Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The incident was 03rd March 2024 - and that was the only letter that I have received from MET 15th April 2024 The charge I paid was at the Stansted Airport exit gate (No real relevance now - I thought this charge was for that!!).   Here is the content of email to them (Yes I know I said I was the driver !!!!) as said above -  I thought this charge was for that!! "Stansted Airport" Dear “To whom it may concern” My name is ??  PCN:  ?? Veh Reg: Date of Incident: 03rd March 2024 I have just received a parking charge final reminder letter, dated 10th April 2024 - for an overstay.  This is the first to my knowledge of any overstay. I am aware that I am out of the 28 days, I don’t mean to be rude, this feels like it is a scam My movements on this day in question are, I pulled into what looked like a service station on my way to pick my daughter and family up from Stansted airport. The reason for me pulling into this area was to use a toilet, so I found Starbucks, and when into there, after the above, I then purchased a coffee. After which I then continued with my journey to pick my daughter up. (however after I sent this email I remember that Starbucks was closed so I then I walked over to Macdonalds) There was no signs about parking or any tickets machines to explains about the parking rules. Once at Stansted, I entered and then paid on exit.  So Im not show where I overstayed my welcome.. With gratitude    
    • Just to enlarge on Dave's great rundown of your case under Penalty. In the oft quoted case often seen on PCNs,  viz PE v Beavis while to Judges said there was a case for claiming that £100 was a penalty, this was overruled in this case because PE had a legitimate interest in keeping the car park free for other motorists which outweighed the penalty. Here there is no legitimate interest since the premises were closed. Therefore the charge is a penalty and the case should be thrown out for that reason alone.   The Appeals dept need informing about what and what isn't a valid PCN. Dummies. You should also mention that you were unable to pay by Iphone as there was no internet connection and there was a long  queue to pay on a very busy day . There was no facility for us to pay from the time of our arrival only the time from when we paid at the machine so we felt that was a bit of a scam since we were not parked until we paid. On top of that we had two children to load and unload in the car which should be taken into account since Consideration periods and Grace periods are minimum time. If you weren't the driver and PoFA isn't compliant you are off scot free since only the driver is liable and they are saying it was you. 
    • Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x
    • Doubt the uneconomic write off would be registered, unless you agreed to accept write off settlement of the claim. It is just cosmetic damage. All that has happened, is that the car has been looked at and they realised the repair costs are going to exceed the value of the car. If the car is perfectly driveable with no upcoming normal work required to pass next MOT, your current Insurers will continue Insurance and you can accept an amount from third party Insurers to go towards you repairing the scratched bodywork.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

JSA first month at work


benson13
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4046 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there, and welcome to CAG. I'll move this post to the Benefits Forum where you should get more responses.

 

The basic answer to your question is no, you cannot claim JSA for your first month at work. Depending on how long you have been claiming, you may be entitled to a Job Grant and an extra four weeks of Housing Benefit (if applicable). Note, though, that these provisions will end on 31st March. When do you start work, and when did your JSA claim begin?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How they expect anyone to even afford the month in fares let alone live, is beyond me. There should be something even if its an interest free loan to pay back over a length of time, having wages in advance only leaves a continuing hurdle, and I cant see many employers being happy to give too much anyway. It wasn't marvellous before with 2 wk benefit but better than nothing and manageable, and at least the 4wk housing/council tax run on was available. Just not seeing how this govt are doing anything for the real people in this country. Making it pay to be in work? really?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are not on the work program you can ask for help with travel costs to get to and from work until you receive you first wage, it is a discretionary fund that is available but very limited and receipts have to be provided to show that the money has been used for the intended purpose.

It may not cover the full cost of travel either.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dyfed,

 

People starting work can request a housing benefit and council tax benefit run on - until the end of this month!! Not sure what happens after April 1st. Also, once working (especially if you're in a lower paid job) take your pay slips in, view will re-calculate your housing benefit each month.

 

As I said before I'm not sure how it will change come April 1st!!

 

Feebee_71

Link to post
Share on other sites

As JSA is paid retrospectively JSA will run partly into the first months work.?

 

With the Housing Benefit, would a contract suffice in proving the hours contracted to work? If one has to wait till the first payslip which is a month ahead and then the long wait for Housing Benefit to work out the recalculation it could take three months with my council!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes my council is slow too, it took about 3 months to sort out when I moved home last year. If I found myself in the situation of a new job I would write and inform council re rent and council tax, obviously cant pay what haven't yet been paid by new employer, but would of course be constantly in arrears unless paid two months in one month to get ahead. They seem to demand payment in advance for rent and council tax here. A neighbour of mine gets a letter every month telling her she is a month behind and it rattles on about debt and losing your home blah blah blah, and every month she pays a month, but its still in arrears since she started work last year. Bonkers!! Whatever the govt says, she really isn't better off in work apart from the fact that she hasn't got the dwp on her back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dyfed,

 

People starting work can request a housing benefit and council tax benefit run on - until the end of this month!! Not sure what happens after April 1st. Also, once working (especially if you're in a lower paid job) take your pay slips in, view will re-calculate your housing benefit each month.

 

As I said before I'm not sure how it will change come April 1st!!

 

Feebee_71

 

Thanks. Will be interesting to see if there are any changes in April. Its disgusting that people are not helped more.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes my council is slow too, it took about 3 months to sort out when I moved home last year. If I found myself in the situation of a new job I would write and inform council re rent and council tax, obviously cant pay what haven't yet been paid by new employer, but would of course be constantly in arrears unless paid two months in one month to get ahead. They seem to demand payment in advance for rent and council tax here. A neighbour of mine gets a letter every month telling her she is a month behind and it rattles on about debt and losing your home blah blah blah, and every month she pays a month, but its still in arrears since she started work last year. Bonkers!! Whatever the govt says, she really isn't better off in work apart from the fact that she hasn't got the dwp on her back.

 

No she has the council on her back now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes my council is slow too, it took about 3 months to sort out when I moved home last year. If I found myself in the situation of a new job I would write and inform council re rent and council tax, obviously cant pay what haven't yet been paid by new employer, but would of course be constantly in arrears unless paid two months in one month to get ahead. They seem to demand payment in advance for rent and council tax here. A neighbour of mine gets a letter every month telling her she is a month behind and it rattles on about debt and losing your home blah blah blah, and every month she pays a month, but its still in arrears since she started work last year. Bonkers!! Whatever the govt says, she really isn't better off in work apart from the fact that she hasn't got the dwp on her back.

 

 

Hi Ruby

 

Would that mean say for instance I start a new job April 1st, now my HB is paid retrospectivley so rent in on the 1st April- next rent due may 1st. Then I inform the Council of my new job the 1 april- I would still get May rent paid along with May etc even if late due to their slow working. I won't loose out on any months?

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no replacement for the run on payments from the 1st April and I have not heard that tere is anything in the pipeline to replace te payments with anything else.

I think it is to do with the introduction of universal credits (albeit that there is gap in removal and intoduction of said benefits/payments).

 

I think HB is the same as JSA and paid in arrears so the payment made on the 1st April covers you for the month of March, so declaring that you start work on the 1st aril will definitely mean no payment of HB run on and you may be liable for full or partial payment of you rent from the 1st April onwards.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...