Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello CAG Team, I'm adding the contents of the claim to this thread, but wanted to open the thread with an urgent question: Do I have to supply a WS for a claim with a court date that states " at the hearing the court will consider allocation and, time permitting, give an early neutral evaluation of the case" ? letter is an N24 General Form of Judgement or Order, if so, then I've messed up again. Court date 25 May 2024 The letter from court does not state (like the other claims I have) that I must provide WS within 28 days.. BUT I have recently received a WS from Link for it! making me think I do need to!??
    • Massive issues from Scottish Power I wonder if someone could advise next steps. Tennant moved out I changed the electric into my name I was out the country at the time so I hadn't been to the flat. During sign up process they tried to hijack my gas supply as well which I made it clear I didn't want duel fuel from them but they still went ahead with it. Phoned them up again. a few days later telling them to make sure they stopped it but they said too late ? had to get my current supplier to cancel it. Paid £50 online to ensure there was money covering standing charges etc eventually got to the flat no power. Phoned Scottish Power 40 minutes to get through they state I have a pay as you go meter and that they had set me up on a credit account so they need to send an engineer out which they will pass my details onto. Phone called from engineer asking questions , found out the float is vacant so not an emergency so I have to speak to Scottish Power again. Spoke with the original person from Scottish Power who admitted a mistake (I had told her it was vacant) and now states that it will take 4 weeks to get an appointment but if I want to raise a complaint they will contact me in 48 hours and it will be looked at quicker. Raised a complaint , complaints emailed me within 24 hours to say it will take 7 days till he speaks with me. All I want is power in the property would I be better switching over to EON who supply the gas surely they could sort it out quicker? One thing is for sure I will never bother with Scottish Power ever again.    
    • Hi. Please don't follow McD's advice to contact Met to appeal. They won't listen and you could end up giving them helpful information. HB
    • The UK-based mining giant Anglo American says it has received a takeover proposal from Australia's BHP.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4047 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Quick run down,

 

Needed to insure my van, done it through compare the market. Got happy quote and took out the policy.

 

My van then after 9 days unfortunately broke and to expensive to repair, a friend offered a cheap car to get me through so i rang gladiator to swap it over. They could do it but it turned out to be £95 extra even though its a smaller cc engine.

 

So they say they will cancel the policy and because its within the 14 days i will be entitled to £14 refund (from £64 up front fee already paid) and put me through to sales BUT said i needed to listen to a recorded message. Message played and i carried on doing other stuff as you do.

 

Sales could not help me as they could not match the quote i had already got from else where, so that, as i thought was the end of it and expected a refund of mentioned £14.

 

Today I received a letter from them asking for proof of no claims so i thought kill two birds with one stone here as not received money and they had not cancelled direct debit and had also took £19.99 from my account a week after the cancellation.

 

Rang and told them the policy was cancelled and man whom i spoke with at that time said he cancelled the policy, she said did he play you the auto mated message, i said yes but did not understand it. She then said , well it says in the message that you have to ring us back again to cancel, i can cancel this with you now but you need to pay US £17 now ! so from them owing me just under £35 i now owe them !

 

Unbelievable , Should i ring them back and say that when i was on hold listening to underhand dribble did you not hear me say that any communications with myself incur costs of £50 a time..

 

really what is it coming too

 

Eggy12

Link to post
Share on other sites

Make a formal complaint in writing following the complaints procedure shown in the policy documents. If you cannot resolve within 8 weeks, you can take it to the FOS. They should have taken your cancellation instructions on the first phone call. Putting some requirement on an IVR to have to phone back to cancel, is not satisfactory. Cancellations processes are covered by FSA rules, which require the process to be made clear to customers. This company have failed in this requirement to make the process clear.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ref. blah blah blah

 

Dear sirs.

 

After taking out Insurance with your company I find myself extremely dissatisfied with the way the cancellation procedure followed through.

 

I first took out van insurance with yourselves and was initially happy with the customer service and how smoothly it seemed to flow.

 

However after finding my vehicle after some 9 days had suffered a major break down, I had no choice but to replace it. I then

rang your offices to swap over from van to car policy. I was told this would be no problem and Gentleman told me he would cancel the policy as I requested and re quote, that he did as well as tell me I am due refund of £14.

 

After cancelling the policy and finding he could not match the quote I had been given from elsewhere he then asked me to listen to an auto mated message, followed by advice to ring a “sister” company that also could not match the quote given to me.

 

This is where the conversation there ended.

 

After some time I check my bank details and have found you have taken out a direct debit for £19.99 a week after the policy was cancelled. I have now cancelled this direct debit.

 

The following day I received a letter from yourselves asking proof of no claims bonus, I rang to say the policy was cancelled but was met by disbelief upon hearing your operator tell me it was not cancelled and was still live. After explaining to the lady what had occurred she then went on to tell me that if i had followed the automated message I would have had to ring back and cancel again and she would cancel the policy now, followed by I have an outstanding debt of £17.

 

You should have taken your cancellation instructions on the first phone call. Putting some requirement on an IVR

to have to phone back to cancel, is not satisfactory. Cancellations processes are covered by FSA rules, which require the process

to be made clear to customers. Your company have failed in this requirement to make the process clear.

 

I hope this matter was a mistake and can be resolved with out delay and not to be moved onto the FOS. (Financial Ombudsman Service)

 

I await a refund of the £14 as promised and the £19.99 direct debit taken from my bank account after the policy was cancelled.

 

 

 

Eggy12

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's a good chance the complaint letter will work but playing devils advocate, if he advised you to listen to a recorded message about cancelling and you did not action the instructions they may deny the complaint and possibly the Ombudsman may as well.

 

It's well worth complaining though

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Eggy12

 

Thank you for your email. As Quality Manager for Gladiator I have looked at our file and would like to reply to your concerns.

 

There clearly has been confusion surrounding the cancellation of your policy. You were transferred to our Sales Department for a quotation only on 14th March 2013. The policy was not cancelled as you did not instruct us to do so and the alternative quotation was not accepted. I am sorry you have experienced poor communication and misunderstood the procedures followed. As the policy was not cancelled, we continued cover and therefore applied for payment in accordance with the direct debit agreement.

 

As an intermediary specialising in commercial vehicle insurance we are unable to simply change the vehicle on a policy from a van to a car with the same insurer. We have the facility to place the vehicle with an alternative insurer starting a new policy and I apologise this option was not suitable for you.

 

We are regulated by the financial Services Authority and are procedures are fully compliant to their requirements and recommendations.

 

As we were unable to accommodate your needs I have asked our Accounts Department to reverse the instalment of £19.19 taken and honour the £14.17 refund agreed, as ideally the policy should have cancelled at this time, if we had spoken with you to confirm this was your wish.

 

At Gladiator we aim to work with our customers to resolve all complaints fairly. While I hope my response answers your concerns, I understand you may have further queries or more information you would like us to consider. You are still welcome to contact me on 0844 848 4302, or via e-mail. Should you remain dissatisfied, you can contact the Financial Ombudsman Service within 6 months of the date of this letter. I have enclosed the leaflet ‘Your Complaint and the Ombudsman

 

 

 

http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/consumer-leaflet.htm

 

 

:first:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...