OK - today I recieved two letters in the post.

    The first is from Cobbetts with a copy of their defence and a CPR Part 18 request.

    The second is from the court, again with a copy of the defence and CPR Part 18 request, and an allocation questionnaireicon.

    Just to clarify, my next step would be to fill out the Questionnaire, return it to the court, and send Cobbetts a the CPR Part 18 response letter located in these forums? Do I need to respond to the defence at all?


  12. #12
    Mumofthreeboys
    Guest

    Default Re: magic_paul vs Natwest

    Have you been requested by the Court to fill out a CPR part 18icon request?


  13. #13
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    magic_paul Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    20

    Default Re: magic_paul vs Natwest

    No I haven't. My letter from the court reads:

    ----

    To all parties

    A defence to this claim has been filed.

    The claim has been transferred to the court covering the area where the claimant lives or carries on business.

    Please read the accompanying documents carefully and note that the allocation questionnaire should be returned to Newcastle Upon Tyne county courticon.

    ----

    It also asks me to send a cheque for another £100 court fee..


  14. #14
    Mumofthreeboys
    Guest

    Default Re: magic_paul vs Natwest

    Quote Originally Posted by magic_paul View Post
    The second is from the court, again with a copy of the defence and CPR Part 18 request, and an allocation questionnaireicon.
    Oh right, I thought from what you wrote that you had received a request from the Court, which you would be obliged to complete. If you have only received a request from Cobbetts then yes, you are correct, send them this http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk...8-request.html


  15. #15
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    magic_paul Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    20

    Default Re: magic_paul vs Natwest

    Brilliant, and should I also send a copy of that letter to the court?


  16. #16
    Mumofthreeboys
    Guest

    Default Re: magic_paul vs Natwest

    I don't think there is any need, I just sent it straight back to Cobbetts with another Schedule of Charges.


  17. #17
    Classic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Make a contribution
    Deller Authoritative Deller Authoritative Deller Authoritative Deller Authoritative Deller Authoritative Deller Authoritative Deller Authoritative Deller Authoritative Deller Authoritative Deller Authoritative Deller Authoritative Deller's Avatar

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Aug 2006
    I am in
    Somewhere!!!
    Posts
    2,355

    Default Re: magic_paul vs Natwest

    Brilliant, and should I also send a copy of that letter to the court?
    Not neccessary yet, but make sure you keep a copy as it may be required by the court later.

    IF MY COMMENTS HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES


    Don't be like the banks - give a little back


    NAT WEST - WON - £4282.36


  18. #18
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    magic_paul Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    20

    Default Re: magic_paul vs Natwest

    Got an offer for £1,450 today. Rejection letter going in the post tomorrow!


  19. #19
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    magic_paul Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    20

    Default Re: magic_paul vs Natwest

    I recieved a letter from the court on Friday - I'm not too sure what it means:

    GENERAL LETTER OF JUDGEMENT OR ORDER

    Before DISTRICT JUDGE STAPLEY sitting at Newcastle Upon Tyne Country Court, Law Courts, The Quayside, Newcastle Upon Tyne.

    Upon the Courts own motion. The Court has made this order of its own initiative without a hearing. If you object to the order, you must make an application to have it set asideicon, varied or stayed within 7 days of recieving it

    IT IS ORDERED THAT

    The Defendant must file an Allocation Questionnaire by 14th February 2007.
    and in default their defence and counterclaim, if any, will be struck out and the claimant will be at liberty to request judgement forthwith.

    is this good or bad??


  20. #20
    Gold Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    Janet-M Authoritative Janet-M Authoritative Janet-M Authoritative Janet-M Authoritative Janet-M Authoritative Janet-M Authoritative Janet-M Authoritative Janet-M Authoritative Janet-M Authoritative Janet-M's Avatar

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    4,944

    Default Re: magic_paul vs Natwest

    It is just saying that they have to lodge their aqicon by that date if they don't then their defence will be struck out and you can get judgement .In other words you will win by default

    Ring the court first thing 15th Feb ..if AQ has not been submitted by then point then to the order and say you wish to apply for judgement

    This is good


    When you want to fool the world, tell the truth.

    Advice & opinions of Janet-M are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any
    doubts.


Browsealoud
Video Tour



Reclaim the Right Ltd. - reg.05783665 in the UK reg. office:- 923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE