Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Better version attached with the late appeal explained more clearly for the judge. This will sound silly, but I think it would be a good idea to e-mail it to the court and UKPC on Sunday.  It's probably me being daft, but Sunday is still March, and as it's late, sending it in March rather than April will make it sound like it was less late than it really is.  if you get my drift. You can still pop in a paper version on Tuesday if you want. E-mail address for the court: [email protected] And for UKPC: [email protected]   [email protected] Defendant WS.pdf
    • Update 15th March the eviction notice period expired, and I paid my next month rent along with sending them the message discussed above. After a short while they just emailed me back this dry phrase "Thank you for your email." In two weeks' time I'm gonna need to pay the rent again, and I have such a feeling that shortly after that date the contracts will be exchanged and all the payments will be made.  Now my main concern is, if possible, not to end up paying rent after I move out.  
    • they cant 'take away' anything, what ever makes you believe that?  dx  
    • The text on the N1SDT Claim Form 1.The claim is for breaching the terms and conditions set on private land. 2. The defendant's vehicle, NumberPlate, was identified in the Leeds Bradford Airport Roadways on the 28/07/2023 in breach of the advertised terms and conditions; namely Stopping in a zone where stopping is prohibited 3.At all material times the Defendant was the registered keeper and/or driver. 4. The terms and conditions upon  entering private land were clearly displayed at the entrance and in prominent locations 5. The sign was the offer and the act of entering private land was the acceptance of the offer hereby entering into a contract by conduct. 6.The signs specifically detail the terms and conditions and the consequences of failure to comply,  namely a parking charge notice will be issued, and the Defendant has failed to settle the outstanding liability. 7.The claimant seeks the recovery of the parking charge notice, contractual costs and interest.   This is what I am thinking of for the wording of my defence The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and are generic in nature which fails to comply with CPR 16.4. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 1. Paragraph 1 is denied. It is denied that the Defendant ever entered into a contract to breach any terms and conditions of the stated private land. 2. Paragraph 2 and 4 are denied. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was only contracted to provide car park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. 3. It is admitted that Defendant is the recorded keeper of the vehicle. 4.  Paragraph 6 is denied the claimant has yet to evidence that their contract with the landowner supersedes  Leeds Bradford airport byelaws. Further it is denied that the Claimant’s signage is capable of creating a legally binding contract. 5. Paragraph 7 is denied, there are no contractual costs and interest cannot be accrued on a speculative charge.   I'm not sure whether point 4 is correct as I think this side road is not covered by byelaws? Any other suggestions/corrections would be appreciated.
    • Dear EVRi parcelnet LTD t/a evri   evri parcelnet isnt a thing also you say defendant's response which is a bit of a weird format.   Something like   Dear EVRi, Claim no xxxx In your defence you said you could not access tracking. Please see attached receipt and label Regards
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

LPA Receivers taken over my properties with no court order & no agreement from me.


Stevlynd
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3481 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Admin if you have to merge my posts pease can this be the main one as it has a more relevant title to my problem.

 

LPA Receivers have taken over my properties with no court order & no agreement from me.

2 of the properties are empty & the receivers are doing nothing about it, how would I stand if I were to go ahead & let the properties with full knowlege of the problem to the tennants?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Admin if you have to merge my posts pease can this be the main one as it has a more relevant title to my problem.

 

LPA Receivers have taken over my properties with no court order & no agreement from me.

2 of the properties are empty & the receivers are doing nothing about it, how would I stand if I were to go ahead & let the properties with full knowlege of the problem to the tennants?

Okay,if it was me I would re let the properties.

 

Open another bank account and have the rents paid into it.

 

Work out how much roughly your quarterly payments were and get that March one paid Pronto.

 

When, if this goes to a court the judge will note that you have tried not to fall into arrears but the bank pushed you into arrears,banks fault being totally unreasonable.

 

If they the receivers have changed the locks on the empty properties,INFORM THE POLICE,these properties are still in your name,get a locksmith to change the locks back.

 

Send a bill to the bank for changing the locks back.

 

l You've got two months before the June payment if you can make it your back in control.

 

If you make to there you can start to negotiate,I don't know all the fact's but I would be getting the other tenants in the properties that are let to pay there rents into your new

Bank account REMEMBER there A.S T,s are with you not the bank or the receivers if they don't agree serve them notice's to quit.

 

GOOD LUCK.

 

 

I'll ask over the road if they can log on to here and help you but some are banned.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are the the LPA receivers acting for the lender

 

They cannot act in their capacity highlighted unless they have the authority of the court ( Ultra vires )

The properties are still yours unless a court has put any restrictions on the properties

 

You need to be asking why they have taken possession without any authority of the court

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are we talking bankruptcy here ?

No I am not bankrupt & have never missed a payment or been late or short with a payment. Lpa receivers took over 27th feb & as they told the tenants not to pay their rent because they hadn't opened a bank account for it to go into marches payment was missed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are the the LPA receivers acting for the lender

 

They cannot act in their capacity highlighted unless they have the authority of the court ( Ultra vires )

The properties are still yours unless a court has put any restrictions on the properties

 

You need to be asking why they have taken possession without any authority of the court

Hi Squaddie,the OP has another thread going but its all over the place but you should get the just of what's going on if you read it.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Are the the LPA receivers acting for the lender

 

They cannot act in their capacity highlighted unless they have the authority of the court ( Ultra vires )

The properties are still yours unless a court has put any restrictions on the properties

 

You need to be asking why they have taken possession without any authority of the court

 

This was initially a 5 year deal which i was assured would be renewed. I then took out further loans over 15 years. The banks went belly up & said sorry we lied we want our money back & if you try to pay the 5 year loans we will probably choose to pay them off the 15 year ones. The loan agreement says they can do pretty much as they like, including putting the properties in the hands of the LPA receivers. After asking a million questions before i signed I was assured nothing like this would happen as long as I made the repayments.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are the the LPA receivers acting for the lender

 

They cannot act in their capacity highlighted unless they have the authority of the court ( Ultra vires )

The properties are still yours unless a court has put any restrictions on the properties

 

You need to be asking why they have taken possession without any authority of the court

Sorry missed the bit about who they are acting for. They have told my tenants they are my agents. I have sent a SARs to them to see if I can find anything that looks although they are acting for the bank in any way but obviously this all takes time.x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Squaddie,the OP has another thread going but its all over the place but you should get the just of what's going on if you read it.

 

Sorry for the messy threads but am new to all this & my heads a bit of a shed. Thanks to you guys am learning very quickly though.

I could post the letter I sent to my Mp as it pretty much covers everything although as you can imagine it is many pages long. Lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

It does not matter what is put into a contract if it is in contravention of established common/case law

 

as long as you are the legal owner, with or without any security/mortgage

 

which this is

 

only a court can take back a property

Link to post
Share on other sites

It does not matter what is put into a contract if it is in contravention of established common/case law

 

as long as you are the legal owner, with or without any security/mortgage

 

which this is

 

only a court can take back a property

Thanks for that squaddie. Am beginning to feel better already.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Looking at that link, i have noticed it is three years old. Since then we have had the meltdown in the banking sector

 

Thing to watch is:

 

Has their been any change in statutory provision or established case law to either support, or negate the situation in 2010 in regards to the established practice by some lenders

Link to post
Share on other sites

It does not matter what is put into a contract if it is in contravention of established common/case law

 

as long as you are the legal owner, with or without any security/mortgage

 

which this is

 

only a court can take back a property

Just another point would a court take the properties back or would they make us get round a table & sort the whole mess out?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The court in any dispute will offer mediation before any sort of difference of opinion was placed before a judge

 

Thanks for that squaddie. I already feel as though a 10 tonne weight has been lifted. Have put the word out that I have properties to let & have already had some interest. Just need to find a tenant with some guts who will be able to stand up to any threats from the receivers.

Edited by Stevlynd
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that squad die. I already feel as though a 10 tonne weight has been lifted. Have put the word out that I have properties to let & have already had some interest. Just need to find a tenant with some guts who will be able to stand up to any threats from the receivers.
You don't really want to tell the new tenants anything about any dispute,its not there business,when you start taking control the receivers will probably back of, someone at the bank is trying to frighten you ,.they the BANK are acting illegally.

 

You are going to have to start to stand up for yourself,the bank will try every dirty trick in the book to bully you and intimidate you,you as a tax payer have an 82% stake in this bank.

 

You've got a long way to go so get going and ask as many questions on here and other places these people will help you.

 

Don't be BULLIED.

.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't really want to tell the new tenants anything about any dispute,its not there business,when you start taking control the receivers will probably back of, someone at the bank is trying to frighten you ,.they the BANK are acting illegally.

 

You are going to have to start to stand up for yourself,the bank will try every dirty trick in the book to bully you and intimidate you,you as a tax payer have an 82% stake in this bank.

 

You've got a long way to go so get going and ask as many questions on here and other places these people will help you.

 

Don't be BULLIED.

.

Thanks streetwise feel like we've been fighting alone since the end of February when they took them. Have seen a couple of solicitors but don't have any faith in them. now feel as though I have a whole army behind me. I certainly wont be bullied now i know where i stand. Am wondering though how I would stand putting tenants in without them being fully aware of the situation with the bank as if this goes to court quickly & they're evicted the may have a case to sue me for damages.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks streetwise feel like we've been fighting alone since the end of February when they took them. Have seen a couple of solicitors but don't have any faith in them. now feel as though I have a whole army behind me. I certainly wont be bullied now i know where i stand. Am wondering though how I would stand putting tenants in without them being fully aware of the situation with the bank as if this goes to court quickly & they're evicted the may have a case to sue me for damages.
You are a long way from court unless there is something you have not told us.

 

When the new tenants sign A.S.T.s they will have rights and the bank won't be able to just throw them out.

 

These properties are yours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are a long way from court unless there is something you have not told us.

 

When the new tenants sign A.S.T.s they will have rights and the bank won't be able to just throw them out.

 

These properties are yours.

 

Lol no I don't think there is anything that I know of that I have not told you but as the tenancy date will be after the date they said they are taking over them and as the bank seem to think they owe them does that not make a difference? Also should I do the assured shorthold tenancy for 5 years, I know you can do them for up to 7 years?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lol no I don't think there is anything that I know of that I have not told you but as the tenancy date will be after the date they said they are taking over them and as the bank seem to think they owe them does that not make a difference? Also should I do the assured shorthold tenancy for 5 years, I know you can do them for up to 7 years?
What do you think.??? I see you've managed to post over the road. Edited by Streetwise
Link to post
Share on other sites

What do you think.??? I see you've managed to post over the road.

Well I will go with my gut instinct & if I feel they are the right tenants I will do it for 5 years. Ok so now I know what over the road means thanks for that. I searched a different term & they were the 1st to come up. Thanks for all your help. Streetwise.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It does not matter what is put into a contract if it is in contravention of established common/case law

 

as long as you are the legal owner, with or without any security/mortgage

 

which this is

 

only a court can take back a property

Sorry missed this post. Have done a land registry search & my name is over the doors so to speak.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...
Sorry missed this post. Have done a land registry search & my name is over the doors so to speak.

 

Hi Stevylynd

Have you got any update on the situation,I find myself with exactly the same as yourself down to the 5year deal agreement which was confirmed would be extended then due to the BANK CRISIS

A formal demand for repayment with zero possibility of refinance and now lpa agents appointed ( I also have no arrears and all payments met)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...