Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. Could you post up what they've sent please so we can see what the charge is? Cover up your name and address and their reference number. HB
    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Library charges - Threatened with DCA/Legal


collateral
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3312 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone (not sure if this is the right place to post),

 

my son graduated university last year,

after graduation, he had a placement for which he was still able to take out books from the library.

 

He didnt hand them in on time and now Ive got the university sending charge statements to me.

 

My son doesnt live with me anymore,

and he told me that he emailed this to the university (he was abroad),

he also told me that he recently returned the books,

yet I still receive these statements.

 

I have a few questions now:

1) Can the university and the DCA (if they bring one in) take stuff from me

2) Will the uni waive his charges since he returned the books

3) Do the uni's bring in DCAs (he tells me he ignored the first few statements - he thought they would go away)

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

woe horsey

 

DCA's are not BAILIFFS

they have NO LEGAL POWERS

 

ignore them.

 

the uni have the books

 

end of.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

nope

 

ignore them totally

 

you'll get all manner of scary letters

 

all saying

 

every word but WILL

 

read the letters carefully

 

they are cleverly worded,

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I'm at a loss as yo why they're contacting you.

 

You have never had a contract with the uni library so they can't successfully sue you and they've been told your son No longer lives at the family home. You didn't answer my question. Are the DCA/library threatening you personally? If so, despite their lack of real powers, they shouldn't be doing this. Tell them to jog on.

 

Don't want to sound harsh, but your sons a grown up, help him by all means but at the end of the day he should be trying to sort this out. I'm trying to help one of my off spring with various problems, but I'm only doing it as a 3rd party and you should do the same.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm at a loss as yo why they're contacting you.

 

You have never had a contract with the uni library so they can't successfully sue you and they've been told your son No longer lives at the family home. You didn't answer my question. Are the DCA/library threatening you personally? If so, despite their lack of real powers, they shouldn't be doing this. Tell them to jog on.

 

Don't want to sound harsh, but your sons a grown up, help him by all means but at the end of the day he should be trying to sort this out. I'm trying to help one of my off spring with various problems, but I'm only doing it as a 3rd party and you should do the same.

 

 

Hey Goodatresearch - the thread was started by a parent being pursued over a childs debt. I'm the actual borrower in this instance. Sorry for the confusion.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Goodatresearch - the thread was started by a parent being pursued over a childs debt. I'm the actual borrower in this instance. Sorry for the confusion.

 

That's OK.

 

This could be an admin error on their behalf. Have you thought of doing a SAR?

 

I say this because I was once told by a catalogue company that I had not made a return. After many weeks of trying to speak to someone who would investigate properly, finally someone advised that returns were logged onto 2 databases and one of these databases confirmed the return.

 

I have no idea how your library works, but as said it could be a similar problem and they just haven't checked properly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's OK.

 

This could be an admin error on their behalf. Have you thought of doing a SAR?

 

I say this because I was once told by a catalogue company that I had not made a return. After many weeks of trying to speak to someone who would investigate properly, finally someone advised that returns were logged onto 2 databases and one of these databases confirmed the return.

 

I have no idea how your library works, but as said it could be a similar problem and they just haven't checked properly.

 

Good thinking, sounds like a good route to go down - they have emailed me screenshots of their systems but presumably an SAR will have something more formalised as a form of output.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

I just got a Dunning letter from my university regarding this and I have seen a few email invoices in my spam folder now.

 

I graduated in 2012 and returned the books in April 2013 - about 5 months late.

 

 

The only reason I was able to do this was because I had a placement after my graduation.

 

Usually I would've have renewed the books online but my account was revoked so I didn't receive any notifications

via email (all correspondence with my uni was via the uni email).

 

 

I emailed the university to tell them I could not return ASAP because lack of transport but I got an ambiguous reply that

"I could return the books but this is not right".

 

 

Luckily I have kept the receipt of my return but atm I don't know where I stand.

 

 

I want to contact them but I'm afraid they will refuse and just keep asking for the money.

 

 

I am willing to pay the late fines but I think they are being unfair with the amount they want now - it currently stands at £177.

Link to post
Share on other sites

its a money making exercise ignore them all of you

 

 

re read this thread from post 1

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...