Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Better version attached with the late appeal explained more clearly for the judge. This will sound silly, but I think it would be a good idea to e-mail it to the court and UKPC on Sunday.  It's probably me being daft, but Sunday is still March, and as it's late, sending it in March rather than April will make it sound like it was less late than it really is.  if you get my drift. You can still pop in a paper version on Tuesday if you want. E-mail address for the court: [email protected] And for UKPC: [email protected]   [email protected] Defendant WS.pdf
    • Update 15th March the eviction notice period expired, and I paid my next month rent along with sending them the message discussed above. After a short while they just emailed me back this dry phrase "Thank you for your email." In two weeks' time I'm gonna need to pay the rent again, and I have such a feeling that shortly after that date the contracts will be exchanged and all the payments will be made.  Now my main concern is, if possible, not to end up paying rent after I move out.  
    • they cant 'take away' anything, what ever makes you believe that?  dx  
    • The text on the N1SDT Claim Form 1.The claim is for breaching the terms and conditions set on private land. 2. The defendant's vehicle, NumberPlate, was identified in the Leeds Bradford Airport Roadways on the 28/07/2023 in breach of the advertised terms and conditions; namely Stopping in a zone where stopping is prohibited 3.At all material times the Defendant was the registered keeper and/or driver. 4. The terms and conditions upon  entering private land were clearly displayed at the entrance and in prominent locations 5. The sign was the offer and the act of entering private land was the acceptance of the offer hereby entering into a contract by conduct. 6.The signs specifically detail the terms and conditions and the consequences of failure to comply,  namely a parking charge notice will be issued, and the Defendant has failed to settle the outstanding liability. 7.The claimant seeks the recovery of the parking charge notice, contractual costs and interest.   This is what I am thinking of for the wording of my defence The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and are generic in nature which fails to comply with CPR 16.4. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 1. Paragraph 1 is denied. It is denied that the Defendant ever entered into a contract to breach any terms and conditions of the stated private land. 2. Paragraph 2 and 4 are denied. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was only contracted to provide car park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. 3. It is admitted that Defendant is the recorded keeper of the vehicle. 4.  Paragraph 6 is denied the claimant has yet to evidence that their contract with the landowner supersedes  Leeds Bradford airport byelaws. Further it is denied that the Claimant’s signage is capable of creating a legally binding contract. 5. Paragraph 7 is denied, there are no contractual costs and interest cannot be accrued on a speculative charge.   I'm not sure whether point 4 is correct as I think this side road is not covered by byelaws? Any other suggestions/corrections would be appreciated.
    • Dear EVRi parcelnet LTD t/a evri   evri parcelnet isnt a thing also you say defendant's response which is a bit of a weird format.   Something like   Dear EVRi, Claim no xxxx In your defence you said you could not access tracking. Please see attached receipt and label Regards
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Credit Corp chasing


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2481 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am also getting calls from Credit Corp in Australia as well They are sending me a notice of assesment via emil. The debt is 12500 and i have not made any paymetns for about 12 months i now live in the UK now and they are telling me they are going to send to the UK.Will this affect my UK rating ?Can anyone help please???

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am also getting calls from Credit Corp in Australia as well They are sending me a notice of assesment via emil. The debt is 12500 and i have not made any paymetns for about 12 months i now live in the UK now and they are telling me they are going to send to the UK.Will this affect my UK rating ?Can anyone help please???

I have received another email from credit corps stating the following:

 

I can confirm your recent dealings with xxxxx in my team regarding this and that it was your intention to make contact with him upon your return to work last week. Sadly this has not happened and xxxx has today escalated the matter to me for the consideration of outsourcing. Our UK agents, Stevensdrake Solicitors, are standing by awaiting my instructions and I must recommend your urgent respnse to this email with a payment proposal. Payments can be made via our website ww.creditcorp.com.au however the amount and frequency will need my approval first.

 

Should I just ignore the email or respond claiming that I have had no contact with his team member and have no knowledge of the debt? Should I ask them to email me proof of the debt. I am about to go away for a month and am worried that this may escalate to court action whilst I am away. At present they only have my work email address (which I am about to leave) but I am sure that UK solicitors would be able to track my address down.

 

Urgent advice needed please.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I was wondering if anyone could help - They have been ringing my manager asking for me while I have been away on holiday...Is this legal is there anything I can do stop them such as reporting them etc???

Link to post
Share on other sites

Start making a list of times and dates etc, who they spoke to and what they said. It will come in handy for any other complaints you need to make. See http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?265807-More-AUS-debt-being-chased-in-the-UK for an example of someone who was contacted at work.

 

BTW also they need permission from you to send emails. If they dont have it they can be reported for privacy breaches.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm a bit scared to reply to a email as doesnt that start the debt again The debt is only 12 months old so looks like i get this for the next 5 years???Or should i send a email stating please do not contact me by phone etc??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont email them or have any contact. If they call you refuse to answer security questions for privacy/security reasons.

The debt clock will only restart if you admit to the debt and sign something to that effect.

If you do email or write at any time start your mail or letter with I DO NOT ACKNOWLEDGE ANY DEBT WITH CREDIT CORP OR ANY OTHER ORGANISATION YOU CLAIM TO REPRESENT.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Impossible to say. Some DCA's hound people for months, others 2 or 3 times and then give up.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

From what i have seen in the past and read on this forum credit corp will not give in easy and will perhaps stop contact for a while maybe 6 months or so and then start all over again. They will search social network sites like linkedin for your details and come at you again every time they think they have a new phone number or address. If they are sure they have your home address they will request Stevensdrake solicitors here in the uk to try their luck and threaten all sorts of stuff.

It all depends on how much contact info they have on you and how much documentation they have on the debt. Every case is different.

Hope that helps

Link to post
Share on other sites

its weird how they got my work details, i know they dont have my UK address Is the Steven Drake thing something that will happen? Is it hard to deal with them ? Or do you just ignore them ?Or wait till steven Drake offer a reduced pay out?

Link to post
Share on other sites

So Credit Corp have rang my manager again asking for me.They passed a note on that the problem can be passed to LondonI have reported them to the ACCCShould I email them and tell them I have reported her?

Link to post
Share on other sites

So Credit Corp have rang my manager again asking for me.They passed a note on that the problem can be passed to LondonI have reported them to the ACCCShould I email them and tell them I have reported her?

 

If Credit Corp are operating outside of the UK, then the OFT guidelines on debt collection don't apply to them. You will have to complain to the Aussie authorities and hope that they get them to stop.

 

As for your Manager, if they don't know about this debt, just tell them that this company keep harassing you about some loan they want to transfer to the UK from Australia, which you don't want to do.

 

If there is no court judgement in Aus, then they cannot do much. It is up to CC to take forward relevant court proceedings in Aus in your absence and then to transfer to the High Court in London, if they want to do so. Obviously there is a cost to this, which they are trying to avoid.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The loan ammount is $15,000 do you think they will? They were suppose to send the debt to the UK end of feb when they contacted me on the first time

 

Empty threats mostly. If you ever receive a court claim from a UK court, you will have to dispute jurisdiction. There is a thread in the legal issues folder by Rebecca H, where CC have just passed the debt to UK Solicitors, who issued a county court claim and jurisdiction is being disputed. They have not followed the correct court procedure for Australian debts to be heard in the UK, so are unlikely to get anywhere. Under legislation, I believe CC would have to obtain court judgement in Aus and then transfer the claim to the High Court in London.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

They wont apply for a court order in Aus as the OP does not live there and much like the uk if you dont live there you cant get a judgment against a non resident. At least thats the way i see it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...